Use of asterisks
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm
Use of asterisks
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7987
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Use of asterisks
...uummmm... hence the "use of asterisks", right?Belindi wrote:It's probably impossible to refer to etymological issues on this discussion forum because some common four letter Anglo -Saxon based words are unprintable. This prudish practice reduces the academic level to which this website may aspire.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm
Re: Use of asterisks
Yes. However I druther raise the tone and this was my real agenda in posting my complaint.LuckyR wrote:...uummmm... hence the "use of asterisks", right?Belindi wrote:It's probably impossible to refer to etymological issues on this discussion forum because some common four letter Anglo -Saxon based words are unprintable. This prudish practice reduces the academic level to which this website may aspire.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7987
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Use of asterisks
I find avoidance of unprintable words to be mildly humorous and way, way more interesting, if for no other reason than the fact that it take more effort and creativity to avoid the use of them than to use them. And since they have lost all shock value, what is really the point of them?Belindi wrote:Yes. However I druther raise the tone and this was my real agenda in posting my complaint.LuckyR wrote: (Nested quote removed.)
...uummmm... hence the "use of asterisks", right?
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm
Re: Use of asterisks
Yes, and yes.I find avoidance of unprintable words to be mildly humorous and way, way more interesting, if for no other reason than the fact that it take more effort and creativity to avoid the use of them than to use them. And since they have lost all shock value, what is really the point of them?
The point of mainly four- letter Anglo Saxon terms for anatomical, sexual, and excretory functions is they are so much more the accessible language of the people than are Latinate terms. Prudery was the attitude of upward-aspiring lower middle classes and I'd rather not try to join in.
Those Anglo-Saxon terms have their place in serious literature. It's quite apalling that a forum that pretends to philosophy cannot print common or garden lexical items.
-
- Posts: 2181
- Joined: January 7th, 2015, 7:09 am
Re: Use of asterisks
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7987
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Use of asterisks
I don't agree with censorship, but then again I am not really subject to it since I don't communicate that way, regardless.Belindi wrote:Lucky R wrote:
Yes, and yes.I find avoidance of unprintable words to be mildly humorous and way, way more interesting, if for no other reason than the fact that it take more effort and creativity to avoid the use of them than to use them. And since they have lost all shock value, what is really the point of them?
The point of mainly four- letter Anglo Saxon terms for anatomical, sexual, and excretory functions is they are so much more the accessible language of the people than are Latinate terms. Prudery was the attitude of upward-aspiring lower middle classes and I'd rather not try to join in.
Those Anglo-Saxon terms have their place in serious literature. It's quite apalling that a forum that pretends to philosophy cannot print common or garden lexical items.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm
Re: Use of asterisks
My complaint is not specially about censorship, although I don't approve of that either. My complaint is that those words are in actual fact real words that have etymological pedigrees which originally have nothing to do with bad language . They became bad language when old English became the language of common peasants and other powerless people . Continued usage amid hegemonic disapprobation of the lower sort of people encouraged those disempowered ones to use their old vocabulary as acts of defiance.I don't agree with censorship, but then again I am not really subject to it since I don't communicate that way, regardless.
-- Updated January 29th, 2017, 5:46 am to add the following --
I can write the above without asterisks but if I chose to illustrate which old English words I referred to I would not be permitted to do so. It would be quite interesting to know the motives for those rules, including the social forces that legitimate those rules.Belindi wrote:Lucky wrote:
My complaint is not specially about censorship, although I don't approve of that either. My complaint is that those words are in actual fact real words that have etymological pedigrees which originally have nothing to do with bad language . They became bad language when old English became the language of common peasants and other powerless people . Continued usage amid hegemonic disapprobation of the lower sort of people encouraged those disempowered ones to use their old vocabulary as acts of defiance.I don't agree with censorship, but then again I am not really subject to it since I don't communicate that way, regardless.
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023