Art vs. Work Of Art

Use this forum to have philosophical discussions about aesthetics and art. What is art? What is beauty? What makes art good? You can also use this forum to discuss philosophy in the arts, namely to discuss the philosophical points in any particular movie, TV show, book or story.
gad-fly
Posts: 1133
Joined: October 23rd, 2019, 4:48 pm

Re: Art vs. Work Of Art

Post by gad-fly »

LuckyR wrote: June 13th, 2022, 6:14 pm but is the art of a musical performance limited to the sound of the music? I'd say: no.
Musical performance may or may not be a work of art. Some, meant for entertainment, should not be called work of art. The art exhibited by the performance may be multi-facetted, coming from lighting, backdrop, and so on, but mainly from performance and the sound of music.
gad-fly
Posts: 1133
Joined: October 23rd, 2019, 4:48 pm

Re: Art vs. Work Of Art

Post by gad-fly »

Count Lucanor wrote: June 12th, 2022, 1:24 pm
To exhibit, to recieve, all point to physical perception of an object. Even if filtered by our emotions, those emotions are physical process in our bodies. What makes some objects or events art may differ in different cultural contexts, but nevertheless, it always points to something concrete with a recognizable form.
perception is a mental process. Hence "physical perception is oxymoron, unless you believe that mental activity is physical because "it always points to something concrete with a recognizable form." If so, what form is that? Some perceived chemical reaction or electric current? If indeed, art may be banished for all I care.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Art vs. Work Of Art

Post by LuckyR »

gad-fly wrote: June 13th, 2022, 10:39 pm
LuckyR wrote: June 13th, 2022, 6:14 pm but is the art of a musical performance limited to the sound of the music? I'd say: no.
Musical performance may or may not be a work of art. Some, meant for entertainment, should not be called work of art. The art exhibited by the performance may be multi-facetted, coming from lighting, backdrop, and so on, but mainly from performance and the sound of music.
Care to explain the reasoning behind this opinion?
"As usual... it depends."
gad-fly
Posts: 1133
Joined: October 23rd, 2019, 4:48 pm

Re: Art vs. Work Of Art

Post by gad-fly »

LuckyR wrote: June 14th, 2022, 11:49 am
gad-fly wrote: June 13th, 2022, 10:39 pm
LuckyR wrote: June 13th, 2022, 6:14 pm but is the art of a musical performance limited to the sound of the music? I'd say: no.
Musical performance may or may not be a work of art. Some, meant for entertainment, should not be called work of art. The art exhibited by the performance may be multi-facetted, coming from lighting, backdrop, and so on, but mainly from performance and the sound of music.
Care to explain the reasoning behind this opinion?
Performance serves to provide others with your exercise. The purpose may be entertainment, education, reward, acclaim, and what not. If for artistic inspiration, whether partially or fully, it is a work of art. If not, it is not. Whether which performance is more artistic is a different issue.

Say you perform to earn a living wage. Your performance is not a work of art. This applies whether you are an artist or not. Indeed, your performance may be better than some with art in mind. Call it the law of unintended consequence.

In your musical performance, you may dress up for the occasion, for example. Your dress, and how you play the violin, may exhibit artistic inspiration.
User avatar
Count Lucanor
Posts: 2318
Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
Location: Panama
Contact:

Re: Art vs. Work Of Art

Post by Count Lucanor »

gad-fly wrote: June 13th, 2022, 10:54 pm
Count Lucanor wrote: June 12th, 2022, 1:24 pm
To exhibit, to recieve, all point to physical perception of an object. Even if filtered by our emotions, those emotions are physical process in our bodies. What makes some objects or events art may differ in different cultural contexts, but nevertheless, it always points to something concrete with a recognizable form.
perception is a mental process.
Perception involves the physical organs of perception. By definition it cannot be a purely mental process.
The wise are instructed by reason, average minds by experience, the stupid by necessity and the brute by instinct.
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6036
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Art vs. Work Of Art

Post by Consul »

gad-fly wrote: June 13th, 2022, 10:39 pmMusical performance may or may not be a work of art. Some, meant for entertainment, should not be called work of art.
Musical performances are artistic activities; but unless they are themselves (part of) a work of performance art, they are not works of art themselves. When Beethoven's 9th symphony is performed by an orchestra, there is only one work of art involved, viz. Beethoven's 9th symphony.

