Discussion of The Fountainhead

We choose one philosophical book per month to read. Then we discuss it as a group.

Nominate books to be philosophy book of the month.


UPCOMING BOOK

June 2017: The Myth of Sisyphus by Albert Camus


Re: Discussion of The Fountainhead

Post Number:#16  Postby Spadoinkel » April 14th, 2016, 11:16 pm

I see there are a lot of "second handers" trying to bend Ayn Rand's philosophy to fit their liberal world views. You can't do it. You either agree with or disagree with her philosophy. It is not a school of thought that you can pick and choose from, unless you are the type of person Elsworth Toohey would recruit to be part of a council on philosophy. Do not try t mold her thoughts to fit your ideals because you can't embrace her idea of truth. Find another school of though, one that embraces mediocrity and blended thought rather than true individualism.
User avatar
Spadoinkel
New Trial Member
 
Posts: 2 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: April 14th, 2016, 10:55 pm

Re: Discussion of The Fountainhead



Become a member for less ads

Already a member? Login
 

Re: Discussion of The Fountainhead

Post Number:#17  Postby Leon » May 20th, 2016, 1:02 pm

What about the rape scene?

Telling someone what a true individual is, or how he should be..doesn't that sound fishy?

It still is a book where the thoughts are layed out for you.

Pragmatic: I worked for an architect and a young woman who worked there an I had a thing, untill I told her that I had read The Fountainhead (in a naive sense that I new what a good architect was). Then the thing was over. I detest the book.
User avatar
Leon
 
Posts: 87 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: May 17th, 2016, 1:50 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Epictetus

Re: Discussion of The Fountainhead

Post Number:#18  Postby Spadoinkel » May 26th, 2016, 12:18 am

Last I checked you can't rape the willing.
User avatar
Spadoinkel
New Trial Member
 
Posts: 2 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: April 14th, 2016, 10:55 pm

Re: Discussion of The Fountainhead

Post Number:#19  Postby Leon » May 26th, 2016, 4:59 pm

The hero in the book is a man stubborn to refuse any adaptation. In an ideal situation he meets the ideal partner.
But may situations are not ideal. And also I don't see why somone who will try to adopt should be less. It's an awkward ideal " no adaptation". With cognitive dissonance and dissonance reduction you might want to call this "having principals".
Biologically speaking creatures who don't adapt will have to be very strong to survive. Of course many people have all kinds of fantasies about this kind of strength.

-- Updated May 27th, 2016, 6:01 am to add the following --

Leon wrote:But may situations are not ideal.


May = many.
User avatar
Leon
 
Posts: 87 (View: All / In topic)

Joined: May 17th, 2016, 1:50 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Epictetus

Previous

Return to Philosophy Book of the Month Club

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Philosophy Trophies

Most Active Members
by posts made in lasts 30 days

Avatar Member Name Recent Posts
Greta 162
Fooloso4 116
Renee 107
Ormond 97
Felix 90

Last updated January 6, 2017, 6:28 pm EST

Most Active Book of the Month Participants
by book of the month posts

Avatar Member Name BOTM Posts
Scott 147
Spectrum 23
Belinda 23
whitetrshsoldier 20
Josefina1110 19
Last updated January 6, 2017, 6:28 pm EST