Mutual Means Hypothesis - Understanding The Void

Discuss any topics related to metaphysics (the philosophical study of the principles of reality) or epistemology (the philosophical study of knowledge) in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Spiral Out
Posts: 5014
Joined: June 26th, 2012, 10:22 am

Mutual Means Hypothesis - Understanding The Void

Post by Spiral Out »

The Mutual Means Hypothesis (MMH) is an explanation of the Void and using a set of axioms it will demonstrate that things can only exist through the observation and realization (conscious experience) inherent to the existence of an observer of those things. It will logically show that while the Void does not exist it is nevertheless quite real.

The primary concept of the hypothesis, the “mutual means”, is that the means by which a thing exists is also the means by which existence produced that thing.

This concept simply says that existence and experience are inseparable and have a reciprocal interdependent relationship for their being. In other words, while the existence is indeed necessary for the experience, it is the experience itself that makes the existence real.

The MMH is a refutation of the common assertion that existence is entirely independent of experience while experience is entirely dependent on existence.

I agree that experience requires existence but the further assumption that existence does not require experience is based on an objective bias, or what I would call the assumption of “being without knowing”.

Using the MMH, I will show this assumption to be incorrect, and that an objective bias is the most fundamental misconception of an environment limited to physicality alone.

The MMH is about things, especially regarding which particular claims about any particular thing are valid, specifically the existence of a thing.

Also, it is important to note that the concepts of what is real and what exists are not equivalent concepts, and this is critically important relative to the valid claims we can make about things.

The MMH simply states that in order for a thing to exist it must be observed and realized (i.e. experienced).

In other words, in order for a material object or other physical phenomenon to have actual being it must be perceived and made real through subjective experience.

The realization of a thing simply causes a thing to be real, it does not cause it to materialize (become material), and thus conversely non-realization or derealization does not cause a thing to be immaterial or dematerialize. Also, realization does not determine a thing’s actual objective thingness (as in the case of hallucination) where a thing may be real (to the observer) but does not have actual material being.

The underlying concept is that existence is dependent upon the experience of things and also that experience is dependent upon existent things. Existence and experience are fundamentally interdependent.

There are several axioms with associated states of potential that will support the Mutual Means Hypothesis.

Axiom #1: Things exist.

This is the first and most common state where we form our reality. This is the state of absolute potential, or realization.

While the claim that things exist is quite self-evident, the justification for claiming that things exist is even more self-evident. It is because we can observe these things, and thus realize (verify) their existence.

Another associated, yet unfounded claim with the state of absolute potential is that things exist outside of our observation and realization of them, or that existence is independent of experience.

This claim is based on objective bias. This objective bias is due to the fact that we are constantly observing and realizing things which creates an attachment to things and physicality. Since all we can know is what’s there and not what isn’t there it creates this bias toward thingness.

We can observe and realize the existence of observable things.

Axiom #2: There are unobserved things that possess only the potential for existence.

This is the second and less common state where we form assumptions. This is the state of qualified potential, or conceptualization.

The claim that things might exist is also quite self-evident, but what is the justification for claiming that there are things that potentially exist? It is because we have discovered previously unobserved things, and thus we can extrapolate that other unobserved things also potentially exist. It is the concept of discovery that allows us to make this claim.

However, the potential for the existence of things is not infinite and thus must be limited both in quantity (i.e. not all things exist in all places at all times) and in quality (i.e. there exist no glass trees) and therefore the potential for the existence of things must be qualified by the paradigm of previous experiences. Any potential existences must be extrapolations on the observed paradigm.

Again, this potential must be qualified by the concepts formed through previous experiences and follow that established paradigm. We also must be able to assign conceptual descriptive values (CDVs), or characteristics, to a thing in order to claim the existence of that thing, otherwise we are not speaking of any thing.

We can conceptualize and imagine the potential existence of observable yet unobserved things.

Axiom #3: That which cannot be observed and thus cannot be realized, or which cannot be assigned characteristics (cannot be described), is not a thing and therefore cannot exist.

This is the third and perhaps most difficult state to understand. This is the state of zero potential, or negation.

This is the Void. The Void is a zero potential state, or a negation of potential.

The claim associated with the state of zero potential is that no things exist outside of our observation and realization (conscious experience).

The above claim incorporates two distinct ideas.

