Hans-Werner Hammen wrote: ↑January 8th, 2021, 8:23 am
evolution wrote: ↑January 8th, 2021, 6:21 am
AND, what EXACTLY is this, alleged and supposed, "religious position" here, which you BELIEVE exists?
Unfortunately I am unable to convey my
assertions to you...
So, you can DEEM some 'thing', make an ALLEGATION about, CLAIM, and/or ASSERT some 'thing', but when questioned about that 'thing', you are COMPLETELY UNABLE to convey ANY 'thing' more about the ALLEGATION, et cetera.
Hans-Werner Hammen wrote: ↑January 8th, 2021, 8:23 am
Your question suggests this.
Look, "the position"
does not exist.
I suggest, and VERY STRONGLY I will add, that it will be BEST for 'you' to NEVER ASSUME absolutely ANY thing AT ALL.
For CLARITY my question does NOT "suggest" ANY such thing as this, AT ALL.
My question was just asking you for CLARITY about what 'it' is, EXACTLY, which you were CLAIMING was existing there.
If you are UNABLE to convey ANY more, then this is just MORE EVIDENCE and/or PROOF that you do NOT YET understand what you are even talking about and saying.
Hans-Werner Hammen wrote: ↑January 8th, 2021, 8:23 am
Your symbol "The position" is yet another symbol for "the truth" or "the imaginary" = "does not exist"
So, you STILL want to INSIST that 'the truth' DOES NOT EXIST, and now you want to CLAIM that now 'the position' DOES NOT EXIST.
1. I NEVER wrote, ' "the" position '. I wrote, ' "religious" position ', which were YOUR WORDS, which I just COPIED. So, If 'the' "religious position" DOES NOT EVEN EXIST, then WHY did YOU bring 'it' up?
2. WHY when I write some 'thing', you then say that 'that' is imaginary and therefore DOES NOT EXIST. YET, you continue to make ASSERTIONS and CLAIMS and then INFER or DEEM them to be true?
You are only CONTRADICTING 'your' OWN 'self' here. EVERY time you say and/or make the claim that, "There is NO truth", or that, "The truth does not exist", but continue to say and/or make claims that but what you say is actually the truth.
Hans-Werner Hammen wrote: ↑January 8th, 2021, 8:23 am
In other words your assertion "you believe
exists"
You are SO FAR OFF TRACK now, that I do NOT see 'you' being able to get back on the Right and True track soon.
Hans-Werner Hammen wrote: ↑January 8th, 2021, 8:23 am
is at the verge of a bizarre comical hilarity...
I have NEVER asserted absolutely ANY thing like "I believe exists". This is just a figment of your OWN imagination, which I will inform is based solely on your OWN ASSUMPTIONS and BELIEFS here.
Hans-Werner Hammen wrote: ↑January 8th, 2021, 8:23 am
Now, if you counter-assert that your symbol "the position" actually symbolized "my readable assertion" - then
YES,
the assertion DOES exist, you could see it "crystal clear"
I NEVER has ANY intention AT ALL to say absolutely ANY thing like this, so the rest is completely MOOT.
Hans-Werner Hammen wrote: ↑January 8th, 2021, 8:23 am
Look, the utterations OF my positions on this forum was, from the very start away, conspicuously directed at the elicitation OF a categorical distinction between
"truth" (position, location, distinction - each is imaginary iow does NOT exist)
"assertion (very real, = DOES exist = causal at an observing-action) OF truth (see above)
Okay. And, I have NEVER even suggested that you have NEVER even said otherwise.
I KNOW that this is YOUR POSITION, which you are COMPLETELY and UTTERLY FREE to HAVE, and, to continue to MAINTAIN for as long as you like.
I have just said that if and WHEN someone makes a CLAIM like, "truth is imaginary and thus does NOT exist", then they just HAVE TO ACCEPT that this statement/claim can NEVER be the truth ALSO. This is because, to them, "truth is just imaginary and does NOT even exist".
Surely this is NOT at all hard to understand, correct?