Welcome to the Philosophy Forums! If you already are a member, please log in. If you are not a member, please join the forums now. It's completely free, and all viewpoints are welcome.
| View previous topic :: View next topic :: |
Serendipitynomad
Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Posts: 4
|
Post: #1  Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 3:43 pm Post subject: Metaphysics of math functions and science phenomena |
  |
|
|
| What thoughts does anyone have on this subject? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ape
Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 3324
|
| Post: #2 Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 5:29 pm Post subject: Re: Metaphysics of math functions and science phenomena |
|
|
|
| Serendipitynomad wrote: |
| What thoughts does anyone have on this subject? |
Great topic, Serendipitynomad!
All numbers in Math are also words. 
So too are all phenomena in Science also words.
NB that we can not think of anything that is not also a word.
So Math and science are functions of words, and as such are auto-metaphysical and are to be also understood as such.
The key is word is the Universal Constant:UC by & thru which all things are led thru all things.
"Know the [*constant*] thought thru [or meta] which things are led thru[meta] all other things."
Heraclitus
Here is a bigger hint as to what that UC is:
"What truly is logic?
Who decides reason?
My quest has taken me to the physical, the metaphysical, the delusional, and back.
I have made the most important discovery of my career - the most important discovery of my life. It is only in the mysterious Equations of Love that any logic or reason can be found."
John Nash, A Beautiful Mind. American mathematician and economist whose works in game theory, differential geometry, and partial differential equations…. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Serendipitynomad
Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Posts: 4
|
| Post: #3 Posted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:28 pm Post subject: Re the metaphysics of word (symbols) |
|
|
|
| Are then the numbers affected representations of archetypical cognitions. Like mechanical frequency and amplitude is our visceral intensity (i.e., Love) the phenomena which numbers are the symbols giving a quantitative and qualitative description in the abstraction for which we could discern functions to enhance our cognitve comprehension and appreciation of our organic capabilities? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ape
Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 3324
|
| Post: #4 Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:14 am Post subject: Re: Re the metaphysics of word (symbols) |
|
|
|
| Serendipitynomad wrote: |
Are then the numbers affected representations of archetypical cognitions. |
Yes.
Archetypal cognitions and re-cognitions such as God is or you are Number One or Numero 1 or as the Barry White song says: My first, my last, my everything!
When all numbers are loved, all numbers mean or represent Love and Love means or represents all numbers. So when Love means all numbers, all numbers then re-affect Love or mean more Love, ad infinitum.
| Serendipitynomad wrote: |
Like mechanical frequency and amplitude is our visceral intensity (i.e., Love) the phenomena which numbers are the symbols giving a quantitative and qualitative description in the abstraction for which we could discern functions to enhance our cognitve comprehension and appreciation of our organic capabilities? |
Yes---to further re-enhance every kind of comprehension and more re-appreciate every kind of our capabilities and capacities.
But no thing is Love of itself unless it and its opposite are first loved with the Frequency and Amplitude and 100% Intensity of the Universal Constant of Love.
By the way, all mathematical constants are symbolic of the Constant that Love is.
And notice all the words you are using to express that idea:
Each one of those words and their opposites are also composites and so are bound and ligamented together.
So when loved, all words and their opposites are rebound or religamented or religionized!
So?
So we are really saying that re-ligion is really about binding what's already bound. And what's already bound ontologically are words and their composite opposites or complementary enemies!
So we are talking the Religion of Love or the Science of Love or the Chemistry of Love or as Nash called it The Equation/s of Love.
"How can feeble reason encompass the Qur'án,
Or the spider snare a phoenix in his web?
Wouldst thou that the mind should not entrap thee?
Teach it the Science of the Love of God!"
Sanai |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Serendipitynomad
Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Posts: 4
|
| Post: #5 Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:46 pm Post subject: the inscrutable is giving the need for emotion? |
|
|
|
Pi, the hyperbolic asymptote, irrational numbers, et al represent the limits of intellectulizations and the reliance on the effects of the undefinable-the irresistible and undeniable. The acceptance of the empirically undeniable is the embracing and the positive engaging intercourse. But it comes with the re-cognitions and appreciation of the "limits" of the other vis a vis your functional operations.We exist in a spatial frame of reference of covalence, attraction and bonding combinations. Within the greater context beyond our secular designs there is a plan hich our secualr plans disturb to our long term disability, as well as our short term distraction and diversion.
