Overall Rating of "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Discuss the February 2015 philosophy book of the month, The Meaning of Human Existence by Edward O. Wilson.

How do you rate The Meaning of Human Existence?

1 star - poor, recommend against reading it
0
No votes
2 stars - fair, okay
1
8%
3 stars - good, recommend it
11
92%
4 stars - excellent, amazing
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 12

User avatar
Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
The admin formerly known as Scott
Posts: 5748
Joined: January 20th, 2007, 6:24 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
Contact:

Overall Rating of "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Post by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes »

What is your overall rating and opinion of the February 2015 philosophy book of the month, The Meaning of Human Existence by Edward O. Wilson?

I like the book. I agree with Wilson about a lot of things, but that doesn't really make for enjoyable reading. I did find many parts of the book to be redundant. In good philosophical arguments, I think it is often useful to summarize what has been allegedly proven or argued so far. However, I felt in this book Wilson would repeat the same points without really referencing them as a summary.

What do you think?
My entire political philosophy summed up in one tweet.

"The mind is a wonderful servant but a terrible master."

I believe spiritual freedom (a.k.a. self-discipline) manifests as bravery, confidence, grace, honesty, love, and inner peace.
Alias
Posts: 3119
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett

Re: Overall Rating of "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Post by Alias »

I think it should have been an essay. There really wasn't enough new content for a whole book. I enjoyed it, just because I like Wilson more, and find him easier to read, than Dawkins. This book had less to say on the unity of knowledge than Consilience, but was more fun.
Those who can induce you to believe absurdities can induce you to commit atrocities. - Voltaire
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14942
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Overall Rating of "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Post by Sy Borg »

Around 2/3s of the way through so I can't rate it yet.

However, I disagree strongly with his romantic notion that humans will not fully explore biotechnology as a conscious choice so as to retain our "messiness" - or as EOW puts it, "our gift".

He is surely dreaming (and seemingly hoping). Each technological advancement potentially confers advantages. I am yet to see such broad eschewing of potential advantages in humanity, or in any other animals.

Many people are uncomfortable with the rate of technological change but Moore's Law rolls on. New generations naturally generate new ideas and they would seem unlikely to all embrace the "existential conservatism" that EOW proposes. If there is a threshold, barrier or record to be broken, rest assured, someone will try to surpass or transcend it.

Personally, I think that to be wedded to our messiness and internal contradictions is a luxury of a person living in comfortable circumstances. As populations increase and resources wind down, life will become less comfortable. There may come a time when there will be a significant advantage for those who are more synthetically based through reduced capacity for pain and suffering.
The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated—Gandhi.
User avatar
3uGH7D4MLj
Posts: 934
Joined: January 4th, 2013, 3:39 pm

Re: Overall Rating of "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Post by 3uGH7D4MLj »

Greta wrote:However, I disagree strongly with his romantic notion that humans will not fully explore biotechnology as a conscious choice so as to retain our "messiness" - or as EOW puts it, "our gift".

He is surely dreaming (and seemingly hoping). Each technological advancement potentially confers advantages. I am yet to see such broad eschewing of potential advantages in humanity, or in any other animals.

Many people are uncomfortable with the rate of technological change but Moore's Law rolls on. New generations naturally generate new ideas and they would seem unlikely to all embrace the "existential conservatism" that EOW proposes. If there is a threshold, barrier or record to be broken, rest assured, someone will try to surpass or transcend it.
I agree with this criticism. Stephen Hawking says that editing the DNA will be irresistible.
fair to say
User avatar
Sy Borg
Site Admin
Posts: 14942
Joined: December 16th, 2013, 9:05 pm

Re: Overall Rating of "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Post by Sy Borg »

3uGH7D4MLj wrote:I agree with this criticism. Stephen Hawking says that editing the DNA will be irresistible.
It's already well under way. Only last night I saw how the tardigrade's ability to repair DNA broken down by radiation is being explored so future space travellers will be less vulnerable.

Changing ourselves will be necessary to help secure our future. The Earth periodically undergoes tempestuous periods that wipe out all dominant organisms - it could be meteors, volcanoes or climate change, and in a billion years the Earth will be completely uninhabitable anyway. If the human race (not to mention other organisms) are to have any hope of survival they must move to another planet or moon. Without genetic or synthetic alterations, we won't be able to do this.

