Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Use this forum to have philosophical discussions about aesthetics and art. What is art? What is beauty? What makes art good? You can also use this forum to discuss philosophy in the arts, namely to discuss the philosophical points in any particular movie, TV show, book or story.
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7086
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Sculptor1 »

Good porn is art. It takes skill and technique to act, direct, and set scenes in any type of film art. I do not see why you would want to exclude pornography from this category.
The thread started by placing porn as "voyeurism". Surely if you are going to categorise porn from the perspective of the end user, then surely ALL narrative film is voyeuristic. Film gives us all a view into activities of people dramatised in ways impossible to see in normal circumstances.
What people do with porn does cannot be used to denigrate the efforts it takes to make it.
Diogenes famously wanked over a statue of a naked female. His act did not make the statues any less art. If a person were to wank over the Mona Lisa that too would not change the fact that it was art.
User avatar
UniversalAlien
Posts: 1577
Joined: March 20th, 2012, 9:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by UniversalAlien »

Sculptor1 wrote: May 20th, 2019, 6:55 pm Good porn is art. It takes skill and technique to act, direct, and set scenes in any type of film art. I do not see why you would want to exclude pornography from this category................
TRUE! - In my opinion - And what people do with it does not change it.......

When I was younger, much younger, I may have watched this genre of art and been highly stimulated by it
in a very sexual sense - But today I find it more stimulating to my mind - so called porn 'erotica' can be a
very philosophical stimulant to philosophers with open minds - It is at the root of the creative force that
generates all - My opinion.

Of course it an be a dangerous force, not only because it is addictive to many people, but because it
generates an open mind - More dangerous to some of the powers that be than anything else.
- But when Liberal justices on the Supreme Court admitted that 'obscenity' is in the mind of the beholder,.
and then virtually legalized the entire genre - the Word changed, freedom triumphed.

But the 'so-called' conservative creeps of the past have not given up - Now that they have a Conservative Supreme Court not only are they trying to overrun 'Roe v. Wade', the ruling that gave women the right to own their own body - But with a little luck, and the truly dirty corruption that drives than - maybe they can
now again outlaw all the erotica that they consider to be filth - And as spirituality decadent as these
moralist really are...........All creative freedom, and the very Constitution of the United States is
under a very dangerous attack - More dangerous than any foreign power.
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Hereandnow »

Scultor1
Good porn is art. It takes skill and technique to act, direct, and set scenes in any type of film art. I do not see why you would want to exclude pornography from this category................
But because it takes skill and technique does it therefore qualify as art? Isn't it that the art of the thing lies in one's ability to receive it AS art? This rug is a utility and nothing more as I walk from the living room to the bedroom. But if I attend to its patterns and colors and, perhaps, historical context and take in all the significant form As art, it becomes art, otherwise it is at best latent art. Pornography, as it is "used" by a person is not art at all. But if, as you say, attention is put to the skills and the rest, there is art the production's artistic dimensions that come forth, though this would be a rather loose interpretation of art. Not so much, I would argue, in the production's techniques in the human form, the curves, movements, etc., like appreciating a Rodin. But then again, it could be that this is what the technical appreciation is about. And yet again, though: These "artists", photographers and others, are not intent on creating aesthetic form, but erotic form, and the art in what they do is usually accidental.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7932
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by LuckyR »

Hereandnow wrote: July 11th, 2019, 9:47 am
Scultor1
Good porn is art. It takes skill and technique to act, direct, and set scenes in any type of film art. I do not see why you would want to exclude pornography from this category................
But because it takes skill and technique does it therefore qualify as art? Isn't it that the art of the thing lies in one's ability to receive it AS art? This rug is a utility and nothing more as I walk from the living room to the bedroom. But if I attend to its patterns and colors and, perhaps, historical context and take in all the significant form As art, it becomes art, otherwise it is at best latent art. Pornography, as it is "used" by a person is not art at all. But if, as you say, attention is put to the skills and the rest, there is art the production's artistic dimensions that come forth, though this would be a rather loose interpretation of art. Not so much, I would argue, in the production's techniques in the human form, the curves, movements, etc., like appreciating a Rodin. But then again, it could be that this is what the technical appreciation is about. And yet again, though: These "artists", photographers and others, are not intent on creating aesthetic form, but erotic form, and the art in what they do is usually accidental.
Very true, but by definition if something is usually something then it is occasionally something else. Thus pornography is art on occasion.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
UniversalAlien
Posts: 1577
Joined: March 20th, 2012, 9:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by UniversalAlien »

