Life is inevitable?

Use this forum to discuss the philosophy of science. Philosophy of science deals with the assumptions, foundations, and implications of science.
User avatar
Prof Bulani
Posts: 367
Joined: December 1st, 2019, 3:47 pm

Re: Life is inevitable?

Post by Prof Bulani »

chewybrian wrote: February 9th, 2020, 8:32 am But, do we have any basis for saying there is a chance, a billion to one or otherwise, for life to begin where there is no life? We may know the environment that can support the life forms we have encountered, but do we know the process by which inert matter can become alive? Aren't we just assuming that there must have been or could have been a 'happy accident', here or elsewhere?
Premise 1: conditions of locales in the universe are randomly generated
Premise 2: life has occurred

Unless you have a third premise, it seems logical to conclude that life occurred as a result of the conditions in at least one locale in the universe being suitable for life to occur.

Remember, chemical complexity is inevitable under conditions in which there is a net surplus of energy. While entropy is the universal law, i.e., chemical "uncomplexity", because energy dissipates towards equilibrium, where energy accumulates we would expect exactly the opposite to occur. An increase in chemical complexity under conditions where energy accumulates is no more "miraculous" than a decrease in chemical complexity under conditions where energy dissipates.

That doesn't mean that a locale in which energy accumulates will inevitably give rise to life because it gives rise to chemical complexity. We have many examples of non-living chemical complexity. Life is a special kind of chemical complexity that requires special conditions. And I agree that we don't understand much about these special conditions or if life is inevitable under these special conditions. All we have are the 2 premises to go on.
"The purpose of life is to survive and replicate" - Erik von Markovik
User avatar
chewybrian
Posts: 1594
Joined: May 9th, 2018, 7:17 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Epictetus
Location: Florida man

Re: Life is inevitable?

Post by chewybrian »

Prof Bulani wrote: February 9th, 2020, 9:24 am
chewybrian wrote: February 9th, 2020, 8:32 am But, do we have any basis for saying there is a chance, a billion to one or otherwise, for life to begin where there is no life? We may know the environment that can support the life forms we have encountered, but do we know the process by which inert matter can become alive? Aren't we just assuming that there must have been or could have been a 'happy accident', here or elsewhere?
Premise 1: conditions of locales in the universe are randomly generated
Premise 2: life has occurred

Unless you have a third premise, it seems logical to conclude that life occurred as a result of the conditions in at least one locale in the universe being suitable for life to occur.
Well, of course there is at least one more premise, which is to say that life began due to some outside cause. This is not a logical conclusion, but only a possibility. There is also no logic to link "life has occurred" to "therefore it must have been a happy accident".
"If determinism holds, then past events have conspired to cause me to hold this view--it is out of my control. Either I am right about free will, or it is not my fault that I am wrong."
User avatar
Prof Bulani
Posts: 367
Joined: December 1st, 2019, 3:47 pm

Re: Life is inevitable?

Post by Prof Bulani »

chewybrian wrote: February 9th, 2020, 10:47 am
Prof Bulani wrote: February 9th, 2020, 9:24 am
Premise 1: conditions of locales in the universe are randomly generated
Premise 2: life has occurred

Unless you have a third premise, it seems logical to conclude that life occurred as a result of the conditions in at least one locale in the universe being suitable for life to occur.
Well, of course there is at least one more premise, which is to say that life began due to some outside cause. This is not a logical conclusion, but only a possibility. There is also no logic to link "life has occurred" to "therefore it must have been a happy accident".
Notice that premise 1 and premise 2 are things we know to be true. We know that locales in the universe are randomly generated. We know that life has occurred in the universe at least once. If it's not something we know to be true, is not a premise. It's a hypothesis at best.
"The purpose of life is to survive and replicate" - Erik von Markovik
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14995
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Life is inevitable?

Post by Sy Borg »

Prof Bulani wrote: February 9th, 2020, 7:03 am
Greta wrote: February 9th, 2020, 12:27 am
So life IS inevitable. Just because something is scarce, does not mean it was a fluke.

