Discuss The Righteous Mind

If you have purchased any recent or upcoming Philosophy Books of the Month, please email [email protected] with a copy or screenshot of your receipt, and your account will be upgraded to premium, which comes with many benefits, including but not limited to:

- Significantly reduced ads

- Posts are not held for moderation

- Ability to approve pending topics/posts in the moderation queue

- Access to official contributors' forum where you can make and vote on suggested changes to the website and policies, including the forum rules.
Post Reply

How do you rate The Righteous Mind?

1 star - poor, recommend against reading it
1
17%
2 stars - fair, okay
0
No votes
3 stars - good, recommend it
3
50%
4 stars - excellent, amazing
2
33%
 
Total votes: 6

User avatar
Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
The admin formerly known as Scott
Posts: 5748
Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
Contact:

Discuss The Righteous Mind

Post by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes »

Please use this topic to discuss the January 2014 philosophy book of the month, The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion by Jonathan Haidt.
My entire political philosophy summed up in one tweet.

"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."

I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
User avatar
Radar
Posts: 1009
Joined: January 1st, 2014, 5:56 pm

Re: Discuss The Righteous Mind

Post by Radar »

I read the book a few months ago. In an interview, Haidt did not want to admit that conservatives are more "balanced" in their outlook than liberals. The illustrations in his book, however, show otherwise. His reluctance to admit to his own findings might have more to do with his own liberal bias (admitted to in the book), a desire to avoid controversy, or political correctness than anything else.
“In finem nostrae cognitionis Deum tamquam ignotum cognoscimus.”
User avatar
PaulNZ
Posts: 595
Joined: January 27th, 2011, 3:56 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Marcus Aurelius

Re: Discuss The Righteous Mind

Post by PaulNZ »

That reaction might be in keeping with his own findings from the research quoted in the book Radar.

I read The Righteous Mind some months ago and found it quite profound. It had an impact in my life on how I react to those who disagree with me on topics where to my mind, there is clear evidence to support my view and negate theirs. It made me stop, think and question myself in those situations. It made me wait and ponder before responding, if indeed I responded at all.

The apparent process Haidt demonstrates in the book of making moral judgements is that the intuitive response is first, followed by strategic reasoning to support the intuitive response, whether or not the intuitive response is actually correct or not. We can by self examination and rational questioning of our reponse change our mind at a later stage.

It was both fascinating and a little frightening to read that we make these judgements largely in a subconscious manner, and then subsequent to that, add strategic reasoning to prop up the initial judgement. The process theorised by Haidt to have been brought about through evolution by an adaptation of the fight/flight response.

The natural intuitive response of many is as far as they get, often backed up by their strategic reasoning. We look for fault the other persons argument to support our own intuitive view, that is until we consciously make the effort to stop and examine our own point of view.

The book certainly makes some good points about the decision making process, faulty reasoning and self examination that are all very relevant to a philosophy forum.

A great read, which got me started on other books in the field!
User avatar
Alan Jones
Posts: 72
Joined: May 7th, 2013, 2:33 pm
Favorite Philosopher: J. Dewey W.T. Rockwell
Location: Emyn Mar, the Otter Lake Moraine, Michigan

Re: Discuss The Righteous Mind

Post by Alan Jones »

In his "The Righteous Mind", Jonathan Haidt says that westerners are righteous and partisan hypocrites. I equate this with saying that westerners are (they think like) schizotypal authoritarians. Haidt does not speak to the minority who enjoy questioning their assumptions (have let go of Truth) and who prefer tentative explanations to justifications.

Haidt and coworkers would systematize, would work out rationally, the moral sense. I found this on their website, moralfoundations.org: "We believe the Five Foundations are the best way to carve nature and culture at its joints when studying moral psychology."

Although I agree with humanistic psychologists that moral values can not be worked out rationally, I entertained the notion that tradional essentialist systematizing might help us understand moral values. In my reading about the Five Foundations I noted that survey results showed the care and fairness foundations to be held by everyone, but that the loyalty, authority, and sanctity foundations are held by a subset of those surveyed. How can this be? Perhaps it is because empathy is expressed with care and fairness, and that loyaly, authority, and sanctity are means of controlling such expressions.

