mind the mind
- Waechter418
- Posts: 42
- Joined: July 19th, 2015, 7:43 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Nietzsche
- Location: Costa Rica
- Contact:
mind the mind
However, the coordination capabilities of latter improve continuously, whereas mind seems to have problems handling the increase of external & internal, objective & subjective data.
More often than not, this is blamed on its hardware, i.e. the physiological aspects, yet rarely on the programs that coordinate the data, despite that many of them are obviously outdated, inefficient, hijacked by emotions and/or malwares which question the capabilities and sometimes even deny the functions of mind, thus impeding the possibility to repair & update its software.
But to alter something requires knowledge and understanding of its structures and dynamics – in this case of the mind.
Lamentably, the mind of Sapiens knows more about molecules and galaxies than about itself. Not because Self-knowledge is an impossible task – after all everyone spends a lifetime with/in his/her mind – but because of millennia of systematic self-denial and subjection to external, superior, eternal etc powers called god, fate and whatever else seems suitable to cover up a lack of Self-responsibility.
Admittedly, Self-response-ability can be a pain in the butt – yet it can also be a blessing, as it may entail the realisation that all (external/internal/subjective/objective) phenomenon are interrelated - and coordinated by/in the mind.
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 6227
- Joined: August 23rd, 2016, 3:00 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Bertrand Russell and WVO Quine
- Location: NYC Man
Re: mind the mind
- Waechter418
- Posts: 42
- Joined: July 19th, 2015, 7:43 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Nietzsche
- Location: Costa Rica
- Contact:
Re: mind the mind
my mind is not in my chestTerrapin Station wrote: ↑September 14th, 2020, 11:11 am Were you just wanting to get that off your chest, or?
- Marvin_Edwards
- Posts: 1106
- Joined: April 14th, 2020, 9:34 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: William James
- Contact:
Re: mind the mind
I don't know that the problem is necessarily in the equipment. There are books on self-improvement of the mind out there, with techniques for memory improvement and strategies for doing math in ones head, etc.Waechter418 wrote: ↑September 13th, 2020, 2:04 pm The way mind processes data reflects in its offspring, the computer.
However, the coordination capabilities of latter improve continuously, whereas mind seems to have problems handling the increase of external & internal, objective & subjective data.
More often than not, this is blamed on its hardware, i.e. the physiological aspects, yet rarely on the programs that coordinate the data, despite that many of them are obviously outdated, inefficient, hijacked by emotions and/or malwares which question the capabilities and sometimes even deny the functions of mind, thus impeding the possibility to repair & update its software.
But to alter something requires knowledge and understanding of its structures and dynamics – in this case of the mind.
Lamentably, the mind of Sapiens knows more about molecules and galaxies than about itself. Not because Self-knowledge is an impossible task – after all everyone spends a lifetime with/in his/her mind – but because of millennia of systematic self-denial and subjection to external, superior, eternal etc powers called god, fate and whatever else seems suitable to cover up a lack of Self-responsibility.
Admittedly, Self-response-ability can be a pain in the butt – yet it can also be a blessing, as it may entail the realisation that all (external/internal/subjective/objective) phenomenon are interrelated - and coordinated by/in the mind.
Someone, possibly here, suggested a book by the Arbinger Institute called "The Anatomy of Peace: Getting to the Heart of Conflict". I've been reading it on my kindle that I keep by the potty. It's been very enlightening as to how we build boxes around ourselves to justify our choices. It's very good and I'd recommend it to anyone.
- Count Lucanor
- Posts: 2318
- Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
- Location: Panama
- Contact:
Re: mind the mind
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
- Waechter418
- Posts: 42
- Joined: July 19th, 2015, 7:43 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Nietzsche
- Location: Costa Rica
- Contact:
Re: mind the mind
Oooyeahh!!!!
- Marvin_Edwards
- Posts: 1106
- Joined: April 14th, 2020, 9:34 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: William James
- Contact:
Re: mind the mind
I'm not familiar with the "computational theory of mind". However, I know that, regardless of any theory, the mind does perform computations.
