Post Number:#61 June 1st, 2010, 1:23 am
Jackowens wrote:In your post (#49) and your present post (#57) you did not answer at all --"yes" or "no" aside-- the question I posed regarding the first plank of the method I proposed that we use in our attempt to arrive at a conclusion regarding the homosexual marriage controversy. Please answer and follow that with whether you find the second plank reasonable.
I don't know what 'planks' you are talking about. I think you are confounding the issue. I have no interest in having to jump through hoops just to have you answer the simple cricisms of your argument that have been raised here. If you aren't willing to defend your argument then I'm not sure what you are doing on a philosophy forum.