Is true randomness fundamentally impossible?

Use this philosophy forum to discuss and debate general philosophy topics that don't fit into one of the other categories.

This forum is NOT for factual, informational or scientific questions about philosophy (e.g. "What year was Socrates born?"). Those kind of questions can be asked in the off-topic section.
Post Reply
value
Premium Member
Posts: 750
Joined: December 11th, 2019, 9:18 am

Re: Is true randomness fundamentally impossible?

Post by value »

Sculptor1 wrote: August 4th, 2022, 12:05 pmAs "perceived" is equivalent to "experienced", no there is no difference.
You forgot the 'in-the-moment' part. The underline should have been experienced in time in-the-moment i.e. 'time as experience'. That experience has no scientific explanation as of today.

(2022) The philosopher’s zombie: What can the zombie argument say about human consciousness?
The infamous thought experiment, flawed as it is, does demonstrate one thing: science can’t explain consciousness.
https://aeon.co/essays/what-can-the-zom ... sciousness
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7096
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Is true randomness fundamentally impossible?

Post by Sculptor1 »

value wrote: August 5th, 2022, 2:27 am
Sculptor1 wrote: August 4th, 2022, 12:05 pmAs "perceived" is equivalent to "experienced", no there is no difference.
You forgot the 'in-the-moment' part. The underline should have been experienced in time in-the-moment i.e. 'time as experience'. That experience has no scientific explanation as of today.
Yes it does.

(2022) The philosopher’s zombie: What can the zombie argument say about human consciousness?
The infamous thought experiment, flawed as it is, does demonstrate one thing: science can’t explain consciousness.
https://aeon.co/essays/what-can-the-zom ... sciousness
This does not help your claim
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8271
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Is true randomness fundamentally impossible?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Sculptor1 wrote: August 3rd, 2022, 6:12 pm Maybe one day when two billiard balls hit each other the result will be different: there might appear as if from no where a bunch of petunias. Maybe a living sperm whale will materialise 10 miles above the earth surface?
"what is this large blue/green ball coming towards me very fast?". it might ask, "will it be friends with me?"

But I doubt it.
Pattern-chaser wrote: August 4th, 2022, 7:39 am I think we all doubt it. But the lesson here, surely, is that both the whale and the petunias are possible? Even though we believe the chance of these things occurring is very small indeed, we also believe that the probability is non-zero: it is possible.
Sculptor1 wrote: August 4th, 2022, 12:04 pm Seriously?
Did you really mean to say that?
It's my understanding that anything might emerge from the 'quantum foam', although the chances of it happening are very tiny. Even the whale or the petunias. [That's why H2G2 was so funny.] So yes, "seriously".
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7096
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Is true randomness fundamentally impossible?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Pattern-chaser wrote: August 5th, 2022, 7:14 am
Sculptor1 wrote: August 3rd, 2022, 6:12 pm Maybe one day when two billiard balls hit each other the result will be different: there might appear as if from no where a bunch of petunias. Maybe a living sperm whale will materialise 10 miles above the earth surface?
"what is this large blue/green ball coming towards me very fast?". it might ask, "will it be friends with me?"

But I doubt it.
Pattern-chaser wrote: August 4th, 2022, 7:39 am I think we all doubt it. But the lesson here, surely, is that both the whale and the petunias are possible? Even though we believe the chance of these things occurring is very small indeed, we also believe that the probability is non-zero: it is possible.
Sculptor1 wrote: August 4th, 2022, 12:04 pm Seriously?
Did you really mean to say that?
It's my understanding that anything might emerge from the 'quantum foam', although the chances of it happening are very tiny. Even the whale or the petunias. [That's why H2G2 was so funny.] So yes, "seriously".
Well what I know is that my coffee is actually emerging from the foam on the top.
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8271
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Is true randomness fundamentally impossible?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Pattern-chaser wrote: August 5th, 2022, 7:14 am It's my understanding that anything might emerge from the 'quantum foam', although the chances of it happening are very tiny. Even the whale or the petunias. [That's why H2G2 was so funny.] So yes, "seriously".
Sculptor1 wrote: August 6th, 2022, 5:08 am Well what I know is that my coffee is actually emerging from the foam on the top.
And yet, if our Big Bang theory is correct, our entire universe emerged, apparently uncaused, from the 'quantum foam', i.e., from nothing (or seemingly so). If that doesn't give you problems, it's difficult to see what your objections to the spontaneous appearance of a bowl of petunias might be.
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7096
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Is true randomness fundamentally impossible?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Pattern-chaser wrote: August 7th, 2022, 12:27 pm
Pattern-chaser wrote: August 5th, 2022, 7:14 am It's my understanding that anything might emerge from the 'quantum foam', although the chances of it happening are very tiny. Even the whale or the petunias. [That's why H2G2 was so funny.] So yes, "seriously".
Sculptor1 wrote: August 6th, 2022, 5:08 am Well what I know is that my coffee is actually emerging from the foam on the top.
And yet, if our Big Bang theory is correct, our entire universe emerged, apparently uncaused, from the 'quantum foam', i.e., from nothing (or seemingly so). If that doesn't give you problems, it's difficult to see what your objections to the spontaneous appearance of a bowl of petunias might be.
Maybe. I wasn't there. And in any event the BB can only include the observable universe.
Humans have such arrogance that they have declared the ultimate cosmology since Aristotle, they all claimed to be right and they were all wrong. I think that another one of the competing cosmologies we already have might supersede that one.
And bowls of petunias do not spontaneously appear. Induction might be flawed but it is all we have.
GE Morton
Posts: 4696
Joined: February 1st, 2017, 1:06 am