LuckyR wrote: July 15th, 2019, 12:03 pm
Hereandnow wrote: July 11th, 2019, 9:47 am
But because it takes skill and technique does it therefore qualify as art? Isn't it that the art of the thing lies in one's ability to receive it AS art? This rug is a utility and nothing more as I walk from the living room to the bedroom. But if I attend to its patterns and colors and, perhaps, historical context and take in all the significant form As art, it becomes art, otherwise it is at best latent art. Pornography, as it is "used" by a person is not art at all. But if, as you say, attention is put to the skills and the rest, there is art the production's artistic dimensions that come forth, though this would be a rather loose interpretation of art. Not so much, I would argue, in the production's techniques in the human form, the curves, movements, etc., like appreciating a Rodin. But then again, it could be that this is what the technical appreciation is about. And yet again, though: These "artists", photographers and others, are not intent on creating aesthetic form, but erotic form, and the art in what they do is usually accidental.
Very true, but by definition if something is usually something then it is occasionally something else. Thus pornography is art on occasion.
But, and then again, to the artistic mind, everything is art, and its duplication and technique is the

artists work - focus on an aspect of a World that is creative art in play.

So pornography {sex} is art, making horror movies, mystery, sci-fi, etc., all of it art.

Even good philosophy is an art - What makes Nietzsche so interesting, even today, is not so much his
ideas, many or which go back to the Ancient Greeks, but the way he expressed them, he made
many classical ideas in philosophy come to life - that too ia an art.

And the film maker as pornographer, making Human sexuality seem more exciting than it actually
is - definitely an art.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7932
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by LuckyR »

UniversalAlien wrote: July 15th, 2019, 2:04 pm
LuckyR wrote: July 15th, 2019, 12:03 pm

Very true, but by definition if something is usually something then it is occasionally something else. Thus pornography is art on occasion.
But, and then again, to the artistic mind, everything is art, and its duplication and technique is the

artists work - focus on an aspect of a World that is creative art in play.

So pornography {sex} is art, making horror movies, mystery, sci-fi, etc., all of it art.

Even good philosophy is an art - What makes Nietzsche so interesting, even today, is not so much his
ideas, many or which go back to the Ancient Greeks, but the way he expressed them, he made
many classical ideas in philosophy come to life - that too ia an art.

And the film maker as pornographer, making Human sexuality seem more exciting than it actually
is - definitely an art.
I agree that the label of art is applied by the audience, not the producer.
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Hereandnow »

UniversalAlien
And the film maker as pornographer, making Human sexuality seem more exciting than it actually
is - definitely an art.
It does raise an interesting question: art is not assessed any longer by the beautiful, the sublime or any of those classical aesthetic ideas. It has become truly open as to what an aesthetic response to art is. Is Piero Manzoni's Can of Human **** art. I guess so. I was appalled to hold it in my hand. Was that the point and was that an "artistic" response, being appalled?
What a weird world the art world has become. So, I wonder after all if having a sexual response to something can qualify as an artistic response. Is erotica as such aesthetic? Is being appalled as such aesthetic? I have always thought we make art by conceiving something AS art, the same way we see a cloud and call it a camel or a poodle; but then, camels and poodles are not problematic concepts, aesthetics is. The only way to understand this is to think as George Dickie did: that art is an institution with no boundaries at all, save the associative gathering of things called art. The principle of their association is now entirely open. If someone is an artist and s/he calls X art, then it is art. The only grounding i can see in historical.

I don't agree with this AT ALL. But this is what art has become.
User avatar
LuckyR
Moderator
Posts: 7932
Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by LuckyR »

Hereandnow wrote: July 16th, 2019, 1:09 am
UniversalAlien
And the film maker as pornographer, making Human sexuality seem more exciting than it actually
is - definitely an art.
It does raise an interesting question: art is not assessed any longer by the beautiful, the sublime or any of those classical aesthetic ideas. It has become truly open as to what an aesthetic response to art is. Is Piero Manzoni's Can of Human **** art. I guess so. I was appalled to hold it in my hand. Was that the point and was that an "artistic" response, being appalled?
What a weird world the art world has become. So, I wonder after all if having a sexual response to something can qualify as an artistic response. Is erotica as such aesthetic? Is being appalled as such aesthetic? I have always thought we make art by conceiving something AS art, the same way we see a cloud and call it a camel or a poodle; but then, camels and poodles are not problematic concepts, aesthetics is. The only way to understand this is to think as George Dickie did: that art is an institution with no boundaries at all, save the associative gathering of things called art. The principle of their association is now entirely open. If someone is an artist and s/he calls X art, then it is art. The only grounding i can see in historical.

I don't agree with this AT ALL. But this is what art has become.
Of course you could turn the thought experiment around. If someone gets sexually aroused from the Venus de Milo, does it change from art to merely erotica?
"As usual... it depends."
User avatar
UniversalAlien
Posts: 1577
Joined: March 20th, 2012, 9:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by UniversalAlien »

I think what has been mostly overlooked in this entire discussion, is how religion has influenced the art concept.

From the Western Judaeo-Christian view the open depiction of sexuality is usually viewed as vulgar and obscene
- hence the old laws banning 'so-called' pornography and actually sending people to jail for making or displaying it.

But the World has changed, and maybe in some ways is returning to its original pagan roots.

