Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

If you have purchased any recent or upcoming Philosophy Books of the Month, please email [email protected] with a copy or screenshot of your receipt, and your account will be upgraded to premium, which comes with many benefits, including but not limited to:

- Significantly reduced ads

- Posts are not held for moderation

- Ability to approve pending topics/posts in the moderation queue

- Access to official contributors' forum where you can make and vote on suggested changes to the website and policies, including the forum rules.
Post Reply

How do you rate Beyond Good and Evil?

1 star - poor, recommend against reading it
6
14%
2 stars - okay, fair
4
10%
3 stars - good, recommend it
11
26%
4 stars - excellent, amazing
21
50%
 
Total votes: 42

User avatar
L00KING
Posts: 15
Joined: July 27th, 2013, 6:54 am
Favorite Philosopher: Me
Location: Texas

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by L00KING »

I think this is a wonderful book. I like Nietzche's sense of humor, parables, and the metaphors he uses to make this book digestible. He uses his wit and candor to point out the diffuse obstacles that may be in the way of discovering the truth of everything discussed in Philosophy. Nietzche not only points out obstacles that he sees, but, also sets a microscope on the works of others and even onto his own thinking. He plainly states that philosophy is so difficult that even the most persevering person might give up to find the truth behind/in our reality.

I like how Nietzche points out that the I is not the cause of thinking. I or the ego is as far as we know just a bunch of sensations, organs, and the mind put together. We don't even have proof of a soul yet. Humans reason, but, some humans may argue that so do animals. Artificial intelligence reasons out things too; but does that make it sentient being or give it a soul?

I agree with his thoughts in most of this book. Language and its limits are absurd to use to talk about truth. Even if we didn't have language as an obstacle there is always another to bar humans from truth. Nevertheless, we should and will, as human beings, always to seek the truth through philosophy.

I concur with Scott that Nietzche is not making a philosophical argument in this book in the modern way. I do believe that he is stating that modern philosophers will always critique their own work and their own religions but still keep to their theories and faiths. This is because we as modern philosophers know that we will never be totally correct in all the truth that we finally recognize. Modern philosophers require a bit of the illusion of the world in order to see the truth in anything. We require a sense of self which we create from all the things we have already experienced. We use this as a grounding instrument, or as our reality and from there walk to truth. We always need a starting point and a goal or some point at which to fix our gaze from a safe distance. I think this is necessary so that a person does not make him or herself go insane for trying to ponder everything that makes up the truth of our universe.

As far as the use of religion as a means to make people content, I have to argue that some modern philosophers, (in fact they may be the majority as far as I know) are atheists that see no need for religion to be content. Religion may be more useful to help the uneducated or controlled population feel content with their lot in life.

In thinking about this book after reading it I have to just laugh at it all and re-commence living and philosophizing. I think Nietzche is indeed mocking human beings and philosophy. Many a time I have laughed at myself because if I tried to understand everything in every moment in continuum, perfectly, I would be. I think that his conclusions would make great fortune cookies.

I want to point out that this book is made available by LibriVox.org as an audiobook for free. This is the only reason I was able to read it at this time since I am a tight budget right now. I am planning to buy this book when I have the money.
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by Hereandnow »

"He plainly states that philosophy is so difficult that even the most persevering person might give up to find the truth behind/in our reality."

But Nietzsche believed in none of this thinking that there is something behind reality, and those who can avoid the excesses of philosophy are better off for it; for there is nothing there to discover. So what do you think: Is the perspective of beyond good and evil right? That is, do you think that human values need to be grounded far away from the metaphysics that have characterized philosophy from Plato through Kant (excluding Aristotle, whom Nietzsche admired an thought was right)? It is not so easy, I think. After all, Nietzsche was a nihilist, and this kind of thinking is deeply disturbing since it recognizes no basis for morality beyond our own making.
User avatar
L00KING
Posts: 15
Joined: July 27th, 2013, 6:54 am
Favorite Philosopher: Me
Location: Texas

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by L00KING »

Hereandnow wrote:"He plainly states that philosophy is so difficult that even the most persevering person might give up to find the truth behind/in our reality."

But Nietzsche believed in none of this thinking that there is something behind reality, and those who can avoid the excesses of philosophy are better off for it; for there is nothing there to discover. So what do you think: Is the perspective of beyond good and evil right? That is, do you think that human values need to be grounded far away from the metaphysics that have characterized philosophy from Plato through Kant (excluding Aristotle, whom Nietzsche admired an thought was right)? It is not so easy, I think. After all, Nietzsche was a nihilist, and this kind of thinking is deeply disturbing since it recognizes no basis for morality beyond our own making.
In my view nihilism is positive because it makes me feel free to create and experience and tear down and re-create. I do not feel burdened by the moral perspectives and judgments of other people. That this experience of living has no intrinsic value overall does not mean that it has no purpose for each one of us. We create the purpose for ourselves. I consider myself a moral person and upstanding citizen because of the respect I have for others. The awe that is inspired in me from the contemplation of things other than self makes me want to cherish all other than self for what it is. Morals have been pressed on me but I don't believe that without society I would be without respect for things other than myself. Self still creates the morals though. This is not negative to me and does not disturb me in the least. Why does it disturb you [addressed to anyone]?
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by Hereandnow »

