The two-facedness of biology

Use this forum to discuss the philosophy of science. Philosophy of science deals with the assumptions, foundations, and implications of science.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: The two-facedness of biology

Post by LuckyR »

I completely disagree. "Natural" selection by it's traditional meaning has been completely co opted by technology and civilization. Especially in terms of intelligence. It is well known that female education is the best form of Family Planning on the planet (for large populations). So in practice, the more intelligent the person the fewer children the family will have. So essentially we are selecting for ignorance.

Got poor eyesight, no worries, we have eyeglasses. Got a terrible memory, no worries, dictate the info to your smartphone's Notes and Calendar. Not very creative, no worries, we're moving to a Service Economy.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14992
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: The two-facedness of biology

Post by Sy Borg »

Atreyu wrote:I myself am of the view that Nature indeed does have a plan, and that this in fact is a part of it. Apparently Nature no longer needs homo sapiens and all this is part of the process of his degeneration and eventual extinction, i.e. apparently the "Experiment" is over.
Misty wrote:What is Nature's plan? What is the nature of the "Experiment" ?
Fair questions. The closest thing to a plan that I can see is that, given enough environmental stability, it was inevitable that intelligent life forms would develop on Earth. Humans are the first animal to significantly use information as a resource in itself. Every resource and niche in nature is investigated by organisms over time and utilised to advantage if possible. It seems unlikely that a resource as potent as information would be forever underutilised.

People seem to think that humanity have have abused their power and will deservedly return to the dust to allow nature to once again resume unmolested by our intrusive intellect. It's as though we were expected to come down from the trees and almost immediately (in evolutionary timescales) develop the collective wisdom to use our power moderately.

Let's say that humans go extinct. What then? Given enough stability in millions of years another intelligent life form may emerge from the leftover species and repeat the cycle. Anyone hoping for the Earth to reach some form of stable biological state in the absence of humans is thinking short term.

My guess is it's more likely that civilisation and its wealthiest and luckiest members will survive the coming environmental instability, but nothing is certain.
LuckyR wrote:I completely disagree. "Natural" selection by it's traditional meaning has been completely co opted by technology and civilization.
I would suggest that natural selection has been slowed biologically but is still present as per Mechsmith's post or the lung capacity of mountain-dwelling Tibetans. Nature is changing; technology and civilization are examples of nature's recent innovations.

Survival of the fittest? Today the fittest are the wealthiest. We are products of the Earth/universe which define nature so I can't see how we can operate outside of nature. Does nature have an "outside"?

-- Updated 22 Jan 2015, 18:31 to add the following --

NB. I meant "civiliSation", not "civilization" - US spellchecker.
The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated—Gandhi.
User avatar
HZY
Posts: 261
Joined: January 30th, 2013, 11:09 pm

Re: The two-facedness of biology

Post by HZY »

Mysterio448 wrote:There is something that I have noticed about biology that I found interesting. It seems that biology is "two-faced." What I mean by this is that it seems every function of the body possesses some flaw that is inherent to its very design. Furthermore, in many cases bodily functions that are keeping us alive are also, ironically, trying to kill us. After doing a little research, I can list a few examples of this strange phenomenon:

1) The pharynx. This is the passage in the throat used for both swallowing and breathing. The pharynx presents to us the very real danger of choking while swallowing food or drink.

2) The blind spot of the human eye. It is a result of the spot on the retina that lacks photoreceptors in order to make way for the optic nerve. Because of this absence of photoreceptors, there is a small spot in our visual field where we are essentially blind (although the brain usually will interpolate around the spot in order to mask it from our consciousness).

3) The electron transport chain. This is a complex process, occurring in cellular mitochondria, that is the body's primary producer of ATP, which is the body's main energy source. However, this process is also simultaneously responsible for releasing various free radicals into the body, such as superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl free radical. These free radicals contribute to aging and diseases such as type 2 diabetes and Parkinson's disease.

