Deceived? PSY OPS & Medical Informed Consent

[LuckyR]

Ah yes, the ol' "no one wants you to know this, but I'll tell you" ploy. This stuff is a dime a dozen now in the Post Truth era.

There's something about seeing ideas typed up in a nice font (or spoken by a guy in a suit behind a desk on video) that makes some folks believe stuff they would never have believed if someone told them the same concept verbally at the watercooler.

[Newme]

FDA experts reveal the Covid-19 Vaccines are killing at least 2 people for every 1 life they save as they vote 16 – 2 against the approval of booster shots
“I’m going to focus my remarks today on the elephant in the room that nobody likes to talk about, that the vaccines kill more than they save.

We were led to believe that the vaccines were perfectly safe but this is simply not true, for example there are four times as many heart attacks in the treatment group in the Pfizer 6 month file report, that wasn’t just bad luck. VAERS shows heart attacks happen 71 times more often following these vaccines compared to any other vaccine,”

Steve Kirsch then continued his presentation by showing a slide titled ‘Excess Death: Life ratio is UNACCEPTABLE’. The slide shows how many excess deaths were required following vaccination to save one life due to Covid-19.

Four experts did analysis using completely different non US data sources and all of them came up with approximately the same number of excess vaccine related deaths, about 411 deaths per million doses. That translates into 115,000 people have died (due to the Covid-19 vaccines).”
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/18/fda-exp ... ife-saved/

And yet, the delusional commander in chief has demanded everyone get these dangerous shots or else lose their jobs?? This is like Hitler’s tyranny. Btw, Hitler was often drugged up - & I wouldn’t be surprised if Biden is loaded too, with his bizarre behavior.


So much is being CENSORED. But eventually facts - consequences - become too obvious to hide. Sadly, that may be too late - damage already done.

[Newme]

There's something about seeing ideas typed up in a nice font (or spoken by a guy in a suit behind a desk on video) that makes some folks believe stuff they would never have believed if someone told them the same concept verbally at the watercooler.

So true!

[img]http://www.quickmeme.com/img/e0/e0dd9315c91bdf4764da4b61042db78198754ae2f7f17c4017d0952a73e7f8cc.jpg[/img]

We have been taught to respect authority. But this is not the only psychological manipulation that can skew perspectives of reality. Peer pressure is powerful. Mobs do insane things individuals would never do on their own. Studies have shown approximately 2/3 of people go along with what others are doing even if it makes no sense.

Like Pavlov’s dogs - people see others stand up at beep, so they do - just because “everyone’s doing it.” https://youtu.be/o8BkzvP19v4

Asch Conformity Experiment
https://youtu.be/NyDDyT1lDhA

[Steve3007]

The central claim of this article:
https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/18/fda-exp ... ife-saved/
is that a VAERS study has indicated that Covid vaccines kill 2 people for every 1 that they save. The evidence it provides is a slide from a presentation by Steve Kirsch simply stating that a VAERS study has indicated that covid vaccines kill 2 people for every 1 that they save. No indication of where we can go to look up the specific VAERS data for ourselves. Just things like pictures of elephants. If I were him I'd drop the gimmicky elephant picture and cite some sources so that anyone who is interested in testing his claims can do so.

On VAERS and its use as a reporting system for Covid:
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/fact ... 587577002/

Note how the USA Today article cites its sources.

It seems that one of the main ways that misinformation about covid vaccines is generated is by mis-using data from the VAERS system. Being a "passive reporting system" means that anyone can use it to report, essentially, anything. A potentially useful data source, but only if used without a pre-existing agenda.

