The March Philosophy Book of the Month is Final Notice by Van Fleisher. Discuss Final Notice now.

The April Philosophy Book of the Month is The Unbound Soul by Richard L. Haight

Regarding Philosophy

Use this philosophy forum to discuss and debate general philosophy topics that don't fit into one of the other categories.

This forum is NOT for factual, informational or scientific questions about philosophy (e.g. "What year was Socrates born?"); such homework-help-style questions can be asked and answered on PhiloPedia: The Philosophy Wiki. If your question is not already answered on the appropriate PhiloPedia page, then see How to Request Content on PhiloPedia to see how to ask your informational question using the wiki.
Post Reply
User avatar
Amjadiqbal
New Trial Member
Posts: 8
Joined: December 21st, 2013, 1:26 am

Regarding Philosophy

Post by Amjadiqbal » November 25th, 2018, 3:38 am

Philosophy is simply misinterpretation of billions of brains according to their own perception regarding any one point agenda while major problem in analyzing anything philosophically is that one is already affected by shadows of experience,time and sorroundings hence in my view any postulate formed in such air is Extremely Biased.
Historians and Man miles made millions of postulates about soul,conscience,theism and on and on but is there any universal truth believed among those?Big No

In my childhood at age 5 i knew few examples here

Oxygen - part of life on any continent,location etc

Colour of milk - white from wherever you see

Water and Fire reaction - Water dominates whatsoever its temperature might be.


People have debated on conscience,soul,life,subconcious so long in debates,books and history that all these seem highly useless in this gadgets era.Where the hell a happy life and happy end need soul or conscience or subconscious??NEVER

Its seems very funny to me that man(an exaggarated form of whatsoever) has to live his life span by eating,drinking and creating offsprings while he is made extraordinary supernatural in many places.He will rot and that's all the philosophy of dead and before birth he was pre-rot.

What if one becomes president of USA or get NOBEL prize and when his generation is over his name is only remained in books rather than brains because all his era brains had rot.Its only the physical profit/margin/benifit which matters in a very limited time.


Man is simply object-less & aim-less among million of glaxies and few people still have desire that one day they will convert subconscious into soul & conscious by merely debating it too much.

Everyone may be ocean of knowledge but what knowledge?What he borrowed from history/time/others?Or Self Generated?No
No one is standard and no one will be standard because whole people stand on time and time is a physical quantity so how a psychological/biological/soul formed/subconscious bullies can be derived from it?
I hope never.
Debate is fun and amazingly both sides are always wrong because Truths don't need debates to verify them or to believe them.


In next threads my personal qoutes will be on the way.
Goodluck

User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2107
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Regarding Philosophy

Post by Hereandnow » November 29th, 2018, 1:13 pm

Amjadiqbal
Debate is fun and amazingly both sides are always wrong because Truths don't need debates to verify them or to believe them.
Can you think of a single Truth that does not need a debate to verify or believe it?

User avatar
Amjadiqbal
New Trial Member
Posts: 8
Joined: December 21st, 2013, 1:26 am

Re: Regarding Philosophy

Post by Amjadiqbal » November 30th, 2018, 4:46 am

Hereandnow wrote:
November 29th, 2018, 1:13 pm
Amjadiqbal
Debate is fun and amazingly both sides are always wrong because Truths don't need debates to verify them or to believe them.
Can you think of a single Truth that does not need a debate to verify or believe it?

Debates ae not needed for results but experimental verifications valid logics are required for maintaining truths.
I suggest you to read very carefully before joining the race of writing about your perception.
Deepest Regard's

User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2107
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Regarding Philosophy

Post by Hereandnow » November 30th, 2018, 11:34 am

Amjadiqbal
Debates ae not needed for results but experimental verifications valid logics are required for maintaining truths.
I suggest you to read very carefully before joining the race of writing about your perception.
Deepest Regard's
And your basis for distinguishing between experimental verifications and valid logic, on the one hand, debate, on the other?
Please, no more premature condescension. My guess this far is that you are in over your head.

