The Invisible Gardener
-
- Posts: 223
- Joined: June 9th, 2021, 12:39 am
The Invisible Gardener
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: The Invisible Gardener
Oh, I thought it was referencing the Intelligent Design argument, also known as the watchmaker.WanderingGaze22 wrote: ↑January 2nd, 2022, 3:58 am Two people return to their long neglected garden. Although the garden has grown wild, there are still many flowers blooming. One of them says, “There must be a gardener at work here.” The other replies, “I don’t think so.” To see who is right, they examine the garden carefully and ask the neighbors, who have never seen anyone at work. They also research what happens to gardens that are left without care. “You see,” says the skeptic, “there is no gardener.” The believer replies, “This gardener is invisible, and if we look more carefully we will find evidence that he comes, unseen and unheard.” The other one maintains there is no gardener. Can this dispute be settled? This is similar to the tree falling in the forest thought experiment.
- Count Lucanor
- Posts: 2318
- Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
- Location: Panama
- Contact:
Re: The Invisible Gardener
If the dispute is to be settled beyond two parties, things get a lot more complicated, as the pools of shared and unshared beliefs are expanded, and particular beliefs will not intersect with others often.
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
- chewybrian
- Posts: 1594
- Joined: May 9th, 2018, 7:17 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Epictetus
- Location: Florida man
Re: The Invisible Gardener
Neither seems like a perfect match. The falling tree in the forest problem presumes the event happened, but asks if the nature of the event is the same whether it is observed or not. The watchmaker doesn't ask if the maker came back to wind the watch, for example, but only if the intricacy of the design shows that someone must have made it, rather than it randomly evolving.LuckyR wrote: ↑January 2nd, 2022, 5:04 amOh, I thought it was referencing the Intelligent Design argument, also known as the watchmaker.WanderingGaze22 wrote: ↑January 2nd, 2022, 3:58 am Two people return to their long neglected garden. Although the garden has grown wild, there are still many flowers blooming. One of them says, “There must be a gardener at work here.” The other replies, “I don’t think so.” To see who is right, they examine the garden carefully and ask the neighbors, who have never seen anyone at work. They also research what happens to gardens that are left without care. “You see,” says the skeptic, “there is no gardener.” The believer replies, “This gardener is invisible, and if we look more carefully we will find evidence that he comes, unseen and unheard.” The other one maintains there is no gardener. Can this dispute be settled? This is similar to the tree falling in the forest thought experiment.
I'll muddle it up further and say this is similar to the china teapot problem posed by Bertrand Russell. There could be a china teapot floating on the opposite side of the sun where we could not see it. We can not disprove the notion, but it seems a bit silly. Neither can we disprove the notion that someone snuck in to the garden and took care of things in such a way that we were unable to know for sure if they had been there or not. We can't resolve either dispute, but we can certainly pick a side with reasonable gut feelings.
- Sy Borg
- Site Admin
- Posts: 14997
- Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm
Re: The Invisible Gardener
The solve the question, bring in an expert gardener familiar with local conditions to assess it. If there were always weeds in the garden and now it's weed-free. If there are almost no weeds, just mulch, then it's a gardener. If there are still weeds but larger plant systems have simply out-competed them (ie. relative order in a world with many flaws), then it's probably not a gardener.WanderingGaze22 wrote: ↑January 2nd, 2022, 3:58 am Two people return to their long neglected garden. Although the garden has grown wild, there are still many flowers blooming. One of them says, “There must be a gardener at work here.” The other replies, “I don’t think so.” To see who is right, they examine the garden carefully and ask the neighbors, who have never seen anyone at work. They also research what happens to gardens that are left without care. “You see,” says the skeptic, “there is no gardener.” The believer replies, “This gardener is invisible, and if we look more carefully we will find evidence that he comes, unseen and unheard.” The other one maintains there is no gardener. Can this dispute be settled? This is similar to the tree falling in the forest thought experiment.
- High order = gardener
- High disorder = probably no gardener, but not certainly (the gardener might be sloppy or missed a few visits)
- Moderate order = maybe either, with more order suggesting a gardener and more disorder suggesting neglect, but neither may be conclusively proved from just inspection, as per Brian's Chinese teapot example above.
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: The Invisible Gardener
The problem is that it is possible to arrive at a resultant state (disorganized garden with a few flowers) from many possible routes, thus one cannot be certain of the actual pathway. It would be common in a complex system to have conflicting "evidence" for and against the gardener and the absent gardener arguments.Sy Borg wrote: ↑January 2nd, 2022, 8:34 pmThe solve the question, bring in an expert gardener familiar with local conditions to assess it. If there were always weeds in the garden and now it's weed-free. If there are almost no weeds, just mulch, then it's a gardener. If there are still weeds but larger plant systems have simply out-competed them (ie. relative order in a world with many flaws), then it's probably not a gardener.WanderingGaze22 wrote: ↑January 2nd, 2022, 3:58 am Two people return to their long neglected garden. Although the garden has grown wild, there are still many flowers blooming. One of them says, “There must be a gardener at work here.” The other replies, “I don’t think so.” To see who is right, they examine the garden carefully and ask the neighbors, who have never seen anyone at work. They also research what happens to gardens that are left without care. “You see,” says the skeptic, “there is no gardener.” The believer replies, “This gardener is invisible, and if we look more carefully we will find evidence that he comes, unseen and unheard.” The other one maintains there is no gardener. Can this dispute be settled? This is similar to the tree falling in the forest thought experiment.
- High order = gardener
- High disorder = probably no gardener, but not certainly (the gardener might be sloppy or missed a few visits)
- Moderate order = maybe either, with more order suggesting a gardener and more disorder suggesting neglect, but neither may be conclusively proved from just inspection, as per Brian's Chinese teapot example above.
-
- Posts: 223
- Joined: June 9th, 2021, 12:39 am
Re: The Invisible Gardener
That answer seems very likely.Sy Borg wrote: ↑January 2nd, 2022, 8:34 pm The solve the question, bring in an expert gardener familiar with local conditions to assess it. If there were always weeds in the garden and now it's weed-free. If there are almost no weeds, just mulch, then it's a gardener. If there are still weeds but larger plant systems have simply out-competed them (ie. relative order in a world with many flaws), then it's probably not a gardener.
- High order = gardener
- High disorder = probably no gardener, but not certainly (the gardener might be sloppy or missed a few visits)
- Moderate order = maybe either, with more order suggesting a gardener and more disorder suggesting neglect, but neither may be conclusively proved from just inspection, as per Brian's Chinese teapot example above.
-
- Posts: 219
- Joined: March 27th, 2011, 8:03 am
Re: The Invisible Gardener
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023