One small thing that irritated me in the book was EO Wilson bitchily referring to one of the most important evolutionary biologists in history, Richard Dawkins, as a "journalist". It was a deliberate and calculated put-down based on their longstanding disagreements about group selection vs kin selection. I largely agree with EO on that issue but such lapses in objectivity reduce trust and credibility.

Otherwise, I have otherwise enjoyed and appreciate the recommendation.
The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated—Gandhi.
User avatar
Parametheus
Posts: 111
Joined: April 5th, 2014, 4:15 pm

Re: Overall Rating of "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Post by Parametheus »

The book pleads the case for Wilson's definition of science to be best placed to define the meaning of human existence. He is in fact arguing that the humanities is represented by religion, which Wilson claims has a wrong-headed view of the meaning of human existence. Wilson suggests that the humanities argue for a creator implying design and intention in the creation. On the other hand, he suggests that the scientific view of life is based on random and accidental events of evolution. Wilson asserts that the scientific nature of evolution is better placed to explain why we exist and that the answer to why we exist is the same as answering the meaning of human existence. But ironically, the more he explained various species the more it seemed to me that there was order and purpose to life that is denied by evolutionists. I am now of the view that science is in a better place to explain the meaning of human existence, but that it is erroneous to suggest that it is all random and accidental. In other words, science has yet to get it right. Turning to the humanities, I find it impossible to accept that randomness and accidents could produce the beauty and wonder of this universe.
Alias
Posts: 3119
Joined: November 26th, 2011, 8:10 pm
Favorite Philosopher: Terry Pratchett

Re: Overall Rating of "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Post by Alias »

What if, for "randomness and accidents" you substituted "serendipity"? See, how it really works is: a random accident happens that makes someone a tiny little bit different, in a way that's just that little bit more attractive, more dexterous, stronger, faster, smarter, more suited to the environment - just that tiny little bit more competitive than the next entity. Then everybody jumps on the band-wagon and tries to have/do/be that new thing. There is nothing random about the train of events or the outcome; they all make perfect sense.
Those who can induce you to believe absurdities can induce you to commit atrocities. - Voltaire
User avatar
Lagayscienza
Posts: 1792
Joined: February 8th, 2015, 3:27 am
Favorite Philosopher: Hume Nietzsche
Location: Antipodes

Re: Overall Rating of "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Post by Lagayscienza »

I enjoyed the The Meaning of Human Existence even though E.O.Wilson had said most of what he had to say in it previous works such as The Social Conquest of Earth.

I was particularly interested in the appendix in which he discusses a recent mathematical analysis of the theory of inclusive fitness which in his words "attempts to find a universal design principle for evolution that applies at the level of the individual". This recent mathematical analysis shows that it fails to do so. I wonder what Richard Dawkins (who Wilson in the present book refers to as a "science journalist" - not a scientist, mind) will have to say about this. When E.O. Wilson argued for group selection in The Social Conquest of Earth (as he does in the present book) Dawkins went ballistic in his review of it in Prospect magazine telling readers to toss the book away forcefully. Surely this mathematical analysis is a blow for Dawkins who freely admits that he's no mathematician. Although I admire Dawkins' work I think has become a bit dogmatic in his later years and needs to be more open to the possibility of selection at the group level which now seems plausible and has increasingly widespread support.

I highly recommend The Meaning of Human Existence.

-- March 16th, 2015, 2:03 pm --
Greta wrote:Around 2/3s of the way through so I can't rate it yet.

However, I disagree strongly with his romantic notion that humans will not fully explore biotechnology as a conscious choice so as to retain our "messiness" - or as EOW puts it, "our gift".

He is surely dreaming (and seemingly hoping). Each technological advancement potentially confers advantages. I am yet to see such broad eschewing of potential advantages in humanity, or in any other animals.

Many people are uncomfortable with the rate of technological change but Moore's Law rolls on. New generations naturally generate new ideas and they would seem unlikely to all embrace the "existential conservatism" that EOW proposes. If there is a threshold, barrier or record to be broken, rest assured, someone will try to surpass or transcend it.