The greater context is the Eden which ego-intellectualizations has ruptured us from the Peace of Love and the Love of Peace in the resonant harmony of the universal function.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ape
Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 3324
|
| Post: #6 Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 11:31 pm Post subject: Re: the inscrutable is giving the need for emotion? |
|
|
|
| Serendipitynomad wrote: |
Pi, the hyperbolic asymptote, irrational numbers, et al represent the limits of intellectulizations...
|
Because rational and irrational are diametric opposites and composite-opposites, both rational and irrational numbers represent the limitlessnss of intellectualizations of the circle or orbit,
Example:
To be rational is to be less irrational than irrational, and to be irrational is to be less rational than rational.
Thus, any irrational which is less irrational than any other irrational is rational, and any rational which is less rational than any other rational is irrational.
So what's really irrational is the Irrationality of Hatred for any irrational.
And so what's really rational is the Rationality of Love for both the rational and the irrational.
| Serendipitynomad wrote: |
...and the reliance on the effects of the undefinable-the irresistible and undeniable. |
Because all words and their opposites are also interdefinable and interconvertible, pi also represents both the resistibe and irresistible, and the deniable and the undeniable.
| Serendipitynomad wrote: |
The acceptance of the empirically undeniable is the embracing and the positive engaging intercourse. |
The Acceptance of Love for both the deniable and the undeniable makes the deniable acceptable and the undenibale doubly acceptable.
| Serendipitynomad wrote: |
But it comes with the re-cognitions and appreciation of the "limits" of the other vis a vis your functional operations.
|
That's true only when we don't see the illimitable in the limitable, and don't see the limitable in the illimitable.
| Serendipitynomad wrote: |
We exist in a spatial frame of reference of covalence, attraction and bonding combinations.
|
Our Frame of reference is actually the Frame of Mind of The Love which both attracts and repulses, binds and unbinds, combines and separates.
| Serendipitynomad wrote: |
Within the greater context beyond our secular designs there is a plan hich our secualr plans disturb to our long term disability, as well as our short term distraction and diversion.
|
That plan is actually The Plan of Love which includes both ability and disability, both the long and the short, both unity and diversity so that we have unity in diversity and diversity in unity: e pluribus unum and ex uno pluribi.
| Serendipitynomad wrote: |
The greater context is the Eden which ego-intellectualizations has ruptured us from the Peace of Love and the Love of Peace in the resonant harmony of the universal function.. |
Yes, the greater context is the Edenic Context of Love for all words and the enemy-opposites, which the Hatego or the Ego of Hate for any word ruptures when employed, and when employed ruptures not only the lesser Love of Peace but also the greater Peace of Love/POL,
which POL loves war and peace and so makes peace out of war and makes double peace or peace peace or peaceful peace or perfect peace out of peace! .
See Isaiah 26:3. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nick_A
Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Posts: 1461
|
| Post: #7 Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:55 am Post subject: Re: Metaphysics of math functions and science phenomena |
|
|
|
| Serendipitynomad wrote: |
| What thoughts does anyone have on this subject? |
Andre Weil, one of the twentieth century's most brilliant mathematicians wrote:
| Quote: |
| God exists since mathematics is consistent, and the Devil exists since we cannot prove it. |
Science and math lead us to a point that in order to get beyond, we must get out of our own way.
_________________
Man would like to be an egoist and cannot. This is the most striking characteristic of his wretchedness and the source of his greatness." Simone Weil....Gravity and Grace |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Serendipitynomad
Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Posts: 4
|
| Post: #8 Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:34 pm Post subject: Getting out of our own way |
|
|
|
"That resonates with an insight I stumbled upon earlier this year"
The "limitless" or the improbable can't be achieved in the midst of our ego's context.
Once we step out of the way, we are no longer the self-defeating obstruction and fallible, imperfect, self-seeking operative. We become the altruistic facilitator for the greater good-Love, per se. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
