Welcome to the Philosophy Forums! If you already are a member, please log in. If you are not a member, please join the forums now. It's completely free, and all viewpoints are welcome.
| View previous topic :: View next topic :: |
Blacksad
Joined: 29 Nov 2009 Posts: 1
|
Post: #1 Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 5:31 pm Post subject: Age Disparity In Relationships: Does Love Have Restrictions? |
|
|
|
Hello all, I am a long time lurker, first time poster.
We've all heard the saying "Love is blind". While not many people openly disagree with this saying, age disparity in a relationship seems to be a hot topic amongst people. The social "rule" for age differences in a relationship is half your age plus seven years. Is it fair of us to place age restrictions, or for that matter, any restrictions upon love?
Western culture has placed a taboo upon older men lusting after younger women, yet on the other hand embraces older women sexually pursuing younger men. Older women who pursue younger men are labeled as "cougars" and considered socially acceptable while older men who pursue younger women are labeled as perverts or pedophiles and ostracized by others. Why the double standard?
I believe that society has become too strict in its definition of pedophilia. Yes, I think it is safe to assume that a 5 year old girl would be ignorant to the serious nature of sexual intercourse and lack the sufficient knowledge to make any form of decision relating to coitus. Can we really say the same for a 14 or 15 year old girl? At this age, most human beings have sexually experimented in some form, be it masturbation or with another person. Why is 18 the "magic number" regarding consensual sex? I know many sexually responsible teenagers, and I also know many more sexually irresponsible adults.
I guess my moral query is, can we as a society really place an age restriction upon something as uncontrollable as love? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ape
Joined: 06 Apr 2009 Posts: 3324
|
Post: #2 Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Blacksad wrote: |
Hello all, I am a long time lurker, first time poster.
|
Hi Blacksad!
Welcome in from the shade!
| Blacksad wrote: |
We've all heard the saying "Love is blind". |
Love is blind because, just as a blind man does not change his focus no matter on who or what his gaze is on, so too Love does not change its focus of Love no matter who or what it sees or doesn't see because it loves the beauty and the ugly, the sighted and the blind, the old and the young, having sex and not having sex.
(Love is totally different to sex or to not having sex.)
So Love is blind because Love is actually also the best thing to see by!
| Blacksad wrote: |
While not many people openly disagree with this saying, age disparity in a relationship seems to be a hot topic amongst people.
|
That is because among most people there is agism: Love of the young mixed with Hate of the old, and vice versa; sexism: Love of women coupled with Hate of men, and vice versa. And other isms like paternalism, classism, racism, homophobism/homophobia, and other isms.
Example:
Love loves to have sex and to not have sex, loves what it wants and love what it does not want.
So Love is totally different to sex and is extant before sex, during sex and after sex, and especially when there is no sex contemplated at all.
Love is what we get or have sex in, and is in what we get or have no sex.
| Blacksad wrote: |
The social "rule" for age differences in a relationship is half your age plus seven years. Is it fair of us to place age restrictions, or for that matter, any restrictions upon love?
|
Do you see how you are conflating sex with Love?
Example: I love God and my mom as much as my wife but I never have sex with God nor my mom and have sex with my wife.
See?
So we can rewrite that like this:
The social "rule" for age differences FOR HAVING SEX in a relationship is half your age plus seven years. Is it fair of us to place age restrictions, or for that matter, any restrictions upon SEX WHILE PUTTING NO RESTRICTIONS ON LOVE?
YES to both questions.
