The Complexity of Evolution

Use this forum to discuss the philosophy of science. Philosophy of science deals with the assumptions, foundations, and implications of science.
User avatar
JamesOfSeattle
Premium Member
Posts: 509
Joined: October 16th, 2015, 11:20 pm

Re: The Complexity of Evolution

Post by JamesOfSeattle »

ThomasHobbes wrote: October 19th, 2018, 3:40 pmBecause any genetic material would have to be sequestered into the human genome and directed into either a human egg or sperm without disrupting its code.
Not sure “sequestered” is the right word here. I think “incorporated” would be better. Yes, the genetic material would have to be incorporated into a cell of the host genome. That’s what retroviruses do. It’s their modus operandi. If that host cell happens to be a germ line cell, there you go.
This would have to happen randomly.
Again, modus operandi.
Maybe you have another mechanism in mind for the human genome acquiring viruses?
So the most likely time/place for a virus to infect a germ line cell would be when it is most exposed to the environment. I’m fairly certain the target would not be a sperm, mostly because 1. the sperm DNA is not in a form in which the retro viral DNA can be inserted (it’s super-compacted), and 2. the odds of any given sperm cell reproducing are minuscule (so sperm are almost always a dead end for the virus). So the most likely target would be the egg after it has been released into the Fallopian tube up until a short time after it has been inseminated and undergone several cell divisions. The germ line cell(s?) would still be exposed to the external milieux until the outside layer of the blastocyst is formed. And for what it’s worth, we know for sure that the “milieux” is full of material from an external source, because that’s what the sperm is, plus whatever viruses might be in the fluid.

Let’s say for now the virus infects the zygote. The viral DNA would get inserted randomly into the host DNA, as you say. Actually, the insertion is probably not completely random. It is most likely to happen where DNA is somewhat exposed, i.e., where the DNA is actively being used by the cell. Now you mention that the insertion has to happen where it doesn’t disrupt the host code. This is true, but given, as mentioned in the video, that the human genome is about 90% “junk”, which just means non-coding for protein, there seems to be a lot of room for safe insertion. If the viral DNA destroys a vital function, that cell dies and is thus selected against.

So now if the viral DNA finds some innocuous spot, it just sits there and the host apparatus makes lots of copies of it, one for each cell.

Now if the viral DNA turns out to be somehow useful to the host, that host will be selected for survival, and the important viral DNA will be preserved, and possibly tweaked. The non-important (for the host) DNA will come along for the ride but will get mutated without effect on the host species.

How’s that?

*
User avatar
ThomasHobbes
Posts: 1122
Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm

Re: The Complexity of Evolution

Post by ThomasHobbes »

JamesOfSeattle wrote: October 19th, 2018, 8:34 pm
ThomasHobbes wrote: October 19th, 2018, 3:40 pmBecause any genetic material would have to be sequestered into the human genome and directed into either a human egg or sperm without disrupting its code.
Not sure “sequestered” is the right word here. I think “incorporated” would be better. Yes, the genetic material would have to be incorporated into a cell of the host genome. That’s what retroviruses do. It’s their modus operandi. If that host cell happens to be a germ line cell, there you go.
No it would have to be successfully incorporated into a host egg or sperm and still result in a successful outcome.
Now all you have to do is ask how the **** foetus managed without the working placenta before the wonderful retrovirus made it all possible.
User avatar
ThomasHobbes
Posts: 1122
Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm

Re: The Complexity of Evolution

Post by ThomasHobbes »

JamesOfSeattle wrote: October 19th, 2018, 8:34 pm...
Now if the viral DNA turns out to be somehow useful to the host, that host will be selected for survival, and the important viral DNA will be preserved, and possibly tweaked. The non-important (for the host) DNA will come along for the ride but will get mutated without effect on the host species.

How’s that?

*
Complete bollox.
Mush more likely that the genetic material originated billions of years ago, and the virus came FROM its original.
User avatar
Mark1955
Posts: 739
Joined: July 21st, 2015, 4:02 am
Favorite Philosopher: David Hume
Location: Nottingham, England.

