None of this logically explains how there could possibly be supposedly always never touching, separated different universes.Marvin_Edwards wrote: ↑May 17th, 2020, 6:34 am1. The answer to where all the other big bangs come from is simple: the same place that the local big bang came from. Each is a separate, eternal cycling between a big bang and a big crunch. The only difference is their location.evolution wrote: ↑May 17th, 2020, 3:05 am
For your notions/ideas to become even a possibility, then you will have to:
1. Explain logically where all these so called "big bangs" could come from, and how they could occur in the beginning.
2. Explain logically how there could be an infinite distance between physical matter.
3. Explain logically how physical matter that is expanding from two so called "separate big bangs" and the matter from two separate bangs never collide.
See, ALL of these things can be logically explained and be shown to be extremely possible in this one and only Universe, and this can be explained and understood very simply and very easily,
2. How can there be an infinite distance between two physical objects? I don't know, but that is how the notions of infinity and eternity work. Infinity divided by 2 is infinity. Eternity divided by 2 is eternity. We are always precisely in the middle of infinity, with an infinite space in any direction. Now, things may be in that space which are not infinitely distant from us, like all the stuff around me in this room. Even the location of the big bang is a finite distance from us and a finite time ago.
3. The reason two big bang expansions never collide is because black holes are all over the place re-accumulating the planets and stars and galaxies. This is the big crunch part of the big bounce cycle.
So, why 'try to' back up and support the notion and idea of separated different universes, especially when ALL-OF-THIS can be logically explained, backed up, and supported through logical reasoning in just One Universe only?