Which One: Religion, Philosophy, or Science?

Use this philosophy forum to discuss and debate general philosophy topics that don't fit into one of the other categories.

This forum is NOT for factual, informational or scientific questions about philosophy (e.g. "What year was Socrates born?"). Those kind of questions can be asked in the off-topic section.
Dewey
Premium Member
Posts: 830
Joined: October 28th, 2007, 1:45 pm
Location: California

Which One: Religion, Philosophy, or Science?

Post by Dewey »

Religion, philosophy, and science are commonly regarded as three branches of our culture. What is the order of our need for them – their relative value in helping us to lead the good life? Please explain your hierarchy. Do we need all three? Why or why not?

My present answers to these questions are too positive, going-on-arrogant – a sure sign I need to get the thoughts of my fellow truth-seekers.

Dewey
Kool-aid
Posts: 286
Joined: December 12th, 2008, 5:30 pm

Post by Kool-aid »

That depends on what you define as "need".

If we are in need of a growth in technology, science is obviously the best way in order to achieve this.

A philosopher will perhaps say that philisophy is the most important, because it gives us a reflected mind.

A religios person will perhaps say that religion is the most important, because of the importance to his own life. He may think that his religion is alpha and omega.

I don't think we need any of them, but considering the status of the current world, I think we'd be better off without religion.
Dewey
Premium Member
Posts: 830
Joined: October 28th, 2007, 1:45 pm
Location: California

Which One: Religion, Philosophy, or Science?

Post by Dewey »

Hi Jarle10,

Look again! It's just that I defined "need" broadly. The aim of everyone is "the good life" but each must define for himself what it consists of.

We will benefit more from your comments if you give us some idea of what the good life means to you.
Kool-aid
Posts: 286
Joined: December 12th, 2008, 5:30 pm

Post by Kool-aid »

I admit I didn't quite catch that sentence. Nevertheless, my answer is applicable. It will of course depend on the person you ask. Religion filled the needs humans had for explanation before, that now sophisticated philosophy and science are overlapping. I think religion is the first branch to disappear, as our need for explanation is stimulated in a much more satisfying sense with science/metaphysics.

Note that I define the 'good life' as a life that stimulates basic human needs. In this case: The need for explanation - which is the only thing science, philosophy and religion can offer. Some may argue that religion brings a certain completeness and a feeling of security. I will though not speculate over that issue now.
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13821
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Post by Belinda »

We need all three because people vary according to which idiom is most easily understood.

By the way I'm inferring that by 'religion' you don't mean religious institutions, but something more like personal religious experiences. These may touch on science, or art, philosophy, rituals or any other activities and still be called 'religious'/
Dewey
Premium Member
Posts: 830
Joined: October 28th, 2007, 1:45 pm
Location: California

Which One: Religion, Philosophy, or Science?

Post by Dewey »

Hi Belinda,

In effect then, I think you’re advising each of us to choose whichever of the three branches is “most easily understood” by the individual as her means of defining the good life she aspires to.

Is it all that easy? Is that which we can most easily understand all we need to know? Should we establish our goal of a good life based on ignorance of that which is most difficult to understand? Please help me "most easily understand" your meaning.

My definition of religion in this forum is a set of beliefs possibly including the attributes you mentioned and also including a belief in the existence of a deity.
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13821
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Post by Belinda »

Yes Dewey, I think 'most' of us are in tune with science as evidenced by the produce of advertisers who use 'science' to attract paying customers.

Far fewer are in touch with philosophy which is a pity in my view, and I trust that schools are making good this shortcoming.

Since by religion you include transcendent God, I would prefer that religion is deleted from the list of what makes life good.I hope that philosophy or a combination of philosophy and science fill up the space. By the way, you have not included arts in your list, and arts are a big influence for good.

I like the idea of the broad- based school qualification called the baccalaureat which may possibly be adopted in this country(UK) and which is used in France.This sort of curriculum may allow learners to range widely, to make connections and to specialise when the time comes to specialise.Arts and sciences can inform each other.