And so to not make this too long, I will just add my words in CAPS:
Western culture AND ALL OTHER CULTURES haVE placed a taboo upon older men lusting after younger women OR UPON OLDER MEN WANTING YOUNGER WOMEN OUT OF HATE FOR OLDER WOMEN, --WHICH IS WHAT LUST IS---yet on the other hand embraces older women WHO IN HATE OF OLDER MEN ARE sexually pursuing younger men. CLEARLY THAT SAME OLD DOUBLE STANDARD OF LOVE FOR ONE AND HATE FOR THE OTHER. Older women who pursue younger men are LOVED AND labeled IN LOVE as "cougars" and considered socially acceptable while older men who pursue younger women are HATED AND labeled IN HATE as perverts or pedophiles and ostracized by others.
| Blacksad wrote: |
Why the double standard?
|
Because all cultures are based on the fundamantal double-standard of Love for one combined with Hate for the opposite-other.
Example:
It is the same double-standard if I only love sex and hate not getting any.
| Blacksad wrote: |
I believe that society has become too strict in its definition of pedophilia. |
First of all, the name pedophilia: Love of children shd be misopedia: Hate for self as a child compounded by Hate for self as not getting any sex.
So the definition is NOT strict enough.
Yes, I think it is safe to assume that a 5 year old girl would be ignorant to the serious nature of sexual intercourse and lack the sufficient knowledge to make any form of decision relating to coitus BUT AT THE SAME TIME BE MOST KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT LOVE.
| Blacksad wrote: |
Can we really say the same for a 14 or 15 year old girl? |
No, we can't say YES when it comes to sex, but we can definitely say NO when it comes to Love! So those 12-18 year olds and older are basically definitely having sex without all the Love needed to make a benefit of having sex and so are having sex out of Hate for getting none which is what and where lust and rape and etc and fatherless kids come from!
| Blacksad wrote: |
At this age, most human beings have sexually experimented in some form, be it masturbation or with another person. |
But they have by this time also bottomed out on the Love they had as toddlers and kindergarten kids so that all of their activities and goals are based on what they hate!
To prove this, all we wd have to is ask any teen: Do you love and/or respect yourself as a foolish virgin or as a loser or as a failure?
| Blacksad wrote: |
Why is 18 the "magic
number" regarding consensual sex? |
18 is not the magic number but it is a reasonable age based on when young people can be expected to be be independently responsible for themselves and for any sex they have and for any kids they have and for any of the other good and bad consequences.
At 10 maybe, kids are physically ready to have sex but not ready spiritually nor psychologically for its consequences.
At 18 and above, adults are still ready for sex but most do not have the Love to make the sex work and for making having no sex work!
| Blacksad wrote: |
I know many sexually responsible teenagers, and I also know many more sexually irresponsible adults. |
I heard that!
| Blacksad wrote: |
I guess my moral query is, can we as a society really place an age restriction upon something as uncontrollable as love? |
No, there shd be no and there can not be not any restrictions on Love which is for all ages. But yes, there shd and must be restrictions on sex.
Example:
I taught my son and dtr to love themselves having sex and not having sex so that their Love for themselves wd be always present in their hearts and minds with or without sex. And in that Love, they shd not have sex before they were living on their own!
This meant that when any guys approached my dtr for sex, the convos wd go like this:
Guy:If you loved me, you wd prove it by giving it up and having sex with me!
Dtr: If you loved me, you wd prove it by NOT having sex with me since you wd love me whether we had sex or not!
Guy: But sex is Love!
Dtr: Yes but Love is both sex and no sex! See? Then when we were not having sex, you wd still love me! But if we have to have sex to prove I love you, then no sex, no Love! Right? And we can't have sex all the time. And altho I want to have sex, I don't want it at this time since I can't afford it and especially since you can't afford it!
And because I love myself and you with sex and without sex, I can wait, I can take it or leave it: and I choose to leave it alone!
Plus: You working? No. You stealing? No. You dealing? No. You're a magician? No? So you're not even ready physically for sex and babies.
Plus without Love for you as sexed and unsexed, you are not ready for yourself nor me: you can't handle you nor me! See? So, do you love me if I don't give you sex?
Guy: You have to prove your Love by doing something, by your actions!
Dtr: Well, I am proving my Love for you by having the action of NO sex with you, and you have to prove to me that you love me by the action of NOT having sex with me! What say you?
