Falsificationism and existential statements
- VarunSoon
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: October 23rd, 2017, 5:45 am
Falsificationism and existential statements
The goal is to defend falsificationism (as formulated my Karl Popper) from this criticism:
Theories that contain existential statements, such as "some mammals lay eggs," are not falsifiable (because one cannot observe the whole universe in order to falsify the statement), but the one I mentioned above seems perfectly scientific.
I already tried saying this: "falsificationists need to bite the bullet and accept that a theory like that is unscientific, but also say that few, if not none of, theories are of that form anyway (the concept of electron specifies a location where it can be observed, and the theory of universal gravitation applies to all location and time)." But my professor said that there is a way to defend that does not involve biting the bullet.
Any help?
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: Falsificationism and existential statements
An individual statement that is falsifiable but not verifiable can easily be turned into a statement that is verifiable but not falsifiable by negating it. e.g. "all swans are white" is falsifiable but not verifiable. Its negation "some swans are not white" is the reverse. It's verifiable but not falsifiable.
In your case, the statement "some mammals lay eggs" is verifiable. Its negation is the statement "there are no mammals that lay eggs". That statement is falsifiable (by finding at least one egg-laying mammal).
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023