But for Goodness's sake, let's do away with the transcendent God! The old man is dead .
User avatar
Akhenaten
Posts: 209
Joined: August 29th, 2008, 6:22 pm

Post by Akhenaten »

Anyone that is "intune" with science? Very well:

Please describe to me the growth process of nannites.

Please explain the two exceptions governing the three strong forces.

Then we move to String theory, if you would explain how the other 8 dimensions of existence are woven beneath and above our own.


I am truly not trying to be condescending, however stating that someone is in tune with something that, really, even those doing the research barely understand, is somewhat silly.

Our minds project emotions, intuition, and autonomic function.... automatically. Science requires effort and a conscious "ignoring" of ones own emotional and intuitive conclusions on most matters (granted most of our greatest discoveries were done by men who ascribed to philosophy greater than science, but hey...).

Even Einstein refused to believe many of his -own- calculations, due to his belief in God... a philosophy. Any of you more in tune with science than he was?

The human race is about as in tune with Science, as it is harmonically similiar to a black hole... Neat to look at, and yes it effects us, but ultimately the one thing that our sciences prove to us is how little we do understand, in the same way I understand Mount Everest because I found a pebble.


P.S. This is not directed at any individual. Don't get arrogant.
DISCLAIMER: THIS DOCUMENT does not cover all individuals in the infinite and variable universe. This is in no way is speaking on cases of incredible, random, or odds of more than 1 : Pi against probability.
Dewey
Premium Member
Posts: 830
Joined: October 28th, 2007, 1:45 pm
Location: California

Which One: Religion, Philosophy, or Science?

Post by Dewey »

Hi Akhenaten,

Your discussion of the meaning of “in tune” is interesting, but I don’t think it addresses the questions I have asked. You appear to know a lot about science, so I would particularly appreciate your ideas about science as a partial or entire basis for defining and living a good life.

Looking again at your comments, I do see some connection with the subject at hand. You refer to Albert Einstein and the influence of his religious beliefs on his scientific work. You might want to recheck your understanding that he believed in a god. I think you’ll find that, despite some public statements that were so construed, over and over again in his private letters and other writings he made it clear he was an atheist.
Belinda
Premium Member
Posts: 13821
Joined: July 10th, 2008, 7:02 pm
Location: UK

Post by Belinda »

Yes, looking at it now it does seem rather silly. It would perhaps have been better if I had written 'scientific' language. The look and sound of scientific language that so often carries the connotation of people (scientists)who are able to provide us with safety etc.is more familiar to 'most'people than the language of philosophy.

The only idiom in which the language of philosophy is approximately equal in the popular mind to the language of science is sci fi.Sci fi at its best is a good educator.

Dewey:
Please help me "most easily understand" your meaning
I had in mind that a learner can start only from where she is in her enthusiasms. Therefore since science is the taste of the moment, it might be better to have science as the leader into learning.And by 'learning' I mean something quite grand. Not vocational skills although they do of course have their place, but 'learning' meaning raising of consciousnesses so that morality and beauty are learned as well as scientific facts.

Oh and please! Morality is not the special preserve of the God religions.
Dewey
Premium Member
Posts: 830
Joined: October 28th, 2007, 1:45 pm
Location: California

Which One: Religion, Philosophy, or Science?

Post by Dewey »

Hi Jarle10.

You don't think we need any of the three (religion, philosophy, and science) to help us to lead the good life. All they offer, you say, is explanation. What, then, do we need and where do we get it?

