wanabe wrote:It can be. "I will" means that you will do this thing in the future. "You will" because you want to, self referencing as it may be, without a specific case that's as good as the answer gets.
Why do I want to?
wanabe wrote:How much wood could a wood chuck chuck if a would chuck could chuck wood? But in all seriousness: you decide what perfect is for you.
That pretty much sums up my dilemma right there. What if the perfection I perceive as perfect, is always something of disappointment in the end.
wanabe wrote:Why thank you, thats because there is no "norm".
Than you are still an exception anyway.
wanabe wrote:"Well enough" is not the same as well, if you are ready to dismiss this proof then you simply have no will(there's that word again) for finding value.
I see the value, I just don't understand value. Its purpose is to separate and define what is something to do or not to do with the limited amount of time to will I've been given.
I may well have an ulterior motive(I don't really) that does not mean you won't be the primary beneficiary of this exchange.
You value
this as something worth your time, why?
Not only but; so now you see that we lay our own path.
I'm not sure what I see!
You didn't know what the answer is going to be so you couldn't have properly made that accusation: that we our doing ourselves an injustice.
Because it possibly could have been a justice or something other? I understand this. It is only through my limited perception that I assumed. I'm afraid my use of words isn't as specific/clear as I'd like them to be.
Authenticity, humbug. life is not a legal ledger, or a play. You decide your "role".
If it's not authentic, how can it have value? How could I live life if it's inauthentic.
That's your problem: you "know" all these "facts" but can't decide what to do with them. You are not as certain as you try to convince your self you are.
You're true, I am completely uncertain, of everything. Possibly even of believing what I've just said.
-- Updated June 28th, 2012, 6:51 pm to add the following --
Grendel wrote:Your whole question is why do something abstract, such as search for meaning. You neglect the physical. I'm a hedonist, I drink, take drugs and shag. it feels great. It's better than not doing it. Is it real? Irrelevant! whether the feeling of greatness is true or simulation, feels the same to me.
That is one interpreted answer.
Realness to me is entirely relevant.
My definition of realness is intercepted with Truth. If Truth doesn't exist, why do anything? We couldn't exist without Truth. Particles could not exist, certain physical constants could not maintain themselves without Truth in their compatibility with one another. They were each designed to represent their own individual Truth, to than integrate with one another to form this reality.
Truth is a way of life, and I'm not so sure if living for the means of physicality is the way we are supposed to devote our energy to entirely.
Thank you for replying, there is Truth in different perspectives. I'm feeling a little overwhelmed right now though, kind of afraid I wont ever come to an answer.
-- Updated June 28th, 2012, 7:01 pm to add the following --
Clapper wrote:'We' are all playing the "game of Life' for the want of something to do. After all what else is there in absolute nothingness. Therefore it is up to us to make our life worthwhile because Life is the best there is.
We are all in this existence, whether subjectively or objectively. I cant remember what it was like before I was alive, I did not exist, so there was no time. I did not exist at the beginning because there was no beginning, time is measurement created by man. Our idea of time may not apply to the universe.
How is it that life is the best there is? Could it not have been better?