Philosophy Forums
Welcome to the Philosophy Forums! If you already are a member, please log in. If you are not a member, please join the forums now. It's completely free, and all viewpoints are welcome.


Helping the poor

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Philosophy Discussion Forum Index // General Philosophy Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic ::
Author Message
wanabe



Joined: 24 Nov 2008
Posts: 2112
Location: EVERYWHERE

Post: #16   PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
KillerUsagi (Hi and welcome)
~~~If people remembered, then the problem would have been solved by now. If the poor weren't so polite^^^ we would have a harder time forgetting as well.

~~~It is wrong to sweep this under the rug. Can one person who cares eliminate poverty (yes, but who cares that much)?

~~~there should be no surprises of “negative” things coming from poverty.

There is no one solution to solve poverty because it can happen for so many reasons. However there is one solution to solve wealth: generosity. Fighting poverty with greed and tough love hasn't worked yet.
_________________
The Secret To Eternal Life: Live Life To The Fullest, And Help All Others To Do So. Fear is weakness leaving the mind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JPhillips



Joined: 22 Oct 2009
Posts: 207

Post: #17   PostPosted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:31 pm    Post subject: Belinda Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
Belinda

The problem with the strong conservative right is that they have a very strong belief in right wing justice based on moral principles taken directly from the Bible. Dont' bother to tell them they are picking and choosing the scriptures that support the strong conservatism to which they adhere. Only a select few will get to heaven. People who have money deserve it because they work hard to get it. People who don't just have to get off their lazy behinds and work harder. Everything is black and white. You are either for me or you are against me.

The political and religious ideology of the strong conservative right stems from an adherence to strong, traditional upbringing including the belief that the United States is a God fearing nation and our leaders support truth, justice, and the American way. We fight for freedom. Oil has nothing to do with it. The conservative right tend to see the left as atheists or worse, being directly opposed to Christ and therefore on the side of the devil. The left is responsible for taking the Bible out of the schools and for pro-choice. They are responsible for access to porn, drugs, and other immoral activities. The left is responsible for taking away the parents' right to use corporal punishment when discipling their children. Our children have been corrupted due to a loss of values, discipline, and because of easy access to vices thanks to the left and the ACLU. It does not help that there is truth in some of this. Our government has decided that the rights of the individual outweigh the strength of society as a whole. This is being viewed by the conservatives as a war on God rather than support for individual rights and choices.

The Republican turns political issues into religious issues in order to get elected. They accuse the Democrats as the ones to blame for a Godless and immoral society. The Democrats accuse Republicans as being Bible thumping neanderthals who would take away the rights of the individual by forcing their God, their beliefs and their morals upon free thinkers.

This country is the victim of brainwashing that has occurred on both sides. Behaviorism and the use of techniques advanced by the principles of modern psychology are being exploited by those in power.

I do not support the views of the left or the right. I do not blame one group over the other. Unless there is some consideration for society as a whole, and until compromise and common sense prevail, we will not advance politically or spiritually.

If we are to judge others, we must be willing to consider all reasonable arguments from all points of view in order to diminish our own cultural biases and have an informed opinion.


Last edited by JPhillips on Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:27 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Belinda
Contributor


Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Posts: 3850

Post: #18   PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
JPhilips, thanks for the clear description of the stance of the strong conservative right.

Quote:
The conservative right tend to see the left as atheists or worse, being directly opposed to Christ and therefore on the side of the devil. The left is responsible for taking the Bible out of the schools and for pro-choice. They are responsible for access to porn, drugs, and other immoral activities. The left is responsible for taking away the parents' right to use corporal punishment when discipling their children. Our children have been corrupted due to a loss of values, discipline, and because of easy access to vices thanks to the left and the ACLU

I have heard of a socio-historical reason for this syndrome, which as we know significantly affects the 'red' states. The thesis is that the culture of the 'red' states is moulded by the hard and dangerous work* that the settlers had to endure to get where their descendents now are, and which contrasts unfavourably with the cushy option displayed by the people of the eastern seaboard who gave the orders and lived off the intellectual fat of the land while their friends had no time or energy left for all that.But I am sure others more fit as historians have explained the culture better than I can.

