This site's porn like suggestive ads

Here is the place for your suggestions, comments, or questions regarding the Philosophy Forums.

Re: This site's porn like suggestive ads

Post Number:#16  Postby Burning ghost » November 16th, 2016, 10:29 am

Roel wrote:
Burning ghost wrote:I watch porn but I don't get any porn ads :(

Should I watch more porn more often in order to get some x-rated ads? Advice please? Haha!

Is it okay to be prejudice towards racists? Should we make racists fearful or educate them? Or introduce them to mulitracial porn?


I get the suspicion from this post that you have certain dangerous ideological opinions. I would definitely not try to violently attack racists, as the effect might be the opposite of what you want to accomplish and even make it worse. A real racist which regards blacks as chimps is intellectually not capable to be educated. If you want to make them useful maybe get them in the army and send them out to a dangerous country until they get killed for something which they want to fight for like countering orthodox islam...

-- Updated November 16th, 2016, 10:22 am to add the following --

Burning ghost wrote:Have you heard of humour? ? ?


From your post it was very difficult to see that you ment it as humour.


Really? By dangerous ideological opinions you are not referring to posts titled "Is White Nationalism necessarily bad?"

Hard to tell I wrote in humour? Did the "Haha!" not suggest humour?

It is clear to me Roel, you are either ignorant or something much, much, much worse. I can forgive ignorance to a degree.
AKA badgerjelly
Burning ghost
 
Posts: 1334 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am

Re: This site's porn like suggestive ads



Become a member for less ads

Already a member? Login
 

Re: This site's porn like suggestive ads

Post Number:#17  Postby Roel » November 16th, 2016, 10:37 am

Burning ghost wrote:
Roel wrote:(Nested quote removed.)


I get the suspicion from this post that you have certain dangerous ideological opinions. I would definitely not try to violently attack racists, as the effect might be the opposite of what you want to accomplish and even make it worse. A real racist which regards blacks as chimps is intellectually not capable to be educated. If you want to make them useful maybe get them in the army and send them out to a dangerous country until they get killed for something which they want to fight for like countering orthodox islam...

-- Updated November 16th, 2016, 10:22 am to add the following --


(Nested quote removed.)


From your post it was very difficult to see that you ment it as humour.


Really? By dangerous ideological opinions you are not referring to posts titled "Is White Nationalism necessarily bad?"

Hard to tell I wrote in humour? Did the "Haha!" not suggest humour?

It is clear to me Roel, you are either ignorant or something much, much, much worse. I can forgive ignorance to a degree.


Have you even read the topic? Have you read the OP? Can you even quote one post which shows that I 'm racist as you suggest?

What I ment is that your post suggests affiliation with dangerous violent extreme-left organisations which don't mind using violence against other people. I have known a communist in real life and I think that they are more dangerous than right-extremist racists, as the violent factions of the second group generally doesn't consist of highly intelligent individuals, but communists want to reach their goals, despite what is harmed in the way to it, and are supported by many intellectuals, the ends justify the means and it's disgusting if a communist says innocent people dying for their goals are a sacrifice. There are very few extreme-right groups or individuals which have done terrorism or violence in post-1945 modern times, some cases like Breivik or the German neo-nazi woman, but in many protests the danger comes from extreme-left protesters commiting crimes like vandalism and attacking the police. What makes these problems worse is that they are mainstream and supported by mainstream media, which enables them to commit terrorist activities and dangerous plans like overthrowing the state. And then I didn't even mention extremely dangerous jihadists commiting terrorist attacks on this continent, getting support from the extreme-left.

The peaceful left-wing protesters against Trump have my respect, I don't fully agree with them, but they show a civil way to protest and that has my respect, the left anarchists which infiltrated them and caused havoc disgust me.

Also, you didn't use your haha after the things you said about racists, if that was supposed to be humour too, you should have used a haha or smiley there too, but it is written as if that part is serious after you made a joke.

---

Ok I re-read what I said and I shouldn't bring you in connection with violent left-wing groups. I don't agree with your accusations against me, not based on facts, but I shouldn't do the same. I apologize for that.
"Genuine tragedies in the world are not conflicts between right and wrong. They are conflicts between two rights." - Friedrich Hegel
User avatar
Roel
Queue Moderator
 
Posts: 375 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: April 11th, 2013, 10:02 am
Favorite Philosopher: Hegel

Re: This site's porn like suggestive ads

Post Number:#18  Postby Burning ghost » November 16th, 2016, 12:14 pm

Also, you didn't use your haha after the things you said about racists, if that was supposed to be humour too, you should have used a haha or smiley there too, but it is written as if that part is serious after you made a joke.


You are being silly now. My posts suggests HUMOUR. Anyone can see that ... did you think I was seriously suggesting multiracial porn is the way forward for race relations ? ARE YOU SERIOUS ?

What I ment is that your post suggests affiliation with dangerous violent extreme-left organisations which don't mind using violence against other people.


Er ... refer to above humour.

Yes, I read the OP which includes :

I don't agree with them on many things, like caucasian jews not being white and the worth of other races, but browsing StormFront was educative and taught me a few things.