1. When a thing cannot be observed and realized then there is zero potential for that thing to exist.

This is when a thing, or the characteristics of that thing, are either unobserved and thus unrealized, or unobservable and thus unrealizable. This can either be due to a fundamental lack of intrinsic qualities in the thing itself or a lack of sensory apparatus or sensory ability in the observer.

2. When an observer cannot observe and realize (such as when the observer is dead) then there is zero potential for any thing to exist.

A thing cannot exist unless we can assign a full set of CDVs to that thing. We cannot assign any CDVs to a thing that does not exist and we cannot assign CDVs to a thing if we ourselves do not exist. Therefore if we do not exist then things also cannot exist.

This is why I have stated previously in other topics regarding this concept that existence is contained entirely within itself. We can only know of existence because we ourselves exist. Things only exist because we are one of those things ourselves, and because we can observe and realize them.

The Void is not a thing. The Void does not exist as a thing. The Void is a subjective nothingness (no-thing-ness) which renders any objective thing unobservable and unrealizable and thus irrelevant and nonexistent.

The Void is the negation of the potential for a thing to exist.

When we ask the question “does a thing “x” exist?” then we must consider it relative to its qualified potential, meaning that we must assign a minimum of CDVs (characteristics) to that thing in order to propose its existence in the first place. Otherwise, we are asking if nothing (no thing) exists, and by virtue of unassigned CDVs the thing in question could be any thing at all with any and all characteristics, either conceivable or inconceivable, and then we are really asking if there are an infinity of existent things. It is self evident that there is not an infinite quantity and/or quality of existent things.

We cannot claim that any thing exists without assigning CDVs to it, and those CDVs are inherently limited to what we are able to conceptualize based on our previous experiences and as derived from our limited senses. This is the paradigm of existence that things must conform to, otherwise the thing would be unobservable and thus unrealizable, and therefore would not exist.

Since there are clearly limits to what can potentially exist due to the limitations of the observation and realization from our limited senses, the qualified potential is limited to that which excludes unobservable things.

Unobservable things cannot exist because we cannot assign any CDVs to them.

Also note that when considering the potential of things, we must also consider the potential of the observing entities. This means that in addition to the three states of potential for the things themselves, there are also three states of potential for the observer.

For example, a conscious person has an absolute potential for observation and realization and thus things exist, a sleeping or otherwise alive but unconscious person has a qualified potential for observation and realization and thus things might exist, and a dead person has zero potential for observation and realization and thus things cannot exist.

If no things are realized, either due to an entity’s inability to observe and realize or due to the lack of an object’s intrinsic properties, then there is only the Void. A thing does not have to exist in order to be real (in the case of hallucination) but a thing does have to be real in order to exist, as in the case of assigned characteristics (CDVs).

I have thus shown that while the Void does not exist, it is quite real. I hope this adequately explains my conception of the Void.

What do you think about the Void and what questions do you have after reading this hypothesis?
Dedicated to the fine art of thinking.
User avatar
Misty
Premium Member
Posts: 5934
Joined: August 10th, 2011, 8:13 pm
Location: United States of America

Re: Mutual Means Hypothesis - Understanding The Void

Post by Misty »

Hmmmmm --


"the means by which a thing exists is also the means by which existence produced that thing." (same idea - two ways of saying it))

If I may, the means (mother/father) by which a thing (baby) exists, is also the means (mother/father) by which existence (mother/father) produced that thing (baby). Isn't this saying the exact same thing?

Misty

-- Updated Fri Jun 05, 2015 5:55 pm to add the following --

"The RMH simply states that in order for a thing to exist it must be observed and realized (i.e. experienced.)"

The thing (baby) can be realized but not observed. (At least not until sonograms were invented)

I don't think your hypothesis works. Something must exist before it can be experienced.
Things are not always as they appear; it's a matter of perception.

The eyes can only see what the mind has, is, or will be prepared to comprehend.

I am Lion, hear me ROAR! Meow.
User avatar
Spiral Out
Posts: 5014
Joined: June 26th, 2012, 10:22 am

Re: Mutual Means Hypothesis - Understanding The Void

Post by Spiral Out »

Spiral Out wrote:The primary concept of the hypothesis, the “mutual means”, is that the means by which a thing exists is also the means by which existence produced that thing.
Spiral Out wrote:In other words, while the existence is indeed necessary for the experience, it is the experience itself that makes the existence real.
Misty wrote:If I may, the means (mother/father) by which a thing (baby) exists, is also the means (mother/father) by which existence (mother/father) produced that thing (baby). Isn't this saying the exact same thing?
How can existence be a means to itself?

