Philosophy Forums
Welcome to the Philosophy Forums! If you already are a member, please log in. If you are not a member, please join the forums now. It's completely free, and all viewpoints are welcome.


The risk of non belief

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Philosophy Discussion Forum Index // Philosophy of Religion and Theism
View previous topic :: View next topic ::
Author Message
ape



Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 3324

Post: #31   PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
What you said there is better, SS!Smile

But this is better:

You can spin it anyway you like but lets be honest in Love of liars: for those theists who hate atheists and hell, there is literally is no point in being theist other than to spare yourself damnation.
If hell was never even mentioned in any of the scripture I guarantee you that little or no people who hate themselves as dead would bother. Ask yourself honestly, if you had never even heard of hell, would you, if you loved hell, be a theist?
If so, why?
Is it to be compassionate?
No, since we can be Love-Compassionate and believe in both heaven and hell, or disbelieve in either!

If so, what does believing a historically alleged fact have to do with compassion? Many don't believe that fact that yet still are compassionate. Which is why it is so sad Sad that so many atheists are so theistic by aping theists who also were the first to hate andwaste their energy of Hate on who and what they do NOT believe in: God's opposite or adversary! Idea

Holistically and wholistically there is little of no difference ethically between good believers and non believers and bad believers and nonbelievers, the only difference is their reason for doing it. Good non-believers and believers often have their own reasons which can be anything from a utilitarianism to deontology or to virtue ethics etc but it is always IN LOVE of who or what they disbelieve in since THE COMPASSION OF LOVE is their basis of resting and working, for belief and disbelief; whereas bad believers and nonbelievers act compassionately to be compassionate and so are HATEFUL WHEN INACTIVE, because they refuse to put Love first as their god tells them to and so their actions are always in HATE of not acting and in HATE of non-actors and in HATE of being inactive!

The result of that HATE for not doing is over+doing and
the EXCESS fear OR PHOBIA of what will happen if they don't do, otherwise known as OCD: OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER and terrorism but better also know as HATISM since terrorists are simply the freedomfighters and freedomfightism we love, while freedomfighters are simply the terrorists and terrorism we hate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Philosophy Discussion Forum Index // Philosophy of Religion and Theism All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Check out our Philosophy Articles!


© 2007-2009 OnlinePhilosophyClub.com, Scott Hughes. | Please suggest ways to make the forums even better!