Welcome to the Philosophy Forums! If you already are a member, please log in. If you are not a member, please join the forums now. It's completely free, and all viewpoints are welcome.
| View previous topic :: View next topic :: |
Alun

Joined: 11 Jul 2009 Posts: 1015
|
Post: #16 Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nick_A wrote: |
The only time the objection to prostitution has merit for a society IMO is when the society values freedom. The nuclear family is the basis of a free society. Without it, obligations become assumed by the state rather then agreed upon within a family structure.
The nuclear family when balanced harmonizes the yin yang influences in the context of higher spiritual influences making for a healthier collective psych within the family which further sustains the inner quality necessary to sustain a free society. |
A free society must be forced to have a nuclear family? When you say "free," are you talking about a society where people are not oppressed, or about a society in which people do things you think they ought to do?
| Nick_A wrote: |
| Young girls are enticed into it for money and fame as they sacrifice their inner quality so consequently the societal inner quality. |
What inner quality?
I suspect what you want is to make society have your moral system. This is not what freedom is, nor is freedom desirable only if people act based upon a particular moral system. It is not the government's job to make us good people.
| Juice wrote: |
| Can we at least try to pretend that we expect more from women than them just being the object of sex and poor self image. |
I don't want my children to be telemarketers, those costumed advertisers on street corners, or even corporate lawyers. Should I mandate all of these occupations be criminalized?
You ought to make your children good people by teaching them to choose of their own volition to be good, not by making society punish them for personal choices. _________________ "I have nothing new to teach the world" -Mohandas "Mahatma" Gandhi |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
whitetrshsoldier Contributor

Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Posts: 1676 Location: San Diego, CA
|
Post: #17 Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Alun,
I think we're seeing eye to eye on this one
See, compromise is possible from any side of the aisle, folks!  _________________ "I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings! I'm obviously just insecure with the ineptitudes of my logic and rational faculties. Forgive me - I'm a "lost soul", blinded by my "ignorant belief" that there's such a thing as reality and truth in the world" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Juice

