James Bond and the power of repetition
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
James Bond and the power of repetition
This kind of repetitive theme is common in various artistic contexts. Comedians, for example, will often use "call back" in their routines, and it usually gets a laugh. It's hard to pinpoint exactly why it's such a successful comic device, but the relief caused by familiarity seems to be a factor.
Do we think that the power of repetition lies mainly in our desire for the comfort of the familiar? If you are the sort of person who doesn't particularly find comfort in the familiar (but craves novelty), do you dislike Bond movies? Or do you dislike them simply because they're terrible movies? If you are the sort of person who does find comfort in the familiar (perhaps you like to listen to the same songs over and over again) do you like Bond movies?
-
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: May 9th, 2012, 3:13 pm
Re: James Bond and the power of repetition
I love reading my favorite books or watching my favorite movies over and over again. In "A New Approach to Criticism" C.S. Lewis divides the "literary" and "non-literary" in part by the eagerness of the literary to reread. Non literary types (Lewis insists) think that once they are done with a book they have no need to dip back into it. I wonder if they feel the same about music (most people like listening to the same song over and over).
Bond movies -- like all big action movies set in exotic locations -- are probably better when seen in the theater. The theme songs are better with the good sound systems (Bond has had some excellent theme songs); the action more involving and exciting. But I haven't quite been encouraged to go to the theater to see the latest Bond. ON TV, those old, black and white filmed stage plays with fast-talking, wise-cracking heroines work well. I liked "Avatar" in the theater, but when I tried to watch it on TV it was dull. I miss the movies -- I went to 5 or 6 when the pandemic died down this summer, but Covid is now raging again in Oregon.
By the way, I think music is an underrated part of the film experience -- and it's generally better in the theater. One reason "Star Wars" was a big hit was the music. Some of my favorite Bond theme songs: "Live and Let Die", "Skyfall", "Nobody does it Better", "Goldfinger" (I'm sure I'm forgetting some). One problem with Bond movies-- they all have great openings (with those songs) and go downhill thereafter.
- Count Lucanor
- Posts: 2318
- Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
- Location: Panama
- Contact:
Re: James Bond and the power of repetition
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
- Consul
- Posts: 6038
- Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
- Location: Germany
Re: James Bond and the power of repetition
You forgot an unforgettable one: "We Have All the Time in the World" [in On Her Majesty's Secret Service, 1969], composed by John Barry & sung by Louis Armstrong:Ecurb wrote: ↑September 22nd, 2021, 11:37 amBy the way, I think music is an underrated part of the film experience -- and it's generally better in the theater. One reason "Star Wars" was a big hit was the music. Some of my favorite Bond theme songs: "Live and Let Die", "Skyfall", "Nobody does it Better", "Goldfinger" (I'm sure I'm forgetting some).
-
- Posts: 711
- Joined: February 6th, 2021, 5:27 am
Re: James Bond and the power of repetition
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: James Bond and the power of repetition
- Consul
- Posts: 6038
- Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
- Location: Germany
Re: James Bond and the power of repetition
Well, my brain is not dead, and yet I like the old Bond movies.Tegularius wrote: ↑September 23rd, 2021, 1:50 amBond movies, same old, same old fit only for the brain dead! Why is this crap even a philosophy subject?
By the way, here's a book: James Bond and Philosophy: Questions are Forever
"Description: James Bond 007 strode into the human imagination in the novel Casino Royale in 1953 and hit the movie screens with Dr. No in 1962. He has become one of the best-known personalities, real or imagined, in global history. One out of every four people in the entire world has now seen a Bond movie, and every month thousands of new readers become addicted to Ian Fleming’s original Bond stories.
In James Bond and Philosophy, seventeen scholars examine hidden philosophical issues in the hazardous, deceptive, glamorous world of Double-0 Seven. Is Bond a Nietzschean hero who graduates "beyond good and evil"? Does Bond paradoxically break the law in order, ultimately, to uphold it like any "stupid policeman"? What can Bond’s razor-sharp reasoning powers tell us about the scientific pursuit of truth? Does 007’s license to kill help us understand the ethics of counterterrorism? What motivates all those despicable Bond villains—could it be a Hegelian quest for recognition?"
- Consul
- Posts: 6038
- Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
- Location: Germany
Re: James Bond and the power of repetition
"[W]e are attached to [James Bond] because we see ourselves in and through him. Bond exemplifies our hopes and dreams, a desire for a world where good always triumphs and where good and evil are clearly defined and easily recognizable. Perhaps this is why the movies do not accurately reproduce the books. In the books the line is not so clear between justice and revenge, good and evil, right and wrong. But in the movies we are given what we want, and what we need, namely, clarity and resolution.