*Including details such as that settler women could seldom get gynaecological help after childbirth and so had to endure actual pain, far more than in the more populous east where there was much more urbanisation.
_________________
Socialist
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
athena
Contributor


Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Posts: 857

Post: #19   PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 11:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
I like what prodygi said about the problem of small living spaces making the problem worse. Just throwing money at the problem is not the solution, unless that money is spent wisely. Create better housing for the people, with care to how the housing connects them with the rest of the community, as Scott said.

All family housing should include a dining room or space for table and chairs in the kitchen, because eating together at a table is important to good manners and learning to be civil. All spaces need to be large, and if anyone wonders how large, s/he needs to spend a few hours in different size rooms and note how the size of the room makes him/her feel. Is it easy staying in a room the size of a large closet? How about sharing this room with a sibling? What might we expect to happen?

We are as the gods. That is why self government is possible. Okay, how about being more scientific in the design of low income housing. What is the optimal space and function of rooms? Is the housing well connected with public transit, grocery story, school, employment opportunity?

Belinda speaks of socialism, and I am not clear how it is organized, but I think we should have a good understanding of it. Every society depends on low wage workers, and these people are as deserving of decent housing and decent nieghorhoods as high income workers. We once called the low wage worker the back bone of our country and we respected them. They worked with a sense of honor and we need to get back to this. We need to return to human dignity being our priority.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
JPhillips



Joined: 22 Oct 2009
Posts: 207

Post: #20   PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 11:19 am    Post subject: Left vs. Right Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
Belinda

How does that saying go? Know thine enemy? If we fail to understand what motivates others, how will we ever learn how to best influence real change?

I'm guessing you already know where I stand and that I don't really view one side or the other as the enemy. Ignorance is the enemy. There is ignorance on both sides. I don't believe most people on the left are as open minded as they like to think they are. I can't dismiss that some bits of wisdom come from the right.

I live in one of the red states. It shames me whenever someone in my state attacks Obama from a racist perspective rather than an ideological one, or attack him from an ideological perspective followed by a racist remark as though only minorities would support such an ideology. I see little difference in many of the policies of Bush and Obama. However, for the most part, Obama seems more protective of human rights and does not condone torture. We are better for that.

It is ignorance that I encounter day to day in my relations with people I care about, that has helped give me my perspective. Sometimes I think to myself, "damn you are so ignorant and close minded, but I love you anyway".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
athena
Contributor


Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Posts: 857

Post: #21   PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:50 pm    Post subject: Re: Left vs. Right Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
JPhillips wrote:


Unless there is some consideration for society as a whole, and until compromise and common sense prevail, we will not advance politically or spiritually.

Ignorance is the enemy.


I see in your words my understanding of democracy and the importance of education in defending our democracy.

Liberal education prepared us to understand things like democracy is one for all and all for one. It is living for the ideal (in imitation of the gods), and raising the common wealth, improving our human potential and shared standard of living. Together we stand united, one Nation under God.

The Statue of Liberty holds a book for literacy and a torch for the enlightenment resulting from liberty. Thomas Jefferson spent his wealth trying to achieve universal education, because he saw this as the way to defend our republic based on democratic values. Ignorance is the enemy, and education is how to defeat this enemy.

The GI bill giving GI's college education and low interest loans for housing, greatly benefited our economy. Unions greatly benefited our economy, by improving wages and working conditions, and providing medical insurance. GI's can get medical care through the VA. As medical care is made available to more people, doctors and hospitals can charge more and buy better equipment and more affluent buildings to house their medical services. With the GI bill providing the education that means having doctors, teachers, engineers and advancing our technology.

Our greatness is a group effort, and it is ignorant and cheap to argue against the common welfare.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Belinda
Contributor


Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Posts: 3850

Post: #22   PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 2:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
Athena,(Re: #19)I think that a socialist would be more inclined than a conservative to advocate state intervention on an individual's behalf, because a socialist believes that help from the state does not inevitably cause the individual to loose the incentive to work, and in other ways live a productive life.