What exists is not necessarily real and what is real does not necessarily exist.
Dedicated to the fine art of thinking.
User avatar
Misty
Premium Member
Posts: 5934
Joined: August 10th, 2011, 8:13 pm
Location: United States of America

Re: Mutual Means Hypothesis - Understanding The Void

Post by Misty »

Spiral Out wrote:
Spiral Out wrote:The primary concept of the hypothesis, the “mutual means”, is that the means by which a thing exists is also the means by which existence produced that thing.
Spiral Out wrote:In other words, while the existence is indeed necessary for the experience, it is the experience itself that makes the existence real.
Misty wrote:If I may, the means (mother/father) by which a thing (baby) exists, is also the means (mother/father) by which existence (mother/father) produced that thing (baby). Isn't this saying the exact same thing?
Spiral Out wrote:How can existence be a means to itself?

What exists is not necessarily real and what is real does not necessarily exist.
Existence provides existence, existence experiences existence.
Things are not always as they appear; it's a matter of perception.

The eyes can only see what the mind has, is, or will be prepared to comprehend.

I am Lion, hear me ROAR! Meow.
User avatar
Spiral Out
Posts: 5014
Joined: June 26th, 2012, 10:22 am

Re: Mutual Means Hypothesis - Understanding The Void

Post by Spiral Out »

Misty wrote:Existence provides existence
I can just as easily claim that "Void provides Void", but that's just as meaningless as "existence provides existence".
Misty wrote:existence experiences existence.
Coffee cups exist. Can coffee cups experience existence?
Dedicated to the fine art of thinking.
User avatar
Misty
Premium Member
Posts: 5934
Joined: August 10th, 2011, 8:13 pm
Location: United States of America

Re: Mutual Means Hypothesis - Understanding The Void

Post by Misty »

Spiral Out wrote:
Misty wrote:Existence provides existence
I can just as easily claim that "Void provides Void", but that's just as meaningless as "existence provides existence".
Misty wrote:existence experiences existence.
Coffee cups exist. Can coffee cups experience existence?
That is quite silly SO. There is existence that creates or manufactures and there is existence that is created or manufactured..
Things are not always as they appear; it's a matter of perception.

The eyes can only see what the mind has, is, or will be prepared to comprehend.

I am Lion, hear me ROAR! Meow.
User avatar
Spiral Out
Posts: 5014
Joined: June 26th, 2012, 10:22 am

Re: Mutual Means Hypothesis - Understanding The Void

Post by Spiral Out »

Misty wrote:There is existence that creates or manufactures and there is existence that is created or manufactured..
What differentiates an "existence that creates or manufactures" from an "existence that is created or manufactured"?
Misty wrote:Existence provides existence
What does this mean?
Misty wrote:existence experiences existence
So you're saying that only "existence that creates or manufactures" experiences existence?

What is the "existence that creates or manufactures" you're speaking of?
Dedicated to the fine art of thinking.
Harbal
Posts: 1532
Joined: May 6th, 2013, 4:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Re: Mutual Means Hypothesis - Understanding The Void

Post by Harbal »

You say:
The MMH simply states that in order for a thing to exist it must be observed and realized (i.e. experienced).
But you also say:
A thing does not have to exist in order to be real (in the case of hallucination)
Hallucinations are experienced, which seems to fulfil your criterion for "existence" yet you also seem to be implying that hallucinations, while being real, do not exist. Maybe you mean that being experienced is just one of the conditions a thing has to fulfil in order to exist and I didn't pick up on it. I haven't fully digested the hypothesis yet and I hope I'm not being overly ambitious to think I eventually will but I'll give it a shot.
User avatar
Spiral Out
Posts: 5014
Joined: June 26th, 2012, 10:22 am

Re: Mutual Means Hypothesis - Understanding The Void

Post by Spiral Out »

Harbal wrote:Maybe you mean that being experienced is just one of the conditions a thing has to fulfil in order to exist and I didn't pick up on it.
Exactly right Harbal. Axiom #2 states that there are unobserved things that possess the potential for existence. It is this potential for existence that is key to the hypothesis.

Again, the concepts of what is real and what exists are not equivalent concepts, and this is critically important relative to the valid claims we can make about things.

