Does time move?
- Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: May 25th, 2013, 8:41 pm
Does time move?
If you don't use time, what then? What would qualify to measure the movement of time?
The rest of this is filler words.
PhilX
- Present awareness
- Posts: 1389
- Joined: February 3rd, 2014, 7:02 pm
Re: Does time move?
Time, is the measurement of objects, moving through space. Time itself, does not move through space. The still point of the present moment, is what makes the concept of time, possible. "Now" it is here, "now" it is there, let's call the difference in position, the "time" it takes to change.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Think about it. What would we use to measure the movement of time? Time itself? I think that time is preoccupied.
If you don't use time, what then? What would qualify to measure the movement of time?
The rest of this is filler words.
PhilX
-
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: September 4th, 2009, 8:18 am
- Favorite Philosopher: God
- Location: Australia
Re: Does time move?
The difference in "position" of an object in space is given by a "distance". The time taken by a body to move through a "distance" is given by referring to the number of cycles completed by some other body that is caught in predictable repetitive motion.Present awareness wrote:The still point of the present moment, is what makes the concept of time, possible. "Now" it is here, "now" it is there, let's call the difference in position, the "time" it takes to change.
Cheers,
enegue
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Does time move?
If we say that we measure time by comparison with objects that undergo regular repetition then we have to define the term "regular repetition". It means: "doing the same thing at regular intervals in time". But how do we measure whether they're doing that? We're still trying to establish how we measure time.
I think, however we word it, our definitions always have a tendency to be circular. When Einstein defined time as: "what we measure with a clock", he invited the question: "What is a clock?". I don't know of any verbal answer to that question that doesn't involve using the word "time", or another word whose definition, in turn, uses the word time. (e.g: "an object that performs a repeated activity at regular intervals of time, like ticking").
Of course, we could point to a whole load of "clocks" and say: "whatever it is that those things have in common, that's a clock (The form of the clock, as Plato might put it)". Ultimately, I think, that is how we define our abstractions, whether they be "time" or any other generalized concepts. We create them by inducing from individual observations.
-
- Posts: 1573
- Joined: March 30th, 2014, 2:18 pm
Re: Does time move?
- Present awareness
- Posts: 1389
- Joined: February 3rd, 2014, 7:02 pm
Re: Does time move?
- Misty
- Premium Member
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: August 10th, 2011, 8:13 pm
- Location: United States of America
Re: Does time move?
Kind of like the disk? The center of time is stationary but connected to and controlling its outer parts while they are moving and changing?Present awareness wrote:Time, is the measurement of objects, moving through space. Time itself, does not move through space. The still point of the present moment, is what makes the concept of time, possible. "Now" it is here, "now" it is there, let's call the difference in position, the "time" it takes to change.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Think about it. What would we use to measure the movement of time? Time itself? I think that time is preoccupied.
If you don't use time, what then? What would qualify to measure the movement of time?
The rest of this is filler words.
PhilX
-- Updated Wed May 07, 2014 8:27 am to add the following --
Time is measured by changes in all creation (sun up, sun down) and for humans in all that is seen and experienced. Time is increments of motion, the whole in a frame by frame process. (reminds me of cartoons being drawn part by part on paper pages put together then flipped to move the drawing)Philosophy Explorer wrote:Think about it. What would we use to measure the movement of time? Time itself? I think that time is preoccupied.
What would qualify to measure the movement of time?
PhilX
The eyes can only see what the mind has, is, or will be prepared to comprehend.
I am Lion, hear me ROAR! Meow.
-
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: March 28th, 2014, 3:13 am
Re: Does time move?
You are a truly brilliant man, Phil. I am stumped with this one. No clue at all.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Think about it. What would we use to measure the movement of time? Time itself? I think that time is preoccupied.
If you don't use time, what then? What would qualify to measure the movement of time?
The rest of this is filler words.
PhilX
-
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: September 4th, 2009, 8:18 am
- Favorite Philosopher: God
- Location: Australia
Re: Does time move?
Whether we use as a reference the orbit of the Earth about the Sun, or the spin of the Earth on its axis, or the natural oscillation frequencies of atoms, we can determine by various processes and calculations a unit of time on which they all agree, such as the "second".Ruskin wrote:It could we're the ones who move but the same difference either way. Apparently time is relative as well it's not universally consistent throughout the universe.
The idea that time is relative is a myth based on the observation that an atomic clock in orbit about the Earth gets out of sync with one on the ground. However, it's the affect of gravity on the oscillation frequency of the atom in the clock that creates the difference, not that "time" has changed in any way.
Cheers,
enegue
- Present awareness
- Posts: 1389
- Joined: February 3rd, 2014, 7:02 pm
Re: Does time move?
-
- Posts: 1573
- Joined: March 30th, 2014, 2:18 pm
Re: Does time move?
enegue wrote: The idea that time is relative is a myth based on the observation that an atomic clock in orbit about the Earth gets out of sync with one on the ground.
It's based around the fact that the speed of light is the same for all observers regardless of how fast you move. For instance if you throw a ball inside a train it will travel forwards at 10 miles an hour from your position but to an observer out the train the ball would be traveling at 70 mile an hour. Speed is the ratio of space to time however if the speed of light is absolute and does not depend upon the speed of the observer then time must be relative.
- Misty
- Premium Member
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: August 10th, 2011, 8:13 pm
- Location: United States of America
Re: Does time move?
It seems time moves with all moving things.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Think about it. What would we use to measure the movement of time? Time itself? I think that time is preoccupied.
If you don't use time, what then? What would qualify to measure the movement of time?
The rest of this is filler words.
PhilX
The eyes can only see what the mind has, is, or will be prepared to comprehend.
I am Lion, hear me ROAR! Meow.
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Does time move?
But I think the key reason why it's regarded as "time dilation" rather than simply as a "classical" change in oscillation speed somehow caused by the change in gravitational force, is that it applies equally to all processes which contain time as a variable. For example, it affects the half-lives of radioactive particles.
In the same sense, the Lorentz length-contraction which is observed for bodies that are moving relative to each other shouldn't be regarded as some kind of classical-type squashing of the moving object due to inertial forces - like a person getting pushed back into their seat in a fast car. It is an actual contraction of space. Of course, you could still maintain that it is not a contraction of space but a contraction of every object that could possibly exist within that space and of the distances between all those possible objects. But since there is, by definition, no possible empirical way to distinguish between the two concepts, the distinction has no physical significance.
This is the origin of Einstein's point about time being what we measure with a clock and distance being what we measure with a ruler. His point was that, at least for the purposes of physics, the only useful distinctions between concepts are those that correspond, either directly or indirectly, to something that could, at least in principle, be measured.
- Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: May 25th, 2013, 8:41 pm
Re: Does time move?
"It's based around the fact that the speed of light is the same for all observers regardless of how fast you move."
It's not a fact, it's an assumption within the theory of special relativity.
PhilX
- A_Seagull
- Posts: 949
- Joined: November 29th, 2012, 10:56 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Heraclitus
Re: Does time move?
Not quite.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Ruskin wrote:
"It's based around the fact that the speed of light is the same for all observers regardless of how fast you move."
It's not a fact, it's an assumption within the theory of special relativity.
PhilX
It is actually an empirical 'fact' that stems from the famous 'Michelson Morley' experiments at the end of the nineteenth century.
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023