Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.

Use this philosophy forum to discuss and debate general philosophy topics that don't fit into one of the other categories.

This forum is NOT for factual, informational or scientific questions about philosophy (e.g. "What year was Socrates born?"). Those kind of questions can be asked in the off-topic section.
Post Reply
Atla
Posts: 2540
Joined: January 30th, 2018, 1:18 pm

Re: Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.

Post by Atla »

Steve3007 wrote: April 28th, 2021, 7:06 am
Atla wrote:Where do you find such a stationary reference frame, when we can't put the universe into a "container" of absolute space and time, for measurement (because there's no absolute space and time)?
I said "a reference frame which is stationary with respect to real objects". An object which is stationary with respect to another object is sometimes said to be "stationary WRT the reference frame of that object" or "stationary in the reference frame of that object" or similar.

For some reason you seem to think I'm referring to some kind of "absolute stationary" concept.
But then there are as many reference frames as there are objects. Actually there are infinitely many reference frames for each object, because we can arbitrarily choose the orientation of the reference frame. So rightness and leftness are relative fictional constructs, based on the reference frame we choose.
True philosophy points to the Moon
User avatar
RJG
Posts: 2767
Joined: March 28th, 2012, 8:52 pm

Re: Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.

Post by RJG »

Atla wrote:So rightness and leftness are relative fictional constructs, based on the reference frame we choose.
"Based on a reference frame that we choose" does not make them "fictional". For then what would make them "non-fictional"? ...a reference frame that you choose?

Whether there is one reference frame or many reference frames, it is still true that "rightness and leftness" exists dependent on the particular reference frame.


**********
Scott wrote:..are you asserting that some kind of subjectivity (i.e. consciousness) actually exists which is the source of alleged leftness and rightness?
Sorry Scott, but these kinds of questions come across to me as just more disingenuous "game playing". EVERYTHING we know (not just "leftness-rightness") comes from our own conscious thoughts.
Last edited by RJG on April 28th, 2021, 7:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Atla
Posts: 2540
Joined: January 30th, 2018, 1:18 pm

Re: Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.

Post by Atla »

RJG wrote: April 28th, 2021, 7:38 am
Atla wrote:So rightness and leftness are relative fictional constructs, based on the reference frame we choose.
"Based on a reference frame that we choose" does not make them "fictional". For then what would make them "non-fictional"? ...a reference frame that you choose?

Whether there is one reference frame or many reference frames, it is still true that "rightness and leftness" exists dependent on the particular reference frame.
I don't know what you mean. Reference frames are also fictional in that sense.
True philosophy points to the Moon
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.

Post by Steve3007 »

Atla wrote:But then there are as many reference frames as there are objects. Actually there are infinitely many reference frames for each object, because we can arbitrarily choose the orientation of the reference frame.
We create reference frames as a way of describing the real positions and orientations of real objects. We can create as many as we like. That doesn't make the positions and orientations of real objects fictional. The possibility of describing a real phenomenon in a number of different ways doesn't make that phenomenon fictional. The fact that the concepts we use to describe the real world are abstract doesn't make anything fictional. "Fictional" (to me at least) means a reference/referent that refers to/is something that is not real. So "Santa Claus" is an example of such a reference. Santa Claus is the referent. There are many ways to refer to that example of a fictional referent. Reference frames are abstract concepts, bits of mathematics/geometry, used to refer to the real relative positions and orientations of real things. I think you're confusing "fictional" with "abstract".
So rightness and leftness are relative fictional constructs, based on the reference frame we choose.
I disagree.
Atla
Posts: 2540
Joined: January 30th, 2018, 1:18 pm

Re: Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.

Post by Atla »

Steve3007 wrote: April 28th, 2021, 7:54 am
Atla wrote:But then there are as many reference frames as there are objects. Actually there are infinitely many reference frames for each object, because we can arbitrarily choose the orientation of the reference frame.
We create reference frames as a way of describing the real positions and orientations of real objects. We can create as many as we like. That doesn't make the positions and orientations of real objects fictional. The possibility of describing a real phenomenon in a number of different ways doesn't make that phenomenon fictional. The fact that the concepts we use to describe the real world are abstract doesn't make anything fictional. "Fictional" (to me at least) means a reference/referent that refers to/is something that is not real. So "Santa Claus" is an example of such a reference. Santa Claus is the referent. There are many ways to refer to that example of a fictional referent. Reference frames are abstract concepts, bits of mathematics/geometry, used to refer to the real relative positions and orientations of real things. I think you're confusing "fictional" with "abstract".
So rightness and leftness are relative fictional constructs, based on the reference frame we choose.
I disagree.
That's not what this is about. We have real objects A and B with real positions, okay.