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: mind the mind
Did you know that we humans have a habit? We compare our brains with the most complicated bit of machinery we have invented so far. Apparently, we used to compare brains and minds with automated looms, when they were the Big Thing. The traditions has come down to us in the present day, when we habitually compare our brains and mind with computers. All of these comparisons are metaphors, used as we do, to foster understanding of something we don't currently understand (or brains and minds). IMO, all of these attempted metaphors have failed, as they don't tell us anything worthwhile about our brains or minds.Waechter418 wrote: ↑September 13th, 2020, 2:04 pm The way mind processes data reflects in its offspring, the computer.
IMO, the way mind processes data does not resemble or reflect its offspring, the computer. Not is any significant or meaningful way.
"Who cares, wins"
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: mind the mind
"Who cares, wins"
- Count Lucanor
- Posts: 2318
- Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
- Location: Panama
- Contact:
Re: mind the mind
One part of what the brain does, that is: calculations, might resemble machine computations, but that as far as we can go with metaphors.Marvin_Edwards wrote: ↑September 15th, 2020, 2:38 pmI'm not familiar with the "computational theory of mind". However, I know that, regardless of any theory, the mind does perform computations.
Why Your Brain is Not a Computer
Your Brain Does Not Process Information And It Is Not a Computer
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
- Marvin_Edwards
- Posts: 1106
- Joined: April 14th, 2020, 9:34 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: William James
- Contact:
Re: mind the mind
I disagree with the Aeon article "The Empty Brain" (your second link). We can define memory functionally as the ability to store and retrieve information. And we can easily demonstrate that function by asking someone to remember something and then ask them to recall it later. How this information is represented in the brain is unimportant. It will certainly be very different from how the computer performs this operation on silicon chips.Count Lucanor wrote: ↑September 23rd, 2020, 9:52 pmOne part of what the brain does, that is: calculations, might resemble machine computations, but that as far as we can go with metaphors.Marvin_Edwards wrote: ↑September 15th, 2020, 2:38 pm
I'm not familiar with the "computational theory of mind". However, I know that, regardless of any theory, the mind does perform computations.
Why Your Brain is Not a Computer
Your Brain Does Not Process Information And It Is Not a Computer
We need to remember that computers were designed as an alterative form of intelligence. In order to do that we would need to have some idea about what intelligence does in a human being. Human beings perform arithmetic calculations. They memorize and recall information. They learn new behavior, like catching a ball, by trial and error (not by arithmetic calculations). Information processing was not invented for computers. It is an emulation of one of the things that we humans do with our brains. And the notion of information existed and was used long before computers were imagined.
- Count Lucanor
- Posts: 2318
- Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
- Location: Panama
- Contact:
Re: mind the mind
It doesn't look, though, that human cognition does this in the same way that computers do. It simply doesn't store digital coded information to retrieve, because the inputs received are of a different nature. Our senses are not simply hardware peripherals. Human memory is most likely sense experience relived, which is why, unlike computer memory, tends to be fuzzy, inaccurate. You might think you have a clear memory of your right hand, after all it has been with you for decades, and yet you will not be able to describe every detail of it.Marvin_Edwards wrote: ↑September 24th, 2020, 8:46 pm
I disagree with the Aeon article "The Empty Brain" (your second link). We can define memory functionally as the ability to store and retrieve information. And we can easily demonstrate that function by asking someone to remember something and then ask them to recall it later. How this information is represented in the brain is unimportant. It will certainly be very different from how the computer performs this operation on silicon chips.