The fact is that the universe is so large that just about any conceivable (and no doubt many not-yet-conceivable) conditions can potentially arise on different worlds. Given that, at least once, biology emerged from simpler organics to more efficiently break down charged material, and that water and organics are plentiful in the universe, the premise can only logically be answered in the affirmative.
No. Even if you bought 1 trillion random lottery tickets and the odds of winning was 1 billion to one, it would still be possible to NOT win the lottery, i.e., winning is never inevitable. The more lottery tickets you buy, the closer your probability of winning approaches to 1, but it never gets there unless you can buy either an infinite number of random lottery tickets, or you deliberately (a guided approach) buy at least one of every possible combination. As long as the tickets are being generated randomly, the possibility will always exist that the winning combination is not one of your tickets.

We can argue that the lottery analogy might be inaccurate, and that life can occur under a range of general conditions rather than only under one combination of exact combinations. And this is likely the case. Still, we have to understand that all these conditions are randomly generated. It will always be within the realm of possibility that the right general conditions for life occurred however in the universe. That's why I would argue that life is not inevitable. Just most likely very highly probable.
Nope. Maybe you would be right as regards a single galaxy, but the entire universe - scale of which is unknown but suspected to be exponentially larger than the observable universe - is too great.

It is suspected that there could be up to 40 billion habitable worlds in the Milky Way alone. Let's say it's a gross overestimation and call it one billion. So that would leave a conservative estimate of 200 billion billion planets (far more than a trillion) in the observable universe alone - never mind the rest.

Besides, if you checked the video you posted you would see that the formation of life appears to be a logical process of efficient stepping down of energy, ie. movement towards chemical balance. Given the odds above, life is most likely plentiful, and quite possibly at multiple sites in our own solar system.
User avatar
Prof Bulani
Posts: 367
Joined: December 1st, 2019, 3:47 pm

Re: Life is inevitable?

Post by Prof Bulani »

Greta, I watched the video. I immediately turned a fan of Eric Smith, as his presentation was phenomenal. I have no doubt that under the conditions of this planet in its early development, with multiple sources of surplus energy accumulation and carbon/mineral mixing, life would have been inevitable.

What I've been saying is that for planet earth, or any other planet in the universe, it wasn't inevitable that those conditions would have randomly occurred (because of how random generation works). There's a possibility (although probably tiny) that nowhere in the universe the conditions may have been generated. I digress though, as I understand your point and I agree with Smith and his colleagues.
"The purpose of life is to survive and replicate" - Erik von Markovik
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14995
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Life is inevitable?

Post by Sy Borg »

Prof B, I'm glad you enjoyed it as much as I did. The material is dense enough to reward multiple viewings.

While the chances that life will not appear at any time in the universe are exceedingly remote, you are right that an exceedingly remote chance is still a chance, that someone will have the winning lottery ticket.

I desperately hope to be alive and healthy when/if life is discovered in the solar system. Especially if multicellular life is found under the ice of Europa or Enceladus, since that transition from microbial life is said by evolutionary biologists to be exceptionally fluky. Trouble is, if animals, fungi or plants are found elsewhere, then we'd have to find another example, to reassure ourselves that the two unlikely events happening close together wasn't a huge fluke :)
User avatar
revo74
Posts: 12
Joined: February 5th, 2020, 11:13 am

Re: Life is inevitable?

Post by revo74 »

Prof Bulani wrote: February 8th, 2020, 9:11 pm Life is not inevitable. The universe tends towards entropy. However, in particular locales of the universe (earth being one of them) there is a net energy increase. While energy dissipation leads to what we would refer to as deterioration of structure, or "chaos", a net surplus of energy leads an increase in structural complexity.