What they also claim is that anti-racist is a code word for anti-white, as only white countries are flooded with immigrants from the third world and white people will become a minority in a few decades due to higher birth rates among immigrants. This is also refered to as white genocide. Although it indeed isn't unlikely that white people might cease to exist in the future, they see this as a deliberate plan, I don't know however why people would want to let white people die out.


I didn't call you racist. I have expressed concern at the way you present the topics.

I suggest you reread what you've written in light of what I have said, such as:

There are very few extreme-right groups or individuals which have done terrorism or violence in post-1945 modern times, some cases like Breivik or the German neo-nazi woman, but in many protests the danger comes from extreme-left protesters commiting crimes like vandalism and attacking the police. What makes these problems worse is that they are mainstream and supported by mainstream media, which enables them to commit terrorist activities and dangerous plans like overthrowing the state. And then I didn't even mention extremely dangerous jihadists commiting terrorist attacks on this continent, getting support from the extreme-left.


Agenda ? Responsible and considered statement ?
AKA badgerjelly
Burning ghost
 
Posts: 1334 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am

Re: This site's porn like suggestive ads

Post Number:#19  Postby Roel » November 16th, 2016, 12:31 pm

Burning ghost wrote:
Also, you didn't use your haha after the things you said about racists, if that was supposed to be humour too, you should have used a haha or smiley there too, but it is written as if that part is serious after you made a joke.


You are being silly now. My posts suggests HUMOUR. Anyone can see that ... did you think I was seriously suggesting multiracial porn is the way forward for race relations ? ARE YOU SERIOUS ?


Read what I said.

What I ment is that your post suggests affiliation with dangerous violent extreme-left organisations which don't mind using violence against other people.


Er ... refer to above humour.


Ok.


Yes, I read the OP which includes :

I don't agree with them on many things, like caucasian jews not being white and the worth of other races, but browsing StormFront was educative and taught me a few things.



Yes, exactly, I disagree with them that other races are worth less and that caucasian jews can't be white, as they have enough Indo-European genetic traits to be considered white.

What they also claim is that anti-racist is a code word for anti-white, as only white countries are flooded with immigrants from the third world and white people will become a minority in a few decades due to higher birth rates among immigrants. This is also refered to as white genocide. Although it indeed isn't unlikely that white people might cease to exist in the future, they see this as a deliberate plan, I don't know however why people would want to let white people die out.


I didn't call you racist. I have expressed concern at the way you present the topics.


What's wrong in how I present it? I stated a fact, they claim that anti-racist is a code word for anti-white, and I give their explanation. That it's likely that caucasians might die out is supported by science. You are afraid to read what they say, which also makes it impossible to seriously discuss their views.

I suggest you reread what you've written in light of what I have said, such as:

There are very few extreme-right groups or individuals which have done terrorism or violence in post-1945 modern times, some cases like Breivik or the German neo-nazi woman, but in many protests the danger comes from extreme-left protesters commiting crimes like vandalism and attacking the police. What makes these problems worse is that they are mainstream and supported by mainstream media, which enables them to commit terrorist activities and dangerous plans like overthrowing the state. And then I didn't even mention extremely dangerous jihadists commiting terrorist attacks on this continent, getting support from the extreme-left.


Agenda ? Responsible and considered statement ?

[/quote]

You wanted to silence down a discussion about if white nationalism is bad, the topic didn't even propose that it's right or wrong, but opened up a debate for the ones who agree and disagree. How is it not having an agenda if you want to ban the discussion, so that, like in a dictatorship, people are silenced and by oppression your opinion wins, instead of a rational debate about it?
"Genuine tragedies in the world are not conflicts between right and wrong. They are conflicts between two rights." - Friedrich Hegel
User avatar
Roel
Queue Moderator
 
Posts: 375 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: April 11th, 2013, 10:02 am
Favorite Philosopher: Hegel

Re: This site's porn like suggestive ads

Post Number:#20  Postby Burning ghost » November 16th, 2016, 1:30 pm

I will, and have, continued there ...
AKA badgerjelly
Burning ghost
 
Posts: 1334 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am

Re: This site's porn like suggestive ads

Post Number:#21  Postby Scott » November 25th, 2016, 5:13 pm

This topic has been derailed, so I am locking it. Please stay on-topic when posting replies. If you wish to discuss something tangential, please start a new topic instead of letting topics get derailed. Your help with this is appreciated.
Online Philosophy Club - Please tell me how to improve this website!

Check it out: Abortion - Not as diametrically divisive as often thought?
User avatar
Scott
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4206 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Diogenes the Cynic

Previous

Return to Feedback, Support & Forum Announcements

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Philosophy Trophies

Most Active Members
by posts made in lasts 30 days

Avatar Member Name Recent Posts
Greta 162
Fooloso4 116
Renee 107
Ormond 97
Felix 90

Last updated January 6, 2017, 6:28 pm EST

Most Active Book of the Month Participants
by book of the month posts

Avatar Member Name BOTM Posts
Scott 147
Spectrum 23
Belinda 23
whitetrshsoldier 20
Josefina1110 19
Last updated January 6, 2017, 6:28 pm EST