Philosophy Forums Rules

Here is the place for your suggestions, comments, or questions regarding the Philosophy Forums.

Re: Philosophy Forums Rules

Post Number:#61  Postby Lucylu » July 26th, 2014, 4:25 pm

Hi

I'm afraid I don't know how to allow myself to receive personal messages? Someone has apparently tried to send me one and tried to tell me how to reset this in the user control panel, but I cant do it. They said to go in to messages and click 'yes' but I cant see it.

Also, I would like to know how to post a you tube link in a post. I have read the post about this but I still don't understand. It says CODE: SELECT which means nothing to me. I know how to highlight what is in the bar at the top of the internet page but I'm not sure how to transfer that in to my post here.

Thanks
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts". -Bertrand Russell
User avatar
Lucylu
Moderator
 
Posts: 676 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: October 1st, 2013, 2:32 pm

Re: Philosophy Forums Rules



Become a member for less ads

Already a member? Login
 

Re: Philosophy Forums Rules

Post Number:#62  Postby Misty » July 27th, 2014, 5:38 am

Lucylu wrote:Hi

I'm afraid I don't know how to allow myself to receive personal messages? Someone has apparently tried to send me one and tried to tell me how to reset this in the user control panel, but I cant do it. They said to go in to messages and click 'yes' but I cant see it.

Thanks


Hi LucyLu, It was corrected, Click User Control Panel, then click Board Preferences, then click yes to users for your pm mail. Misty
Things are not always as they appear; it's a matter of perception.

The eyes can only see what the mind has, is, or will be prepared to comprehend.

I am Lion, hear me ROAR! Meow.
User avatar
Misty
Contributor
 
Posts: 5933 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: August 10th, 2011, 8:13 pm
Location: United States of America

Re: Philosophy Forums Rules

Post Number:#63  Postby Lucylu » July 27th, 2014, 3:53 pm

Thank you Misty. I found it! I think I have done it now. :D
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts". -Bertrand Russell
User avatar
Lucylu
Moderator
 
Posts: 676 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: October 1st, 2013, 2:32 pm

Re: Philosophy Forums Rules

Post Number:#64  Postby Roodigger » August 17th, 2014, 1:36 pm

Can you enlighten me please. On Aug. 15th I generated a post on the topic "Why do I have to be good and nice?" It has not appeared yet and I suspect there are restrictions for new users. Is there anything else I must do to be able to join these discussions?
User avatar
Roodigger
New Trial Member
 
Posts: 1 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: August 16th, 2014, 11:43 am

Re: Philosophy Forums Rules

Post Number:#65  Postby Scott » August 21st, 2014, 11:39 am

Roodigger wrote:Can you enlighten me please. On Aug. 15th I generated a post on the topic "Why do I have to be good and nice?" It has not appeared yet and I suspect there are restrictions for new users. Is there anything else I must do to be able to join these discussions?

The first post in this topic which contains the forum rules has the answer to that question.
Online Philosophy Club - Please tell me how to improve this website!

Check it out: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?
User avatar
Scott
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4197 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Diogenes the Cynic

Re: Philosophy Forums Rules

Post Number:#66  Postby Vijaydevani » November 1st, 2014, 8:17 pm

Can you tell us why you locked "what is atheism"? Everyone was on topic there.

-- Updated November 1st, 2014, 8:51 pm to add the following --

Ignore the above post. I figured that one out myself.
A little knowledge is a religious thing.
Vijaydevani
 
Posts: 2116 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: March 28th, 2014, 3:13 am

Re: Philosophy Forums Rules

Post Number:#67  Postby Misty » November 2nd, 2014, 6:35 am

Good Morning Scott,

About rule G.2, reading all posts on a thread before posting. Some threads are hundreds of posts, many are extremely long and very boring, and usually two or three get into a conversation among themselves. It is inevitable. I, personally think it is redundant to have to read so much before answering the OP, after all that is who poses the questions. Please rethink this rule. Besides how in the world can that be monitored? It is kind of like saying one has to answer the last post in a thread to participate. I do not want to waste my time reading what seems redundant and boring to me.