Guy: No way! It's sex or the hi way!
Dtr: See what I mean? You only have part-time Love: no sex, no Love. Ok. So bye, altho I still love you!
Qed.
Hope that helps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Homicidal Pacifist

Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 546 Location: Your mom's house. Ha.
|
Post: #3 Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:07 am Post subject: . |
|
|
|
I started seeing my girlfriend of 2 years when I was 26. She was 17. I was robbin' the cradle and she was robbin' the grave. It was she who pursued me. I hesitated for a month or two because of the 9 year difference and because I was her boss (naughty!) but I finally gave in.
We are very happy together.
There's got to be some kind of restriction because otherwise, 30 year old dudes would doing some messed up stuff to 10 year olds. The Line might need to vary depending on the people and the circumstances, and penalties may not need to be overly severe when it is consentual and the youngin is at least has the legal right to drive a car. Driving is as serious a situation as f*cking and entails as much responsibility, caution, and understanding. _________________ "If Ignorance Is Bliss, Then Knock The Smile Off My Face!"
- Rage Against The Machine |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scott Site Admin

Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Posts: 1559
|
Post: #4 Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I also think the age of consent is too high in most places.
The issue of adults having sex with children is very different than the issue of wrinkly old people having sex with significantly younger adults. Firstly, almost nobody wants the latter to be illegal while almost everybody wants the former to be illegal--even though may disagree slightly on where to draw the line between child and the age of consent.
I assume people feel negatively about a 65-year-old having a sexual relationship with a 25-year-old for the many of the same reasons they would feel negatively about a super hot person being in a sexual relationship with an ugly, morbidly obese person of the same age. It could be jealousy. It could be the belief that one of the people is taking advantage of the other. For instance, is it gold-digging, implicit prostitution, abusive, career-driven or what?
While statutory rape and that which is close to it is commonly viewed as a problem with male perpetrators, I have not noticed a significant difference in people's opinions about an elderly man and a younger adult being together as opposed to an elderly woman and a younger adult. Is there any evidence to support the claim to the contrary such as a scientific poll? _________________ Online Philosophy Club - Please tell me how to improve this website! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Alun

Joined: 11 Jul 2009 Posts: 883
|
Post: #5 Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Welcome to the forum Blacksad,
I think it is fair to mandate restrictions on love based on what love actually is. Love is a deliberate affection; in order for people to have a loving relationship, those individuals need to choose to enter it. Making an informed choice can require at least some experience; in the case of love, as a society we find that quite a bit of life experience is necessary to guard against a non-consensual, and thus non-loving, relationship.
So, as has been said, there's definitely a restriction in age somewhere. However, mandates by society are, imo, generalizations on the side of caution. We are willing to make all 16 year olds (in Texas) wait until their next birthday, since we think at least a statistically significant portion of them aren't ready--that doesn't mean they're magically matured at 17, just that on average the majority of people will be ready to choose for themselves by then.
I think what you're really asking, though, is not about pedophilia or teenage lust, but about age disparity among people who are unquestionably adults. Should a 24 year-old woman be allowed to see a 58 year-old man? Well, I think it should be allowed. However, I think there's also some wisdom behind the stereotype against age differences. People in a committed relationship grow together--but age is a huge determinant of life experiences, so it's hard to imagine that an older person will be affected by circumstances the way a younger person might.
However, both parties are fully capable of figuring out whether they fall under this generalization; I honestly believe that, for some people, even a substantial age disparity is more desirable, healthy, and fulfilling than age equality. I just doubt this is the case for most people. _________________ "I have nothing new to teach the world" -Mohandas "Mahatma" Gandhi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
athena Contributor
Joined: 11 Jun 2009 Posts: 855
|
Post: #6 Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
At least two female teachers have been persecuted for having sex with under age male students. For sure one went to prison for a few years. If someone is persecuted for having sex with a minor, depends to some degree on the minor's parents. If the parents do not object, it is unlikely the law will take action, unless the minor is very young. It is not saver for the female than it is for the male, to have sex with minors, and when it comes to older women having affairs with younger men, I would not say society looks on this well.