I define a random reference frame from the point of view of A, and in this reference frame, B is to the right.
I take a 180 degree turn, and define another reference frame from the point of view of A, and now B is to the left.

So while we have real objects with real positions, leftness and rightness can be chosen arbitrarily. Comparatively, leftness and rightness are fictional constructs.
True philosophy points to the Moon
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.

Post by Steve3007 »

RJG wrote:"Based on a reference frame that we choose" does not make them "fictional". For then what would make them "non-fictional"? ...a reference frame that you choose?

Whether there is one reference frame or many reference frames, it is still true that "rightness and leftness" exists dependent on the particular reference frame.
I agree. Proposing that everything which can be described differently depending on viewpoint be labelled "fictional" makes everything fictional. That's not a useful way to use that word in my view. The phenomenon of Santa Claus can be described using the references (for example) "Santa Claus" or "Father Christmas", depending on the viewpoint. The phenomenon of the position of my car in the parking lot can be described as (for example) "left of the blue Toyota" or "right of the blue Toyota" depending on viewpoint. Concluding from this that both are fictional is not a word usage that I find useful. I prefer to label Santa Claus as fictional and the position of my car as real.
User avatar
RJG
Posts: 2767
Joined: March 28th, 2012, 8:52 pm

Re: Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.

Post by RJG »

Atla wrote:I don't know what you mean. Reference frames are also fictional in that sense.
If some-things exist, then reference frames are not "fictional".
If no-things exist, then this conversation does not exist (which means that you do not disagree with me).

Does anything exist in this reality? Does anything 'else' exist in this reality? Is there a difference (spatial, directional, velocity, time, etc etc) between these "things"? If so, then your view of this difference is your "reference frame".
Atla
Posts: 2540
Joined: January 30th, 2018, 1:18 pm

Re: Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.

Post by Atla »

RJG wrote: April 28th, 2021, 8:12 am
Atla wrote:I don't know what you mean. Reference frames are also fictional in that sense.
If some-things exist, then reference frames are not "fictional".
If no-things exist, then this conversation does not exist (which means that you do not disagree with me).

Does anything exist in this reality? Does anything 'else' exist in this reality? Is there a difference (spatial, directional, velocity, time, etc etc) between these "things"? If so, then your view of this difference is your "reference frame".
Total nonsense. Things exist, and we make arbitrary/fictional reference frames about them.
True philosophy points to the Moon
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.

Post by Steve3007 »

Atla wrote:Things exist, and we make arbitrary/fictional reference frames about them.
In my experience here, a large proportion of the disagreements are pseudo-disagreements (disagreements which lack substance) about semantics. People simply use words in different ways. So I don't think it's good enough to say something like "arbitrary/fictional" as if those two words mean essentially the same thing. Likewise, for example, I think we're asking for trouble (for needless arguments) if we confuse "fictional" with "abstract".
Atla
Posts: 2540
Joined: January 30th, 2018, 1:18 pm

Re: Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.

Post by Atla »

Steve3007 wrote: April 28th, 2021, 8:19 am
Atla wrote:Things exist, and we make arbitrary/fictional reference frames about them.
In my experience here, a large proportion of the disagreements are pseudo-disagreements (disagreements which lack substance) about semantics. People simply use words in different ways. So I don't think it's good enough to say something like "arbitrary/fictional" as if those two words mean essentially the same thing. Likewise, for example, I think we're asking for trouble (for needless arguments) if we confuse "fictional" with "abstract".
I thought it was fairly obvious what "fictional" was supposed to mean in the context of the OP.
True philosophy points to the Moon
User avatar
RJG
Posts: 2767
Joined: March 28th, 2012, 8:52 pm

Re: Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.

Post by RJG »

Atla wrote:Things exist, and we make arbitrary/fictional reference frames about them.
But it is still a real "reference frame" irrespective of its accuracy, ...right?