A socialist will support big government while a conservative will prefer to believe that the country will do better if individuals are left to their own resources with the state looking after little more than foreign relations, and policing at home.
_________________
Socialist
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
athena
Contributor


Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Posts: 857

Post: #23   PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
Belinda wrote:
Athena,(Re: #19)I think that a socialist would be more inclined than a conservative to advocate state intervention on an individual's behalf, because a socialist believes that help from the state does not inevitably cause the individual to loose the incentive to work, and in other ways live a productive life.

A socialist will support big government while a conservative will prefer to believe that the country will do better if individuals are left to their own resources with the state looking after little more than foreign relations, and policing at home.


...IF INDIVIDUALS ARE LEFT TO THEIR OWN RESOURCES...

And what are the resources of a child living with a single mother in constant insecurity and fear? How about growing up in a household where no one reads, and the mother hides bread so there will be bread for dinner, and where you may leave the table hungry if you do not get to the table soon enough to grab your food, and brothers will pull knives on each other in a fight over a pair of pants? I am asking this of everyone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
JPhillips



Joined: 22 Oct 2009
Posts: 207

Post: #24   PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:47 pm    Post subject: Helpless Children Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
Athena

Therein lies the problem. Our Society has chosen to protect the rights of abusive parents over the rights of the abused children. Maybe it is because abused children can't vote.

There is a total lack of trust towards the government in our Society. The government has shown time and time again it's lack of competence in handling social problems. Too much beaurocracy and too many greedy people who are more interested in getting their dirty, greedy hands on our tax dollars than they are in showing true altruism. Too many in power that want to control us more than help us. That is the only reason most of us do not want to give the government anymore control over us then it already has.

Now ask me if I would totally eliminate all social services programs due to government waste and abuse. The answer is an emphatic NO. I worked within the system. The system does make a difference and does help people who are deserving of the help. Would I change the sytem? The answer is an emphatic YES. More accountability and transparency is needed.

Speaking of which, some say HIPAA was enacted to protect patients' rights. I say it was enacted in part to keep meddling reporters who are investigating fraud, government overspending and waste from reviewing the medical histories and medical cases of Medicaid patients who are receiving and also reviewing Medicaid providers who are supplying services that are excessive or just not medically necessary. Now there is accountability and transparency for you.

The reporters should have just asked me or some of my colleagures about fraud and abuse when I worked for Medicaid. Probably one third of the money spent in my state in Medicaid is government waste. That money could be used to help more people, or to give rate increases for Medicaid services where it is desperately needed.

My son asks me why I don't write a book about what I learned over the course of my public service, so as to educate the public. My answer is the public would not hear me saying "overhaul the system" but would choose to hear "eliminate the system entirely".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wanabe



Joined: 24 Nov 2008
Posts: 2112
Location: EVERYWHERE

Post: #25   PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
Being poor isn't about money, it's about peoples willingness to help(not use) a given person.

What the poor truly lack is proportionate opportunity.

As things currently are education(the gate way to opportunity) does not cost money but the diploma that says you have an education does (you have to jump through the hoops they tell you to).

Do not be jealous of the poor man who gets a break you got a break where ever you came from as well.

The more wealth you have what ever form that may be, be generous with it no matter how much you have.
_________________
The Secret To Eternal Life: Live Life To The Fullest, And Help All Others To Do So. Fear is weakness leaving the mind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Belinda
Contributor


Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Posts: 3850

Post: #26   PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 4:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
Quote:
And what are the resources of a child living with a single mother in constant insecurity and fear? How about growing up in a household where no one reads, and the mother hides bread so there will be bread for dinner, and where you may leave the table hungry if you do not get to the table soon enough to grab your food, and brothers will pull knives on each other in a fight over a pair of pants? I am asking this of everyone.
(Athena)

No resources at all, to fall back upon, and what a a waste of a nation's strength and potential!
_________________
Socialist
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
athena
Contributor


Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Posts: 857

Post: #27   PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 10:46 am    Post subject: Re: Helpless Children Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
JPhillips wrote:
Athena

Therein lies the problem. Our Society has chosen to protect the rights of abusive parents over the rights of the abused children. Maybe it is because abused children can't vote.

