The Big Bang didn't happen
The Big Bang hypothesis has been defended for decades as unquestionable truth by the vast majority of cosmological theorists, the new data of JWST is causing theorists to panic. “Right now I find myself lying awake at three in the morning,” says Alison Kirkpatrick, an astronomer at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, “and wondering if everything I’ve done is wrong.”
https://iai.tv/articles/the-big-bang-di ... -auid-2215
In a 2013 article titled Getting Einstein to Say "I Was Wrong" on PhysicsBuzz it was argued that the origin of the Big Bang theory is controversial.
Mysteriously lost papers by Albert Einstein that he submitted to the Prussian Academy of Sciences in Berlin were found in Jerusalem in 2013. Those papers show that Albert Einstein actively attempted to restore his theory for an infinite Universe in the years after the discoveries made by Edwin Hubble and in those papers he appeared to deliberately misspell the name of Edwin Hubble, calling him "Hubbel" repeatedly.
It seems to be impossible that the misspelling was an accident.
At the time of the paper it was two years after Hubble's discoveries and the evidence shows that there had been a publicity force at play in which it was said that Hubble's discovery had changed Albert Einstein's mind.
"headlines across the country [USA] lit up, claiming that Einstein had been converted to a believer in an expanding universe."
Besides this information, it is seen that Albert Einstein had been a persistent opponent of the expanding Universe theory in the years after the media hype about his conversion into a believer.
"Two years after Hubble's discovery - [Albert Einstein] highlighted a major shortcoming of the expanding universe theory.... This was a major sticking point for Einstein. The idea of an expanding universe had been kicking around for several years at that point, but each time a physicist approached Einstein about it, he would dismiss the theory."
A year after the mysteriously lost paper Albert Einstein would join a priest on a tour across the USA to promote the Big Bang theory. The public announcement about his conversion into 'a believer' mentions specifically that he was convinced after 'listening' to a beautiful creation story.
"This is the most beautiful and satisfactory explanation of creation to which I have ever listened," Einstein said, and called his own theory the biggest blunder of his career."
At the time of Albert Einstein's lost paper, the Tired Light Theory was an alternative theory for redshift that according to some scientists today, is the most plausible theory.
Tired Light Denies the Big Bang
More and more problems related to Big Bang have been appeared in recent years. All the problems are due to the Doppler interpretation of redshift.
https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/64538
Tired Light refutes the big bang theory
https://tiredlight.net/
New Tired Light Theory
http://tiredlight.org/
New Tired-Light Theory Explains Redshift and CMB in an Infinite Universe
http://www.noeticadvancedstudies.us/Ashmore.pdf
--
The article on iai.tv is authored by Eric J. Lerner. The article is based on a paper that starts with "Panick! (in cosmology)"
He writes: It has become almost impossible to publish papers critical of the Big Bang in any astronomical journals.
I have been banned on Space.com myself for questioning the Big Bang theory. In June 2021, a decent written post about the fact that the Big Bang theory is considered to be a religion by an increasing amount of scientists that received several serious replies, was deleted for questionable motives.
Topics are normally ‘closed’ and remain readable but the moderator deleted the topic.
"This thread has runs its course. Thank you to those who contributed. Closing now."
Sabine Hossenfelder, theoretical physicist specialized in quantum gravity and high energy physics, said the following:
You will find the three main problems of the Big Bang theory religiously repeated as a motivation for inflation, in lectures and textbooks and popular science pages all over the place.
One of inflation’s cofounders has turned his back on the idea. But practically no one else is following him. Is he right?
I was dismayed to see that the criticism by Steinhardt, Ijas, and Loeb that inflation is not a scientific theory, was dismissed so quickly by a community which has become too comfortable with itself.
There’s no warning sign you when you cross the border between science and blabla-land. But inflationary model building left behind reasonable scientific speculation long ago. I, for one, am glad that at least some people are speaking out about it. And that’s why I approve of the Steinhardt et al. criticism.
--
What is your opinion about the Big Bang theory and the way that it is dogmatically enforced in academic research?