Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

If you have purchased any recent or upcoming Philosophy Books of the Month, please email [email protected] with a copy or screenshot of your receipt, and your account will be upgraded to premium, which comes with many benefits, including but not limited to:

- Significantly reduced ads

- Posts are not held for moderation

- Ability to approve pending topics/posts in the moderation queue

- Access to official contributors' forum where you can make and vote on suggested changes to the website and policies, including the forum rules.

How do you rate Beyond Good and Evil?

1 star - poor, recommend against reading it
6
14%
2 stars - okay, fair
4
10%
3 stars - good, recommend it
11
26%
4 stars - excellent, amazing
21
50%
 
Total votes: 42

User avatar
EMTe
Posts: 786
Joined: March 28th, 2012, 5:58 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Jessica Fletcher
Location: Cracow

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by EMTe »

Well, never convert to "visions" based on syntax and semantics. Which roughly translates to "don't spend too much time online and don't read too many books". ;)

Take a breathe of fresh air, meet people, don't philosophise more than necessary, hug the tree, kiss the stone. And never get excited. Excitement is The Devil.
The penultimate goal of the human is to howl like the wolf.
User avatar
Rayliikanen
Posts: 136
Joined: May 22nd, 2013, 10:31 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
Location: British Columbia
Contact:

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by Rayliikanen »

Emte:

I never get excited. At anything. But I hear the Devil knocking on the door. And the window's open right now letting in fresh air. What's he doing at the door?
SoylentGreen
Posts: 88
Joined: June 19th, 2013, 7:31 pm

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by SoylentGreen »

Emte:

I've registered and am now appearing in the disguise of one of my favorite science fiction movies. Rayliikanen no longer exists.
User avatar
EMTe
Posts: 786
Joined: March 28th, 2012, 5:58 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Jessica Fletcher
Location: Cracow

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by EMTe »

Oh, I forgot.

Go to bed at 10 pm.

Don't drink. Don't smoke. These come together with overdosed reading.

^^
The penultimate goal of the human is to howl like the wolf.
SoylentGreen
Posts: 88
Joined: June 19th, 2013, 7:31 pm

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by SoylentGreen »

Emte:

I like your sense of humor. My wife always gets the better of me. I can never watch movies until after midnight, like I used to as a bachelor. And I never smoked, ever.

And at least eight hour of sleep is mandatory to avoid brain atrophy. I know. I read it in "Beyond Good and Evil." But don't try and find the exact quote.
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by Hereandnow »

Nietzsche was not a screwball!! Stop saying that. If you really want to get into the dynamics of the metaphysical issue, you really must read the strongest defense of Descartes, which is from Kant, then on to Husserl's Cartesian Meditations. This latter will blow you so far away that you will never find your way back. N. was before Husserl, true, but H. gives a very powerful argument and is in my mind the countervailing force against the current dominent perspective in the world--which is N's perspective. Husserl and Kant turned my world inside out...LITERALLY! (Then on to Levinas!)


Socially speaking, I should add that Ayn Rand was a great proponent of N., though her anticommunist/prolibertarian rant was not what N had in mind. She believed in the master race, the gifted elite, the natural aristocracy that *should* rise to the top and stay there. This is how nature intended. Today's right wing is driven by Ayn Randian thinking: John Galt, Howard Roark, and so on--all ubermensches. Just look at the conservatives on social and economic issues: These "Christians" are as close to Rand's neoNietzschean take as you can get. Of course, N. was not an atheist....he was THE atheist! It is a wonderful irony: These great defenders of Christendom-- church going, Bible loving, and endlessly moralizing, are the very close social policy descendants of Friedrich Nietzsche, the most infamous atheist the ever lived. HA!

PS Most don't realize how important N is because they live so completely in his shadow.
User avatar
Breathing_purple
Posts: 10
Joined: July 3rd, 2013, 4:18 am

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by Breathing_purple »

I loved the book, though I tend to forget the prose still retaining the main idea. Sometimes we have to read between the lines to understand it. Also, we must consider the state of the writer philosopher mental and physical health when he wrote the book. The book is beautifully written, I loved it and enjoyed reading it.