Joined: 08 May 2009 Posts: 1966
|
Post: #18 Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Come on now guys let's at least try to be a little objectively intellectual here! I'm sure we can agree that being a prostitute is far removed from being a telemarketer. I wanted my daughter to be president instead I got a smartass who seemingly plans on making school a career. I think what some may be avoiding is answering the question of whether they would encourage or support their wives, daughters and maybe even their mothers deciding to undertake a career in prostitution or maybe even doing so "just to get by".
Let's also not pretend that there is no morality or expected morality in society.
In a just and free society there must be a recognition of some semblance of order and morality. Just ask the question of how far one is willing to go in order to allow for unrestrained individual freedom. Wouldn't prostitutes be then allowed to set up shop right next to you, at your house, your place of work, across the street of a school? Please don't tell me that you would confine them to dark alleys, warehouse districts and DC? Wouldn't doing so be in violation or their rights?
What about my right to seeing to it that the individual has the best opportunities to live a life with dignity.
And yes Alun I would want my children punished for making the wrong choices (criminal).
Pretending that there is some disproportionate level of value expectations can not negate the fact that the majority of people see morality very similarly. It may sound good as a philosophical exercise to mentally construct a world were everyone is free to act as they please without consequence or hurting others but the truth is that this society, man, is self governed by an idea of morality. No not my morality but a general concept of right and wrong.
Let me ask you were does one go to when they want to become sex objects? Can they go to WTS or Alun. Will you be the one to encourage entry into that world? I see that you guys glossed over the reference to the world sex slave industry. Do you know how much a blond haired blue eyed girl is worth in Saudi or Hong Kong? While it may be a persons choice to place themselves in bondage what does it say about society or the person who allows and supports it? _________________ When everyone looks to better their own future then the future will be better for everyone.
An explanation of cause is not a justification by reason.
C. S. Lewis
Fight the illusion!
Last edited by Juice on Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:33 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nick_A
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1461
|
Post: #19 Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Scott
| Quote: |
| Nick_A, it seems to me you are contradicting yourself. How can you on one hand say you support a "free society" and then on the other hand say you want big government regulating the personal, consensual choices of competent adults? How can you oppose the free market so clearly and say you are doing it because you want to keep the free society. That I don't understand. |
Preamble to the Constitution
| Quote: |
| We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense,[1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. |
What does the general welfare mean to you? Does it mean providing a welfare state or an environment that is conducive for a person becoming themselves?
The general welfare to me means sustaining an environment that includes promoting the psychological qualities necessary for a society to sustain freedom.
I showed in the thread "Obligations vs. Rights" why it is essential for a free society to have a healthy regard for obligations in order to sustain rights. In order to promote the acceptance of rights it is essential to make certain sacrifices. One of these sacrifices is sexual expression.
Because it is such a volatile energy and an essential part of our being, the means for avoiding its degradation into negative expression must be accepted. One such means is celebrating the nuclear family and minimizing the negative appeal of the hooker.
Promoting the general welfare means promoting what sustains the environment within which freedom can prosper.
Freedom is a double edged coin. We talk about our rights but not our obligations. From the point of view of valuing a free society and the sacrifices necessary to sustain it, there is no reason to celebrate prostitution.
| Quote: |
| But what I do understand of you argument, Nick_A, is the claim that legalization of prostitution is tantamount to promotion of prostitution. I disagree with this claim. Firstly, as I clearly argued in my other posts in this thread and in the blog post, prohibition of prostitution does not stop prostitution form occurring; prohibition makes prostitution more dangerous and disables us from regulating it. You wouldn't say that having a more dangerous STD-ridden black market filled with many unwilling sex slaves of all ages is more conducive to a 'free society' than a regulated, legal market of consenting adults; would you? Legalization of prostitution doesn't promote prostitution but rather enables us to regulate it and discourages sex slavery, underage prostitution and STD-filled prostitution. To stress this point further, it may currently be legal for one to shove a battery up his own butt and eat lit candles, but I would not say the legalization of those ridiculous activities is tantamount to promotion of them, nor would I say that criminalization of them promotes a free society. |
Prostitution cannot be stopped as long as we have something capable of being prostituted. It is human nature. The question is if we celebrate it by legalizing it.
The question is how to minimize it and the psychological as well as physiological consequences.
Only a small part of prostition would occur in a govt. run whore house with pictures of politicians looking down at you saying "wear your condom." But the attractive neon signs will just promote it on the outside free of taxes and governmental interference. All legalizing it will do is to make it more attractive and invite more prostitution out of the Govt. approved brothels. the result will be more STDs
The only way to minimize prostitution is to help people remember the value of obligations by remembering that they are prostituting something of importance. They are selling themselves cheaply in an STD infested whore house.
But since we've lost the religious awakening influence, I don't think it is possible other than for a minority. Society would rather suck them out for the dollars they can produce.
When you legalize prostitution you are not directly promoting it but rather putting it on the same level as other institutions. I'm in a minority but I'd prefer a brothel not being considered on the same level as a hospital even though the trend is to consider them equal in their legality. _________________ Man would like to be an egoist and cannot. This is the most striking characteristic of his wretchedness and the source of his greatness." Simone Weil....Gravity and Grace |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Homicidal Pacifist

Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 546 Location: Your mom's house. Ha.
|
Post: #20 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:33 am Post subject: . |
|
|
|
"Selling is legal.
F*cking is legal.
...
Why isn't selling f*cking legal?"
- (The Late) George Carlin
Freedom, freedom, freedom.
If you want to live self-destructively as an alcoholic, for example, I will recommend other lifestyles but I will not imprison you unless you actually violate someone else's rights or freedoms.
Regardless of consequences like the spreading of disease (which many people obviously are willing to risk by sleeping with whores and your daughter - don't get pissed, I said that only because something like 1 out of 4 highschool students has herpes), etc., LET FREEDOM REIGN.
I believe it is prejudice, disrepectful, and a waste of time and money to persecute people for engaging in prostitution. But I don't think it's the best way to live. But I could be wrong or it could be relative.
Just because I don't agree with or respect the action itself does not mean that I should or have the right to illegalize that action which ought to be an inherent part of civil and human rights.
The only reason that prostitution is illegal is because there is a struggle between the "morality" of the country and the ability to tax prostitution. The government realizes that they can't tax many of the transactions (and that Christian America will come down on them if they do) and so prostitution will always be under-the-table. You don't pay income tax when you're a whore and if it legal and more widespread, the government would not make as much money through income taxes because less people would be working and more people would be whoring.
Stop calling this a free country. _________________ "If Ignorance Is Bliss, Then Knock The Smile Off My Face!"
- Rage Against The Machine |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
whitetrshsoldier Contributor

Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Posts: 1676 Location: San Diego, CA
|
Post: #21 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nick_A wrote: |
Preamble to the Constitution
| Quote: |
| We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense,[1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. |
What does the general welfare mean to you? Does it mean providing a welfare state or an environment that is conducive for a person becoming themselves?
The general welfare to me means sustaining an environment that includes promoting the psychological qualities necessary for a society to sustain freedom. |
Don't try and pull this crap, Nick.
Here's what "welfare" really means:
| Dictionary Historical Origin wrote: |
welfare
O.E. wel faran, from wel (see well (adv.)) + faran "get along" (see fare (v.)). Cf. O.N. velferš., is first attested 1904. Welfare state is recorded from 1941. |
"To get along", "well". "Promoting the common welfare" was an extension of 'securing the Blessings of Liberty' by providing a common defense for people so that they may experience freedom to live as they wish. This includes doing with their bodies what they wish.
Of course we all know that every man "pays" for sex in one way or another, so may I ask what the difference is if a women skips driving me to a restuarant and buying my meal and instead just gives me the money up front so I can dine in peace? I'm not sure why you don't understand this, but as Thomas Jefferson once said, "It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg" if this occurs. This is the definition of a 'permissible' act in a free society.
| Nick_A wrote: |
| Because it is such a volatile energy and an essential part of our being, the means for avoiding its degradation into negative expression must be accepted. One such means is celebrating the nuclear family and minimizing the negative appeal of the hooker. |
A volatile energy? What if I said I disapproved of religion and god [I do] and found both detrimental to society? Would you consider that a "volatile energy"? And so, wouldn't you wish it illegal in your 'free' society? Do you now desire to 'minimize my negative appeal' and push me and my free thought and expression underground?
| Nick_A wrote: |
| Promoting the general welfare means promoting what sustains the environment within which freedom can prosper. |
Exactly. Like rendering religious fascists/zealots who wish to impart their religion/morality on other individuals impotent at doing so, so that "free men" aren't forced to comply with their dictates. _________________ "I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings! I'm obviously just insecure with the ineptitudes of my logic and rational faculties. Forgive me - I'm a "lost soul", blinded by my "ignorant belief" that there's such a thing as reality and truth in the world" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pjkeeley

Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 647
|
Post: #22 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Juice wrote: |
| I think what some may be avoiding is answering the question of whether they would encourage or support their wives, daughters and maybe even their mothers deciding to undertake a career in prostitution or maybe even doing so "just to get by". |
But I think this is sidetracking. We are talking about whether or not prostitution should be legal, not whether we approve of it or want it for others. I think that you see the two as the same when in fact to many people they are seperate questions (think whether abortion should be legal as opposed to whether or not you personally would have an abortion). A free society can allow something; it doesn't mean you personally have to encourage it.
As such, if someone I care about wanted or needed to prostitute themselves, my disapproval would be entirely separate from my feelings about whether or not prostitution should be legal. It seems like you are saying that if we accept that it should be legal, we have to approve of our wives/girlfriends/sisters/mothers wanting to be prostitutes. But it is not inconsistent in my worldview to want a thing to be legal and still disapprove of it for myself or others. That to me is the distinction between public policy questions and personal moral questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Homicidal Pacifist

Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 546 Location: Your mom's house. Ha.
|
Post: #23 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:33 am Post subject: . |
|
|
|
whitetrshsoldier said, "Of course we all know that every man "pays" for sex in one way or another, so may I ask what the difference is if a women skips driving me to a restuarant and buying my meal and instead just gives me the money up front so I can dine in peace? I'm not sure why you don't understand this, but as Thomas Jefferson once said, "It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg" if this occurs. This is the definition of a 'permissible' act in a free society.
... What if I said I disapproved of religion and god [I do] and found both detrimental to society? Would you consider that a "volatile energy"? And so, wouldn't you wish it illegal in your 'free' society? Do you now desire to 'minimize my negative appeal' and push me and my free thought and expression underground?"
----
That was awesome. That bit about paying for sex by dating was hilarious.
Though I feel I've seen you in action before regarding the issue of doing some bad (freedom destroying) acts for the sake of the general welfare (in your support of war for freedom which, through collateral damage, actually crushes some freedoms while expanding other freedoms). Maybe it applies in some areas and not others.
Anyway, don't bow to the selfish masses if they demand that you sacrifice your rights. Aid them as much as possible without allowing or supporting blatant injustices. _________________ "If Ignorance Is Bliss, Then Knock The Smile Off My Face!"
- Rage Against The Machine |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Juice

Joined: 08 May 2009 Posts: 1966
|
Post: #24 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
You are right PJ, consider my point an attempt to put some "emotion" into the question. The question is one of social acceptance. Once prostitution becomes legal then it sends the message that it has become socially acceptable, and therefore negates the necessity for familiar discourse. Granted we can then argue what is socially acceptable but adultery is not socially acceptable and does have consequences unless people create a mutually exclusive contract whether verbal or religious, spiritual or otherwise. So choice exists in any relationship depending on the needs of parties.
But, let's try not to fool ourselves that prostitution is some sort of intellectually fulfilling lifestyle or that it satisfies some overarching feminist liberation, or rebellious anarchism against religious doctrine or societal restrictions.
The activity is exploitive and foments other criminal enterprises such as pedophilia and drug trafficking. Ninety percent of prostitutes are drug addicts.
As I stated; as men we need to be the protectors of woman and children this includes protections against some peoples inclination to place themselves in situations which may cause them harm. While we can consider sex to be benign prostitution lends itself to increasingly self deprecating and harmful activities. Considering the alternatives, legalization, in order to be protective and effective, will be so regulated as to make the effort unworthy. _________________ When everyone looks to better their own future then the future will be better for everyone.
An explanation of cause is not a justification by reason.
C. S. Lewis
Fight the illusion! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scott Site Admin

Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Posts: 1710
|
Post: #25 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Nick_A, I'm not celebrating prostitution. I am not proposing we celebrate prostitution. I think you are incorrect when you conflate legalization with celebration. For instance, I would definitely support replacing the expensive, ineffective war on prostitution with a less expensive public health campaign similar to what is done with cigarettes and alcohol.
| Scott in post 13 wrote: |
| prohibition of prostitution does not stop prostitution form occurring; prohibition makes prostitution more dangerous and disables us from regulating it. You wouldn't say that having a more dangerous STD-ridden black market filled with many unwilling sex slaves of all ages is more conducive to a 'free society' than a regulated, legal market of consenting adults; would you? Legalization of prostitution doesn't promote prostitution but rather enables us to regulate it and discourages sex slavery, underage prostitution and STD-filled prostitution. |
| Nick_A in post 19 wrote: |
| All legalizing it will do is to make it more attractive and invite more prostitution out of the Govt. approved brothels. the result will be more STDs |
The result of prohibition is more STDs, and more violence, slavery and underage sex.
As for this claim that legalization will make it more attractive, I do not think so. Legalization of overage, consensual, STD-less prostitution from legitimate businesses will make the other types of prostitution less appealing in comparison. Like with the historical prohibition of alcohol, I think prohibition doesn't significantly stop people from engaging in the activity. I think a public health campaign like what is done with cigarettes is more effective and more conducive to a free society than prohibition. Indeed, since prohibition so drastically increases the harmful effects of prostitution and its impact on society, it is the equivalent of drastically increasing the amount of prostitution.
In regards to your continued claims that legalization is celebration, what is your response to my previous example in post #13: "it may currently be legal for one to shove a battery up his own butt and eat lit candles, but I would not say the legalization of those ridiculous activities is tantamount to promotion of them, nor would I say that criminalization of them promotes a free society."
| Nick_A wrote: |
| What does the general welfare mean to you? Does it mean providing a welfare state or an environment that is conducive for a person becoming themselves? |
Any single country's constitution aside, I will repeat the common slogan that I think liberty is the mother, not the daughter, of order and prosperity. (As you point out, liberty entails as many obligations as it does rights. For instance, the universal obligation not to murder or rape is included in the universal freedom not to be murdered or raped.)
| Juice wrote: |
| Once prostitution becomes legal then it sends the message that it has become socially acceptable, and therefore negates the necessity for familiar discourse. |
| Nick_A wrote: |
| When you legalize prostitution you are not directly promoting it but rather putting it on the same level as other institutions. I'm in a minority but I'd prefer a brothel not being considered on the same level as a hospital even though the trend is to consider them equal in their legality. |
No, legalization of something is not celebrating it and is "not putting it on the same level" as other institutions. Regardless of their legal status, a package store is not on the same level as a hospital, a lottery ticket salesmen is not on the same level as a charity, an employer who pays his employees minimum wage and treats them meanly is not on the same level as a kindhearted small businessman who pays his employees well and goes the extra mile with his customers not because he has to but because he cares about the community.
We don't need a big government to interfere in the consensual interactions between competent adults to tell us what is on the same level or to tell us what to celebrate. There are many things I wouldn't do, many things I discourage rather than celebrate, many things that if my hypothetical child did could make me cry, but that I want to be legal at least on the nationwide and statewide level. (If a particular small town wants to make up a very local ordinance that prohibits prostitution or smoking, or that creates a high minimum wage or so forth, go for it.)
| Juice wrote: |
| The activity is exploitive and foments other criminal enterprises such as pedophilia and drug trafficking. Ninety percent of prostitutes are drug addicts. |
I think I agree with that. Indeed, I have been arguing against prohibition because prohibition increases the amount of destructive or criminal activity (besides prostitution itself) that prostitutes and their clients engage in by pushing this huge industry underground and handing it over to violent career criminals. Prohibition increases STDs, drug addiction, violence, sex slavery, statutory rape and generic criminal activity among those who are involved in prostitution.
There are many activities which could be called exploitative, mean, unhelpful or self-destructive. In addition to prostitution, this includes cigarettes, marijuana, alcohol, sweat shops, unprotected sex with strangers, gambling, not giving employees health benefits, risky wall street investing, overeating, etc. Generally, I think criminalizing them only makes matters worse by creating new problems and exacerbating others. In contrast, I believe freedom tends to lead to prosperity through self-responsibility, lack of violence, lack of government spending, and the tendency of voluntary interactions to be more mutually beneficial than involuntary ones. _________________ Online Philosophy Club - Please tell me how to improve this website! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Juice

Joined: 08 May 2009 Posts: 1966
|
Post: #26 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Let's make it clear that it is the "activity" of prostitution itself that promotes destructive and criminal activity regardless of its legality. Prostitution is a self perpetuating social inequity. Make no mistake that while some may want to maintain the fantasy of the "happy hooker" to legitimize the false premise that prostitution is somehow a viable social enterprise with "growth" marketability that will somehow improve the character of society in some way, it is exactly this mindset that sets itself towards the destructive intents of progressivism.
Prostitution may be an uncontrollable aspect of society and tauted as the "worlds oldest profession" but so is slavery. It would seem that the two go hand in hand. We can see the underpinnings of the progressive mindset and its rationalizations and its means to an end by neo-feminism manipulations disguised as freedom. When will people wake up and realize that they are being played by fools? _________________ When everyone looks to better their own future then the future will be better for everyone.
An explanation of cause is not a justification by reason.
C. S. Lewis
Fight the illusion! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
whitetrshsoldier Contributor