Re: The Complexity of Evolution

Post by Mark1955 »

ThomasHobbes wrote: October 18th, 2018, 2:58 amYet the anecdotal evidence that the source of all human-like viruses is in fact originally from humans is vast.
Setting aside the lack of value of anecdotes to a scientist, would you like to provide this evidence, then we can criticise it.
If you think you know the answer you probably don't understand the question.
User avatar
Mark1955
Posts: 739
Joined: July 21st, 2015, 4:02 am
Favorite Philosopher: David Hume
Location: Nottingham, England.

Re: The Complexity of Evolution

Post by Mark1955 »

Burning ghost wrote: October 12th, 2018, 6:04 am Note: This post was made by LuckyR


The build up to this can be seen here: viewtopic.php?f=12&t=15797&p=321710#p321710

Moved due to an inappropriate thread title (which cannot be editted once posted.) If anyone would like any particular posts above thread placed here please PM me and I’ll copy and paste where appropriate. Anyway, back to LuckyR’s post:
ThomasHobbes wrote: October 11th, 2018, 4:37 pm

Prove it!
Here is an entertaining synopsis geared to the lay public:

The Virus and the Placenta
Boston in the mid-1990s was humming with the activity of the Human Genome Project. Sequencing technologies had advanced to the point where scientists were incorporating gene discovery into even the most basic research. Since the American courts had thus far allowed companies to patent the genes they discovered, companies like the Genetics Institute (now a part of Pfizer) saw a chance to cash in. There, molecular biologist John McCoy was looking for proteins secreted by cells since they seemed good targets for developing potential drugs.

All was going as planned until McCoy’s bioinformatics specialist Steve Howes rushed into his lab in 1997 to show him the sequence of a gene they called syncytin, which their work showed was secreted by placenta tissue.

Before McCoy could go public with his discovery, he needed to figure out exactly what syncytin did, a job he passed to bench scientist Sha Mi, who everyone called Misha. Misha’s experiments seemed to be going as planned until, a few months later, she, too, rushed into McCoy’s lab with findings of her own.

Syncytin is produced only by certain cells in the placenta, and it directs the formation of the cellular boundary between the placenta and maternal tissue. Approximately one week after fertilization, the egg, now a hollow ball of cells called a blastocyst, implants itself into the uterus, stimulating the formation of the placenta, which provides the fetus with oxygen and nutrients while removing carbon dioxide and other wastes. It also serves as a barrier to prevent infection and keep maternal and fetal blood separate. (Mixing the two could cause a fatal autoimmune response.) The cells in the outer layer of the blastocyst form the outer layer of the placenta, and those in direct contact with the uterus are the only ones that made syncytin.

When the scientists looked closer at the DNA sequence of syncytin, they found that it was nearly identical to a viral protein called env that caused the virus to fuse with its host cell. In the placenta, syncytin performed helped the fetus fuse with its mother. At last McCoy, Howe, and Mi knew what syncytin did.

“This was a bona fide retroviral envelope protein that had somehow been captured during evolution and been trained to operate in human biology,” McCoy says.

The two other retroviral genes next to syncytin, gag and pol, were completely non-functional, McCoy says. Only env remained intact. “Everything else about that retrovirus had been trashed,” he says. The team published a paper in Nature in 2000.

“An important step in mammalian evolution was accomplished by capturing this viral envelope gene,” McCoy says. “There’s plenty of examples of viruses picking up human genes, but this is one of the first examples of the reverse.”

Humans aren’t the only species with a placenta, however. All mammals have placentas, including marsupials and egg-laying mammals. Although all of these mammals have a syncytin gene, they don’t all have the same syncytin gene. The syncytin produced by mice is completely different from the two syncytins found in humans and other primates. At numerous points in mammalian evolution, symbiotic retroviruses entered the genome and steered different groups of mammals along different evolutionary paths, according to a 2012 paper in PNAS by virologist Harmit Malik at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle. Nor was syncytin the only driver
What bugs me about this is the use of words like trained and steered. This implies agency for which there is no evidence.

