Happy New Year! The January Philosophy Book of the Month is The Runaway Species. Discuss it now.

The February Philosophy Book of the Month is The Fourth Age by Byron Reese (Nominated by RJG.)

Free will does not exist (Beware)

Use this philosophy forum to discuss and debate general philosophy topics that don't fit into one of the other categories.

This forum is NOT for factual, informational or scientific questions about philosophy (e.g. "What year was Socrates born?"); such homework-help-style questions can be asked and answered on PhiloPedia: The Philosophy Wiki. If your question is not already answered on the appropriate PhiloPedia page, then see How to Request Content on PhiloPedia to see how to ask your informational question using the wiki.
Post Reply
User avatar
Amjadiqbal
New Trial Member
Posts: 8
Joined: December 21st, 2013, 1:26 am

Closing the topic "Free Will"

Post by Amjadiqbal » December 1st, 2018, 4:48 am

Let me close the topic.
When brain works and you begin thinking(about whatsoever) this is your will and when you start thinking that all your thoughts are independent of every ground this is called free will/stupidity.
There is not a single universal constant in the universe whose value remains constant through mediums/no-medium.Hence a foot ahead of will,man developed the word free will but they ignored the bound will.Its the bound will which we kept ignoring and this is all that every mind started believing a fake thing called free will.Every free will is bounded to time/entity/medium/personal thought for a few period in which it seems free but in living world it doesn't take a minute to prove it fake in another frame.

User avatar
Burning ghost
Posts: 2901
Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am

Re: Free will does not exist (Beware)

Post by Burning ghost » December 2nd, 2018, 3:27 am

When people talk of free will they so actually mean will within bounded limits. If you thought otherwise then you’re “stupid.”

All “freedom” is necessarily bound by the unknown dictates of reality - maybe there are set “rules” and maybe not. All we can do is see the world as a structure existing for us because we’re able to appreciate certain patterns that are measureable (to varying degrees) by our constitution.

The idea that thoughts are “independent of every ground” is an extreme idealism (a position only the dogmatic take up.)
AKA badgerjelly

Post Reply