The right to freedom of expression.

Official website announcements are posted in this forum.

If you have questions, suggestions, or need support or help with anything, please email [email protected].
Dachshund
Posts: 513
Joined: October 11th, 2017, 5:30 pm

The right to freedom of expression.

Post by Dachshund »

I note that my OP on the topic of repealing women's suffrage has been locked by Greta. In my opinion this decision was made predominantly because she because she knew full well that there was no prospect of the arguments I was in the process of setting down in support of my case being defeated ,and,being female she was not prepared to hear the truth about the tremendous damage that the women's right's movement has inflicted- and is continuing to inflict -on the Western societies. It is a classic example of politically correct censorship and I have to say that I am very disappointed to learn that this philosophy forum is not a place where the right to freedom of expression is respected.

Dachshund
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: The right to freedom of expression.

Post by Sy Borg »

No, it was locked down because you repeatedly refused to read or address points made where you posted instead:
PUT UP OR SHUT UP
Seven posts in a row. If you think that visitors to philosophy forums want this kind of vacuous self indulgence, you are mistaken.

There is no freedom of expression anywhere. One is not even allowed to utter the term "climate change" in the White House today, which is almost Orwellian!

So there are always limits on expression, and when you become too self indulgent, threads will continue to be locked. If you stay focused then threads will stay open.
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: The right to freedom of expression.

Post by Steve3007 »

Many modern democratic societies are (at least in theory) structured so as to have a government (legislative and executive) whose business is to create laws, a judiciary, which is independent of the legislature and whose business is to decide whether or not the laws have been adhered to, and a citizenry whose business is to vote for the government and be judged by the judiciary.

This website has a sort of legislature (Scott - the guy who created the rules of the site) and a judiciary. But the citizens (posters) don't vote. They don't have a say about the laws. So, in a sense, it's a kind of dictatorship. If the posters/citizens did have a vote, I wonder whether they would substantially change them? If they did, it seems reasonable to assume that all posters should have one vote. Does anybody disagree? Does anybody think that only some posters should have a vote? If so, what would be the criteria for deciding whether a given poster has a vote?
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: The right to freedom of expression.

Post by Sy Borg »

All forums, and all private enterprise for that matter, are basically autocratic, as is this one. In the light of this and the fact that Scott carries all risk and responsibility, the most reasonable option is that each member gets zero votes because customers are not shareholders :) Many are keen to point out their own rights but only other people's responsibilities.

Regulars hoping to have influence and proven to be responsible can offer their services as a mod. Alas, modding can be bruising at times and one excellent regular seems to have left the forum after a difficult period modding where he'd hoped to raise standards a little (with my full support). Alas, standards did not want to be raised and fought back vigorously enough for him to decide to do something else. Pity. A fine mind driven off by lesser ones.

I myself have wanted to quit modding about half a dozen times. It is especially difficult to moderate alt right people because they inherently have no respect for authority, and even less so for women in positions of authority, generally inspired by the antics of US's rebel-in-chief. Modding such people is like trying to control teenagers. I have experimented with numerous methods and found that cold ruthlessness is the only way to deal with such people - set the rules, make them clear, transgress too much, no fuss, just ejection.

Of course, then they claim bias and talk about "freedom of expression" and never once will they acknowledge that their own trolling and poor manners were the source of the issues. Generally, if a new member arrives with attitude and arrogance I will generally be quick to ban for transgressions because in my experience such people get worse with familiarity rather than better; they are akin to a dinner guest arriving at your home for the first time and telling everyone that they are fools.
Alias
Posts: 3119
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett

Re: The right to freedom of expression.

Post by Alias »

A forum is not a nation or a government. It's somebody's private property. If the homeowner has a no-shoes rule, you remove footwear, or you stay out. The rules are posted on the door: you enter with informed assent; you could freely choose the option of not entering. If you cannot or will not abide by house rules, you have the option of leaving; they have the option of ejecting you.
If you want a say in what happens inside or how the rules are made, you have a further option of earning a seat on the governing council.
If the council wants to hold a referendum on some specific issue or proposed change of protocol, they can do so.
Those who can induce you to believe absurdities can induce you to commit atrocities. - Voltaire
Alias
Posts: 3119
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett

Re: The right to freedom of expression.

Post by Alias »

:lol: yeah, that! ^^^
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: The right to freedom of expression.

Post by Sy Borg »

I added a little since your post (editing while you posted), Alias. Hopefully the above post still applies :)

Yes, it's just house rules. Imagine throwing a dinner party and giving the guests a vote as to how you run your household? :lol:
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: The right to freedom of expression.

