Xris wrote:dparrott wrote:That is my point John, to many people take second hand knowledge as truth instead of investigating things for themselves. Many people do this same thing with various religions and God. If there really are starving children why are they starving? who's fault is it? God's? or their parents? or the government they live under? Is it just because their ancestors settled in a place with no food? Blaming God seems to me like an easy way of not blaming ourselves for not helping them.
So your argument amounts to not believing in things you read. So why in hells name do you believe in god? Have you encountered him personally , face to face? What value has the bible with your opinion?
I believe in God because it makes sense to me. It would not be wise to believe everything you read but with further personal investigation you can come to your own conclusions on the matter. The value of the Bible is the same as the value of a map if your lost in the wilderness. It is possible to find your way out without it but with a map it is much easier.
Xris wrote:As for your opinion on children dying in Africa and god. What can I say? I once watched a child drowning in a canal near me and thankfully I did not take gods view. What if I had said, where are his parents? Its his fault being in the water. What would you have thought of me if I had stood back and did nothing? That was one child. You tell me god has that thought every second of the day, every time a child dies. You are not doing a very good job describing this perfect god Paro.
If you would have let that child die and then blamed God for his death, it would be the same thing you are doing with those kids in Africa. I'm not trying to explain my perfect God because I can't even explain perfection, much less God. I'm trying to explain that people blame God because they do not want to blame themselves. Also an agnostic blaming God seems strange.