Personally, I think that to be wedded to our messiness and internal contradictions is a luxury of a person living in comfortable circumstances. As populations increase and resources wind down, life will become less comfortable. There may come a time when there will be a significant advantage for those who are more synthetically based through reduced capacity for pain and suffering.
Yes, I found his idea that "humans will not fully explore biotechnology as a conscious choice so as to retain our "messiness"" a bit fanciful.

I think that if we survive it is almost inevitable that at some stage we will install our brain in, and even upload our minds to, machines that are physically much more robust and which don't need the very specific environment currently found on earth to function and flourish. We could achieve and discover and experience so much more if we were not so earthbound and still retain our "humanity" as we do so. I find the idea very exciting. A sort of immortality for atheists.
La Gaya Scienza
Jklint
Posts: 1719
Joined: February 23rd, 2012, 3:06 am

Re: Overall Rating of "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Post by Jklint »

Lagayscienza wrote: I think that if we survive it is almost inevitable that at some stage we will install our brain in, and even upload our minds to, machines that are physically much more robust and which don't need the very specific environment currently found on earth to function and flourish. We could achieve and discover and experience so much more if we were not so earthbound and still retain our "humanity" as we do so. I find the idea very exciting. A sort of immortality for atheists.
Supposing that this will happen. We can't be certain that it won't. But would this actually be a good thing or is it merely spreading our own toxins within our immediate vicinity and by that I mean our quadrant of the galaxy. It's not just new technologies which are indispensable for such a dispensation of ourselves to whatever degree but much more so and with much more difficulty the creation of a new mind, a metanoia (however enclosed) which makes the journey going forward as constructive as we idealistically imagine it to be.

More likely it's to be a continuation of the human as we know him now hitching a ride by whatever means futuristic technologies will allow...as any successful virus would.

...But think of all the followed
upon creation of the Master Man,
no tragedy before or after
only a farce that long began.
User avatar
Lagayscienza
Posts: 1792
Joined: February 8th, 2015, 3:27 am
Favorite Philosopher: Hume Nietzsche
Location: Antipodes

Re: Overall Rating of "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Post by Lagayscienza »

Jklint wrote:Supposing that this will happen. We can't be certain that it won't.
Indeed, some say that it's inevitable. It's certainly possible in principle and some argue that, given enough time, anything that can happen will happen. (Deutsch) If that is true then we will eventually become immortal if we wish to be. However, I suppose there is always the possibility that we will met up with an even more advanced species who will want to destroy us. But if there really is a necessary connection between the development of scientific knowledge and moral progress (Pinker, Shermer) then we can expect the science/moral connection to be seen in other advanced species. Thus, we may not have too much to worry about in that respect. And, anyway, the universe is a big place and there's probably room for us all.


Jklint wrote:But would this actually be a good thing or is it merely spreading our own toxins within our immediate vicinity and by that I mean our quadrant of the galaxy.
Well,I suppose that will depend upon whether, as mentioned above, our moral progress keeps pace with our scientific and technological progress. I agree with Pinker and Shermer that there has been moral progress and that that progress has been a corollary of the Enlightenment and the burgeoning scientific understanding that has taken place over the last few centuries. I don't see why that moral progress should not continue. So if we do expand out into the galaxy I expect (or at least hope) we'll take care not to hurt others the way we did when we expanded out of Africa, then out of Asia and Europe to other continents.
La Gaya Scienza
Jklint
Posts: 1719
Joined: February 23rd, 2012, 3:06 am

Re: Overall Rating of "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Post by Jklint »

My own view would be that if we are as successful in dealing with ourselves as we are with the planet - the prime infrastructure upon which the totality of ours is based - then clearly the obvious direction is down. If we have indeed gotten more moral as espoused by some, it still remains an exceedingly relative term based on what it's applied to, for what purpose and by whom all conjoining in defining morality as an abstraction at best and at worst as justifications for the sake of expediency and power. In that respect morality serves as a secular form of religion. Governments in order to convince or win confidence give their arguments a moral edge almost every time often for the most immoral of reasons.

The "meaning of human existence", as written by humans according to their individual perspectives, defaults to nothing more than interpretation since any such overt meaning never existed in the first place though some are more insightful than others. I found E.O. Wilson's arguments somewhat trite and repetitive with a thoroughly un-Nietzschean title to the book . There didn't seem to be much new here and appears more like a short story for a lot of money.