Here's an analysis of some of Steve Kirsch's claims:
https://www.covid-datascience.com/post/ ... e-proteins



Whac-A-Mole

As we know, In bothering to try to follow up the claims in that "TheExposer" article I'm just falling for the old "Whac-A-Mole" technique. i.e. Any serious rebuttal of the article's claims will be ignored and other articles and claims will be posted. It's always quicker to post the articles with the false and misleading claims than it is to go to the effort of doing the research required to discover whether they are false or misleading, especially when the articles make it harder for you by citing no specific sources and simply asserting things. So new "moles" will always pop up faster than they can be "whacked", so to speak. And usually what happens after a while is that articles whose claims have already been shown to be false or misleading will just be posted again when it's felt that the rebuttals have been forgotten or that there are new readers to fool who won't have seen the rebuttals.

[Steve3007]

An interesting bit of history of the VAERS in the context of its misuse by the agenda-driven:
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid ... are-tactic

Characters like Tucker Carlson are particularly interesting in that they must surely know that they are being disingenuous when they cite VAERS to give their scare stories a veneer or scientific credibility. But they know that the methodical demonstration that their claims are false are boring compared to their "listen to this if you don't want to die!" style of attention-grabbing. I wonder if there is some kind of double-think going on inside the head of a guy like that, or it's a straightforward calculation along the lines of: "This will increase my viewing figures and that will increase my wealth. I like being rich and listened to."

[Newme]

Steve,
Thanks for noting how it’s difficult to know who to believe. Confusion, censorship, lies & contradiction - are part of psychological warfare. Eg., Fauci 1st said, “you don’t need a mask - they don’t work.” Then it changed to everyone put on a dirty, more harmful than helpful covering over your breathing.

This has been PLANNED out in multiple ways & times, not just
*Coronavirus patent filed in 2014 by The Pirbright Institute, funded by Bill and Melinda Gates,
*Event 201 https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/ &
*”The SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028: A Futuristic Scenario to Facilitate Medical Countermeasure Communication”
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org ... munication…

In 2007, another puppet played the part of Fauci… in Belgium, in persuading the masses to believe what is counter to common sense, science & logic. This is explained clearly in the 2nd 1/2 of this video… Eg., :46 They’d read through a bunch of concerns like “can I still travel?”, & would find ways to answer their questions before anyone else - so he’d be trusted as an authority etc.
https://odysee.com/@LegunusAspieAnalyti ... in-India:3

The same play/script that played out in Belgium in 2007, is playing now - just on a larger scale. At about :30, Dr. Mark Van Ranst (like Fauci except he was Flu Commissioner for Belgium in 2006 & later) explained in passing “I guess these are my conflicts of interest” with a list, including J&J.

What is particularly haunting in the video (which was recorded January 22, 2019 - before masses knew “covid”) was not just the timing but also the reactions of the audience. He’s flat out joking about how he fooled most of an entire nation - and you can too!

Look back at an 2007 archive directed at Belgium people….
“Are Belgian hospitals prepared for an H5N1-pandemic?”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17620910/
Same ol’ BS we saw last year.

PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE IS TARGETING US. This is why this & other obvious evidence (like Event 201) are not covered in the news. I didn’t find the video of VanRanst’s 2019 lecture anywhere online except above & this other bitchute… https://www.bitchute.com/video/2hx14AuK7Ote/

[Steve3007]

I think I'll pass on whacking any more moles for now.

[Newme]

“NY TIMES corrects pediatric hospitalization claim: which was exaggerated by 1400%

How could the New York Times overestimate pediatric hospitalizations by such a huge amount? Don’t they have editors? Or was this from a CDC press release that deliberately inflated the problem of Covid and children the same week Pfizer asked the FDA to authorize its Covid vaccine for those aged five through 11?”

https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/202 ... n.html?m=1

[LuckyR]

“NY TIMES corrects pediatric hospitalization claim: which was exaggerated by 1400%

How could the New York Times overestimate pediatric hospitalizations by such a huge amount? Don’t they have editors? Or was this from a CDC press release that deliberately inflated the problem of Covid and children the same week Pfizer asked the FDA to authorize its Covid vaccine for those aged five through 11?”

https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/202 ... n.html?m=1

A couple of things, first if the CDC made the error, the NY Times wouldn't take the responsibility for the error. Second, despite some opinions, the NY Times doesn't make health policy.