Among Pagans of the past licentiousness, bacchanals, and orgies were often practiced as part of certain
pagan religious rights and celebrations.

And let us never forget Witchcraft - in fact the term Witch has many meanings from practitioners of the
religion of Wicca to women who are prostitutes - And pornography, more than any other medium, allows
for certain Witches to express themselves.

And in today's World the battle between these ideologies continues - A battle between right wing so called
conservative religions of the Western World vs. the Eastern {mainly Hindu] and Pagan / Witch philosophy of
its adepts.

Pornography art? - Yes, it is art - But it is a lot more than art - Today's pornography is a war for freedom
of expression and for a religious ideology that goes back to the Ancients :!:
User avatar
detail
Posts: 171
Joined: June 1st, 2019, 1:39 pm

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by detail »

From the practical viewpoint , yes. It would even qualify as an application !!!!
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Hereandnow »

UniversalAlien
I think what has been mostly overlooked in this entire discussion, is how religion has influenced the art concept.

From the Western Judaeo-Christian view the open depiction of sexuality is usually viewed as vulgar and obscene
- hence the old laws banning 'so-called' pornography and actually sending people to jail for making or displaying it.

But the World has changed, and maybe in some ways is returning to its original pagan roots.

Among Pagans of the past licentiousness, bacchanals, and orgies were often practiced as part of certain
pagan religious rights and celebrations.

And let us never forget Witchcraft - in fact the term Witch has many meanings from practitioners of the
religion of Wicca to women who are prostitutes - And pornography, more than any other medium, allows
for certain Witches to express themselves.

And in today's World the battle between these ideologies continues - A battle between right wing so called
conservative religions of the Western World vs. the Eastern {mainly Hindu] and Pagan / Witch philosophy of
its adepts.

Pornography art? - Yes, it is art - But it is a lot more than art - Today's pornography is a war for freedom
of expression and for a religious ideology that goes back to the Ancients :!:

Excellent point. Consider: From this point of view our exclusion of sex from art has been based on a kind of Christian neurosis and metaphysic that sex lies outside of God's grace and this has put the kibosh on sex in art, and certainly sex as art. Let's not forget Tantra art!!It is interesting to note that sex was considered a means to and end by Tantra Buddhists: it was to gather divine energy (or shakti) and being it to the head for achieving liberation.
But the art world cares little for such ideas. Sex is now ubiquitous in art, for art has become all things and sex is a big, well, thing, with us. The question is, what does this do to art as a concept: if all is art, then what makes something not art; if you can't this this, it trivializes the idea altogether.
User avatar
Felix
Posts: 3117
Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Felix »

Hereandnow: It is interesting to note that sex was considered a means to and end by Tantra Buddhists: it was to gather divine energy (or shakti) and being it to the head for achieving liberation.
That is incorrect, the point of it is to transcend the senses, and attachment to sensual pleasures, and discover the sensor (and the censor too I suppose). Who is it that senses, that knows pleasure and pain? What you described is an ignorant corruption of the practice.

If one accepts the legal definition of pornography, i.e., "expression with no redeeming social value," than pornography could not be art but art could be pornographic.
"We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are." - Anaïs Nin
User avatar
UniversalAlien
Posts: 1577
Joined: March 20th, 2012, 9:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by UniversalAlien »

Felix wrote:
....... If one accepts the legal definition of pornography, i.e., "expression with no redeeming social value," than pornography could not be art but art could be pornographic.
I'll accept your legal definition for now - BUT "expression with no redeeming social value," would be, and
is, impossible to define in any absolute sense - Hence the Supreme Court stopped trying to define it
- And soon after so-called porn became mostly legal in most if not all of the US.

And just what do you mean by 'social value'? - Sounds like some kind of myth that still remains a fantasy.
User avatar
Hereandnow
Posts: 2837
Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Hereandnow »

Felix
That is incorrect, the point of it is to transcend the senses, and attachment to sensual pleasures, and discover the sensor (and the censor too I suppose). Who is it that senses, that knows pleasure and pain? What you described is an ignorant corruption of the practice.
No, it's not an ignorant corruption of anything (but thank you for those harsh words all the same). It is a paraphrasal of a text I read long ago. And besides, and this is a big "besides", your account of what Tantra is really about in no way contradicts what I said. Think about it, and if you still think otherwise, then be more specific.
User avatar
Felix
Posts: 3117
Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am

Re: Does Pornography Qualify as Art?

Post by Felix »

Sorry, I didn't mean that to sound pejorative....
Hereandnow: It is a paraphrasal of a text I read long ago. And besides, and this is a big "besides", your account of what Tantra is really about in no way contradicts what I said.
You mean what you said about it being a means to an end? I would still say that such an ego-centric goal oriented attitude towards spiritual practice is a symptom of ignorance, it's not like training for a marathon or something.
"We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are." - Anaïs Nin
Post Reply

Return to “Philosophy of the Arts and Philosophy in the Arts”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021