You define the good life as a life that stimulates basic human needs. I see that as a bad life. What don't I understand?
User avatar
wanabe
Posts: 3377
Joined: November 24th, 2008, 5:12 am
Favorite Philosopher: Gandhi.
Location: UBIQUITY
Contact:

Post by wanabe »

in order of value, and logical evolution, that is most suiting, to the most productive and efficient method of learning and using all 3

a life with none of these is void of life at all, and life by any less than all, can hardly be considered a life at all. I think of it as 1d, 2d, 3d....which one do you want to live in, and which one do you think has the most opportunities? (sort of a suggestive, rhetorical question, sorry)

philosophy- I lump this in with reason and critical thinking then followed by...

science-since we can now reason, we may now interpret our data using our skills and reason, for science

religion-an intuition in to the unknown and unexplainable, lastly but most importantly an optimism to keep us trying even though things may look bleak

I think that is the basic/necessary 3, generally. too add to the list, I cant think of any others to add that wouldn't encroach on another's territory

in some form of the other, I think this triad must exist, the smallest shape is a triangle.

one could argue we don't need religion, but then without it, that eliminates styles and cultures almost, of people. and that diversity of ideas and influences is both our curse, and our blessing

no we don't need to speculate about the unknown (((religion and I'm not saying that's all there is to it, it does so much more for us.))) but that would be akin to a life without fun, and there is most certainly a need for that, to create a real desire to live. now if you find fun in philosophy or science, then great, but there are so many unknowns in both, that like I said, its a necessity.
Secret To Eternal Life: Live Life To The Fullest, Help All Others To Do So.Meaning of Life Is Choice. Increase choice through direct perception. Golden rule+universality principal+Promote benefits-harm+logical consistency=morality.BeTheChange.
Dewey
Premium Member
Posts: 830
Joined: October 28th, 2007, 1:45 pm
Location: California

Which One: Religion, Philosophy, or Science?

Post by Dewey »

Hi wanabe,

In your opinion, after philosophy and science, religion helps you to define and live the good life. It’s needed, you say, because it provides us “an intuition in to the unknown and unexplainable”. You see it fulfilling a need not satisfied by philosophy and science in which “there are so many unknowns”.

That surprises me, especially with regard to science which I think of as a process entirely dedicated to erasing the unknown and creating the known.

Please expound on this if you will (including, of course, correcting anything I have misinterpreted). Some examples of these unknowns might help me and perhaps others to better understand this matter.
User avatar
wanabe
Posts: 3377
Joined: November 24th, 2008, 5:12 am
Favorite Philosopher: Gandhi.
Location: UBIQUITY
Contact:

Post by wanabe »

when I say religion, I mean MY religion which is just, so hard to explain...think budism hinduism "jedi" with heavy concerns to all the worlds religions.

in most cases I think that the bible is a huge metaphor, and at the same time a teller of patterns of human action.....i would assume that the Koran is much the same, along with what ever other big books are out there...so if that helped at all, that is what I mean by religion, I know I wasn't clear on that sorry.

in a lot of ways science and philosophy are intertwined in my religion, as I made my religion up of scientific "fact" and "philosophical reasoning" just like every other religion.

oh and the god I worship, is the group conciousness of all dead things in the havens...and a separate entity entirely...chance/probability, but as of yet I'm not sure which side of the "/", it is. not that it's all that important, the name doesn't change what it does...

now you see what I mean, its a necessity every one has beliefs, that is a religion.....

yea, this is why I wasn't clear... um don't join my cult I'm just as wrong/right as everybody else.

so now, its crystal clear I hope. and yes I'm just as crazy as everyone else, but who is more crazy? one who makes up his own beliefs, or one the follows anthers?
Secret To Eternal Life: Live Life To The Fullest, Help All Others To Do So.Meaning of Life Is Choice. Increase choice through direct perception. Golden rule+universality principal+Promote benefits-harm+logical consistency=morality.BeTheChange.
Dewey
Premium Member
Posts: 830
Joined: October 28th, 2007, 1:45 pm
Location: California

Which One: Religion, Philosophy, or Science?

Post by Dewey »

Thanks, wanabe. I do understand you better now. Perhaps the key is in the intertwining relationship of your particular religion with philosophy and science. (I don't agree, however, that's "just like every other religion.)
Post Reply

Return to “General Philosophy”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021