Traditional authoritarian and essentialist distinctions of kind can be replaced with distinctions of degree and complexity. Metaphors of vertical distance and separateness can be replaced by metaphors of horizontal extent and inclusion. Jonathan Haidt's psychology and language that would carve nature and culture at its joints supports (or at least apologizes for) notions imposed by authoritarians and their institutions. I believe it should be replaced by a humanistic psychology and a language of most workable explanations.
"Beliefs are what divide people. Doubt unites them." - Peter Ustinov "Every great advance in natural knowledge has involved the absolute rejection of authority." - Thomas Huxley
User avatar
Radar
Posts: 1009
Joined: January 1st, 2014, 5:56 pm

Re: Discuss The Righteous Mind

Post by Radar »

Alan Jones wrote:In his "The Righteous Mind", Jonathan Haidt says that westerners are righteous and partisan hypocrites. I equate this with saying that westerners are (they think like) schizotypal authoritarians. Haidt does not speak to the minority who enjoy questioning their assumptions (have let go of Truth) and who prefer tentative explanations to justifications.

Haidt and coworkers would systematize, would work out rationally, the moral sense. I found this on their website, moralfoundations.org: "We believe the Five Foundations are the best way to carve nature and culture at its joints when studying moral psychology."

Although I agree with humanistic psychologists that moral values can not be worked out rationally, I entertained the notion that tradional essentialist systematizing might help us understand moral values. In my reading about the Five Foundations I noted that survey results showed the care and fairness foundations to be held by everyone, but that the loyalty, authority, and sanctity foundations are held by a subset of those surveyed. How can this be? Perhaps it is because empathy is expressed with care and fairness, and that loyaly, authority, and sanctity are means of controlling such expressions.

Traditional authoritarian and essentialist distinctions of kind can be replaced with distinctions of degree and complexity. Metaphors of vertical distance and separateness can be replaced by metaphors of horizontal extent and inclusion. Jonathan Haidt's psychology and language that would carve nature and culture at its joints supports (or at least apologizes for) notions imposed by authoritarians and their institutions. I believe it should be replaced by a humanistic psychology and a language of most workable explanations.
I would like to submit this post as evidence that Haidt was right, as it does indeed seem righteous and partisan.
“In finem nostrae cognitionis Deum tamquam ignotum cognoscimus.”
User avatar
Alan Jones
Posts: 72
Joined: May 7th, 2013, 2:33 pm
Favorite Philosopher: J. Dewey W.T. Rockwell
Location: Emyn Mar, the Otter Lake Moraine, Michigan

Re: Discuss The Righteous Mind

Post by Alan Jones »

Hello Radar, What is righteous or partisan about anti-authoritarianism?
"Beliefs are what divide people. Doubt unites them." - Peter Ustinov "Every great advance in natural knowledge has involved the absolute rejection of authority." - Thomas Huxley
Prof
Posts: 421
Joined: April 29th, 2010, 8:49 pm

Re: Discuss The Righteous Mind

Post by Prof »

Haidt offers (on page 274),this definition of "moral systems":

"Moral systems are interlocking sets of values, virtues, norms, practices, identities, institutions, technologies, and evolved psychological mechanisms that work together to suppress or regulate self-interest and make cooperative societies possible."

I feel moved to respond: No. This is not how I like to use the concept "self-interest." I have a chapter on this in ETHICS: A College Course. [Click on the second item referenced in the link in the signature below.] Allow me to explain.

Cooperation for the common good IS in our self-interest ! When we reflect on that thought, focus on it, believe it, and live it, we realize that there is no need 'to suppress,' nor 'to regulate' our self-interest. We will discover, though, that our selfishness - and our self-centeredness - have been drastically reduced

.You see the distinctions I am drawing? It would be best, I argue, to use the term "selfishness" when we mean a self-aggrandizing kind of self-interest, and reserve the term "self-interest" to mean a good and natural human trait (almost synonymous with the longer, more-unwieldy phrase: enlightened self-interest.) E.g., "When we know our self-interest we will vote for sincerely ethical candidates for public office."