Re: Is true randomness fundamentally impossible?

Post by GE Morton »

Pattern-chaser wrote: August 7th, 2022, 12:27 pm
Pattern-chaser wrote: August 5th, 2022, 7:14 am It's my understanding that anything might emerge from the 'quantum foam', although the chances of it happening are very tiny. Even the whale or the petunias. [That's why H2G2 was so funny.] So yes, "seriously".
Sculptor1 wrote: August 6th, 2022, 5:08 am Well what I know is that my coffee is actually emerging from the foam on the top.
And yet, if our Big Bang theory is correct, our entire universe emerged, apparently uncaused, from the 'quantum foam', i.e., from nothing (or seemingly so). If that doesn't give you problems, it's difficult to see what your objections to the spontaneous appearance of a bowl of petunias might be.
Apparently, perhaps, but not necessarily. There is the cyclic theory, per which the universe cycles between expansion and contraction phases. The current expansion is due to the presence of "dark energy," the force of which overcomes the gravitational attraction of matter. But perhaps when the matter density falls below a certain point the dark energy begins to dissipate, gravity takes over, and the "Big Crunch" begins. That and the Big Bang are the transition points in that endless cycle.

https://www.accessscience.com/content/c ... ory/176017
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8271
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Is true randomness fundamentally impossible?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Sculptor1 wrote: August 7th, 2022, 5:02 pm And bowls of petunias do not spontaneously appear. Induction might be flawed but it is all we have.
We have no recorded observations of bowls of petunias spontaneously appearing. Your conclusion (above) proves to be a good example of the shortcomings of induction, I think. You assume that, because we have never seen something happen in the past, that it will not happen in the future. Isn't that a somewhat blinkered view? And maybe illogical too?
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7096
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Is true randomness fundamentally impossible?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Pattern-chaser wrote: August 8th, 2022, 6:24 am
Sculptor1 wrote: August 7th, 2022, 5:02 pm And bowls of petunias do not spontaneously appear. Induction might be flawed but it is all we have.
We have no recorded observations of bowls of petunias spontaneously appearing. Your conclusion (above) proves to be a good example of the shortcomings of induction, I think. You assume that, because we have never seen something happen in the past, that it will not happen in the future. Isn't that a somewhat blinkered view? And maybe illogical too?
Not particularly no.
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7096
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Is true randomness fundamentally impossible?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Pattern-chaser wrote: August 8th, 2022, 6:24 am
Sculptor1 wrote: August 7th, 2022, 5:02 pm And bowls of petunias do not spontaneously appear. Induction might be flawed but it is all we have.
We have no recorded observations of bowls of petunias spontaneously appearing. Your conclusion (above) proves to be a good example of the shortcomings of induction, I think. You assume that, because we have never seen something happen in the past, that it will not happen in the future. Isn't that a somewhat blinkered view? And maybe illogical too?
Have you ever expected the fridge to make your food cold?
Have you ever expected your car to start in the morning, or conversely expected it to start when you have not put petrol in it??
I know what your answers to these question are, and I know how much you rely on induction.
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8271
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Is true randomness fundamentally impossible?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Sculptor1 wrote: August 8th, 2022, 2:22 pm Have you ever expected the fridge to make your food cold?
Have you ever expected your car to start in the morning, or conversely expected it to start when you have not put petrol in it??
I know what your answers to these question are, and I know how much you rely on induction.
Why are you asking, when you already "know what [my] answers to these question are"? Are you talking to yourself?


Do you acknowledge the difference between what is expected and what is possible?
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7096
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Is true randomness fundamentally impossible?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Pattern-chaser wrote: August 9th, 2022, 5:22 am
Sculptor1 wrote: August 8th, 2022, 2:22 pm Have you ever expected the fridge to make your food cold?
Have you ever expected your car to start in the morning, or conversely expected it to start when you have not put petrol in it??
I know what your answers to these question are, and I know how much you rely on induction.
Why are you asking, when you already "know what [my] answers to these question are"? Are you talking to yourself?