Any statements made for the "Meaning of human existence" are best made indirectly and it's in that sense that I much prefer the essays of Lewis Thomas and definitely Nietzsche.
User avatar
Lagayscienza
Posts: 1792
Joined: February 8th, 2015, 3:27 am
Favorite Philosopher: Hume Nietzsche
Location: Antipodes

Re: Overall Rating of "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Post by Lagayscienza »

Yes, Jklimt, to some extent I agree with you. E.O.Wilson did not go to great lengths in this book to argue for moral progress. As others have said, there wasn't much that was new in it - the book might best be seen as a drawing together of threads - a type of summary of his previous work.

BTW, Neitzsche is an old favorite of mine, too. I'll have to have a look at Lewis Thomas. From what you say he sounds like a writer I should get to know.

Cheers
La Gaya Scienza
User avatar
Alan Jones
Posts: 72
Joined: May 7th, 2013, 2:33 pm
Favorite Philosopher: J. Dewey W.T. Rockwell
Location: Emyn Mar, the Otter Lake Moraine, Michigan

Re: Overall Rating of "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Post by Alan Jones »

Much of the book is a (sometimes disjointed) restatement or supplementing of ideas found in previous works. Still, I enjoyed the revisions and very much agree with Wilson that the most important change humans must make is in how they think [how they make their meanings]. "Only wisdom based on self-understanding, not piety, will save us." The understanding will need to be based on thinking that has replaced the either/or with continua. Religious and other forms of ideological-tribal thinking must be set aside. "If the heuristic and analytic power of science can be joined with the introspective creativity of the humanities, human existence will rise to an infinitely more productive and interesting meaning." Unlike Wilson, I hope that genetic modifications will become available that will help mitigate human cognitive biases, that will help make all who wish it more free and more critical thinkers.
"Beliefs are what divide people. Doubt unites them." - Peter Ustinov "Every great advance in natural knowledge has involved the absolute rejection of authority." - Thomas Huxley
Platos stepchild
Posts: 545
Joined: July 19th, 2014, 9:58 pm

Re: Overall Rating of "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Post by Platos stepchild »

I'll admit that The Meaning of Human Existence isn't Wilson at his best. I found him overly sanguine about the synthesis of the humanities and science; and yes, he was occasionally redundant. Also, the argument that scientific knowledge, which has been advancing exponentially will level out wasn't convincing. (It seemed, in fact to be a foil for his unsubstantiated optimism for the aforementioned synthesis). However, Wilson has properly ensconced man in his parochial, sensory niche. We are all but blind and deaf, insentient to the world, save a tiny sliver of perception. Given our parochial access to the world, via our (feeble) senses, Wilson nailed the hubris of religious (and even secular) leaders whose legitimacy is based on religious narratives, which presume knowledge beyond what can be justified. (In doing so, he thereby shows why his refutation of the dogma of inclusive fitness makes sense).

Wilson argues persuasively that the engine of evolution is the dynamic-tension between individual survival, and group survival. (Tyrants who traffic in religious legitimacy, in fact are exploiting our genetically-derived propensities for group identity). Wilson has helped to reveal the theoretical inadequacies of so-called inclusive fitness. This laid the groundwork for what he calls a paradigm shift in Evolutionary Theory. In lieu of Biologist Richard Dawkins' selfish gene, we see that group fitness can profit at the expense of individual fitness. (Note: as the dynamic-tension between the group and the individual, the survival of both depend on a complex, kaleidoscopic interplay of their opposing agendas). This improvement in evolution's explanatory powers is, to me the true greatness of the book.

-- September 15th, 2015, 6:20 pm --

I wish to retract my opinion.

-- September 16th, 2015, 7:30 pm --

Please delete this post.
User avatar
Ireeesh
New Trial Member
Posts: 4
Joined: September 27th, 2015, 1:16 pm

Re: Overall Rating of "The Meaning of Human Existence"

Post by Ireeesh »

Life is like driving down a highway. Hurtling along at 60-70 miles per hour only mere feet from equally opposing and admittedly unknown elements. We all, mostly, do this in a perfectly relaxed manner. Some people stay inside and avoid venturing out and are considered crazy. Conventional wisdom is nothing if not conventional.
Post Reply

Return to “"The Meaning of Human Existence" by Edward O. Wilson”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021