I have a disagreement with Haidt in his choice of words, and it may not be merely a stylistic matter. For purposes of building a good theory of Ethics we ought be very careful in our use of words.

I am not far apart from Haidt in his view that one of the benefits of an ethical system is to help make society function better. When we cooperate on a worthwhile goal we are all better off :!: :D

Comments?
To learn more on ethical topics, check out these references:onlinephilosophyclub.com/forums/viewtop ... amp;t=6097
Logic_ill
Posts: 1624
Joined: August 21st, 2012, 7:26 pm

Re: Discuss The Righteous Mind

Post by Logic_ill »

i cannot know any mind,...
User avatar
Alan Jones
Posts: 72
Joined: May 7th, 2013, 2:33 pm
Favorite Philosopher: J. Dewey W.T. Rockwell
Location: Emyn Mar, the Otter Lake Moraine, Michigan

Re: Discuss The Righteous Mind

Post by Alan Jones »

My comment that Haidt's "moral foundations" should not include authoritarian "moral foundations" is supported by a study of the effects of damage to ventro-medial pre-frontal cortices. An excerpt from "Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, and the human prefrontal cortex", Erik Asp, Kanchna Ramchandran, and Daniel Tranel, Neuropsychology, July 26, 2012:

Our findings indicate that vmPFC damage increased authoritarianism, as measured by a psychometric attitudinal scale. Beyond this scale, behavioral and experimental evidence suggests that vmPFC patients exhibit characteristics similar to those often seen in healthy individuals with high authoritarianism and fundamentalism. Healthy individuals high in authoritarianism demonstrate diminished empathy and guilt, increased punitive judgments, and increased endorsement of immoral, hurtful actions. VMPFC patients have acquired deficits in empathy and guilt, tend to manifest punitive behavior, and often endorse moral violations. Reflecting their decreased empathy, healthy authoritarians are also profoundly egocentric as most prominently illustrated by their blindness to their own faults and vices. Llikewise, vmPFC patients are notable for being egocentric and having poor insight into their own deficits.

In sum, the behavioral and personality profile of patients with damage to the vmPFC is strongly reminiscent of authoritarian individuals, consistent with the interpretation that prefrontal damage increases authoritarianism and fundamentalism. This profile arises in the absence of deficits in general intelligence or working memory consistent with the finding that healthy authoritarians have intact general intelligence and even arises in the absence of deficits on putative frontal lobe functioning or executive functioning tests. Thus, the increase in authoritarianism and fundamentalism is not due to a general cognitive or executive functioning deficit per se.
"Beliefs are what divide people. Doubt unites them." - Peter Ustinov "Every great advance in natural knowledge has involved the absolute rejection of authority." - Thomas Huxley
User avatar
Niebieskieucho
Posts: 28
Joined: December 20th, 2015, 5:53 am

Re: Discuss The Righteous Mind

Post by Niebieskieucho »

Scott wrote:Please...
As there is no way to to contact you, I took the liberty to sent my message to you, by means of this post which should obviously be cancelled

=-=-=
Kindly delete my last post of today to Alec Smart, as I've already answered him earlier and overlooked it.

Thank you
niebieskieucho
User avatar
Bronxguy
New Trial Member
Posts: 2
Joined: May 28th, 2014, 4:22 pm

Re: Discuss The Righteous Mind

Post by Bronxguy »

Well, I went and ordered a copy of The Righteous Mind, specifying fast delivery. I might have some remarks to offer in a little while now.

----Denis
User avatar
Eddie Larry
New Trial Member
Posts: 8
Joined: September 10th, 2018, 7:20 pm

Re: Discuss The Righteous Mind

Post by Eddie Larry »

I read this book and thought it excellent. In general , we are driven by our emotions wha Hume calls moral sentiments. These sentiments drive self interest, rational or not! I call this being arbitrary, as in people are arbitrary.

Ethics is the development of culture to control these sentiments. Morality arises when an arbitrary individual actually questions the ethical foundation of his or her beliefs and tries to find a path to better solutions. This may not happen that often but that is why we are more arbitrary than moral!
Post Reply

Return to “Older Philosophy Books of the Month”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021