That's inadequate, and it's also biased against Muslims. I'd prefer something universal and robust which can be applied by all countries to protect them against infiltration by all haters:-ThomasHobbes wrote: ↑August 15th, 2018, 9:11 am You can imagine the questionnaire:
Q: Are you or any of your family hell bent on world domination?
yes/no.
Q: Are you committed to the overthrown of Western freedom?
yes/no
Q; Do you think Mohammed exhorts all Muslims to slay infidels where ever they are?
yes/no
If you answered yes to any of the above questions, you may be refused entry in to the USA.
Q1: Are you in possession of any hate materials? [Entry immediately refused if so.]
Q2: Do you condemn all the hate speech in the manifestos and holy texts of ideologies/religions which has been banned in this country? [Entry immediately refused if not.]
Q3: Do you understand that if you are subsequently found to possess or propagate any such banned hate you will permanently lose your right to vote and stand for political office, you may lose the freedom to travel unsupervised outside of your home and to associate with other people who have committed the same offence, and that you may also be deported?
A similar questionnaire would be needed for existing residents of the country after the hate has been outlawed:-
Q1: Are you in possession of any hate materials? [If so, you permanently lose your right to vote and stand for political office, you may lose the freedom to travel unsupervised outside of your home and to associate with other people who have committed the same offence, and you may also be deported if your place of origin is abroad.]
Q2: Do you condemn all the hate speech in the manifestos/holy texts of the ideologies/religions which has been banned in this country? [If not, you permanently lose your right to vote and stand for political office, you may lose the freedom to travel unsupervised outside of your home and to associate with other people who have committed the same offence, and you may also be deported if your place of origin is abroad.]
Q3: Do you understand that if you possess or propagate any such banned hate you will permanently lose your right to vote and stand for political office, you may lose the freedom to travel unsupervised outside of your home and to associate with other people who have committed the same offence, and you may also be deported if your place of origin is abroad?
That is how this hate should be stamped out and the world gradually made safe, one country at a time. New, safe versions of all holy texts and manifestos would be made available and there would be no problem with possessing and propagating them. The versions with hate could still be accessed by academics under licence at secure locations if they have been evaluated as sufficiently rational, peaceful individuals, although they would have to accept that they may be kept under close surveillance for the rest of their lives if there is any cause for suspicion about their motives or susceptibility. Other curious people could potentially be allowed to see examples of holy and ideological hate in a form that makes it impossible to tell which religion or ideology it comes from to help them decide whether they want to become the kind of person who wastes their life studying it academically, but again they would have to accept that they may be kept under close surveillance for the rest of their lives if there is any cause for suspicion about their motives or susceptibility. Different categories of hate would also be treated differently in terms of ease of access, higher protection measures being put in place for the more dangerous kinds (such as direct commands to kill), but any text that sets any kind of precedent for killing people who don't deserve to be killed will still be classed as banned hate (meaning that access to it is tightly controlled) - this will include a lot of the stuff that Dachshund is defending. The masses will be allowed to read modified versions where all such precedents are removed through careful rewording to make it clear that God does not call for or allow any abuses to be carried out in any circumstances.