Site Policies Regarding Links and URLs

Here is the place for your suggestions, comments, or questions regarding the Philosophy Forums.

Re: Site Policies Regarding Links and URLs

Post Number:#16  Postby Carol » October 31st, 2016, 5:04 pm

Wow, this forum looks as controlled as the church of old. I am reminded of a forum I drop out of because I have a phobic reaction to being confined by too much control. Kind of makes me think about what our reality would be if the church had managed to main control?
User avatar
Carol
New Trial Member
 
Posts: 10 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: October 30th, 2016, 1:24 pm

Re: Site Policies Regarding Links and URLs



Become a member for less ads

Already a member? Login
 

Re: Site Policies Regarding Links and URLs

Post Number:#17  Postby Venryx » August 15th, 2017, 9:21 am

This is pretty disappointing. I've spent a good amount of time over the years on various forums, and being able to link freely to relevant information is really helpful.

I don't understand why there is so much fear about people linking to "non-credible sources". If it's a bad source, people can demonstrate that by pointing out its flaws; it doesn't need hand-holding by mods to designate what sources they find acceptable or not.

For example, many people find Wikipedia to be a powerful starting place for understanding a topic, and I agree. I respect that the owners disagree on this, though would urge them to rethink the decision, and ask: even if they don't consider Wikipedia and such reliable, is it really to such an extreme that discussions get *damaged* by it? At worst, I believe it would just not contribute much. And in the absence of a solid danger, censorship tends to just reduce community interaction. I know that on the personal level, sadly, the strict linking policy has reduced my likelihood of engaging here much. (which is a shame since it seems to have quality conversations)

Also, I am sad because they declined my first post, which linked to a page I spent 5+ hours creating specifically for one of the threads, because they said it was self-promotion. :'(
User avatar
Venryx
New Trial Member
 
Posts: 0 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: August 15th, 2017, 5:30 am

Re: Site Policies Regarding Links and URLs

Post Number:#18  Postby Empiricist-Bruno » August 17th, 2017, 5:28 pm

Venrix, no links are allowed for new people until they have made 10 posts, and this could mean 10 posts in the on topic sections...
All you need is love- (But not the one from narcissists)
User avatar
Empiricist-Bruno
Queue Moderator
 
Posts: 312 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: July 15th, 2014, 1:52 pm
Location: Toronto
Favorite Philosopher: Berkeley

Re: Site Policies Regarding Links and URLs

Post Number:#19  Postby Gertie » August 18th, 2017, 1:29 pm

Venryx wrote:This is pretty disappointing. I've spent a good amount of time over the years on various forums, and being able to link freely to relevant information is really helpful.

I don't understand why there is so much fear about people linking to "non-credible sources". If it's a bad source, people can demonstrate that by pointing out its flaws; it doesn't need hand-holding by mods to designate what sources they find acceptable or not.

For example, many people find Wikipedia to be a powerful starting place for understanding a topic, and I agree. I respect that the owners disagree on this, though would urge them to rethink the decision, and ask: even if they don't consider Wikipedia and such reliable, is it really to such an extreme that discussions get *damaged* by it? At worst, I believe it would just not contribute much. And in the absence of a solid danger, censorship tends to just reduce community interaction. I know that on the personal level, sadly, the strict linking policy has reduced my likelihood of engaging here much. (which is a shame since it seems to have quality conversations)

Also, I am sad because they declined my first post, which linked to a page I spent 5+ hours creating specifically for one of the threads, because they said it was self-promotion. :'(


I agree it's a pain.

Once you grind your way through your first 20 posts, if you can be bothered, it's much looser. After a couple of rejections for annoying reasons I ended up making a lot of short inane posts I wasn't much invested in to get past the 20 post barrier.
Gertie
 
Posts: 390 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: January 7th, 2015, 7:09 am

Previous

Return to Feedback, Support & Forum Announcements

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Philosophy Trophies

Most Active Members
by posts made in lasts 30 days

Avatar Member Name Recent Posts
Greta 162
Fooloso4 116
Renee 107
Ormond 97
Felix 90

Last updated January 6, 2017, 6:28 pm EST

Most Active Book of the Month Participants
by book of the month posts

Avatar Member Name BOTM Posts
Scott 147
Spectrum 23
Belinda 23
whitetrshsoldier 20
Josefina1110 19
Last updated January 6, 2017, 6:28 pm EST