Despite Bond’s flaws, his status as a cultural icon, the themes of good and evil, and the degree to which we both identify with him and worry about that identification, make Bond an ideal vehicle for philosophical discussion. He provides the impetus for us to reflect upon ourselves, our values, and our world. He provokes us to ask ourselves what we believe, why we believe it, and if we should believe it.
The Bondscape is rife with important and thought provoking issues. There are the obvious issues pertaining to misogyny, objectification, feminism as well as cold war politics and nuclear proliferation. But the Bondscape is much lusher than some give it credit for. Through Bond we are confronted with humanity’s intersection with technology: how we create it and it creates us. We are provoked into asking about the nature of a license to kill, the rule or law, governmental powers, and human rights. As a character study Bond provides an interesting window onto classical conceptions of the good life and themes in existential philosophy. The themes covered in this book range over a great deal of philosophy from existentialism to logic, law to eastern philosophy, and technology to phenomenology. There will be some areas not covered and some readers will find glaring omissions, but hopefully all will find present an introduction and discussion of major philosophical themes in a way that will both engage them as intellectuals and delight them as fans."
(Held, Jacob M., and James B. South. James Bond and Philosophy: Questions are Forever. Chicago: Open Court, 2006. p. xv)
<QUOTE
-
- Posts: 711
- Joined: February 6th, 2021, 5:27 am
Re: James Bond and the power of repetition
Whatever turns your crank! The asinine questions referred to can just as easily pertain to a thousand other movies...many much better. As for the "scholars" you mention, they seem desperate to find any subject remotely viable to philosophically analyze, justifying their titles and salaries.Consul wrote: ↑September 23rd, 2021, 3:26 amWell, my brain is not dead, and yet I like the old Bond movies.Tegularius wrote: ↑September 23rd, 2021, 1:50 amBond movies, same old, same old fit only for the brain dead! Why is this crap even a philosophy subject?
By the way, here's a book: James Bond and Philosophy: Questions are Forever
"Description: James Bond 007 strode into the human imagination in the novel Casino Royale in 1953 and hit the movie screens with Dr. No in 1962. He has become one of the best-known personalities, real or imagined, in global history. One out of every four people in the entire world has now seen a Bond movie, and every month thousands of new readers become addicted to Ian Fleming’s original Bond stories.
In James Bond and Philosophy, seventeen scholars examine hidden philosophical issues in the hazardous, deceptive, glamorous world of Double-0 Seven. Is Bond a Nietzschean hero who graduates "beyond good and evil"? Does Bond paradoxically break the law in order, ultimately, to uphold it like any "stupid policeman"? What can Bond’s razor-sharp reasoning powers tell us about the scientific pursuit of truth? Does 007’s license to kill help us understand the ethics of counterterrorism? What motivates all those despicable Bond villains—could it be a Hegelian quest for recognition?"
As occasionally mentioned, there was never a dearth of educated idiots; the hallowed halls of academia certainly haven't been spared. Also, from everything I read by and of Nietzsche, anything that stupid and phony would not have interested him in the least. It's not a secret that what ranks as most ludicrous in entertainment is usually the most liked by the crowds. The lowest common denominator has always had the largest following.
-
- Posts: 2138
- Joined: May 9th, 2012, 3:13 pm
Re: James Bond and the power of repetition
This makes sense, to me. First, filmed stage plays (which might be more intellectually and artistically mature) are probably less accessible to non-English-speaking audiences. Second, with everyone having access to TV, big. special effects extravaganzas are better suited to the big screen. I've seen all the Disneys and Sci-Fi fantasies, but none of the super hero movies, which I've boycotted ever since the Batman with Heath Ledger as the Joker, which was so terrible that when The Joker was captured halfway through the movie I prayed that meant the movie would soon be over. Unfortunately, it did not.
James Bond made nary an appearance on the list.
I see nothing wrong with trying to analyze pop culture. Why shouldn't academics show an interest in it? (Whether the analyses are cogent is a separate issue.)
Bond seems a little dated; the Cold War is over. Nonetheless, glamor, action, and special effects still drive audiences to the theater. Animation is also far better at the theater than on TV -- watching animated films on TV reminds me of looking at prints of famous paintings instead of seeing them in a museum.
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7094
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: James Bond and the power of repetition
What do you think of it so far........?Steve3007 wrote: ↑September 22nd, 2021, 9:31 am The distinguishing characteristics of James Bond movies are the longevity of the franchise and the use of numerous repeated tropes/motifs/themes that are all familiar to most people who have ever watched more than, say, two of them. It sometimes seems that a new James Bond movie could be created by feeding a set of rules into a computer algorithm.