As a matter of probability in the universe, we could say that life is inevitable, in that there are enough locales with energy surpluses to give rise to the complexity that is life. If you would consider it "inevitable" to win the lottery if you bought 500 million tickets (random draws) and the odds were 500 million to one, then I the same sense you might consider that it would be inevitable for life to occur in the universe.
You're claiming like is a result of chance "(a series of random events). This is no more than a bald assertion. How can you be certain life isn't directed by governing rules/forces to emerge when certain conditions are met just as every other system of matter? And the fact the universe is heading towards entropy is irrelevant. The heat death of the universe won't occur for 10^100 years.
User avatar
revo74
Posts: 12
Joined: February 5th, 2020, 11:13 am

Re: Life is inevitable?

Post by revo74 »

woodbine wrote: February 8th, 2020, 5:35 pm
As a matter of abductive reasoning (inference to the best explanation), the conclusion life is an inevitable consequence of governing rules/forces, is the best one to arrive at. Agree or not?
Hello fellow newbie.

The natural "laws" are as they are and we have life, therefore, deterministically speaking I suppose life is/was inevitable as is the current state of the universe generally.

However, I don't think it significant that the laws facilitate life for two reasons:

We can only have a discussion like this in a universe where the laws facilitate life.(Anthropic principle....I think )

It also reminds me of the analogy where any well shuffled deck of cards will result in a particular order, and the chances of that particular arrangement occurring are - a very big number :1. - in other words, hugely improbable but totally unremarkable.
Similarly, in which ever way the universe developed it would have been hugely improbable. This univese is hugely improbable and supports life but I do not think the two are necessarily connected.
There is a distinction to be recognized between a universe with natural laws that permit life to exist and flourish and one where there a natural laws that direct life to emerge similarly to how the strong interaction/force and electromagnetism direct the formation of atoms. The former is obvious, hence the Anthropic Principle. The later is what I am questioning.
User avatar
revo74
Posts: 12
Joined: February 5th, 2020, 11:13 am

Re: Life is inevitable?

Post by revo74 »

Prof Bulani wrote: February 9th, 2020, 7:03 am
Greta wrote: February 9th, 2020, 12:27 am
So life IS inevitable. Just because something is scarce, does not mean it was a fluke.

The fact is that the universe is so large that just about any conceivable (and no doubt many not-yet-conceivable) conditions can potentially arise on different worlds. Given that, at least once, biology emerged from simpler organics to more efficiently break down charged material, and that water and organics are plentiful in the universe, the premise can only logically be answered in the affirmative.
No. Even if you bought 1 trillion random lottery tickets and the odds of winning was 1 billion to one, it would still be possible to NOT win the lottery, i.e., winning is never inevitable. The more lottery tickets you buy, the closer your probability of winning approaches to 1, but it never gets there unless you can buy either an infinite number of random lottery tickets, or you deliberately (a guided approach) buy at least one of every possible combination. As long as the tickets are being generated randomly, the possibility will always exist that the winning combination is not one of your tickets.

We can argue that the lottery analogy might be inaccurate, and that life can occur under a range of general conditions rather than only under one combination of exact combinations. And this is likely the case. Still, we have to understand that all these conditions are randomly generated. It will always be within the realm of possibility that the right general conditions for life occurred however in the universe. That's why I would argue that life is not inevitable. Just most likely very highly probable.
Once again, you're assuming without warrant that life is a result of chance (a series of random events). Do atoms form by chance? No they do not. As previously mentioned, the strong interaction/force and electromagnetic force direct particles to form into atoms. Atoms are merely one system of matter. The thing is, every single system of matter we observe in nature for which we do know how they come about, is a result of governing rules/forces (or natural laws). Why would life, the most intricate and complex system of matter be any different? There is no good reason to believe life forms accidentally.
User avatar
revo74
Posts: 12
Joined: February 5th, 2020, 11:13 am

Re: Life is inevitable?

Post by revo74 »

Prof Bulani wrote: February 9th, 2020, 9:24 am
chewybrian wrote: February 9th, 2020, 8:32 am But, do we have any basis for saying there is a chance, a billion to one or otherwise, for life to begin where there is no life? We may know the environment that can support the life forms we have encountered, but do we know the process by which inert matter can become alive? Aren't we just assuming that there must have been or could have been a 'happy accident', here or elsewhere?
Premise 1: conditions of locales in the universe are randomly generated
Premise 2: life has occurred

Unless you have a third premise, it seems logical to conclude that life occurred as a result of the conditions in at least one locale in the universe being suitable for life to occur.

