Women Philosophers: Do they exist?
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: June 4th, 2012, 10:56 am
Women Philosophers: Do they exist?
And I understand there are women on this forum. And if you are, do you consider yourself a philosopher?
And lastly, I'm not speaking of women authors and poets. I mean bullet-point proofs, such as those by Wittgenstein.
- Theophane
- Posts: 2349
- Joined: May 25th, 2013, 9:03 am
- Favorite Philosopher: C.S. Lewis
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Women Philosophers: Do they exist?
Maybe that's because philosophy is androcentric (old boys' club). There aren't many women in the canon of science, either.Sartre's partner Simone de Beauvoir was a feminist and philosopher. But when I go through my memory banks, it seems that very few women are in the canon of philosophers.
-
- Posts: 2084
- Joined: July 20th, 2012, 11:56 pm
Re: Women Philosophers: Do they exist?
- Theophane
- Posts: 2349
- Joined: May 25th, 2013, 9:03 am
- Favorite Philosopher: C.S. Lewis
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Women Philosophers: Do they exist?
-
- Posts: 5161
- Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Eclectic -Various
Re: Women Philosophers: Do they exist?
'What' is that?Theophane wrote:What about Ayn Rand?
Rand was bulls....
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the past, males has been dominating most of noticeable human activities while women had remained in the background. Naturally we do not expect to hear of many women philosophers then.
Currently more and more women are coming into the forefront of human endeavors including philosophy.
Check out w:ki's
h t t p://en.wik:pedia.org/w:ki/Category:Women_philosophers
The female sex has evolved with different mental focus (more holistic) from the males and they will contribute to widen the perspectives of existing philosophical views.
- Theophane
- Posts: 2349
- Joined: May 25th, 2013, 9:03 am
- Favorite Philosopher: C.S. Lewis
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Women Philosophers: Do they exist?
(I agree with your assessment of Ayn Rand, btw.)
-
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: October 18th, 2012, 5:30 am
Re: Women Philosophers: Do they exist?
- Theophane
- Posts: 2349
- Joined: May 25th, 2013, 9:03 am
- Favorite Philosopher: C.S. Lewis
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Women Philosophers: Do they exist?
-
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: October 18th, 2012, 5:30 am
Re: Women Philosophers: Do they exist?
- Larry
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 3
- Joined: January 11th, 2014, 4:22 pm
Re: Women Philosophers: Do they exist?
- Misty
- Premium Member
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: August 10th, 2011, 8:13 pm
- Location: United States of America
Re: Women Philosophers: Do they exist?
One of my favorite women philosophers is Karen Armstrong. And all mothers IMHO are philosophers.XavierAlex wrote:Sartre's partner Simone de Beauvoir was a feminist and philosopher. But when I go through my memory banks, it seems that very few women are in the canon of philosophers. As Jack Nicholson said in one movie, when asked how he wrote about women so well (He wrote Romance novels): "I imagine men and take away reason and accountability". Is Jack Nicholson right? And women cannot be philosophers? I understand this may be very misogynist sounding, but in the inherent differences between men and women, what are some famous women who tackle the big philosophical questions, and do so with as much rigor as Plato, Aristotle, Hume, Kant, and so on?
And I understand there are women on this forum. And if you are, do you consider yourself a philosopher?
And lastly, I'm not speaking of women authors and poets. I mean bullet-point proofs, such as those by Wittgenstein.
The eyes can only see what the mind has, is, or will be prepared to comprehend.
I am Lion, hear me ROAR! Meow.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15154
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Women Philosophers: Do they exist?
I've read that philosophy is increasingly being rendered irrelevant by science as the latter continues to definitely answer questions once debated by philosophers. Increasingly theoretical physicists, biologists, mathematicians and chemists are seeing their work expand into traditionally philosophical realms that were once the domain of poets, artists, clergy and philosophers and other unreliable traders of verities (I've had involvement with art and music, myself).
I suspect most women are too busy faffing around with kids (including the high maintenance big kid) to think too deeply about life, the universe and everything. Hence the continued existence of astrology and the popularity of new age bowerbirding of existential concepts - it's how far a seeking person can go when they don't have time to think.
When women realise their mental potential, you're more likely to find us in healthcare, law and economics. Given that some of the most powerful and well connected people on the planet believe strange ancient myths, and they are obviously doing just fine, it seems that what we believe when it comes to "the big things" largely only matters to ourselves.
- Msl0012au
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: January 10th, 2014, 5:57 am
Re: Women Philosophers: Do they exist?
So what is philosophy? As a starting point, the discipline of philosophy can be said to be an investigation into the nature of human life (why do we believe, act, speak, and respond as we do to the world around us). Of course these questions can be influenced by disciplines outside of philosophy, just as every discipline is influenced by disciplines beyond the narrow scope of its purview. But scientists and mathematicians who find there work expanding into the philosophical realm must yield to the professional philosopher (unless they are egomaniacal jerks, in which case they are likely to find themselves being wrong) just as philosophers must yield to the professionals in other disciplines when using their work in a philosophical inquiry.
As to the question of women in the philosophical canon, I do not think we can exclude Elizabeth Anscombe. Then there is the question of just where you place people like Mary Wollstonecraft, Helene Cixous, and Julia Kristeva, who some consider philosophers (and that is the nature of the latter two's collegiate training) but which some associate more strongly with feminist or critical theory thought, fairly or unfairly. I will say that I had three female professors in my time in college who were all substantially published and more than qualified, and met several others from across the country both as visiting scholars and at conferences, so I claim unequivocally that there is nothing inherent in women that prevents them from being philosophers.
-
- Posts: 5161
- Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:25 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Eclectic -Various
Re: Women Philosophers: Do they exist?
As you had admitted you are not sure what that is and raise a few doubts -that admission and further doubting/questioning it is philosophizing itself, albeit in your case, crude philosophy rather than refine. You will be doing more philosophizing if you investigate further (if you have such inclinations) on these questions and doubts.Greta wrote:I'm not a philosopher but I'm not even sure what that is. It seems like an uneven mix of science, intuition, experience and woo woo. Like many, I'm just interested in overviews of life and the universe, but lack the intelligence, aptitude and inclination to go into too much detail.
I've read that philosophy is increasingly being rendered irrelevant by science as the latter continues to definitely answer questions once debated by philosophers. Increasingly theoretical physicists, biologists, mathematicians and chemists are seeing their work expand into traditionally philosophical realms that were once the domain of poets, artists, clergy and philosophers and other unreliable traders of verities (I've had involvement with art and music, myself).
As Russell had stated, the value of philosophy is in the ongoing questioning process (implying doubting) not the relative answers.
IMO, philosophy is that fundamental impulse in humans that is almost (not exactly) as near as the breathing impulse. Its basic element is a trend of net-positive continuous improvement for the well-being of the individual, the specie and others.
Philosophy at the very basic level as an impulse is more fundamental than Science which is merely another faculty of Knowledge, albeit a very useful one.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15154
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: Women Philosophers: Do they exist?
Just one I won't let by because it sucks when people use the word "utterly" in a negative way against you The reason I said "woo woo", ie. unfounded beliefs was a glib (so sue me) reference to the fact that the history of philosophy is sprinkled with unfounded assertions that are either now looking shaky (Plato's dualism) or has since been fully disproved (too many to mention). Philosophical argument about the existence of God, other than the obvious absurdity of an anthropomorphised deity, is necessarily speculative rather than factual since none of us can actually know.
I would also argue that intuition is not just a useful tool but an absolutely essential one in discovery. Just because some people are unable to parse their intuitions from objective reality (as far as we know) does not invalidate intuition as an investigatory tool.
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023