Thomas Kuhn vs Errol Morris

Use this forum to discuss the philosophy of science. Philosophy of science deals with the assumptions, foundations, and implications of science.
Post Reply
User avatar
3uGH7D4MLj
Posts: 920
Joined: January 4th, 2013, 3:39 pm

Thomas Kuhn vs Errol Morris

Post by 3uGH7D4MLj » August 7th, 2018, 3:26 pm

Thomas Kuhn's 1962 book, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" is being taken to task by Errol Morris in his book "The Ashtray."

Morris, who was in Kuhn's class at Princeton, was supposedly the victim or target of an ashtray thrown by Kuhn. Is anybody else following this kerfuffle?
fair to say

User avatar
3uGH7D4MLj
Posts: 920
Joined: January 4th, 2013, 3:39 pm

Re: Thomas Kuhn vs Errol Morris

Post by 3uGH7D4MLj » August 8th, 2018, 11:56 am

You may remember Errol Morris questioning Susan Sontag's analysis of Roger Fenton's 1855 Crimean War photograph Valley of Shadow of Death. The NYTimes did a series following his investigation, which didn't come to much.

The Ashtray is a pretty severe attack on Kuhn's 50 year old book.
fair to say

User avatar
ThomasHobbes
Posts: 673
Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm

Re: Thomas Kuhn vs Errol Morris

Post by ThomasHobbes » August 8th, 2018, 6:00 pm

What's Morris' point here.
Kuhn still makes perfect sense to me, and should act as a warning to all who take the science too religiously.

User avatar
ThomasHobbes
Posts: 673
Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm

Re: Thomas Kuhn vs Errol Morris

Post by ThomasHobbes » August 8th, 2018, 6:04 pm

PS. having read a couple of reviews.

It appears that Morris is an intellectual light-weight using polemic exaggeration to build a strawman argument to attack his old teacher.

User avatar
3uGH7D4MLj
Posts: 920
Joined: January 4th, 2013, 3:39 pm

Re: Thomas Kuhn vs Errol Morris

Post by 3uGH7D4MLj » August 10th, 2018, 10:32 am

ThomasHobbes wrote:
August 8th, 2018, 6:00 pm
What's Morris' point here.
Kuhn still makes perfect sense to me, and should act as a warning to all who take the science too religiously.
My reading of the SSR is that it is a pretty good analysis of how science stumbles along. It's not the only analysis maybe, but a pretty good clarification of dynamics. Fifty years along, we are now used to think in terms of paradigms, or assumption bundles, in every field of endeavor. The dynamics and vocabulary that Kuhn introduced are now part of everyone's paradigm whether they know it or not. Back then, it could have been harder to accept. Why? Incommensurability! :)

It's easy to see the SSR as being a bit hyperbolic, are scientific advances really "revolutions"? Are scientists still devoted to an old paradigm really in a different world from those working with a new one? Out of touch? Are the different points of view really incommensurable? So I can understand criticism of the book. But Morris' attack is shallow and petty. And he uses the (dubious) ashtray story as an angle.

Most obvious problem is Morris faulting Kuhn for promotion of (horrors) "relative truth". I really didn't come across any discussion of relative truth in the SSR. There's your strawman.

Say more about "should act as a warning to all who take the science too religiously."
fair to say

User avatar
ThomasHobbes
Posts: 673
Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm

Re: Thomas Kuhn vs Errol Morris

Post by ThomasHobbes » August 10th, 2018, 10:56 am

3uGH7D4MLj wrote:
August 10th, 2018, 10:32 am
.

Say more about "should act as a warning to all who take the science too religiously."
Surely the whole point of SSR?
The paradigm serves the vested interests of those born into it; have staked their careers on it and tend to resist new and better ideas.
The old professor with tenure at the University is the ball and chain of progress, like the Catholic priest wishing to burn the heretics.

Eduk
Posts: 1632
Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
Favorite Philosopher: Socrates

Re: Thomas Kuhn vs Errol Morris

Post by Eduk » August 13th, 2018, 3:07 pm

I would argue that the ball and chain of progress is only very very slightly anything to do with tenured professors ( indeed I'm sure they are of net benefit). Rather the ball and chain of progress is complete science illiteracy coupled with supreme overconfidence.

User avatar
ThomasHobbes
Posts: 673
Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm

Re: Thomas Kuhn vs Errol Morris

Post by ThomasHobbes » August 13th, 2018, 3:54 pm

Eduk wrote:
August 13th, 2018, 3:07 pm
I would argue that the ball and chain of progress is only very very slightly anything to do with tenured professors ( indeed I'm sure they are of net benefit). Rather the ball and chain of progress is complete science illiteracy coupled with supreme overconfidence.
The point is that Kuhn was talking about the academic process of science.
Hence I talked about vested interests

Eduk
Posts: 1632
Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
Favorite Philosopher: Socrates

Re: Thomas Kuhn vs Errol Morris

Post by Eduk » August 13th, 2018, 4:00 pm

I may be wrong as I've only really skim read Kuhn but he seems to be suggesting that every advancement of science is a paradigm shift which invalidates everything that went before it? I'm not sure what conclusion he drew from this though?

Post Reply