There is a total lack of trust towards the government in our Society. The government has shown time and time again it's lack of competence in handling social problems. Too much beaurocracy and too many greedy people who are more interested in getting their dirty, greedy hands on our tax dollars than they are in showing true altruism. Too many in power that want to control us more than help us. That is the only reason most of us do not want to give the government anymore control over us then it already has.

Now ask me if I would totally eliminate all social services programs due to government waste and abuse. The answer is an emphatic NO. I worked within the system. The system does make a difference and does help people who are deserving of the help. Would I change the sytem? The answer is an emphatic YES. More accountability and transparency is needed.

Speaking of which, some say HIPAA was enacted to protect patients' rights. I say it was enacted in part to keep meddling reporters who are investigating fraud, government overspending and waste from reviewing the medical histories and medical cases of Medicaid patients who are receiving and also reviewing Medicaid providers who are supplying services that are excessive or just not medically necessary. Now there is accountability and transparency for you.

The reporters should have just asked me or some of my colleagures about fraud and abuse when I worked for Medicaid. Probably one third of the money spent in my state in Medicaid is government waste. That money could be used to help more people, or to give rate increases for Medicaid services where it is desperately needed.

My son asks me why I don't write a book about what I learned over the course of my public service, so as to educate the public. My answer is the public would not hear me saying "overhaul the system" but would choose to hear "eliminate the system entirely".


Oh, my goodness, I have attended several town hall meetings done by our representatives, explaining the meaning of budget deficits. Many of our programs are the result of good citizens voting for them, because they want good things for the people, but when these programs get on the ballot, they do not include how we will pay for them. Good people asking government for too much, because they don't want to be the ones who pay for the good programs. Then when the economy goes bad, there is a major budget crisis.

My representatives are not greedy people. They are idealistic people faced with a terrible reality. They are explaining to us, they know budget cuts mean people will die, but there is not enough money to fully fund the program.

However, for the Medical services fraud and waste, this is not exactly the fault of government, but the fault of an immoral society, and all those companies thrilled to wrongly take government money. I hate seeing $4,000 electric wheel chairs in the homes of people who never use them. Trying to stop payment on a medical bill is next to impossible, and I would like to see an end to all medical insurance. When people have to pay out of pocket, they have more control over not paying for unsatisfactory services. They also wouldn't be getting $4,000 wheel chairs they don't use.

As for government in the middle of our families? My grandchildren were made wards of the state, and that was a lesson in tyranny I never want to repeat. My experience as a Senior Companion was another lesson in the failure of government to manage our problems. The problem here is the impersonalness of bureaucracy. Bureaucrats do not know the people for whom they are making decisions and this results in very bad decision making- and the tyranny of power being held in the hands of those who are not effected by the decisions they make.

Belinda my post is too long, so I can't adequately reply to the resource problem. Just know I want to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
JPhillips



Joined: 22 Oct 2009
Posts: 207

Post: #28   PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 1:31 pm    Post subject: Helping the Poor Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
Athena

In my state politicians are allowed to particate as Medicaid providers and then serve on the legislative committees that decide funding for these Programs. The governor and politicians decide who gets the money and who gets the cuts at budget time. Representives who own Medicaid companies or affluential providers who have legislative connections are shown preferential treatment from the Department. Government personnel, such as myself when I was a Program Manager, are told to review claims in which which the connected providers are having problems, and assist in getting them paid. State employees are told to do everything possible to help politicians and those politically connected, including dropping important work to take care of them first. This interferes with efforts to help the people who truly need it.

There is much more corruption in government than most people who don't have this perspective know about.


Last edited by JPhillips on Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:05 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Philosophallic Soda



Joined: 15 Nov 2009
Posts: 14

Post: #29   PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
I don't believe in charity.

Most people are all about helping the poor and the brainless, but I ask: what about us, the bright individuals of this stinking society?

As for hunger in the world, two words: soylent green. Cook half the population of africa and feed it to the other half.

