Reconciling a Finite and an Infinite Universe
- The Beast
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: July 7th, 2013, 10:32 pm
Re: Reconciling a Finite and an Infinite Universe
- Rr6
- Posts: 1034
- Joined: April 5th, 2015, 2:20 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: R. Bucky Fuller
Re: Reconciling a Finite and an Infinite Universe
R6---"float". Universe is not a boat in water or in any liquid for that matter. You appear to keep trying to apply words, the macro-infinite, non-occupied space like field or sea, that infer an occupied space, rather than a macro-infinite non-occupied space.Felix wrote:Rr6, I'm still waiting for you to explain how a finite universe can float in a complete void, a sea of nothingness, this is not "rational, logical common sense" as you said, which is why no physicist has ever proposed the idea.
Ergo you do not appear to understand, comprehend, acknowledge, accept, concede or differentiate the two basic components of my given conceptual scenario, as stated.
It appears that, your preconditioning, does not allow the ability to make this simple distinction between words that infer an occupied space from truly non-occupied space. You are not alone in that respect. I've come across many similar to yourself.
My explanations have been very clear and concise. If live in a finite, occupied space Universe then that only leaves one rational, logical common sense, possible answer as to what exists beyond/outside of that finite, occupied space Universe, and that is macro-infintenon-occupied space.
Felix, you do not ,
1} acknowledge this concept of a finite occupied space Universe as rational, logical common sense conclusion,
...fear of loss of ego keeps you from acknowledging the concept....
2}concede this scenario of finite occupied space Universe is a rational , logical common sense truth, and
.....derived from what we observe......
3} you certainly offer no rational, logical common sense alternatives to a finite, occupied space Universe,
4} you certainly offer no comments, that, invalidate any of my comments as stated.
Your replies are a bit childish, in that the just appear to infer 'no', to any concepts I've proposed.
.....outside/beyond ...( Uni-Verse ) ...outside/beyond........
...........(*U*)...........
.....macro-infinite non-occupied space......(>^v occupied space v^<).....macro-infinite, non-occupied space..........
Finite = structural and systemic integrity
Infinite = non-integral.
Felix, please share if you have rational, logical common sense that, invalidates any of my comments as stated.
4 hexagons define the cubo{6}-octa{8}hedron aka Vector Equilibrium
...Space { 31 } icosa{20}hedron
.....Time { 24 } Vector Equilibrium
.....Mind { 12 } metaphyscial-1
.Biological { 8 }
.......Spin { 6 } three sets of XYZ left and right
..........IS { 2 } occupied and non-occupied, inside and outside
2^2 = 4 vertexes of a XYZ-tri-90-degree tetra{4}hedron ergo abstract time { frequency } as 3D volumetrically closed system and structural quanta.
Here is link to the conceptually spun tetrahedrons 6 chords/edges;
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergeti ... f5812.html
---------------------------outer surface space peak curvature-----------------------------------
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv sine-wave peak vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ sine-wave peak of trough ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
------------------------inner surface space peak curvature----------------------------------------
r6
- Felix
- Posts: 3117
- Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am
Re: Reconciling a Finite and an Infinite Universe
This part of the concept is perfectly logical and acceptable, the illogical part of your thesis is that beyond the finite universe is a complete void or nothingness. If you can't see the fatal flaw in this argument, I don't know what else I can say to you. Cheers.this scenario of finite occupied space Universe is a rational , logical common sense truth.
- Rr6
- Posts: 1034
- Joined: April 5th, 2015, 2:20 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: R. Bucky Fuller
Re: Reconciling a Finite and an Infinite Universe
r6--this scenario of finite occupied space Universe is a rational , logical common sense truth.
And you have no rational, logical common sense that invalidates any of my comments, as stated. You can only inferences that a macro-infinite non-occupied space embracing our finite occupied space Universe, is not true,without any rational logical common sense to support you irrational, illogical conclusion.This part of the concept is perfectly logical and acceptable, the illogical part of your thesis is that beyond the finite universe is a complete void or nothingness. If you can't see the fatal flaw in this argument, I don't know what else I can say to you. Cheers.
Reminds me of a child who only knows how to say no, no, no over and over to his adult guardians.
Please share, when you have rational logical common sense comments that invalidate my comments as stated. You do not because you have not.
r6
2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
2023 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023