its obvious that you are not just unable to understand basic concepts, you also don't want to understand.Atla wrote: ↑February 22nd, 2021, 6:00 pmI don't know what you're smoking but I never doubted that the cosmos can be understood as a theorethical take on a well-ordered universe, as a secondary meaning. I've been saying from the start that you're the one talking about a third something.NickGaspar wrote: ↑February 22nd, 2021, 5:30 pmFirrst try to understand the differences between "contradiction" and "additional usages of a word".Atla wrote: ↑February 22nd, 2021, 4:48 pmYou continue contradicting yourself. If cosmos = universe then you can't say that "No space No time" is a specific claim about our universe. How do you know that the claim is correct?NickGaspar wrote: ↑February 22nd, 2021, 4:27 pm
lol no, that all you there!
The Big Bang theory describes a change of state(commence of a process that can be quantified through spatial and temporal units) part of the same realm known by two different labels (Universe or Cosmos).
Our theories about the Cosmo include hypotheses about possible different states of the cosmos, informed by the current observable state of the cosmos.
My 8yp nephew did not need more than 10 minutes to get this mate!.....Ok, his ego was not threatened by this simple definition so he didn't waste time thinking how to strawman me. Your argumentation makes me wonder...how are you Alta?
Secondly that is not a claim that I entertain. Why are you making things up??
Why don't you accept the fact that the word Cosmos has this additional use and move on to what you really want to talk about. Is it about Jesus?
Again, why is "No space No time" a specific claim about the universe? This is what you based your lecture on about how people should use the word "nothing".
Yet "No space No time" is not part of our observations, it's a possible hypothesis. Another possible hypothesis is that there were space and time in our universe before the BB. Another possible hypothesis is that there was absolutely nothing 'before' the BB. etc.
This should be 'cosmos' no? But you say it's specifically about universe but not cosmos. It doesn't even make any sense. You'd need to have a literally bigger cosmos for this.
I am bored.......