good art and bad art?
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2839
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: good art and bad art?
But when it comes to the complex examples you mention, Casablanca, Warhol, Rockwell, these are examples of VISUAL art, and as such are embedded in a broad range of representational possibilities (unlike music which is representationally weak) that thrust art into the world at large, and here, among images and ideas of living and breathing, it gets cluttered with non artistic content. This is exactly why art appreciation in the visual arts is so complicated: The eye is so much more cognitive than the ear (that is, auditory aesthetic, not language, of course), you might say. And the formal aesthetic properties cannot be isolated. What is Warhol without the postmodern crisis of the trivialization of the individual; what is Casablanca without WWII contexts? Not at all like Bach, is it? Bach may take orientation, but it is not so much ideational orientation.
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2839
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: good art and bad art?
Keep in mind that there has been recent speculation that being a psychopath or sociopath is the hallmark of being a good surgeon, or whatever requires explicit control in otherwise stressful conditions: Without the sensitivity of humanity and empathy, the psychopath is well suited to things other would have a hard time with. Also, I think conservatives thinking is mostly like this, trying to make things great at the cost of the least advantaged. They think nothing of using others as means rather than as ends. the scary part is, this actually does produce results. It is much, much easier to make money if you don't have to worry about the tired, poor, huddled masses.Greta:
If we remove our "goggles of judgement" and don our "David Attenborough lenses" then we observe that psychopaths are just predators and parasites. We live in a competitive concrete jungle and the apex predators naturally found their niches. People looking up to their psychopath leaders are largely akin to smaller African species fearing and respecting lions.
China does this with the environment and has been a long time; just take a trip to Beijing and see... oh, wait, the US does this too, now that we have a moron in office.
- cavacava
- Posts: 55
- Joined: October 12th, 2018, 11:10 am
Re: good art and bad art?
So then the intensity of the affect of a work of art determines its value in relative to a listener, a reader, or a viewer. You suggest that these intensitiesSome things are inherently superior to others just by virtue of their aesthetic affect.
and you go on to suggest that in music the value of a works intensity is easier to discern. How does one sort out these intensities? And how does intensity of feeling entail objective reality.... are inherently superior to others just by virtue of their aesthetic affect.
People have intense feelings for all kinds of art. Are people who swoon at the sight of a Thomas Kincade 'inherently superior' to a person nonplussed by Picasso's Guernica? Does Schonberg's 12 tone have inherently less value because its aesthetic affect is more theoretic and is intensively less felt?
I don't think the ideal state you suggest is real or possibleWhat is Warhol without the postmodern crisis of the trivialization of the individual; what is Casablanca without WWII contexts? Not at all like Bach, is it?
. Works of art always have precedents, which are always presented in some context, regardless of age, content, medium and so on. Even John Cage's silence had a context and a history.IFF the issue is MUSIC and about beauty and not complicated by other content
-
- Posts: 298
- Joined: July 18th, 2014, 7:32 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Chesterton
- Location: Lubbock, Texas
Re: good art and bad art?
And there's the rub. If the beholder is not a fully developed human, it's possible that something passing for a work of art will please, whereas for a fully developed person it might seem unworthy to be called art. So yes, there is good and bad art, there are people with enormously different life experiences who will approach the same work of art, some calling it good, some calling it bad. In truth, the final judge is usually history. The bad art will perish as it should. The good art will last beyond its time. The great art will last forever unless some fool deliberately destroys it.
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: January 6th, 2024, 5:21 am
Re: good art and bad art?
I have spent about 1/3 of my life well away from the U.S./West. A lot of locales still exist where the sense of what is art is in large part collective. A certain shared consensus indexed to shared history/ethnicity. Arguably the "purely personal" standard for what is art represents a breakdown more than it does liberation.
-
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: October 22nd, 2020, 2:22 am
Re: good art and bad art?
- Lagayscienza
- Posts: 2012
- Joined: February 8th, 2015, 3:27 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Hume Nietzsche
- Location: Antipodes
Re: good art and bad art?
-
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: October 22nd, 2020, 2:22 am
Re: good art and bad art?
- Lagayscienza
- Posts: 2012
- Joined: February 8th, 2015, 3:27 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Hume Nietzsche
- Location: Antipodes
Re: good art and bad art?
-
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: October 22nd, 2020, 2:22 am
Re: good art and bad art?
There is nothing objective about morality, it is entirely subjective, on an individual level, and a collective subjective level. Those it does not work for are psychopaths or varying levels. Intent is all important, and remembering that moralities proper subject is always the security and wellbeing of a conscious subject.Lagayscienza wrote: ↑January 26th, 2024, 10:48 am I pretty much agree with you about morality, popeye1945. The difficulty is in proving objectively that I am right.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm
Re: good art and bad art?
-
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: October 22nd, 2020, 2:22 am
Re: good art and bad art?
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: September 11th, 2016, 2:11 pm
Re: good art and bad art?
Maybe the ultimate authority is the maker of the work of art. In that case the performance of Bach could be a lot less good than that of a skilled performer of the work.popeye1945 wrote: ↑January 28th, 2024, 11:59 am Does it not depend upon how effective it is in content, in context, and the skill of its deliver. Does the artist succeed through his/her particular medium? Good point though Belinda, depends on the authoritative collective because it is directed at a collective.
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7148
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: good art and bad art?
Not all aspects of art are purely subjective
It is perfectly possible to apply objective criteria to many aspects.
In sculpture the persuit of accuracy in shape and form is essential to the creation of believable statues and busts of recognisable persona, animals and items of a geometric nature.
Much the same can be said of 2D art espacially as found in portraiture where a likeness to the subject is very important.
There are also more esoteric factors such as balance and adherence to the golden ratio, which if understood can offer the viewer of the art recognisable qualities that are thought to be universal.
Recognition of such things can give an indication of the skill and the personal engagement of the artist to their craft.
For my money the value of a good artist is where such qualities exist,
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7148
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: good art and bad art?
How do you excuse your own behaviour in this respect.popeye1945 wrote: ↑January 26th, 2024, 10:19 am Morally wrong, is when one intently makes another creature's life more difficult than it otherwise need be. Such an act/reaction is devoid of identifying with others, devoid of compassion, and thus, devoid of all morality. This applies to all creatures. The rest of your post, EXCELLENT!
Every vegetable you eat makes you reseponsible for the deaths of potantially thousands of insects.
THe land used for pasture could other wise be home to other living things, and the highway you drive on was once the territoriy of afully funcitonisn ecosystem.
Yet you intend to live on in this civilisation which is slowly destroying the world and all that would otherised have a happy life in the absence of the human disease.
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023