Why Plato Is an Enemy to Artist?
-
- Posts: 525
- Joined: April 7th, 2011, 9:52 am
Why Plato Is an Enemy to Artist?
But I do like art. I do like philosophy, and when I read Plato, I ask the question: Why does he need to think that philosophy is intellectual? And if he does not think that philosophy is intellectual, then, maybe he will not think that artist is an enemy to philosopher?
Because I like art, I do not like the idea that philosophy is pure thinking. And if a person thinks that philosophy is purely intellectual, then, he cannot appreciate art.
So this is why I feel if a person wants to appreciate art, then, he must not think that philosophy is purely intellectual, otherwise, he is going to think like Plato, thinking that artist is an enemy to philosopher.
So I do not think philosophy is an enemy to artist. But if you think that philosophy is purely intellectual, then, you are unable to appreciate art and I feel Albert Einstein and Bertrand Russell thought that philosophy is purely intellectual and because they thought that way, they felt that science is superior to art.
But to me, science is the same as art because I do not think that philosophy is purely intellectual realm. So in the future, if I published papers, the heading will be ‘The Art of Science.’
So, do you still think that philosophy is an enemy to artist?
-
- Posts: 428
- Joined: August 27th, 2012, 2:11 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: Epictetus
Re: Why Plato Is an Enemy to Artist?
-- Updated August 27th, 2012, 7:54 pm to add the following --
Therefore art is superior to philosophy, but without words, art can never be shared.
- Snakeranger
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: August 27th, 2012, 1:33 am
Re: Why Plato Is an Enemy to Artist?
Plato was good at logging the knowledge of others. He didn't have the goods himself, though.
Good luck.
-
- Posts: 525
- Joined: April 7th, 2011, 9:52 am
Re: Why Plato Is an Enemy to Artist?
- 113086
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 5
- Joined: August 28th, 2012, 5:02 am
Re: Why Plato Is an Enemy to Artist?
-
- Posts: 525
- Joined: April 7th, 2011, 9:52 am
Re: Why Plato Is an Enemy to Artist?
And a person said: "Because not all people agree with Plato, and therefore many people do not feel certain when people asked philosophical questions. If people feel philosophically certain, then, maybe there will be no more philosophers."
- HANDSON
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 1st, 2012, 8:40 pm
Re: Why Plato Is an Enemy to Artist?
Even a work such as Monet's Water Lilies, although the initial reaction may be to the beauty of color and scene depicted, addresses the nature of flux; the impermanence of life through the rapidly changing color and movement recorded as the artist produced his work.
- 113086
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 5
- Joined: August 28th, 2012, 5:02 am
Re: Why Plato Is an Enemy to Artist?
-
- Posts: 525
- Joined: April 7th, 2011, 9:52 am
Re: Why Plato Is an Enemy to Artist?
- Vojos
- Posts: 83
- Joined: February 28th, 2012, 5:25 pm
Re: Why Plato Is an Enemy to Artist?
The way I see it Nietzsche somehow agrees to a certain distinct with Plato's notion of an imitation of the world as appearances, the Apollonian art-forms (as he calls them), which are mainly concerned with the reality perceived directly through our sensory apparatus, the naïve artist, as Nietzsche calls him; which is mainly the painter, sculptor and so on, but also many poets.
In my opinion true art has to touch on this philosophical aspect. All though the painter might not be able to touch in directly to that "world-spirit", "God", "Brahman", "Dao", "Essence", "The world beyond appearances" the way they claim music does, which both Schopenhauer and Nietzsche almost refers to as the language of this ground of existence, or at least the form that brings us closest to this Reality (or provide relief from it, as in Schopenhauer's case), it clearly has some value in peoples eyes, but is it only because it's an enforcement of emotion or relief of torment? If thats the arts only objective I certainly agree with Plato, that it has psychological ill-effects as it just as a medicament where that state is the end-goal itself. Just look at all the "music" and "films" which mere objective is to massage the reptile brains of unconscious members of society. True art directs humanity towards a deeper understanding of life. Forces them out of that unconscious state. If (true) music (however you define that philosophically) is the end-goal as Schopenhauer and Nietzsche seems to think, or whether any form of art are able to, or should be, is another debate.
-- Updated August 31st, 2012, 11:28 pm to add the following --
Btw, Nietzsche said about the socratic artist (as a logician and dialectic concerned with Apollonian structures of reality) in "The Birth of Tragedy" specifically in relation to a culture in opera during his time: "He projects himself into a time when passion sufficed to produce songs and poems, as though mere emotion had ever been able to create art". In that regard he shares some of the views as Plato. The difference (I'm not sure how deeply Plato goes into this in his works, so sorry if I jump to rash conclusions) is that Nietzsche saw this as pseudo-art, whereas Plato ascribed this view to art in general, or at least didn't have the same notion of "true" art as Nietzsche did.
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023