In the past, we married 14 year old girls off to older men. This serves a practical purpose, considering how unruly a 14 year old girl can get, and the cost of providing for her, especially if she has a baby out of wed lock. It is best to marry off the girls when they are old enough to get pregnant.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Homicidal Pacifist

Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 546 Location: Your mom's house. Ha.
|
Post: #7 Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:08 am Post subject: . |
|
|
|
The older can potentially guide the younger and the younger can potentially revitalize the older. _________________ "If Ignorance Is Bliss, Then Knock The Smile Off My Face!"
- Rage Against The Machine |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Keith Russell

Joined: 06 Jan 2010 Posts: 588
|
Post: #8 Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Anyone who is bothered by the idea of being with someone much older, or much younger (at least in the USA) is free to date someone close to their own age.
(The keyword is "free"...) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Isidorus
Joined: 16 Nov 2009 Posts: 124
|
Post: #9 Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| There is a minor degree of sarcasm lurking in you statement, somewhere, Keith! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Keith Russell

Joined: 06 Jan 2010 Posts: 588
|
Post: #10 Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Isidorus wrote: |
| There is a minor degree of sarcasm lurking in you statement, somewhere, Keith! |
You'll probably find that to be true of most of my statements... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
athena Contributor
Joined: 11 Jun 2009 Posts: 855
|
Post: #11 Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Scott wrote: |
I also think the age of consent is too high in most places.
The issue of adults having sex with children is very different than the issue of wrinkly old people having sex with significantly younger adults. Firstly, almost nobody wants the latter to be illegal while almost everybody wants the former to be illegal--even though may disagree slightly on where to draw the line between child and the age of consent.
I assume people feel negatively about a 65-year-old having a sexual relationship with a 25-year-old for the many of the same reasons they would feel negatively about a super hot person being in a sexual relationship with an ugly, morbidly obese person of the same age. It could be jealousy. It could be the belief that one of the people is taking advantage of the other. For instance, is it gold-digging, implicit prostitution, abusive, career-driven or what?
While statutory rape and that which is close to it is commonly viewed as a problem with male perpetrators, I have not noticed a significant difference in people's opinions about an elderly man and a younger adult being together as opposed to an elderly woman and a younger adult. Is there any evidence to support the claim to the contrary such as a scientific poll? |
Scott, are you married? What do you think will happen to your self image and your marriage, as you age, if your opinion of what makes someone sexually attractive does not change?
"Harold and Maude" is a good movie for anyone interested in thoughts of life and death, or the idea of an older woman and young man having a love relationship. He is 19 and she is 79. She ends her life on her 89th birthday.
George Burn's movie "18 Again" includes the possible problem of an older man having a relationship with a younger woman.
These relationships with great age differences can seem desirable for awhile, but problems do come up.
Around age 40, I was surprised by the number of young men attracted to older women, but that has came to an end. I don't think it impossible to have a relationship like Harold and Maude, but unlikely, because it is unlikely for such a couple to meet. However, for sure, there are relationships that are not dependent on physical attraction, and anyone who thinks marriage should last a life time, needs to give some thought to what makes a relationship desirable, besides physical attraction. _________________ born to master the art of love |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scott Site Admin

Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Posts: 1559
|
Post: #12 Posted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| athena wrote: |
| Scott, are you married? What do you think will happen to your self image and your marriage, as you age, if your opinion of what makes someone sexually attractive does not change? |
I don't see the relevance of these questions to what I wrote that you quoted.
I did not say that I would ever want to be in a sexual relationship with someone who is significantly different in age than I. I simply explained why I want the age of consent to be lowered. There are plenty of things that I want to be legal that I would never do.