Post by Steve3007 »

Yes I see your points about the reason why this is not a democracy. The difficulty for moderators here, I think, is interpreting the rules. After this case I had another look at them. As with most rules and laws, it's difficult to think of a way that they could be worded so as to be unambiguous enough to simply be taken literally. So they have to be used as broad guidelines, with common sense playing a large part (as they generally are). This gives those with these teenager-like attitudes plenty of scope to cry foul. It's interesting to me that judges, when dealing with the laws governing nations, face exactly the same problems. For example, we've seen it recently in the US with judges interpreting the US Constitution to rule that Trump's Muslim ban was unconstitutional. Interpreting something like the US Constitution in such a way as to minimize the accusations of political bias must be particularly difficult.

There are the same problems when trying to critique any passage of text that purports to make an argument supporting a point of view or opinion. In trying to do that here, I've usually found that the cold, logical, rational "you have said this and you are wrong for this reason" approach simply doesn't work for various reasons. Mostly because people rarely set out their position as an orderly evidence-based argument. They generally make assertions and express personal tastes. It's not possible to demonstrate to people that their personal tastes are wrong. It's only really possible to state that one doesn't share them.

As an exercise, before it was locked, I was starting to try this with the OP which proposed to revoke women's suffrage - breaking it into small parts and demonstrating why I disagreed with each part. I guess it was probably a waste of time though. The central flaws of the OP (correlation does not imply cause etc) had already been pointed out by Greta and others, and ignored.
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: The right to freedom of expression.

Post by Sy Borg »

Steve, if you are to engage in such an experiment again, by all means let me know and I will hold off. I'm a bit disappointed to have stood in the way of scientific inquiry! :)
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: The right to freedom of expression.

Post by Steve3007 »

Actually, I've just finished writing the OP for a new topic which attempts to approach the issue again by attempting to find the broader principles involved. I'm not sure how well it works, but I'll post it shortly.
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: The right to freedom of expression.

Post by Sy Borg »

Good luck Tuvok. Let me know as soon as possible how things are going. And give my regards to T'Pel :)
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: The right to freedom of expression.

Post by Steve3007 »

I had to google Tuvok and T'Pel to get that joke. Perhaps it's a hopeful sign that I'm not enough of a Trekkie to get it without doing so. Although, I suppose if you'd said Spock I would have got it.

Anyway, I've posted the topic now.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7932
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: The right to freedom of expression.

Post by LuckyR »

Dachshund wrote: January 6th, 2018, 4:59 pm I note that my OP on the topic of repealing women's suffrage has been locked by Greta. In my opinion this decision was made predominantly because she because she knew full well that there was no prospect of the arguments I was in the process of setting down in support of my case being defeated ,and,being female she was not prepared to hear the truth about the tremendous damage that the women's right's movement has inflicted- and is continuing to inflict -on the Western societies. It is a classic example of politically correct censorship and I have to say that I am very disappointed to learn that this philosophy forum is not a place where the right to freedom of expression is respected.

Dachshund
Some advice: whining doesn't help one's case when you are trying to project masculinity.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: The right to freedom of expression.

Post by Sy Borg »

Steve3007 wrote: January 7th, 2018, 10:53 pm I had to google Tuvok and T'Pel to get that joke. Perhaps it's a hopeful sign that I'm not enough of a Trekkie to get it without doing so.
Pray that you never reach that point, Steven.

Lucky, now that you mention it, those with extreme views will naturally tend towards whining - because they are on the losing side of history and that will largely continue to be the case. Every society where extremists have achieved power has come to grief. As extremism lifts, so does prosperity and happiness (aside from malcontent extremists who see the bulk of people as ignorant puppets as they suffer from their self-inflicted injuries).

In healthy societies, however, most people will be moderate in their views, and literally more philosophical about life than miserable extremists.
User avatar
Maldon007
Posts: 396
Joined: June 18th, 2012, 3:57 am

Re: The right to freedom of expression.

Post by Maldon007 »

Their house, their rules, dude. And yeah, this my first time on this forum in a loooong time, and one of the first things I see is, PUT UP OR SHUT UP!... And most of the quoted posts didn't even seem right for the demand. Like, I might expect that to a hard to believe claim or a quoted stat that seems off... Anyway, mellow out and make reasoned arguments, and you will probably get better results.
Locked

Return to “Forum Announcements”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021