Misty
Things are not always as they appear; it's a matter of perception.

The eyes can only see what the mind has, is, or will be prepared to comprehend.

I am Lion, hear me ROAR! Meow.
User avatar
Misty
Contributor
 
Posts: 5933 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: August 10th, 2011, 8:13 pm
Location: United States of America

Re: Philosophy Forums Rules

Post Number:#68  Postby Roel » January 25th, 2015, 7:16 pm

Misty wrote:Good Morning Scott,

About rule G.2, reading all posts on a thread before posting. Some threads are hundreds of posts, many are extremely long and very boring, and usually two or three get into a conversation among themselves. It is inevitable. I, personally think it is redundant to have to read so much before answering the OP, after all that is who poses the questions. Please rethink this rule. Besides how in the world can that be monitored? It is kind of like saying one has to answer the last post in a thread to participate. I do not want to waste my time reading what seems redundant and boring to me.

Misty


Misty, I think that with this rule a topic of 1 or 2 pages is ment, of course you are not going to read 100 posts before you post a reply, but what I can recommend is to read the OP, 1 or 2 of the first replies and maybe the last replies before you post, so that you get a general sense of the topic.
"Genuine tragedies in the world are not conflicts between right and wrong. They are conflicts between two rights." - Friedrich Hegel
User avatar
Roel
Queue Moderator
 
Posts: 365 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: April 11th, 2013, 10:02 am
Favorite Philosopher: Hegel

Re: Philosophy Forums Rules

Post Number:#69  Postby Madera » January 25th, 2015, 10:06 pm

Where are recent posts?
Madera
 
Posts: 340 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: April 25th, 2014, 7:53 pm

Re: Philosophy Forums Rules

Post Number:#70  Postby Scott » January 26th, 2015, 12:26 pm

Misty wrote:Good Morning Scott,

About rule G.2, reading all posts on a thread before posting. Some threads are hundreds of posts, many are extremely long and very boring, and usually two or three get into a conversation among themselves. It is inevitable. I, personally think it is redundant to have to read so much before answering the OP, after all that is who poses the questions. Please rethink this rule. Besides how in the world can that be monitored? It is kind of like saying one has to answer the last post in a thread to participate. I do not want to waste my time reading what seems redundant and boring to me.

Misty

I think if the OP follows the forum rules and the topic is correctly moderated, it would not get to be hundreds of pages long--at least not without some very valuable writings on the specific subject with which one would need to read to continue the long in-depth discussion of a specific philosophical question.
Online Philosophy Club - Please tell me how to improve this website!

Check it out: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?
User avatar
Scott
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4197 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Diogenes the Cynic

Re: Philosophy Forums Rules

Post Number:#71  Postby Roel » January 26th, 2015, 2:48 pm

Scott wrote:
Misty wrote:Good Morning Scott,

About rule G.2, reading all posts on a thread before posting. Some threads are hundreds of posts, many are extremely long and very boring, and usually two or three get into a conversation among themselves. It is inevitable. I, personally think it is redundant to have to read so much before answering the OP, after all that is who poses the questions. Please rethink this rule. Besides how in the world can that be monitored? It is kind of like saying one has to answer the last post in a thread to participate. I do not want to waste my time reading what seems redundant and boring to me.

Misty

I think if the OP follows the forum rules and the topic is correctly moderated, it would not get to be hundreds of pages long--at least not without some very valuable writings on the specific subject with which one would need to read to continue the long in-depth discussion of a specific philosophical question.


I have to say that if a topic is 5 pages and I want to give a simple reply to the OP without having read the topic, I usually don't spend valuable time reading 5 pages for just one reply, however, if a topic has 1, 2 or 3 pages, I tend to first read all the posts before I reply, but in the case of more pages I simply read the OP very well. I think that it would be better to let this rule apply to topics with maybe 1 or 2 pages.
"Genuine tragedies in the world are not conflicts between right and wrong. They are conflicts between two rights." - Friedrich Hegel
User avatar
Roel
Queue Moderator
 
Posts: 365 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: April 11th, 2013, 10:02 am
Favorite Philosopher: Hegel

Re: Philosophy Forums Rules

Post Number:#72  Postby Scott » January 26th, 2015, 3:56 pm

There are over 7 billion people in the world. The point of the forums is not to have up to 7 billion different answers to a question from people who have not been listening to the rest of the discussion. What's even the point of responding then--if we aren't reading what each other writes? Rather, the goal is to have productive philosophical discussions. When the previous posts are not read it is going to lead to the kind of 'going-in-circles' type of pseudo-discussion that causes topics to bloat to ten or pages of stuff that really isn't worth being read. No progress can be made in the discussion if people just keep repeating what has already been said, rebutted, re-rebutted, etc.