While illegality is perhaps the strongest form of social disapproval, I also disagree with the social tendency to inherently, prejudicially frown upon relationships with a young person and a moderately older person even if it's legal (e.g. between a 21-year-old and a 15-year-old).
The rest of my statements I felt were very agreeable statements about why most people probably feel the way they do about relationships that involve a large age gap (e.g. a 65-year-old and a 25-year-old). I wasn't agreeing or disagreeing, but just explaining what I think are the reasons why people feel the way they do. Besides, there are plenty of activities I condone that I would never do myself.
| athena wrote: |
| These relationships with great age differences can seem desirable for awhile, but problems do come up. |
Big problems come up in any relationship.
Some general types of relationships do tend to have some problems in common with each other. Certain types of problems come up in relationships between a wealthy person and a poor person. In racist societies, certain types of problems come up in interracial relationships. Certain types of problems come up in relationships between 2 people of the same age when one is terminally ill. Other problems may come up in all types of relationships. I don't think love and sex would be as desirable, fun or beautiful if these problems tended to stunt or stop love and sex. Perhaps it is the capability of love and sex to overcome such obstacles and problems and make us do such seemingly impractical things that makes love and sex so special. _________________ Online Philosophy Club - Please tell me how to improve this website! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
athena Contributor
Joined: 11 Jun 2009 Posts: 855
|
Post: #13 Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Wow, Scott that was really analytical and good. Another thread about love and sex is also forcing this deeper thinking about our feelings and actions.
On occasion, a person's personality can be more impressive than a person's physical appearance, and then the physical barriers to love and sexual attraction can be bridged. I can remember being attracted to a very ugly man. His face was so ugly, I deliberately restricted my vision of him to his eyes.
Like the Beauty and Beast story, the skin condition that made him so ugly could be cured, and he became more appealing to the eye, but before this happened I had begun bonding with him, because of the eye contact, and his inned qualities.
I think to a large degree, our attraction to another rest on our personal fantasies. That is why I expressed concern when you wrote
| Quote: |
| I assume people feel negatively about a 65-year-old having a sexual relationship with a 25-year-old for the many of the same reasons they would feel negatively about a super hot person being in a sexual relationship with an ugly, morbidly obese person of the same age. |
I read into that, that you think of a 65 year is like an physically ugly person, and that a person who is over weight is ugly. This judging of people based on appearance, can manifest into a problem as we age, and our lover no longer looks like our fantasy of a good looking person, or we ourselves are no longer are our own idea of attractive. The subject of this thread, as it was introduced, begs the question of how important is appearance to intimate behavior?
But then when discussing sex and young people, we are also concerned with the young person's ability and willingness to accept responsibility, because children can be the result of sexual activity.
However, religion gets mixed into this, and the demands of our modern, industrial society, distort our nature. How great it would be to experience a different culture and possibly a primitive culture, and come back to this subject. I suspect under more natural conditions, ah, ah- I am thinking of chimps- I was going to say, people would stay with those who are their own age, but that is not true of chimps where the older male or female may be attractive because of status. Even in the animal world, status plays a part in sexual attractiveness. _________________ born to master the art of love |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
celebritydiscodave
Joined: 07 Oct 2008 Posts: 66 Location: nr. Leigh on Sea, Essex UK
|
Post: #14 Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 2:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I agree with the quote, but it could be added perhaps that, society wouldn`t require any physical come ageing data on the seventy year old, only time since birth!-We are programmed to be ageist. My definition of disgusting in sex(/most disgusting?) would be to engage in it with a partner which isn`t fancied, and after that by degree. In reality how else could it be considered disgusting(?), though you might well stop fancying someone in the process. The term inappropriate was surely never ment to be applied as a form of disgusting, and the two should actually be thought of as being separate terms? _________________ My main social contention is over the degree of age discrimination/programming that there is of younger adults over not specifically age, but rather... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|