This kind of repetitive theme is common in various artistic contexts. Comedians, for example, will often use [*****//en*wikipedia*org/wiki/Callback_(comedy)]"call back"[/url] in their routines, and it usually gets a laugh. It's hard to pinpoint exactly why it's such a successful comic device, but the relief caused by familiarity seems to be a factor.
Do we think that the power of repetition lies mainly in our desire for the comfort of the familiar? If you are the sort of person who doesn't particularly find comfort in the familiar (but craves novelty), do you dislike Bond movies? Or do you dislike them simply because they're terrible movies? If you are the sort of person who does find comfort in the familiar (perhaps you like to listen to the same songs over and over again) do you like Bond movies?
-
- Posts: 711
- Joined: February 6th, 2021, 5:27 am
Re: James Bond and the power of repetition
I'm sorry, but this has to be one of the biggest pieces of crap I ever read...not to mention if this were true, then every absurd hero movie ever filmed has equal merit. It wouldn't surprise me that anyone who takes Bond movies seriously as a sort of course in existential philosophy and beyond would also tend to believe that the movie Amadeus was a true story.Consul wrote: ↑September 23rd, 2021, 3:37 am QUOTE>
"[W]e are attached to [James Bond] because we see ourselves in and through him. Bond exemplifies our hopes and dreams, a desire for a world where good always triumphs and where good and evil are clearly defined and easily recognizable. Perhaps this is why the movies do not accurately reproduce the books. In the books the line is not so clear between justice and revenge, good and evil, right and wrong. But in the movies we are given what we want, and what we need, namely, clarity and resolution.
Despite Bond’s flaws, his status as a cultural icon, the themes of good and evil, and the degree to which we both identify with him and worry about that identification, make Bond an ideal vehicle for philosophical discussion. He provides the impetus for us to reflect upon ourselves, our values, and our world. He provokes us to ask ourselves what we believe, why we believe it, and if we should believe it.
The Bondscape is rife with important and thought provoking issues. There are the obvious issues pertaining to misogyny, objectification, feminism as well as cold war politics and nuclear proliferation. But the Bondscape is much lusher than some give it credit for. Through Bond we are confronted with humanity’s intersection with technology: how we create it and it creates us. We are provoked into asking about the nature of a license to kill, the rule or law, governmental powers, and human rights. As a character study Bond provides an interesting window onto classical conceptions of the good life and themes in existential philosophy. The themes covered in this book range over a great deal of philosophy from existentialism to logic, law to eastern philosophy, and technology to phenomenology. There will be some areas not covered and some readers will find glaring omissions, but hopefully all will find present an introduction and discussion of major philosophical themes in a way that will both engage them as intellectuals and delight them as fans."
(Held, Jacob M., and James B. South. James Bond and Philosophy: Questions are Forever. Chicago: Open Court, 2006. p. xv)
<QUOTE
For sure! let's take a shortcut; forget about Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. Instead, watch the entire series of repetitive Bond movies a few times in a row to learn all about modern existentialism. Idiots are forever (and that's not fiction) should have been the title of that book!
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: James Bond and the power of repetition
Of the latest Bond movie or the whole franchise? If you mean the whole franchise, I think of them roughly the same way I think of "Carry On..." films. I like the idea of them and have fond childhood memories of them, but when I actually watch one I remember how awful they were. I remember going to see "The Spy Who Loved Me" at the cinema when I was about 11. Loved it. Watched it again recently with my son when he was a similar age. Awful. He was bored rigid by it.Sculptor1 wrote:What do you think of it so far........?
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: James Bond and the power of repetition
You gotta take these things with a pinch of salt. Like astrology, or Morrissey's political views. Astrology is a way for people to chat about their personalities. The whole star sign thing is just a loose framework for that chat. I'd take a book like the one described by Consul as a tongue-in-cheek coffee table curiosity to buy as a Christmas present for a Bond fan if they've already got too many socks. Even if it isn't.Tegularius wrote:I'm sorry, but this has to be one of the biggest pieces of crap I ever read...
- Sculptor1
- Posts: 7094
- Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am
Re: James Bond and the power of repetition
Steve3007 wrote: ↑September 24th, 2021, 6:37 amOf the latest Bond movie or the whole franchise? If you mean the whole franchise, I think of them roughly the same way I think of "Carry On..." films. I like the idea of them and have fond childhood memories of them, but when I actually watch one I remember how awful they were. I remember going to see "The Spy Who Loved Me" at the cinema when I was about 11. Loved it. Watched it again recently with my son when he was a similar age. Awful. He was bored rigid by it.Sculptor1 wrote:What do you think of it so far........?
This is a UK in-joke, related to repitition.
https**/www*youtube*com/watch?v=WMXz2SCqtfg
http**//www*youtube*com/watch?v=kJKYcZiqK5Y
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023