What I would suggest is if you see a topic with so many replies, consider creating a new related topic with a better written OP that more clearly states the topic to be discussed.
Online Philosophy Club - Please tell me how to improve this website!

Check it out: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?
User avatar
Scott
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4197 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Diogenes the Cynic

Re: Philosophy Forums Rules

Post Number:#73  Postby Roel » January 26th, 2015, 4:39 pm

Scott wrote:There are over 7 billion people in the world. The point of the forums is not to have up to 7 billion different answers to a question from people who have not been listening to the rest of the discussion. What's even the point of responding then--if we aren't reading what each other writes? Rather, the goal is to have productive philosophical discussions. When the previous posts are not read it is going to lead to the kind of 'going-in-circles' type of pseudo-discussion that causes topics to bloat to ten or pages of stuff that really isn't worth being read. No progress can be made in the discussion if people just keep repeating what has already been said, rebutted, re-rebutted, etc.

What I would suggest is if you see a topic with so many replies, consider creating a new related topic with a better written OP that more clearly states the topic to be discussed.


I fully agree with you that people more easily give similar answers when they haven't read all other replies, however, when I find a topic with too many pages, I sometimes reply to one of the last posts which doesn't make it repetitive and can give a good productive post in a topic.
"Genuine tragedies in the world are not conflicts between right and wrong. They are conflicts between two rights." - Friedrich Hegel
User avatar
Roel
Queue Moderator
 
Posts: 365 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: April 11th, 2013, 10:02 am
Favorite Philosopher: Hegel

Re: Philosophy Forums Rules

Post Number:#74  Postby Lagayscienza » February 15th, 2015, 1:09 am

Can anyone me how to edit my posts? I read in FAQ that there is an edit button somewhere but I don't see it.

La gaya Scienza
La gaya Scienza
User avatar
Lagayscienza
 
Posts: 675 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: February 8th, 2015, 3:27 am
Location: Antipodes
Favorite Philosopher: Neitszche

Re: Philosophy Forums Rules

Post Number:#75  Postby Lucylu » February 20th, 2015, 4:04 pm

Lagayscienza wrote:Can anyone me how to edit my posts? I read in FAQ that there is an edit button somewhere but I don't see it.La gaya Scienza


There was an edit button but a few months ago it was taken away- presumably because it caused too much confusion, with people always going back and repeatedly changing what they'd said. However I would like to see the edit button restored in part, at least for a 5-10 minute window after the initial posting, just in case there are any obvious mistakes that need to be changed. Sometimes the 'preview' button doesn't cover all things and a post can appear quite differently than we think, especially if someone else adds a post while we are writing ours. Otherwise I think its a good idea.

I actually wanted to post here today because I still don't know how to post videos, like Youtube clips? I looked it up in the FAQs and found the bit about posting pictures in posts but it doesn't really make sense to me.

Thanks
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts". -Bertrand Russell
User avatar
Lucylu
Moderator
 
Posts: 676 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: October 1st, 2013, 2:32 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Feedback, Support & Forum Announcements

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Philosophy Trophies

Most Active Members
by posts made in lasts 30 days

Avatar Member Name Recent Posts
Greta 162
Fooloso4 116
Renee 107
Ormond 97
Felix 90

Last updated January 6, 2017, 6:28 pm EST

Most Active Book of the Month Participants
by book of the month posts

Avatar Member Name BOTM Posts
Scott 147
Spectrum 23
Belinda 23
whitetrshsoldier 20
Josefina1110 19
Last updated January 6, 2017, 6:28 pm EST