There are things that trouble me these days, that we are becoming more of a textbook philosophers.
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by Hereandnow »

Absolutely! He was always ill. But he anticipated the end of rationalism. As to becomng textbook philosophers, I don't see the problem. A text is another person talking to you and taking her time to get it right. Philosophy texts give us interpretative possibilities; they transfigure the worldif you stick with them.
User avatar
Breathing_purple
Posts: 10
Joined: July 3rd, 2013, 4:18 am

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by Breathing_purple »

Hereandnow wrote:Absolutely! He was always ill. But he anticipated the end of rationalism. As to becomng textbook philosophers, I don't see the problem. A text is another person talking to you and taking her time to get it right. Philosophy texts give us interpretative possibilities; they transfigure the worldif you stick with them.

By using the word textbook philosophers I mean learning from the ideas of someone else and forcefully injecting ideas in your head are two different things. I came across certain freethinker closed groups ( Why the hell freethinker group is a closed group :roll: ) who claim to be a philosophical rational group try to free the masses from religion, irrationality and mysticism but they act in the same way like the fanatical religious people do.

"Common man doesn't care, while the freethinkers (often belonging to rational religion) and religious groups pushing too hard."

Beyond good and evil is a great book and I love reading it over and over again.
SoylentGreen
Posts: 88
Joined: June 19th, 2013, 7:31 pm

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by SoylentGreen »

From my reading, trying to catch up with Nietzsche, I interpret the hammer as saying we need to incorporate into our thinking 'intuition' as much as 'rational' thinking. Where we lose touch with our intuition our rationality loses its way. We need to strike a balance between the intuitive side and the rational side of our reasoning. Despite his attack against Kant, whom he called an idiot, Kant said much the same thing in his critical philosophy, though I won't point out the relevant quotes. Nietzsche is hard on Kant as he is with many others.

Right now I'm reading "Twilight of the Idols," after reading "The Anti-Christ."

Despite the negative depictions in the latter work, I enjoyed reading both of these much more than "Beyond Good and Evil." "Twilight of the Idols," is a superior work to BGE in my estimate, even though it's much shorter. Maybe this brevity explains its superior clarity. At least here, I can definitely see where I take exception to the hammer.
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by Hereandnow »

Breathing_purple wrote
philosophical rational group try to free the masses from religion, irrationality and mysticism but they act in the same way like the fanatical religious people do.
I do tend to agree with the intolerant free thinkers, though I would leave mysticism off the list. But I am different from them in this: Religion needs to overcome because it stands in the way of people seeing clearly into the real religious human condition. Yes,we have one, but if the bible is all you read, you will never deconstruct your beliefs and never be free of their influence. Nietzsche hated Christianity with great intensity. See his The AntiChrist. Of course, Beyond Good and Evil is a refutation of biblical (and philosophical) moral authority.


SoylentGreen wrote

I interpret the hammer as saying we need to incorporate into our thinking 'intuition' as much as 'rational' thinking. Where we lose touch with our intuition our rationality loses its way.

It is more about style and charisma than about intuition. Intution is a term reserved for direct cognitive apprehension. But you, know, Nietzsche was a big fan of Ralph Waldo Emerson, the American transcendentalist, who was very intuitive. In fact, he is considered a moral intuitionist. Nietzsche liked his Self Reliance and the flare of his rhetorical prose, but certainly not his religious bent. Just goes to show you, it is not the ideas so much. Like Aristotle, it is the man himself that made for respect and honor.
User avatar
Breathing_purple
Posts: 10
Joined: July 3rd, 2013, 4:18 am

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by Breathing_purple »

Hereandnow wrote:

It is more about style and charisma than about intuition. Intution is a term reserved for direct cognitive apprehension. But you, know, Nietzsche was a big fan of Ralph Waldo Emerson, the American transcendentalist, who was very intuitive. In fact, he is considered a moral intuitionist. Nietzsche liked his Self Reliance and the flare of his rhetorical prose, but certainly not his religious bent. Just goes to show you, it is not the ideas so much. Like Aristotle, it is the man himself that made for respect and honor.
So, Is intuition really important for the individual and what is the significance of intuition in the society.?
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by Hereandnow »

For Emerson we intuit God through our own radical amazement in nautre and we intuit right and wrong through conscience, which is a feeling that something is wrong, not so much a thought process. Of coursre, conscince is important for society as well as the thoughtful constuction of arguments. Anyway, see Emerson's little book called "Nature" (not the essay of that name). It's available online. Al;so, see his Address to the divinity school at Harvard. Online, too.
User avatar
Anathematized_one
Posts: 74
Joined: April 25th, 2012, 7:17 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Friedrich Nietzsche
Contact:

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by Anathematized_one »

As with all his writing, I love a few key aspects which were probably due to an influence from Schopenhauer: - Short, concise and directly to the point.

I feel that Beyond Good and Evil is best read/accompanied with On the Genealogy of Morals and with Kierkegaard's Either/Or for a contrasting view (more to contrast "On the Genealogy" than "BGE").

The overall idea is sort of a reevaluation of Aristotelian ethics to me and somewhat a commentary on the subjective view of moral determinations based soley on the action, the motivation or the result of any situation. Example, one may say murder (as in purposeful killing of another) is always immoral, yet the circumstances are different. Is it in self-defence? Is it in retribution? Is the result the loss of a horrible person to all of man or a good person?

Essentially that to say a given action, motivation or outcome alone is "good" or "evil" is highly subjective and an entirely human concept. If you purposely murder an animal for food, is it immoral? Same action, different circumstances. What of a person who alone is a blight on society as a whole? Does it matter if the murder of that person is motivated by anger, retribution or an altruistic "greater good" idea?

The critique being that no action, motivation or result is inherently good or evil, both subjective concepts found only in mankind and that moral determinations are also subjective and purely human. There is no "murder" in "nature", it is in "nature's" nature to have no morality. Morality only exists in mankind and it is due to our need to regulate ourselves as "nature" regulates itself. Because we cannot live beyond subjective "good" and "evil" behaviour, we must have a subjective morality which constantly changes based on our subjective views of good and evil (such as in "Genealogy of" where Christianity, to Nietzsche, takes what was once a good thing of industriousness and saving for your family and turns it to an evil of greed because they were oppressed by those with and they were without).
*NOTE!
I'm never indirect/insinuating w/out explicitly saying I am (but may not say exactly what). I have a large vocabulary, but use common speech (not all are the same reading level or speak native English). What I say means exactly that and nothing else.
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by Hereandnow »

Well said O Anathematized_one. Nietzsche tries to get away with an appeal to the world, to nature which gives rise the select few, and we, as Aristotle, should accept that some are bound to servitude. The so-called "ought" of the "is/ought" problem is a metaphysical contrivance. Two issues come to mind: Thasymachus' claim that justice lies with the advantage of the stronger is the same as Socrates' claim of a tripartite soul and society in which philosophers rule. The latter ushers in rationalism, which Nietzsche despised, the former anticipates existentialism, a freedom from rationalism. It does seem that Niezsche is not free of a metaphysical bias: why not Socrates than Thrasymachus? Nature is no more bound to Niezsche's naturalist interpretation than it is rationalism. It is beyond all of this. Nature favors what works. Hence , the one true view: Pragmatism, though I think Rorty and his ilk (not many of these) to much ignore things that do not give themselves easily to language and its conditions for truth and falisity. One should not sideline Emanuell Levinas and others who pay attention to what is intimated. Forget the other issue. For now, at any rate.
Post Reply

Return to “Older Philosophy Books of the Month”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021