Hallucinations are experienced which makes the things in the hallucination real, yet they do not exist.

"The MMH simply states that in order for a thing to exist it must be observed and realized (i.e. experienced)."
Harbal wrote:Hallucinations are experienced, which seems to fulfil your criterion for "existence" yet you also seem to be implying that hallucinations, while being real, do not exist.
I see where the use of "existence" might be confusing in this context. Thanks for pointing that out.

The qualifier for existence in this case is based on the thing initially possessing a state of objective thingness, which admittedly cannot be directly verified. However, I don't think that this singular condition really makes any difference to the hypothesis when considered as a whole.

In fact, this condition may be another level of support for the hypothesis in that if objective thingness cannot be verified, except perhaps through the common agreement of multiple observers (consensus), then how can the objective thingness be claimed to be an actual thing external to our own being?

Even then, simple consensus still wouldn't make whatever is agreed upon an actuality, as in the case of the concept of gods.
Dedicated to the fine art of thinking.
Harbal
Posts: 1532
Joined: May 6th, 2013, 4:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Re: Mutual Means Hypothesis - Understanding The Void

Post by Harbal »

Spiral Out.

Once we have grasped the concept of the void what can we do with it?
User avatar
Spiral Out
Posts: 5014
Joined: June 26th, 2012, 10:22 am

Re: Mutual Means Hypothesis - Understanding The Void

Post by Spiral Out »

When you understand the Void then I suppose you'll know what to do with that understanding. What did you do with the understanding that you are mortal?
Dedicated to the fine art of thinking.
Harbal
Posts: 1532
Joined: May 6th, 2013, 4:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Re: Mutual Means Hypothesis - Understanding The Void

Post by Harbal »

Spiral Out wrote: What did you do with the understanding that you are mortal?
I started to be more careful when I crossed the road.

The reason I asked what we could do with it is that I thought the answer might give me a target to aim for in trying to better understand your hypothesis.
User avatar
Spiral Out
Posts: 5014
Joined: June 26th, 2012, 10:22 am

Re: Mutual Means Hypothesis - Understanding The Void

Post by Spiral Out »

What parts of it require more explanation? I tried to be as thorough as I could without making the OP too long.

I appreciate your interest.
Dedicated to the fine art of thinking.
Harbal
Posts: 1532
Joined: May 6th, 2013, 4:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Re: Mutual Means Hypothesis - Understanding The Void

Post by Harbal »

Spiral Out wrote:What parts of it require more explanation?
I'm not sure. I think it's the differentiation between existence and reality. I can't reconcile what it says in some parts of the post with what it says in other parts, regarding the difference between what it is to exist and what it is to be real. My first impulse was to ask for a more precise definition of the two terms but then I thought the hypothesis probably is the definition, in which case the question would have looked a bit dumb. I think maybe I need to read through it a couple more times.
User avatar
Spiral Out
Posts: 5014
Joined: June 26th, 2012, 10:22 am

Re: Mutual Means Hypothesis - Understanding The Void

Post by Spiral Out »

Harbal wrote:I think it's the differentiation between existence and reality. I can't reconcile what it says in some parts of the post with what it says in other parts, regarding the difference between what it is to exist and what it is to be real.
Try to think of them in terms of potential.

Reality is a state of absolute potential. The thing is observed and realized, or the observer is conscious and has an absolute potential for observation and realization and thus things exist.

Existence is a state of qualified potential. The thing is unobserved and unrealized, or the observer is sleeping or otherwise alive but unconscious and has a qualified potential for observation and realization and thus things might exist.

The Void is a state of zero potential. The thing is unobservable and unrealizable, or the observer is dead and has zero potential for observation and realization and thus things cannot exist.

Does a thing exist?

If it is observed and thus realized, then it exists. If it is unobserved and thus unrealized, then it might exist. If it is unobservable and thus unrealizable, then it doesn't exist.

Is it unobservable and unrealizable because its characteristics are not sensible to an observer? Then that thing cannot exist.

Is it unobservable and unrealizable because the observer has zero potential for observation and realization? Then nothing (the Void) can exist. The Void is a zero potential state, or the negation of potential.
Harbal wrote:I think maybe I need to read through it a couple more times.
I'm not very adept at explaining my thoughts clearly. My apologies.
Dedicated to the fine art of thinking.
Post Reply

Return to “Epistemology and Metaphysics”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021