The role of art in drawing attention to political issues
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
The role of art in drawing attention to political issues
The idea is to raise awareness of the plight of refugees. Obviously this isn't the first time that art has been used to raise awareness of social and political issues. Striking artistic images can have the power to grab people's attention in a way that news stories often can't.
Is this a good role for art? Or would you rather art confined itself to being aesthetically pleasing? Do you actually regard this as art?
- Pattern-chaser
- Premium Member
- Posts: 8265
- Joined: September 22nd, 2019, 5:17 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Cratylus
- Location: England
Re: The role of art in drawing attention to political issues
"Who cares, wins"
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7932
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: The role of art in drawing attention to political issues
- Count Lucanor
- Posts: 2318
- Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
- Location: Panama
- Contact:
Re: The role of art in drawing attention to political issues
Surely, political messages are conveyed this way all the time.
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: The role of art in drawing attention to political issues
Yes, I think it's closely related to advertising. Clearly a lot of advertising is very artistically creative. And a lot of the things we tend to find aesthetically appealing in nature are advertising (birds' plumage and so on).Count Lucanor wrote:It depends on what we call "art". I would say that if the project described in the OP is art, it would be under the same classification as a newspaper cartoon, an article, a manifest, or an ad. They all have form and composition to convey a message, being the message (content) its main reason for being created.
Yes, so arguably political messages are also art.Surely, political messages are conveyed this way all the time.
- Count Lucanor
- Posts: 2318
- Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
- Location: Panama
- Contact:
Re: The role of art in drawing attention to political issues
Whether it is creative or not, doesn't seem to be a condition to be called art in this case. There's nothing particularly creative in a Nixon speech, a sign in a picket line, or the puppet of a refugee girl. It's just called "art" because it's a form composed to convey a direct message.Steve3007 wrote: ↑October 25th, 2021, 9:15 amYes, I think it's closely related to advertising. Clearly a lot of advertising is very artistically creative. And a lot of the things we tend to find aesthetically appealing in nature are advertising (birds' plumage and so on).Count Lucanor wrote:It depends on what we call "art". I would say that if the project described in the OP is art, it would be under the same classification as a newspaper cartoon, an article, a manifest, or an ad. They all have form and composition to convey a message, being the message (content) its main reason for being created.
Yes, so arguably political messages are also art.Surely, political messages are conveyed this way all the time.
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: The role of art in drawing attention to political issues
Well, I don't know about that. I saw it up close and it was quite cleverly made and operated by the guy inside it (who appeared to be on stilts). If the creators weren't trying to make a point about refugees but decided to have it dancing around in an art gallery, I reckon we'd probably call it art.Count Lucanor wrote:Whether it is creative or not, doesn't seem to be a condition to be called art in this case. There's nothing particularly creative in a Nixon speech, a sign in a picket line, or the puppet of a refugee girl. It's just called "art" because it's a form composed to convey a direct message.
- Count Lucanor
- Posts: 2318
- Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
- Location: Panama
- Contact:
Re: The role of art in drawing attention to political issues
There are tons of things done cleverly, including a microchip and a car's interior accesories. Would that qualify as art, too?Steve3007 wrote: ↑October 25th, 2021, 12:02 pmWell, I don't know about that. I saw it up close and it was quite cleverly made and operated by the guy inside it (who appeared to be on stilts). If the creators weren't trying to make a point about refugees but decided to have it dancing around in an art gallery, I reckon we'd probably call it art.Count Lucanor wrote:Whether it is creative or not, doesn't seem to be a condition to be called art in this case. There's nothing particularly creative in a Nixon speech, a sign in a picket line, or the puppet of a refugee girl. It's just called "art" because it's a form composed to convey a direct message.
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
- Count Lucanor
- Posts: 2318
- Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
- Location: Panama
- Contact:
Re: The role of art in drawing attention to political issues
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
-
- Posts: 10339
- Joined: June 15th, 2011, 5:53 pm
Re: The role of art in drawing attention to political issues
I don't know without looking it up what the Fountain is that you're referring to but I understand the kind of art exhibit you're referring to. The kind where we only know it's art because it's in an art gallery. Like the infamous Carl Andre pile of bricks.Count Lucanor wrote:BTW, about that last comment in your last post, it takes us to "Fountain". However, in that case the object in its original setting was not considered art, only (in a heated dispute) when it entered the art gallery to be exhibited.
- Count Lucanor
- Posts: 2318
- Joined: May 6th, 2017, 5:08 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Umberto Eco
- Location: Panama
- Contact:
Re: The role of art in drawing attention to political issues
It was Duchamp's famous ready-made: a common urinal. It was a scandal and thrown away as rubbish, but some years ago it was voted the most influential work of art of the 20th century. The key was the setting that gave meaning to the object being displayed, not the object itself, which nevertheless was cleverly designed.Steve3007 wrote: ↑October 26th, 2021, 4:40 amI don't know without looking it up what the Fountain is that you're referring to but I understand the kind of art exhibit you're referring to. The kind where we only know it's art because it's in an art gallery. Like the infamous Carl Andre pile of bricks.Count Lucanor wrote:BTW, about that last comment in your last post, it takes us to "Fountain". However, in that case the object in its original setting was not considered art, only (in a heated dispute) when it entered the art gallery to be exhibited.
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: January 6th, 2024, 5:21 am
Re: The role of art in drawing attention to political issues
I regard it as propaganda. Which I suppose one might define as political art one oneself deplores.Steve3007 wrote: ↑October 21st, 2021, 10:46 am There is currently an art project underway called. It involves a 3.5 metre tall puppet of a refugee girl, called Amal, walking across Europe from the Syria/Turkey border to Manchester in England. A couple of hours ago "she" reached the campus of the University of Kent in England and I went there to have a look. Here's a picture:
Amal2.jpg
The idea is to raise awareness of the plight of refugees. Obviously this isn't the first time that art has been used to raise awareness of social and political issues. Striking artistic images can have the power to grab people's attention in a way that news stories often can't.
Is this a good role for art? Or would you rather art confined itself to being aesthetically pleasing? Do you actually regard this as art?
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: January 6th, 2024, 5:21 am
Re: The role of art in drawing attention to political issues
Of course one could say the same about how everything is sexual, economic, race-related. It's a favorite gambit of profs in survey-level classes. One of those "cheeks-in-seats" tactics. to pimp-up enrollment for the department's enrollment. Just like how, when graduation time nears, dads and older male relatives take one aside to very seriously counsel, "Biff, has it ever occurred to you that everyone is a salesman?" In fine, the claim is true but not particularly informative.Pattern-chaser wrote: ↑October 21st, 2021, 10:57 am Art is rightfully political, just as every non-trivial subject has a political aspect.
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: January 6th, 2024, 5:21 am
Re: The role of art in drawing attention to political issues
Would crashing a car into Amal be terrorism or performance art? Or a fusion deed?Steve3007 wrote: ↑October 21st, 2021, 10:46 am There is currently an art project underway called. It involves a 3.5 metre tall puppet of a refugee girl, called Amal, walking across Europe from the Syria/Turkey border to Manchester in England. A couple of hours ago "she" reached the campus of the University of Kent in England and I went there to have a look. Here's a picture:
Amal2.jpg
The idea is to raise awareness of the plight of refugees. Obviously this isn't the first time that art has been used to raise awareness of social and political issues. Striking artistic images can have the power to grab people's attention in a way that news stories often can't.
Is this a good role for art? Or would you rather art confined itself to being aesthetically pleasing? Do you actually regard this as art?
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023