A work of art is a work of art, no matter whether it's meant for elevation or education, or mere entertainment. The artist's intention in creating a work of art needn't be to raise people to a higher cultural, moral, intellectual, or spiritual level. It's very snobbish to say that nothing is a work of art unless it is part of the elitist Hochkultur (high culture). That said, there are more or less sophisticated works of art; but no matter how sophisticated they are, all works of music are works of art, since music is a form of art.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6036
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Art vs. Work Of Art

Post by Consul »

gad-fly wrote: June 14th, 2022, 6:19 pmPerformance serves to provide others with your exercise. The purpose may be entertainment, education, reward, acclaim, and what not. If for artistic inspiration, whether partially or fully, it is a work of art. If not, it is not. Whether which performance is more artistic is a different issue.
Right, a work of art is a work of art independently of its artistic or aesthetic value. A bad work of art is still a work of art.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
gad-fly
Posts: 1133
Joined: October 23rd, 2019, 4:48 pm

Re: Art vs. Work Of Art

Post by gad-fly »

Consul wrote: June 14th, 2022, 9:57 pm
Right, a work of art is a work of art independently of its artistic or aesthetic value. A bad work of art is still a work of art.
Right on. That is my line. Good or bad, call the spade a spade. A noun is not defined by its adjective.

If it makes you feel better, your painting is a work of art, unless painted under exasperation. Your good deed? Less likely.

You can feel art in the air. The feeling is mental, but you are the host. Can the feeling be turned physical because you being physical is in the receiving end? Nope.
gad-fly
Posts: 1133
Joined: October 23rd, 2019, 4:48 pm

Re: Art vs. Work Of Art

Post by gad-fly »

Consul wrote: June 14th, 2022, 9:57 pm
Right, a work of art is a work of art independently of its artistic or aesthetic value. A bad work of art is still a work of art.
how do we tell the difference between work-of-art and non-work-of-art. At the risk of mincing words, I would say:
The difference lies in whether it is work or not work. if enough dedication has been made to qualify it as work, then it is a work of art. In other words, it is not the result, but rather, the effort that earns the namesake.
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6036
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Art vs. Work Of Art

Post by Consul »

gad-fly wrote: July 23rd, 2022, 4:06 pm
Consul wrote: June 14th, 2022, 9:57 pm
Right, a work of art is a work of art independently of its artistic or aesthetic value. A bad work of art is still a work of art.
how do we tell the difference between work-of-art and non-work-of-art. At the risk of mincing words, I would say:
The difference lies in whether it is work or not work. if enough dedication has been made to qualify it as work, then it is a work of art. In other words, it is not the result, but rather, the effort that earns the namesake.
Consider Marcel Duchamp's famous ready-made Fountain from 1917: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fountain_(Duchamp)

He didn't make this porcelain urinal; he took it as it already was—"ready-made"—and just gave it a name, dated, and signed it (with a pseudonym), there being no more creative "work" on his part. Is Fountain a work of art? I think so, although you might prefer to call it a piece of art, given that the material work wasn't done by Duchamp but by industrial workers, who didn't have any artistic intentions when they were creating the urinal. Duchamp's (effortless) contribution is ideal or conceptual, because he turned the urinal as an ordinary Gebrauchsgegenstand (object of utility) into a Kunstgegenstand (object of art) simply by declaring that it is a work (piece) of art, and using it as such by exhibiting it in art galleries. Nonart can become art through a simple speech-act, like an unmarried couple can become a married one through a simple (official) speech-act: "I hereby declare you husband and wife!" – Analogously: "I hereby declare this object a work of art!"
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Count Lucanor
Posts: 2318
Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
Location: Panama
Contact:

Re: Art vs. Work Of Art

Post by Count Lucanor »

Consul wrote: July 28th, 2022, 4:24 pm
gad-fly wrote: July 23rd, 2022, 4:06 pm
Consul wrote: June 14th, 2022, 9:57 pm
Right, a work of art is a work of art independently of its artistic or aesthetic value. A bad work of art is still a work of art.
how do we tell the difference between work-of-art and non-work-of-art. At the risk of mincing words, I would say:
The difference lies in whether it is work or not work. if enough dedication has been made to qualify it as work, then it is a work of art. In other words, it is not the result, but rather, the effort that earns the namesake.
Consider Marcel Duchamp's famous ready-made Fountain from 1917: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fountain_(Duchamp)