Looking said: In my view nihilism is positive because it makes me feel free to create and experience and tear down and re-create. I do not feel burdened by the moral perspectives and judgments of other people. That this experience of living has no intrinsic value overall does not mean that it has no purpose for each one of us. We create the purpose for ourselves. I consider myself a moral person and upstanding citizen because of the respect I have for others. The awe that is inspired in me from the contemplation of things other than self makes me want to cherish all other than self for what it is. Morals have been pressed on me but I don't believe that without society I would be without respect for things other than myself. Self still creates the morals though. This is not negative to me and does not disturb me in the least. Why does it disturb you [addressed to anyone]?
Well, without society I dare say you would be no self at all since there would be no language, no objective social construct to have as a model to internalize to give you a structured ego. But anyway, you can be all the things you mention above independently of taking on the issue of nihilism. Note that the same applies to all morally repellent conditions: Ignore them and they are irrelevant. The rub lies in the thinking awareness when moral issues are taken to their foundation. At this level, one is asked to examine suffering morally. Nietzsche thinks we made it all up and that we have all been dupes to Christian/ Platonistic metaphysics. But he does this at the risk of endorsing nihilism. This is not so easy to live with if you think about it. It means that all human (animal) suffering is for nothing; that Being decided to torture itself through us, through the beautiful people of the world, and for nothing, for no redeeming reason. If you think about this seriously, it is a moral crisis that cannot stand; it is moraly impossible, notwithstanding Camus. And this consitutes an argument for a qualified theism.
User avatar
My Socks Smell
Posts: 22
Joined: June 19th, 2013, 7:29 am

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by My Socks Smell »

I appreciate Dewey's comments on good and evil.

The worse or evil is a rejected good. In deliberation and before choice no evil presents itself as evil. The worse or evil is a rejected good. In deliberation and before choice, no evil presents itself as evil. Until it is rejected, it is a competing good. After rejection, it figures not as lesser good, but as the bad of that situation. ~ Human Nature and Conduct, in The Middle Words of John Dewey 1983.

Goodness is not remoteness from badness. In one sense, goodness is based upon badness; that is, good action is always based upon action good once, but bad if persisted in under changing circumstances. ~ Outlines of a Critical Theory of Ethics, The Early Works of John Dewey.

-- Updated August 7th, 2013, 9:54 am to add the following --

The view that there is no such thing as a hypostatic realm of eternal things or ideas is not the same as claiming that everything is already destroyed. Just because things exist conditionally and impermanently does not mean they don't exist in any way whatsoever. To say that a cup was broken even before you dropped it is nihilism. To appreciate each unique cup for what it is while it lasts is something else. Which of these was Nietzsche's view?
User avatar
Windhorse
New Trial Member
Posts: 6
Joined: August 9th, 2013, 7:08 pm

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by Windhorse »

My personal opinion of Beyond Good and Evil is that it is (brilliant, stimulating) dangerous nonsense, which is preferable to dull nonsense, but irritating and scary, non the less. His belief that self-assertion, imagination, and originality are the qualities that separate genuine philosophy from dusty scholarship assumes humans are free and capable of choice, which flies in the face of the materialism he uses to criticize theology. You can't have it both ways. Either the materialist assumption is wrong, or there is mechanism but also some force capable of striking through mechanism, endowing free will (which would, by definition, be transcendental). That he seemed comfortable with exploitation, domination, and injury to the weak, that he seemed to designate a series of moralities in an order of rank, ascending from the plebeian to the noble, and that he felt what counted as legitimate action depended on what kind of person one was--weaker or more powerful--is the stuff of Nazi ideology. Of course, this is overly simplified. His ubermensch, his idea of the superior man, has also been compared to the Buddhist idea of the enlightened being, and there do seem to be some legitimate parallels. The real problem is that Nietzsche himself never adequately distinguished between the ubermensch as truly noble, and the ubermensch as brown shirt thug, which, to my mind makes BG&E dangerous nonsense.
User avatar
Universal Knowledge
New Trial Member
Posts: 9
Joined: October 4th, 2013, 5:39 am

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by Universal Knowledge »

I read this book for A level philosophy and I found large chunks of the writings esoteric or vague. However, I think one of the key points of the book was Nietzshe's critique of hitherto Western philosophy and its reliance upon the grammatical structure of language.
NeilWallace
Posts: 10
Joined: October 11th, 2017, 3:15 pm

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by NeilWallace »

As already mentioned (cliches), our culture has absorbed/or at least contained Nietzsche's ideas over 100 or so years. When we read his work now its perhaps not the same effect as it would be to read it when first written. Our culture has taken on board certain Nietzschean perspectives, in the same way as one hearing the sermon on the mount for the first time, or watching a movie about it through the lens of the remains of a "Christianized" culture 2000 years later.
Joshua10
Posts: 1135
Joined: March 20th, 2021, 4:07 am

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by Joshua10 »

If you go beyond good and evil then you end up with rules.
Joshua10
Posts: 1135
Joined: March 20th, 2021, 4:07 am

Re: Discuss Beyond Good and Evil

Post by Joshua10 »

Whether one believes in a mechanical or non mechanical process or even both for the explanation of our very being I would suggest that the need for rules starts and ends that process.

So if the need for rules is built into our very make up or society would collapse and even a machine states this requirement (if we are of a merely a mechanical persuasion), then the question arises, where did this need for rules originate from?
Post Reply

Return to “Older Philosophy Books of the Month”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021