Marvin_Edwards wrote: ↑May 16th, 2020, 9:25 pm
evolution wrote: ↑May 16th, 2020, 8:26 pm
Which sums up this one and only Universe quite nicely.
So, for you, infinity is the single universe. Using your terms then, I am suggesting that within that single universe of infinite size there will be room for more than one Big Bang to occur.
I do not disagree with this at all, except I would not call more than one bang "a big bang", for the obvious reason of what the word 'big' means and refers to.
To me, there could be countless bangs, which have happened in this Universe, and maybe are happening right now. But the chances of them being the exact same size and so all being 'big bangs' I think will be highly unlikely. So, to me anyway, although there may be many 'bangs' happening they probably are of varying different sizes, and so not all 'big bangs' at all.
Marvin_Edwards wrote: ↑May 16th, 2020, 9:25 pm
Each Big Bang would have its own set of expanding galaxies. And, given infinite space, they would never interact with each other.
Just because there is an area of infinite size that in no way infers that expanding universes would not interact with each other. They all in fact could be interacting with each other.
Also, if as you propose there are these different so called "big bangs" causing or creating expanding galaxies, then how do you explain where these bangs came from and what caused them? If there are bangs occurring and appearing in completely empty areas, and the expansion of them would not interact with other expansions, then what could possibly cause these bangs to occur in the first place, and how and where did the material from them come from exactly? Are you able to explain this in any logical way?
See, from my perspective, what I am proposing is can all be very logically explained, and be actually very possible.
Marvin_Edwards wrote: ↑May 16th, 2020, 9:25 pm
Now, you ask for me to provide some logical argument for this notion. The logic is that, given infinite space, it would be unlikely that our observable set of galaxies would be the only one.
What has the observable area of the Universe, and this tiny minute area and minuscule set of galaxies, got to do with the whole Universe, Itself?
Your so called "logic" still does not stand up at all, well to me anyway. Actually, what you are saying is becoming more illogical.
Marvin_Edwards wrote: ↑May 16th, 2020, 9:25 pm
In the same fashion that early man imagined the Earth to be the center of everything, it may be equally short-sighted of us to presume that our observable set of galaxies is the only one out there in infinite space.
Is there any human being in the days of when this is being written who actually thinks that the observable part of the Universe is the only thing here, or as you call it "out there"?
Marvin_Edwards wrote: ↑May 16th, 2020, 9:25 pm
I don't offer any proof of this. It is simply a notion of a possibility.
But it is not yet simply a notion of possibility at all.
For your notions/ideas to become even a possibility, then you will have to:
1. Explain logically where all these so called "big bangs" could come from, and how they could occur in the beginning.
2. Explain logically how there could be an infinite distance between physical matter.
3. Explain logically how physical matter that is expanding from two so called "separate big bangs" and the matter from two separate bangs never collide.
See, ALL of these things can be logically explained and be shown to be extremely possible in this one and only Universe, and this can be explained and understood very simply and very easily,