4) DNA replication. Before cells undergo cell division, their DNA are first replicated. After the two strands of DNA are "unzipped" from each other, a protein called DNA polymerase travels along each strand using them as templates to make copy DNA strands. However, the two parent strands are not completely separated before this process; they are copied as they are being separated from each other. So while the DNA polymerase can copy one parent strand continuously, to avoid copying in the wrong direction it can only copy the other strand in fragments, and only after the fragments are preceded by a short nucleotide sequence called an RNA primer. The problem with this process is that when the DNA polymerase gets to the end of the DNA strand, there is nowhere for the RNA primer to attach to, thus the RNA polymerase cannot copy anymore DNA at this point. Technically, this should lead to gradual loss of DNA information with subsequent cell divisions. In reality, this design flaw is mitigated by redundant DNA sequences called telomeres, but this only delays DNA degradation rather than preventing it. Telomere shortening is an inevitable process that subsequently contributes to aging and death.

5) Coagulation. A vital physiological process which forms a plug (blood clot) on the walls of a blood vessel that has been damaged, thus preventing dangerous hemorrhaging. However, these same plugs also run the risk of accidentally detaching from their point of origin and becoming an "embolus" that can freely travel along the blood flow. This can likely impede blood flow and cause serious health problems or death.

6) The immune system. This vital system protects the body from pathogens and harmful irritants. However, the immune system can also itself injure the body. Inflammation, normally a helpful part of the immune system, can often lead to chronic inflammation, which can be a serious health problem. Autoimmune diseases (such as arthritis, lupus, and multiple sclerosis) are diseases in which the immune system begins attacking the body's own tissues, treating them as if they were an infectious pathogen.

7) Cellular structure. Scientists have learned that cancer is actually a natural result of the normal cellular dynamics of the body. The disease is inevitable; everyone will eventually get it, provided they live long enough. A scientific article in Wired Magazine says that there is a "misguided notion that cancer cells are fundamentally different from their normal counterparts.” According to oncology researcher Jarle Breivik, "[Cancer is] the inevitable consequence of our multicellular composition." He says that multicellular organisms are themselves evolutionary systems in which mutation and natural selection occur all the time. Furthermore he says, "The cells of your body are genetically programmed to collaborate, but as we age and new mutations appear, natural selection will favor those mutants that break away from the control mechanisms and proliferate.” So cancer is "an inescapable byproduct of multicellularity and long lifespans." Ironically, the same multicellular structure that constitutes the body is also slowly tearing the body down.

So what do you make of this? Do you agree with my observation that biology is inherently two-faced? And if so, why do you think this is?
What you are describing is the consequence of evolutionary adaptive accumulation of error in the current state.
User avatar
Mysterio448
Posts: 393
Joined: May 3rd, 2013, 6:44 pm

Re: The two-facedness of biology

Post by Mysterio448 »

HZY wrote:
What you are describing is the consequence of evolutionary adaptive accumulation of error in the current state.
Can evolution make "errors"? Evolution isn't actually trying to do anything, so how can it make mistakes?
Mechsmith
Posts: 210
Joined: October 27th, 2013, 5:09 pm

Re: The two-facedness of biology

Post by Mechsmith »

From OUR point of view any error in replication that results in the death of the organism could be called a mistake. Evolution tries many things simply because nothing is perfect. But evolution simply is. The theory of evolution is simply showing how the mechanism works.