User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 3342
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Regarding Philosophy

Post by LuckyR » November 30th, 2018, 3:50 pm

Amjadiqbal wrote:
November 25th, 2018, 3:38 am
Philosophy is simply misinterpretation of billions of brains according to their own perception regarding any one point agenda while major problem in analyzing anything philosophically is that one is already affected by shadows of experience,time and sorroundings hence in my view any postulate formed in such air is Extremely Biased.
Historians and Man miles made millions of postulates about soul,conscience,theism and on and on but is there any universal truth believed among those?Big No

In my childhood at age 5 i knew few examples here

Oxygen - part of life on any continent,location etc

Colour of milk - white from wherever you see

Water and Fire reaction - Water dominates whatsoever its temperature might be.


People have debated on conscience,soul,life,subconcious so long in debates,books and history that all these seem highly useless in this gadgets era.Where the hell a happy life and happy end need soul or conscience or subconscious??NEVER

Its seems very funny to me that man(an exaggarated form of whatsoever) has to live his life span by eating,drinking and creating offsprings while he is made extraordinary supernatural in many places.He will rot and that's all the philosophy of dead and before birth he was pre-rot.

What if one becomes president of USA or get NOBEL prize and when his generation is over his name is only remained in books rather than brains because all his era brains had rot.Its only the physical profit/margin/benifit which matters in a very limited time.


Man is simply object-less & aim-less among million of glaxies and few people still have desire that one day they will convert subconscious into soul & conscious by merely debating it too much.

Everyone may be ocean of knowledge but what knowledge?What he borrowed from history/time/others?Or Self Generated?No
No one is standard and no one will be standard because whole people stand on time and time is a physical quantity so how a psychological/biological/soul formed/subconscious bullies can be derived from it?
I hope never.
Debate is fun and amazingly both sides are always wrong because Truths don't need debates to verify them or to believe them.


In next threads my personal qoutes will be on the way.
Goodluck
A unique and entertaining set of opinions.

I have no doubt that you have more material.
"As usual... it depends."

User avatar
h_k_s
Posts: 248
Joined: November 25th, 2018, 12:09 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Aristotle
Location: Rocky Mountains

Re: Regarding Philosophy

Post by h_k_s » December 4th, 2018, 12:09 am

Amjadiqbal wrote:
November 25th, 2018, 3:38 am
Philosophy is simply misinterpretation of billions of brains according to their own perception regarding any one point agenda while major problem in analyzing anything philosophically is that one is already affected by shadows of experience,time and sorroundings hence in my view any postulate formed in such air is Extremely Biased.
Historians and Man miles made millions of postulates about soul,conscience,theism and on and on but is there any universal truth believed among those?Big No

In my childhood at age 5 i knew few examples here

Oxygen - part of life on any continent,location etc

Colour of milk - white from wherever you see

Water and Fire reaction - Water dominates whatsoever its temperature might be.


People have debated on conscience,soul,life,subconcious so long in debates,books and history that all these seem highly useless in this gadgets era.Where the hell a happy life and happy end need soul or conscience or subconscious??NEVER

Its seems very funny to me that man(an exaggarated form of whatsoever) has to live his life span by eating,drinking and creating offsprings while he is made extraordinary supernatural in many places.He will rot and that's all the philosophy of dead and before birth he was pre-rot.

What if one becomes president of USA or get NOBEL prize and when his generation is over his name is only remained in books rather than brains because all his era brains had rot.Its only the physical profit/margin/benifit which matters in a very limited time.


Man is simply object-less & aim-less among million of glaxies and few people still have desire that one day they will convert subconscious into soul & conscious by merely debating it too much.

Everyone may be ocean of knowledge but what knowledge?What he borrowed from history/time/others?Or Self Generated?No
No one is standard and no one will be standard because whole people stand on time and time is a physical quantity so how a psychological/biological/soul formed/subconscious bullies can be derived from it?
I hope never.
Debate is fun and amazingly both sides are always wrong because Truths don't need debates to verify them or to believe them.


In next threads my personal qoutes will be on the way.
Goodluck
At age 5 years old I seriously doubt that you knew the word "oxygen."

And you played with fire then ?! Lots of kids did then.

You would have learned "your colors" in preschool, yes. That is part of the preschool curriculum -- leaning the names of colors, numbers, the alphabet, etc. White is the color of milk, yes.

It sounds like you are currently a skeptic. You should read some of Descartes' writings. He is the dragon slayer of skepticism.

After Descartes Skepticism no longer had any meaning.

If you have not yet come to Descartes in your readings then you have much to look forward to !!!

Post Reply