In other words, you only label this reference frame as "arbitrary/fictional" because you falsely believe that there is, or there should be, an absolute/universal reference frame by which to measure everything in this universe. But since an absolute/universal reference point is impossible in an infinite universe, then that itself is what is "fictional", and not the reference frame from given objects within this universe.
Atla
Posts: 2540
Joined: January 30th, 2018, 1:18 pm

Re: Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.

Post by Atla »

RJG wrote: April 28th, 2021, 8:29 am
Atla wrote:Things exist, and we make arbitrary/fictional reference frames about them.
But it is still a real "reference frame" irrespective of its accuracy, ...right?

In other words, you only label this reference frame as "arbitrary/fictional" because you falsely believe that there is, or there should be, an absolute/universal reference frame by which to measure everything in this universe. But since an absolute/universal reference point is impossible in an infinite universe, then that itself is what is "fictional", and not the reference frame from given objects within this universe.
No, no and no. This isn't even about an absolute reference frame, or an infinite universe.

No reference frame is "real". A reference frame is an arbitrary map about the territory, not the territory itself. As I recall, you can't differentiate between the abstract and the concrete, yes?
True philosophy points to the Moon
User avatar
RJG
Posts: 2767
Joined: March 28th, 2012, 8:52 pm

Re: Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.

Post by RJG »

Atla wrote:No reference frame is "real". A reference frame is an arbitrary map about the territory, not the territory itself. As I recall, you can't differentiate between the abstract and the concrete, yes?
Well technically, everything we know is "abstract"; just mental concepts. Everything we know comes from our own conscious experiences. So then the only "concrete" thing we can be absolutely certain of is our own conscious experiences (of abstract concepts).

But then taking that stance is "solipsism". Is that what you are implying here? If so, then I can't disagree with you.

Atla wrote:A reference frame is an arbitrary map about the territory, not the territory itself.
But if territories are 'real' then so are its properties and dimensions and therefore the reference frames ("maps") that define it. If territories are not real then there can be no maps (or reference frames) of the territory. But if territories are real, then real maps (reference frames) can exist of that territory. And if so, this does not make these 'real' maps "arbitrary".
Last edited by RJG on April 28th, 2021, 9:23 am, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
Thomyum2
Posts: 366
Joined: June 10th, 2019, 4:21 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Robert Pirsig + William James

Re: Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.

Post by Thomyum2 »

RJG wrote: April 28th, 2021, 7:38 am
Atla wrote:So rightness and leftness are relative fictional constructs, based on the reference frame we choose.
"Based on a reference frame that we choose" does not make them "fictional". For then what would make them "non-fictional"? ...a reference frame that you choose?

Whether there is one reference frame or many reference frames, it is still true that "rightness and leftness" exists dependent on the particular reference frame.


**********
Scott wrote:..are you asserting that some kind of subjectivity (i.e. consciousness) actually exists which is the source of alleged leftness and rightness?
Sorry Scott, but these kinds of questions come across to me as just more disingenuous "game playing". EVERYTHING we know (not just "leftness-rightness") comes from our own conscious thoughts.
All of these words - left, right, up, down, here, now, I, you - are indexicals, terms for the which the meaning is always context-dependent. This is really its own sub-topic in philosophy - I think this article sums it all up pretty well: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/indexicals/
“We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.”
— Epictetus
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Neither time, time-ness, unconscious here-ness, unconscious now-ness, nor any unconscious presence exist.

Post by Steve3007 »

Thomyum2 wrote:All of these words - left, right, up, down, here, now, I, you - are indexicals, terms for the which the meaning is always context-dependent. This is really its own sub-topic in philosophy - I think this article sums it all up pretty well: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/indexicals/
Yes, and it's a subset of the topic of semantics and meaning, not of ontology. The trouble is, people sometimes confuse semantics/meanings/words with the things that those words refer to, (confusing the reference with the referent), just as they sometimes confuse the properties of a model (the model as a physical existent) with the properties that the model models. Hence, in the former case, we get people claiming that those references are fiction simply because they're context dependent. In the latter case we get people claiming that the universe doesn't contain change just because a model of that universe doesn't change; equivalent to claiming that a car doesn't move because a graph of the car's worldline doesn't move.

In my view, the answer to the question of whether a reference is fiction or not is a function of the thing that it references, not a function of the reference itself. If it was a function of the reference itself then everything would be fiction because obviously references aren't real things.
Post Reply

Return to “General Philosophy”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021