He didn't make this porcelain urinal; he took it as it already was—"ready-made"—and just gave it a name, dated, and signed it (with a pseudonym), there being no more creative "work" on his part. Is Fountain a work of art? I think so, although you might prefer to call it a piece of art, given that the material work wasn't done by Duchamp but by industrial workers, who didn't have any artistic intentions when they were creating the urinal. Duchamp's (effortless) contribution is ideal or conceptual, because he turned the urinal as an ordinary Gebrauchsgegenstand (object of utility) into a Kunstgegenstand (object of art) simply by declaring that it is a work (piece) of art, and using it as such by exhibiting it in art galleries. Nonart can become art through a simple speech-act, like an unmarried couple can become a married one through a simple (official) speech-act: "I hereby declare you husband and wife!" – Analogously: "I hereby declare this object a work of art!"
One thing to consider, which made "Fountain" a work of art, is how context introduces meaning and even makes possible to be creative and innovative with a common everyday, utilitarian object, placed in a different setting for mere contemplation. This was the first time something like this happened and opened the door to conceptual art. However, once the "shock effect" is exhausted, doing the same thing again is no longer innovative. So it's not enough to declare an object a work of art, even if "Fountain" achieved that.

There's, of course, that famous Arthur Danto's definition which says that every object classified as an object of art by a social institution (the artworld), is art. I disagree, but most art galleries doing good business won't.
The wise are instructed by reason, average minds by experience, the stupid by necessity and the brute by instinct.
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
Tegularius
Posts: 711
Joined: February 6th, 2021, 5:27 am

Re: Art vs. Work Of Art

Post by Tegularius »

Consul wrote: June 14th, 2022, 9:50 pm That said, there are more or less sophisticated works of art; but no matter how sophisticated they are, all works of music are works of art, since music is a form of art.
That implies that even the talent-less or nearly so can be artistic for no other reason than attempting to construct something within some artistic genre.
The earth has a skin and that skin has diseases; one of its diseases is called man ... Nietzsche
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7935
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Art vs. Work Of Art

Post by LuckyR »

Tegularius wrote: August 29th, 2022, 4:16 pm
Consul wrote: June 14th, 2022, 9:50 pm That said, there are more or less sophisticated works of art; but no matter how sophisticated they are, all works of music are works of art, since music is a form of art.
That implies that even the talent-less or nearly so can be artistic for no other reason than attempting to construct something within some artistic genre.
Many, if not most would consider that the definition of the term.
"As usual... it depends."
Tegularius
Posts: 711
Joined: February 6th, 2021, 5:27 am

Re: Art vs. Work Of Art

Post by Tegularius »

LuckyR wrote: August 29th, 2022, 4:28 pm
Tegularius wrote: August 29th, 2022, 4:16 pm
Consul wrote: June 14th, 2022, 9:50 pm That said, there are more or less sophisticated works of art; but no matter how sophisticated they are, all works of music are works of art, since music is a form of art.
That implies that even the talent-less or nearly so can be artistic for no other reason than attempting to construct something within some artistic genre.
Many, if not most would consider that the definition of the term.
Yes! Most would consider that its definition. Somewhat tragic I would say. Why not just make a 10x10 container fill it up with stuff one usually throws in a landfill and call that art as well; put it in a display area along with other such artistic artifacts and be sure to give it an appropriate title so there's no mistaking its artistic significance!
The earth has a skin and that skin has diseases; one of its diseases is called man ... Nietzsche
Nick_A
Posts: 3364
Joined: April 19th, 2009, 11:45 pm

Re: Art vs. Work Of Art

Post by Nick_A »

Tegularius wrote: August 30th, 2022, 4:32 am
LuckyR wrote: August 29th, 2022, 4:28 pm
Tegularius wrote: August 29th, 2022, 4:16 pm
Consul wrote: June 14th, 2022, 9:50 pm That said, there are more or less sophisticated works of art; but no matter how sophisticated they are, all works of music are works of art, since music is a form of art.
That implies that even the talent-less or nearly so can be artistic for no other reason than attempting to construct something within some artistic genre.
Many, if not most would consider that the definition of the term.
Yes! Most would consider that its definition. Somewhat tragic I would say. Why not just make a 10x10 container fill it up with stuff one usually throws in a landfill and call that art as well; put it in a display area along with other such artistic artifacts and be sure to give it an appropriate title so there's no mistaking its artistic significance!
As I understand it, art is a verb. Art occurs. A work of art is like a phone call. It has an objective quality allowing the quality of emotion put into it to be be received by another. When this happens, art occurs.

A work of art has the objective emotional quality within it that can be received by another. Otherwise a work of art is really just an expression which can be interpreted by anyone. A work of art is the attempt at objective communication while a work of expression is just emotionally expressing an opinion.
Man would like to be an egoist and cannot. This is the most striking characteristic of his wretchedness and the source of his greatness." Simone Weil....Gravity and Grace
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of the Arts and Philosophy in the Arts”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021