As long as there is time there will be change. This is true for galaxies and bacteria. For water and rocks. We don't think of water as trying to dissolve rocks as a goal. It just does. It's the same with evolution. No goal implied or required in the larger scheme of things.
User avatar
HZY
Posts: 261
Joined: January 30th, 2013, 11:09 pm

Re: The two-facedness of biology

Post by HZY »

Mysterio448 wrote:
HZY wrote:
What you are describing is the consequence of evolutionary adaptive accumulation of error in the current state.
Can evolution make "errors"? Evolution isn't actually trying to do anything, so how can it make mistakes?
Well, by error, I meant older genes that are out of favor to the changing environment and is replaced by newer and more adapted genes that sit "on top of" but don't totally eliminate these older genes whose effects can still be felt on occasion. So over time there is an accumulation of these out-of-favor or "defective" genes, the effect of which is magnified as "flaws".
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: The two-facedness of biology

Post by LuckyR »

Greta wrote:
LuckyR wrote:I completely disagree. "Natural" selection by it's traditional meaning has been completely co opted by technology and civilization.
I would suggest that natural selection has been slowed biologically but is still present as per Mechsmith's post or the lung capacity of mountain-dwelling Tibetans. Nature is changing; technology and civilization are examples of nature's recent innovations.

Survival of the fittest? Today the fittest are the wealthiest. We are products of the Earth/universe which define nature so I can't see how we can operate outside of nature. Does nature have an "outside"?

-- Updated 22 Jan 2015, 18:31 to add the following --

NB. I meant "civiliSation", not "civilization" - US spellchecker.
Depends on what you mean by survival. For the individual organism, true the wealthy live longer than the poor. But this is an evolutionary discussion and the wealthy, clearly spread their genes much less successfully than the poor.
"As usual... it depends."
Obvious Leo
Posts: 2501
Joined: April 28th, 2013, 10:03 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Omar Khayyam
Location: Australia

Re: The two-facedness of biology

Post by Obvious Leo »

Greta wrote:I would suggest that natural selection has been slowed biologically but is still present as per Mechsmith's post or the lung capacity of mountain-dwelling Tibetans. Nature is changing; technology and civilization are examples of nature's recent innovations.
The lung capacity of mountain-dwelling Tibetans has been enhanced by gene expression and by gene adaptation and hardly at all by gene selection. Evolution in the human organism occurs continuously at the level of our cellular biology and almost all of these changes are passed on during gestation. The neo-Darwinists are in full retreat in the face of our modern understanding of methylation and epigenetics, which explains why mammals can evolve so astonishingly quickly, a fact which had Charles Darwin utterly mystified. The new buzz-word in evolutionary theory is autopoeisis, which is all about continuous self-creation and essentially a revival of Lamarck at the cellular level.

Regards Leo
User avatar
Atreyu
Posts: 1737
Joined: June 17th, 2014, 3:11 am
Favorite Philosopher: P.D. Ouspensky
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: The two-facedness of biology

Post by Atreyu »

LuckyR wrote: Depends on what you mean by survival. For the individual organism, true the wealthy live longer than the poor. But this is an evolutionary discussion and the wealthy, clearly spread their genes much less successfully than the poor.
Yep. Mankind's current lifestyle appears to be leading him towards extinction, if we stick to the principles of the theory of evolution. When "survival of the fittest" no longer applies, and particularly when the opposite appears to be the norm, the decline of the species in question becomes an eventual inevitability...
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: The two-facedness of biology

Post by LuckyR »

Atreyu wrote:
LuckyR wrote: Depends on what you mean by survival. For the individual organism, true the wealthy live longer than the poor. But this is an evolutionary discussion and the wealthy, clearly spread their genes much less successfully than the poor.
Yep. Mankind's current lifestyle appears to be leading him towards extinction, if we stick to the principles of the theory of evolution. When "survival of the fittest" no longer applies, and particularly when the opposite appears to be the norm, the decline of the species in question becomes an eventual inevitability...

Well, yes and mostly no. True, the educated have lower birth rates, heck if things continue at the projected rate for Japan over the next 60 years, indefinitely (which it will not), the Japanese will die out, as a nation, in 2140-something.

However, if the most educated have lower birth rates, which they do, that just means that the pyramid will continue to have a skinny, pointy top, which most pyramids do (by definition). But that has always been true.
"As usual... it depends."
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Science”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021