For those questioning the idea that it went from virus to human and not the other way round, the fact that mice have a different gene indicates our common ancestor didn't have a common gene. When the located gene can be shown to match a suitable virus and different virii have different gene the logic dictates transfer from virus to mammal. Otherwise a group of unrelated virii would have an approximately common geen they had inherited from different mammals.
If you think you know the answer you probably don't understand the question.
User avatar
ThomasHobbes
Posts: 1122
Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm

Re: The Complexity of Evolution

Post by ThomasHobbes »

Mark1955 wrote: October 21st, 2018, 5:13 am
ThomasHobbes wrote: October 18th, 2018, 2:58 amYet the anecdotal evidence that the source of all human-like viruses is in fact originally from humans is vast.
Setting aside the lack of value of anecdotes to a scientist, would you like to provide this evidence, then we can criticise it.
I've no need, since the alternative offered is probabilistically impossible.
User avatar
JamesOfSeattle
Premium Member
Posts: 509
Joined: October 16th, 2015, 11:20 pm

Re: The Complexity of Evolution

Post by JamesOfSeattle »

Mark1955 wrote: October 21st, 2018, 5:19 am
Burning ghost wrote: October 12th, 2018, 6:04 amHumans aren’t the only species with a placenta, however. All mammals have placentas, including marsupials and egg-laying mammals. Although all of these mammals have a syncytin gene, they don’t all have the same syncytin gene.
What bugs me about this is the use of words like trained and steered. This implies agency for which there is no evidence.
The use of trained and steered doesn’t bug me because these are just the terms of design, but in this context we can assume natural design, i.e. natural selection. It would be awkward to have to say “naturally selectively trained” every time.

What bugs me is how they say all mammals have a syncytin gene but they don’t all have the same syncytin gene. Are the genes homologous? Which is to say, are the sequences similar enough to indicate that they started out the same but diverged thru evolution? If not, how could they both be called by the same name: syncytin?
For those questioning the idea that it went from virus to human and not the other way round, the fact that mice have a different gene indicates our common ancestor didn't have a common gene.
I can understand seeing a problem when someone says that everything with a placenta has a syncytin gene, but they didn’t all evolve from the same syncytin gene. It seems improbable that some mammals developed a placenta by co-opting a gene from virus X and others developed the placenta by co-opting from virus Y (or some other mechanism). That said, I can imagine that all mammals started out with a placenta and a gene that performed the syncytin function. Let’s call that version 0. If after many species have diverged, one of those species gets a viral DNA into it’s germ line, and a gene from that virus performs the syncytin function better than the version 0 gene, natural selection could select for the new version, say version 1, and the old version 0 could mutate into non-functionality without harm to the species.

*
User avatar
Mark1955
Posts: 739
Joined: July 21st, 2015, 4:02 am
Favorite Philosopher: David Hume
Location: Nottingham, England.

Re: The Complexity of Evolution

Post by Mark1955 »

JamesOfSeattle wrote: October 21st, 2018, 3:00 pmWhat bugs me is how they say all mammals have a syncytin gene but they don’t all have the same syncytin gene. Are the genes homologous? Which is to say, are the sequences similar enough to indicate that they started out the same but diverged thru evolution? If not, how could they both be called by the same name: syncytin?
Genes are named based on the function of the protein they code, so if it does the same job it gets the same name. We start by identifying the function, then we find the protein structure, then we work out the DNA sequence. If we find, as we generally do, that related species have related DNA sequences located then the gene and the species likely evolved together. If two fairly closely related species have very different DNA codes then we need to look for other ways the gene came into existence.
If you think you know the answer you probably don't understand the question.
User avatar
Mark1955
Posts: 739
Joined: July 21st, 2015, 4:02 am
Favorite Philosopher: David Hume
Location: Nottingham, England.

Re: The Complexity of Evolution

Post by Mark1955 »

ThomasHobbes wrote: October 21st, 2018, 9:10 am
Mark1955 wrote: October 21st, 2018, 5:13 am
Setting aside the lack of value of anecdotes to a scientist, would you like to provide this evidence, then we can criticise it.
I've no need, since the alternative offered is probabilistically impossible.
Another statement without any evidence, why is it probabilistically impossible.
If you think you know the answer you probably don't understand the question.
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Science”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021