Do you acknowledge the difference between what is expected and what is possible?
Yes.
Your problem is that you seem not to be able to conceive of the impossible.
The case of the spontaneous generation of petunias is in that category.
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8271
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Is true randomness fundamentally impossible?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Sculptor1 wrote: August 8th, 2022, 2:22 pm Have you ever expected the fridge to make your food cold?
Have you ever expected your car to start in the morning, or conversely expected it to start when you have not put petrol in it??
Pattern-chaser wrote: August 9th, 2022, 5:22 am Do you acknowledge the difference between what is expected and what is possible?
Sculptor1 wrote: August 9th, 2022, 6:03 am Your problem is that you seem not to be able to conceive of the impossible.
The case of the spontaneous generation of petunias is in that category.
In this context, "impossible" and "certain" are the same thing, but opposite. One asserts that an event cannot and will never occur, the other asserts that an event must and will always occur. In my view, both are pretty rare. Not unknown, but pretty rare.

Things get more difficult when we consider events that we consider to be very unlikely. The temptation is always there to label them "impossible" instead of "very unlikely", because that enables us to dismiss them, and have one thing less to worry about.

But to say that something is impossible, or certain, seems, logically, to demand conclusive evidence. In the absence of such evidence, it is difficult to see how any such event can/could logically be deemed "impossible" or "certain". If there should exist clear contradictory evidence, then perhaps such a verdict can be justified, but in the absence of such evidence — maybe in the absence of any/all evidence — no valid conclusion can be logically reached.

As for the specific example of the bowl of petunias, it is my understanding that quantum theory — science's most successful theory ever — allows for its emergence, even though the same theory seems to indicate that such an event would be very unlikely. If I am incorrectly reporting my own misunderstanding of QM, fair enough. But I believe that what I'm saying here is in accord with QM. That is to say, if our best current understanding of the spacetime universe is valid — a very big "if", I admit — then a bowl of petunias could possibly emerge in your living room, or in Earth's upper atmosphere.
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7096
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Is true randomness fundamentally impossible?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Pattern-chaser wrote: August 11th, 2022, 7:04 am
Sculptor1 wrote: August 8th, 2022, 2:22 pm Have you ever expected the fridge to make your food cold?
Have you ever expected your car to start in the morning, or conversely expected it to start when you have not put petrol in it??
Pattern-chaser wrote: August 9th, 2022, 5:22 am Do you acknowledge the difference between what is expected and what is possible?
Sculptor1 wrote: August 9th, 2022, 6:03 am Your problem is that you seem not to be able to conceive of the impossible.
The case of the spontaneous generation of petunias is in that category.
In this context, "impossible" and "certain" are the same thing, but opposite. One asserts that an event cannot and will never occur, the other asserts that an event must and will always occur. In my view, both are pretty rare. Not unknown, but pretty rare.
This is not a serious response.

Things get more difficult when we consider events that we consider to be very unlikely. The temptation is always there to label them "impossible" instead of "very unlikely", because that enables us to dismiss them, and have one thing less to worry about.

But to say that something is impossible, or certain, seems, logically, to demand conclusive evidence. In the absence of such evidence, it is difficult to see how any such event can/could logically be deemed "impossible" or "certain". If there should exist clear contradictory evidence, then perhaps such a verdict can be justified, but in the absence of such evidence — maybe in the absence of any/all evidence — no valid conclusion can be logically reached.

As for the specific example of the bowl of petunias, it is my understanding that quantum theory — science's most successful theory ever — allows for its emergence, even though the same theory seems to indicate that such an event would be very unlikely. If I am incorrectly reporting my own misunderstanding of QM, fair enough. But I believe that what I'm saying here is in accord with QM. That is to say, if our best current understanding of the spacetime universe is valid — a very big "if", I admit — then a bowl of petunias could possibly emerge in your living room, or in Earth's upper atmosphere.
User avatar
Pattern-chaser
Premium Member
Posts: 8271
Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
Location: England

Re: Is true randomness fundamentally impossible?

Post by Pattern-chaser »

Sculptor1 wrote: August 11th, 2022, 7:23 am This is not a serious response.
Unless my understanding of QM is faulty — Richard Feynman said, “If you think you understand quantum mechanics, then you don't." — mine is very much a serious response. This is not an intellectual ivory-tower plaything we're considering, it's real life, and the real spacetime universe. It does no good to consider these possibilities in a philosophy forum, and then return to our own everyday prejudices afterward. Either this stuff is applicable in and to the real world, or what's the point in discussing it?

AFAIK, my response is serious and correct. But I cannot help you to accept it, if you are disposed to do otherwise.
Pattern-chaser

"Who cares, wins"
Post Reply

Return to “General Philosophy”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021