Joined: 11 Mar 2009 Posts: 1676 Location: San Diego, CA
|
Post: #27 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Juice wrote: |
Let's make it clear that it is the "activity" of prostitution itself that promotes destructive and criminal activity regardless of its legality. Prostitution is a self perpetuating social inequity. Make no mistake that while some may want to maintain the fantasy of the "happy hooker" to legitimize the false premise that prostitution is somehow a viable social enterprise with "growth" marketability that will somehow improve the character of society in some way, it is exactly this mindset that sets itself towards the destructive intents of progressivism.
Prostitution may be an uncontrollable aspect of society and tauted as the "worlds oldest profession" but so is slavery. It would seem that the two go hand in hand. We can see the underpinnings of the progressive mindset and its rationalizations and its means to an end by neo-feminism manipulations disguised as freedom. When will people wake up and realize that they are being played by fools? |
Kind of like how the "activity" of drinking alcohol created the violent underground of the prohibition era, Juice?
Then why don't we have gangsters like Al Capone anymore? Where did they all go? OH, THAT'S RIGHT! They're all now in the drug business, because they follow the laws. Remember, they can't make money legally - there's no profit in that for criminals ...
Here's the point. Once alcohol was re-legalized [the end of prohibition], people began to STOP DYING FROM POISINOUS ALCOHOL. Why? Because they realized that moonshine filtered through a car radiator wasn't quite as safe as good, clean, distilled name-brand liquor. So they went ahead and paid a couple cents for the guarantee that they wouldn't die from a bad batch.
So, looking at this historical example of what happens when you de-criminalize something, why do you still choose to ignore the facts?
*** And by the way, "progressivism" is a term that defines people who wish that the government would assist the people in "progressing" towards a safer society. How? Well, by determining what is 'good' for society and what isn't, of course! A "progressive" is a person who supports governmental regulation of 'immoral' or 'unethical' behaviors, Juice. You, sir, are the progressive on this issue. _________________ "I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings! I'm obviously just insecure with the ineptitudes of my logic and rational faculties. Forgive me - I'm a "lost soul", blinded by my "ignorant belief" that there's such a thing as reality and truth in the world" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scott Site Admin

Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Posts: 1710
|
Post: #28 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Juice wrote: |
| Let's make it clear that it is the "activity" of prostitution itself that promotes destructive and criminal activity regardless of its legality. |
Even if that is true, criminalizing prostitution or any other activity causes the activity to lead even more to destructive and criminal activity. I think more problems are caused by the criminalization of prostitution than by prostitution itself. And since criminalization isn't an effective way of stopping prostitution, when it's criminalized we have to deal with the alleged regular drawbacks of prostitution and the new problems and exacerbated problems caused by criminalization, i.e. the drastic increase in prostitutes with STDs, sex slavery, underage prostitution, violence, other crimes, government spending, police corruption, and funding for criminal organizations.
One can allege that consensual, above age, STD-less prostitution engaged in by law-abiding citizens or any other activity consensually engaged in by competent adults "promotes destructive and criminal behavior." Maybe eating ice cream promotes destructive and criminal behavior. Maybe playing video games does. But this fancy language does not put these behaviors in the same category as offensive violence, victimization or other involuntary interactions between people, such as rape, battery or murder. So how does it warrant infringing on the freedom of competent adults to engage in voluntary interactions and exchanges? Why criminalize these non-violent, consensual interactions if criminalizing them will not stop people from engaging in the activity but worsens the drawbacks of engaging in the activity and causes many more problems such as the drastically increased government spending and actual violent victimization? I want to understand the underlying general principle you want used to decide which activities the government involves itself and prohibits, i.e. what types of statism you support. If it turns out playing violent video games 'promotes destructive and criminal activity,' would you support criminalizing that? If it turns out paying employees anything less than $20 an hour 'promotes destructive and criminal activity,' would you support criminalizing that? If not, then what qualities does any given activity have to possess for you to support criminalizing it and waging an expensive government-run war on it?
Would you really rather have a dangerous, violent STD-ridden black market filled with many unwilling sex slaves of all ages rather than a regulated, taxed market of consenting, STD-free adults?
I commend you for your comments on respecting and protecting women. Perhaps the main reason to demand the legalization of prostitution is out of respect for the many women who suffer the consequences of prohibition such as the unwilling women who are literally slaves of violent thugs who have been given this huge industry. Criminalization of prostitution is a policy that was created by elite men and is a policy that causes dire harm to many but most of all to the women the elitists claim to protect. _________________ Online Philosophy Club - Please tell me how to improve this website! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Juice