Remember, chemical complexity is inevitable under conditions in which there is a net surplus of energy. While entropy is the universal law, i.e., chemical "uncomplexity", because energy dissipates towards equilibrium, where energy accumulates we would expect exactly the opposite to occur. An increase in chemical complexity under conditions where energy accumulates is no more "miraculous" than a decrease in chemical complexity under conditions where energy dissipates.

That doesn't mean that a locale in which energy accumulates will inevitably give rise to life because it gives rise to chemical complexity. We have many examples of non-living chemical complexity. Life is a special kind of chemical complexity that requires special conditions. And I agree that we don't understand much about these special conditions or if life is inevitable under these special conditions. All we have are the 2 premises to go on.
Premise one is wrong. However, perhaps I'm not fully comprehending what you're implying, please elaborate.
User avatar
Prof Bulani
Posts: 367
Joined: December 1st, 2019, 3:47 pm

Re: Life is inevitable?

Post by Prof Bulani »

revo74 wrote: February 11th, 2020, 10:14 pm Once again, you're assuming without warrant that life is a result of chance (a series of random events). Do atoms form by chance? No they do not. As previously mentioned, the strong interaction/force and electromagnetic force direct particles to form into atoms. Atoms are merely one system of matter. The thing is, every single system of matter we observe in nature for which we do know how they come about, is a result of governing rules/forces (or natural laws). Why would life, the most intricate and complex system of matter be any different? There is no good reason to believe life forms accidentally.
Let me again clarify what I'm saying. The conditions on any given planet (its size, composition, solar proximity, subterranean activity, etc) are randomly generated. This is the case for all planets that exist. And yes, this "randomness" must comply with governing natural laws (just like a rolling die's "randomness" is still compliant with forces of friction and gravity). My argument was never that life forms accidentally. Life is inevitable provided that the conditions on the planet are within certain parameters. My arguments was that planet generation is accidental. The formation of at least one planet in the universe in which the conditions are suitable for life to emerge is technically not inevitable. That's the point I'm making. It's a weak point though as the chance of zero planets with the minimal conditions for life being randomly generated is likely infinitesimally tiny.
"The purpose of life is to survive and replicate" - Erik von Markovik
Steve3007
Posts: 10339
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm

Re: Life is inevitable?

Post by Steve3007 »

Prof Bulani wrote:...That's the point I'm making. It's a weak point though as the chance of zero planets with the minimal conditions for life being randomly generated is likely infinitesimally tiny.
And it's a good point. Although it's nigh on impossible to say just how small or large those chances are because, so far, we only have one example to go on. If you knew nothing at all about the structure of the die in your hand, and you rolled it once, and got a 6, you'd have no idea how likely it is that the next roll would also be a 6.

As far as I'm aware, we have no clear idea of how small a probability hole life had to squeeze through to emerge on Earth. We just know, after the fact, that it happened.
User avatar
Prof Bulani
Posts: 367
Joined: December 1st, 2019, 3:47 pm

Re: Life is inevitable?

Post by Prof Bulani »

Steve3007 wrote: February 12th, 2020, 3:25 am And it's a good point. Although it's nigh on impossible to say just how small or large those chances are because, so far, we only have one example to go on. If you knew nothing at all about the structure of the die in your hand, and you rolled it once, and got a 6, you'd have no idea how likely it is that the next roll would also be a 6.

As far as I'm aware, we have no clear idea of how small a probability hole life had to squeeze through to emerge on Earth. We just know, after the fact, that it happened.
There are two probability measures we are looking at.
1. The probability of at least one planet in the universe being randomly generated with conditions suitable for the emergence of life.
2. The probability of the emergence of life on a planet in which the conditions are suitable for the emergence of life.