Then repeat.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
prodygi



Joined: 29 Aug 2009
Posts: 217

Post: #30   PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:06 am    Post subject: Re: Helpless Children Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
athena wrote:
JPhillips wrote:
Athena

Therein lies the problem. Our Society has chosen to protect the rights of abusive parents over the rights of the abused children. Maybe it is because abused children can't vote.

There is a total lack of trust towards the government in our Society. The government has shown time and time again it's lack of competence in handling social problems. Too much beaurocracy and too many greedy people who are more interested in getting their dirty, greedy hands on our tax dollars than they are in showing true altruism. Too many in power that want to control us more than help us. That is the only reason most of us do not want to give the government anymore control over us then it already has.

Now ask me if I would totally eliminate all social services programs due to government waste and abuse. The answer is an emphatic NO. I worked within the system. The system does make a difference and does help people who are deserving of the help. Would I change the sytem? The answer is an emphatic YES. More accountability and transparency is needed.

Speaking of which, some say HIPAA was enacted to protect patients' rights. I say it was enacted in part to keep meddling reporters who are investigating fraud, government overspending and waste from reviewing the medical histories and medical cases of Medicaid patients who are receiving and also reviewing Medicaid providers who are supplying services that are excessive or just not medically necessary. Now there is accountability and transparency for you.

The reporters should have just asked me or some of my colleagures about fraud and abuse when I worked for Medicaid. Probably one third of the money spent in my state in Medicaid is government waste. That money could be used to help more people, or to give rate increases for Medicaid services where it is desperately needed.

My son asks me why I don't write a book about what I learned over the course of my public service, so as to educate the public. My answer is the public would not hear me saying "overhaul the system" but would choose to hear "eliminate the system entirely".


Oh, my goodness, I have attended several town hall meetings done by our representatives, explaining the meaning of budget deficits. Many of our programs are the result of good citizens voting for them, because they want good things for the people, but when these programs get on the ballot, they do not include how we will pay for them. Good people asking government for too much, because they don't want to be the ones who pay for the good programs. Then when the economy goes bad, there is a major budget crisis.

My representatives are not greedy people. They are idealistic people faced with a terrible reality. They are explaining to us, they know budget cuts mean people will die, but there is not enough money to fully fund the program.

However, for the Medical services fraud and waste, this is not exactly the fault of government, but the fault of an immoral society, and all those companies thrilled to wrongly take government money. I hate seeing $4,000 electric wheel chairs in the homes of people who never use them. Trying to stop payment on a medical bill is next to impossible, and I would like to see an end to all medical insurance. When people have to pay out of pocket, they have more control over not paying for unsatisfactory services. They also wouldn't be getting $4,000 wheel chairs they don't use.

As for government in the middle of our families? My grandchildren were made wards of the state, and that was a lesson in tyranny I never want to repeat. My experience as a Senior Companion was another lesson in the failure of government to manage our problems. The problem here is the impersonalness of bureaucracy. Bureaucrats do not know the people for whom they are making decisions and this results in very bad decision making- and the tyranny of power being held in the hands of those who are not effected by the decisions they make.

Belinda my post is too long, so I can't adequately reply to the resource problem. Just know I want to.


This is off topic, but little relative to this rply.
This lady, that my grandparents know, recieved a letter from the hospital stating that medicare had paid her hospital bill in full; it was about $85,000 according to the statement. The thing was, she had not been to the hospital; it was a mistake. So, she called the Medicare people and told them that it was wrong and they should, I guess, get their money back. They told her that since it was already paid, to just forget about it. They weren't at all worried about getting the $85,000 back! I guess they just didn't want to do the paperwork or something. They just gave away the money.
_________________
He so buried himself in his books that he spent the nights...and the days...[reading]; and so, from little sleep and much reading, his brains dried up and he lost his wits. ~~~Don Quixote
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Philosophy Discussion Forum Index // General Philosophy Forum All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Check out our Philosophy Articles!


© 2007-2009 OnlinePhilosophyClub.com, Scott Hughes. | Please suggest ways to make the forums even better!