Steve3007 wrote: ↑February 2nd, 2020, 4:57 am
creation wrote:Why are you asking me if I am up for "starting" that?
I thought you might be interested in seeing how the foundations and walls of the house support the roof, as previously discussed.
But why ask me if I am up for starting that?
And considering we have already started at the foundations and have seen what the actual solid foundation is, then we have already started.
Steve3007 wrote: ↑February 2nd, 2020, 4:57 am
creation wrote:Where do you want me to "start"?
I don't want you to do anything that you're not interested in. It takes a lot of time and patience to study a subject to this level, and a lot of time and patience to describe it. If you're not interested in it, it's probably not a good idea to start. But if you were interested, the answer would be: the beginning. Obviously.
Did I miss something? Have we not already started at the beginning, and now you want to move onto some next part, where I really do not care where you move onto next. I am just interested in seeing what else you have to say here.
Steve3007 wrote: ↑February 2nd, 2020, 4:57 am
creation wrote:You can start that if you like. That way of doing things was your idea anyway.
I take it from this comment that you're not interested.
Well that was a very wrong assumption and conclusion that you just made and came to. I am very interested in where you can go with this and what you have to say.
Steve3007 wrote: ↑February 2nd, 2020, 4:57 am
No problem. Nothing wrong with that at all. But do bear in mind that when you post your usual "this is all nonsense and I know the truth and it's all very simple" comments, you're talking from a position of ignorance on the subject.
And, once again, your assumptions have led you completely astray. This is just another of your assumptions.
Besides that, we have already established that there is no actual thing as time in any physical sense that could dilate anyway.
This is based on the foundation that you wanted to look at and inspect.
To me, it appears to set out to suggest a way to look at things, which you were not expecting any to take up. I am more than willing for you to do what you discussed we would, and am very interested in hearing what 'you', yourself, have to say, as then I have your own actual words that I can use to show where the faults and flaws lay. But, now that I have shown I am very interested in this, you appeared to have completely changed and now do not want to do it all.
The readers will decided why you do not want to continue on with this now?
Steve3007 wrote: ↑February 2nd, 2020, 4:57 am
Nothing wrong with ignorance. We're all ignorant of all kinds of things. It only becomes a problem if we pretend otherwise.
Nice talking to you creation.
And, once again, your fear or complete incapability, or both, to just look at a thought experiment, and discuss it truly honestly, because if my thought experiment did happen to reveal that what you accept and/or believe is true is actual false and logically impossible anyway, then is just to much for you to bear.
Your closed attitude in not wanting to look at ideas and find out what they actually contain is why human beings are so very slow at progressing.
Human beings still fight for and claim that 'their' theory has been already verified and confirmed, yet others say the exact same thing about 'their' different theory that they accept and/or believe is already verified and confirmed.
Nothing much has changed since human beings when they continually fought for what they accepted and/or believed was true in relation to the sun revolving around the earth.
Obviously, what happens in my thought experiment completely falsifies some of what is proposed, predicted, or claimed in 'the theory of relativity', which no one could prove this statement illogical or false.
And, no one taking up my offer to discuss this thought experiment with me, or no one even showing the slightest bit of interest in understanding my views and ideas, so that they could challenge or question me legitimately, then just dismissing me and my ideas is actually what is based on absolute total true ignorance.
If, according to your logic here, if anyone pretends that they are not ignorant of my views and ideas, and so propose my ideas or views as being "irrational", "pseudo", "denying accepted knowledge ideologies", et cetera, for example, then only then this obvious ignorance becomes a problem.
But just remember this is certainly not a problem for me. As I have set out to show just how the brain, through the belief-system, will not even consider looking at a new or any idea that which is suspected of opposing the ideas, which are currently held to be logical and true.
The power of this belief-system I have exposed and shown through test subjects, and have their own written words as the evidence needed.
So, either way, if anyone is not afraid to look at some thoughts and answer some questions, or not, I am achieving what I have set out to do.