I was commenting on probability measure 1. My point has been that planet generation is random, and, from what we can observe, the odds of a planet being randomly generated with conditions suitable for life on it seems to be far smaller than the odds of a planet being generated that cannot support life on it at all. Therefore it is possible, albeit unlikely, that even given the vast number of generated planets in the universe, zero could have been generated with conditions suitable for the emergence of life. Because the probability of a universe with no planets randomly generated to have suitable conditions is not zero, this would imply that it would be possible for the universe to exist and have no life on it. Hence, from this stance, life is not inevitable.

Contrast that with probability measure 2. Once a planet has been generated with the conditions that allow for the emergence of life (essentially liquid water, energy input, and carbon-rich chemical mixing), scientists are arguing that life is inevitable.

In other words, life will emerge in the right conditions (probability = 1) given that a planet is randomly generated with the right conditions (probability < 0).
"The purpose of life is to survive and replicate" - Erik von Markovik
User avatar
woodbine
Posts: 29
Joined: January 31st, 2020, 4:04 pm
Location: UK

Re: Life is inevitable?

Post by woodbine »

revo74 wrote: February 11th, 2020, 10:07 pm
woodbine wrote: February 8th, 2020, 5:35 pm

Hello fellow newbie.

The natural "laws" are as they are and we have life, therefore, deterministically speaking I suppose life is/was inevitable as is the current state of the universe generally.

However, I don't think it significant that the laws facilitate life for two reasons:

Socan only have a discussion like this in a universe where the laws facilitate life.(Anthropic principle....I think )

It also reminds me of the analogy where any well shuffled deck of cards will result in a particular order, and the chances of that particular arrangement occurring are - a very big number :1. - in other words, hugely improbable but totally unremarkable.
Similarly, in which ever way the universe developed it would have been hugely improbable. This univese is hugely improbable and supports life but I do not think the two are necessarily connected.
There is a distinction to be recognized between a universe with natural laws that permit life to exist and flourish and one where there a natural laws that direct life to emerge similarly to how the strong interaction/force and electromagnetism direct the formation of atoms. The former is obvious, hence the Anthropic Principle. The later is what I am questioning.
I don't quite know what you mean.

So, we are looking for a distinction between;

Natural laws that "permit" life to exist.
And
Natural laws that "direct" life to exist.

To me, "Direct" in this context implies purposeful agency otherwise it would be synonymous with "permit".

Is your point that, regarding the existence of life, purposeful agency is more probable than a chance event?
User avatar
h_k_s
Posts: 1243
Joined: November 25th, 2018, 12:09 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Aristotle
Location: Rocky Mountains

Re: Life is inevitable?

Post by h_k_s »

revo74 wrote: February 7th, 2020, 11:09 pm In order to avoid posts that continue to grow in size I will just respond to your first two points for now.
h_k_s wrote: February 7th, 2020, 10:35 pm "The universe is governed …" -- that be a stretch. We don't know if it is governed or not. It may just behave any way that it wants. It is a human hypothesis that it is "governed."
When I say governed, I mean that there are natural laws that govern various aspects of the universe. With our contemporary technology we are only able to observe and describe what we see. We give labels to phenomena we observe, such as the force of gravity and the strong interaction/force. However, we don't know what these things are fundamentally. With that said, these phenomena do govern the universe in a regular, reliable, measurable manner. Do you object to this. If so, please elaborate.
" ... rules/forces that direct matter is specific ways … " we only know of gravity and nuclear fusion, and that's a very short list.
There are 4 fundamental forces. Then what about things like the speed of light in a vacuum? Embedded in space-time in some mysterious force that is controlling the speed of light, if not photons would vary in speed, would they not. Fractals, like the Mandelbrot set would be another governing rule. Once again, there is some mysterious rule/force that causes matter to take of specific forms. Please elaborate if you disagree. Thanks!
"... natural laws …" that also be a stretch. This is what you were taught in high school and college Physics, however these are only scientific inferences. We don't even really "know" for sure what causes gravity. We have only observed that large galactic objects such as moons, planets, and stars attract other objects towards themselves.
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of Science”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021