Biology end in meaningless nonsense as its idea of species ends in self contradiction
species is a basic concept in biology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species
“In biology a species is one of the basic units of biological classification and a taxonomic rank”
Yet biologist don’t know what a species is-so much for a science that cant even identify its object of investigation
gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/books/phi ... ection.pdf
Many e seem to think biologists know what species are
We hear biologist and such figures as dawkins gould talks about speciation ie the appearance of new species BUT biologists cannot tell us what a species or phylum is
some argue that
species can breed with each other
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species
“A species is often defined as a group of organisms capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring… [this following part will be discussed in the appendix where it will be shown leads to nonsense and again biologist cant agree on what a species is] While in many cases this definition is adequate, more precise or differing measures are often used, such as similarity of DNA, morphology or ecological niche
yet this definition is shown to end in meaningless nonsense
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species
"However, the exact definition of the term "species"
is still controversial, particularly in prokaryotes,[2]
and this is called the species problem.[3"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phylum
"Although a phylum is often spoken of as if it were a hard and fast entity,
no satisfactory definition of a phylum exists"
With out a definition of these terms then biologists are really talking nonsense for with out definitions to locate and identify the things they talk about they are really not talking about anything at all If the biologist talks about say speciation or this species proving natural selection but cant tell you what a species or phylum is then he is talking meaningless nonsense. He could as easily said certain gibbles prove natural selection but with out knowing what a gibble is the claim is meaningless
some argue that
species can breed with each other
yet this definition is shown to end in meaningless nonsense
take the Bactrian and dromedary camels they are different species yet they can breed with fertile off spring which should mean they are the same species- yet they are different species
http://www.camelphotos.com/camel_breeds.html
Wild camels have three more genes than domestic camels and so they have concluded that they are a completely different species.
yet these two different species can interbreed and have fertile off spring
http://www.geocities.com/plin9k/limiting-species.htm
thus we have a contradiction
dromedary and Bactrian camels are different species
yet they can interbreed , which only species can
thus the notion of species ends in self contradiction
thus because biologist cant tell us what a species is
thus all of this taxonomy is meaningless nonsense