Joined: 08 May 2009 Posts: 1966
|
Post: #29 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Come on WTS, I can see the need to defend Libertarian ideologies but to call me a "Progressive" You've got to admit that advocating for the legalization of prostitution or drugs is clearly a Progressive undertaking rather than a Conservative perspective.
Once again we seem to be deliberately overlooking many of the key points expressed. But, first let's try to make sense of the proposition, particularly in light of the fact that it seems that only "men" are taking part in this discussion and considering that woman made much better bras once it was noted that the "man" made designs tended to fulfill the confused fantasies of men.
I also consider it intellectually dishonest to make the type of comparisons made particularly since the argument can be made that anything can be abused whether it is alcohol, drugs, sex, children, spouses, the elderly, work or leisure. The argument lends weight to my contention that despite any legalization further criminalization will be a byproduct of the activity subject to any manner of abuse, including slavery. People don't enter into criminal activity or attach themselves to legal activities in a criminal manner because they are want to do so for honest gain. It's just an easy way around making money.
As far as alcohol is concerned I know many people who make their own liqueur, wine and beer. I don't think there is a community in Canada that doesn't have their own private beer label. Same goes for France and wine.
What I find remarkable about this discussion is the level of pluralism and cultural relativism displayed. If one would ask the question of what better serves society and to what level of magnanimity should man aim then to what end does promoting sexual ineptness allow? What is supposed to be easy?
While I feel sympathy for the sexually inept or repressed individual I will continue my practice of looking at those individuals unable to use intelligence and physical superiority to achieve sexual aims as pathetically socially and biologically inferior. Sure we can legalize prostitution as long as I can make fun of those who need that service. _________________ When everyone looks to better their own future then the future will be better for everyone.
An explanation of cause is not a justification by reason.
C. S. Lewis
Fight the illusion! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JPhillips
Joined: 22 Oct 2009 Posts: 207
|
Post: #30 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:32 pm Post subject: Prostitution |
|
|
|
Isn't this a moral issue in which we have decided something is wrong and should be illegal based entirely on our personal beliefs?
Legal prostitution in Germany has been correlated with fewer sex crimes and STD's. Maybe you can argue that there are other, as yet unknown reasons for these things, but you can't argue that it leads to an increase in sex crimes and STD's.
I don't condone the business of prostitution on moral grounds. Then again, I can probably list a lot of things that I can object to on moral grounds which are entirely legal. Such as a CEO making millions while an employee at the bottom of the organizational ladder is working for minimum wages and receiving government assistance which are paid for by tax dollars. You may ask how I can compare this to prostitution. I say to me greed is just as immoral as lust. That is how I can compare the two.
I also have to acknowledge that making prostitution legal would give both the prostitutes and their clients some protection against, STD's, violence in the trade, and the sex slave industry. It may even, to a small degree, reduce the number of rapes committed in this country.
I don't see the legalization of prostitution as a good thing. I would view it as an attempt to make it less bad or at least to have some say as to how the business is conducted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|