A parrot might emulate perfectly a human talking, but that does not mean that parrot speech is a key to understanding how human language works. Computer functions can be metaphorically called 'intelligence', but computers simply don't think, they just perform mechanical, syntactic operations, which can be very complex and sophisticated, but without any semantic relations involved. To process information is not the same as understanding it. That was the idea behind Searle's Chinese Room Experiment, which debunked the idea that the human mind is a computer.Marvin_Edwards wrote: ↑September 24th, 2020, 8:46 pm We need to remember that computers were designed as an alterative form of intelligence. In order to do that we would need to have some idea about what intelligence does in a human being. Human beings perform arithmetic calculations. They memorize and recall information. They learn new behavior, like catching a ball, by trial and error (not by arithmetic calculations). Information processing was not invented for computers. It is an emulation of one of the things that we humans do with our brains. And the notion of information existed and was used long before computers were imagined.
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: November 23rd, 2017, 11:12 pm
Re: mind the mind
Marvin_Edwards wrote: ↑September 24th, 2020, 8:46 pmI'm sure there will come a time that a machine will think or process thoughts the same way we humans do.Count Lucanor wrote: ↑September 23rd, 2020, 9:52 pm
One part of what the brain does, that is: calculations, might resemble machine computations, but that as far as we can go with metaphors.
I disagree with the Aeon article "The Empty Brain" (your second link). We can define memory functionally as the ability to store and retrieve information. And we can easily demonstrate that function by asking someone to remember something and then ask them to recall it later. How this information is represented in the brain is unimportant. It will certainly be very different from how the computer performs this operation on silicon chips.
We need to remember that computers were designed as an alterative form of intelligence. In order to do that we would need to have some idea about what intelligence does in a human being. Human beings perform arithmetic calculations. They memorize and recall information. They learn new behavior, like catching a ball, by trial and error (not by arithmetic calculations). Information processing was not invented for computers. It is an emulation of one of the things that we humans do with our brains. And the notion of information existed and was used long before computers were imagined.
- Waechter418
- Posts: 42
- Joined: July 19th, 2015, 7:43 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Nietzsche
- Location: Costa Rica
- Contact:
Re: mind the mind
Possible, but not desirable - considering the mess our thinking gets us into......
- Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- The admin formerly known as Scott
- Posts: 5787
- Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
- Contact:
Re: mind the mind
I don't necessarily disagree, but just to nitpick, I think it would be more accurate to say that the offspring (computers) reflect the creating parent (our human minds), rather than vice versa.Waechter418 wrote: ↑September 13th, 2020, 2:04 pm The way mind processes data reflects in its offspring, the computer.
While there's certainly ways in which the above is true, I believe there's also a degree to which the exact opposite is the case: That computers are specifically designed to compliment rather than mimic our brains, to fill the gaps and be the yin to our yang. In other words, there's ways in which we specifically design computers to do what we don't do well and not do what we can easily do or like to do. That could help explain why we designed computers to be so good at arithmetic (literal computing). A human mind is great a many things, but quickly and reliably calculating the square root of 13 is not one of them.
I don't disagree with what you have written, and I bet we can both agree that it is not the full story. Incidentally, your above quoted comments, especially the multiple references to self-responsibility, seem to share a lot in common with my overall philosophy, which I roughly outlined in my topic, Man Is Not Fit to Govern Man: My Philosophy of Non-Violence, Self-Government, Self-Discipline, and Spiritual Freedom. In that topic, I quoted Shaw's words about how humans dread self-responsibility, which of course is another way to express that it can be a "pain in the butt" as you accurately put it.Waechter418 wrote: ↑September 13th, 2020, 2:04 pm Lamentably, the mind of Sapiens knows more about molecules and galaxies than about itself[...] because of millennia of systematic self-denial and subjection to external, superior, eternal etc powers called god, fate and whatever else seems suitable to cover up a lack of Self-responsibility.
Admittedly, Self-response-ability can be a pain in the butt – yet it can also be a blessing, as it may entail the realisation that all (external/internal/subjective/objective) phenomenon are interrelated - and coordinated by/in the mind.
Well said. I agree.Count Lucanor wrote: ↑September 24th, 2020, 11:46 pm A parrot might emulate perfectly a human talking, but that does not mean that parrot speech is a key to understanding how human language works.
"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."
I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023