Materialism is absurd

Discuss any topics related to metaphysics (the philosophical study of the principles of reality) or epistemology (the philosophical study of knowledge) in this forum.
Post Reply
Atla
Posts: 2540
Joined: January 30th, 2018, 1:18 pm

Re: Materialism is absurd

Post by Atla »

Consul wrote: June 9th, 2019, 5:04 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: June 9th, 2019, 12:47 pm In other words its true but I can't tel you why.
Here's someone who was able to write a book on nondualism "in a dualistic language like English": viewtopic.php?p=332058#p332058

It's not true that Western philosophy is "totally dualistic", since it contains monisms as well. However, there are different types of monism (and dualism):

"There are many monisms. What they share is that they attribute oneness. Where they differ is in what they target and how they count.…"

Monism: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/monism/
Attributing oneness is dualistic thinking.

Anyway I think at this point we really are finished.
True philosophy points to the Moon
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6038
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Materialism is absurd

Post by Consul »

Consul wrote: June 9th, 2019, 4:46 pm Doing some googling, I just came upon the book "Nonduality: In Buddhism and Beyond" by David Loy, which seems to be a good introduction and might interest you too (if you haven't read it already).
I just saw that the whole book can be freely downloaded from Loy's website: http://www.davidloy.org/downloads/Loy_Nonduality.pdf
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Felix
Posts: 3117
Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am

Re: Materialism is absurd

Post by Felix »

The Buddha said the conditional self is illusory, he did not say the knower of that self is illusory, that would be an absurd assertion.

Consul: "But even to say that rocks experience "chaotic flashes of light and dark or whatever" is to say that they are capable of conscious vision, that they see things through undergoing or "enjoying" visual appearances/impressions of them."

I once read a series of discussions by prominent exobiologists in which they debated whether humans would be able to recognize intelligent extraterrestrial life that did not resemble us at all, for example, crystalline entities, mobile aquatic organisms, or compact gaseous clouds. Their opinion on the subject was just about evenly divided, but they all agreed that communication was the key. If the ET's communicated nonverbally, via telepathy, chemical signals, or whatever, we probably would not recognize them as sentient.
"We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are." - Anaïs Nin
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7091
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Materialism is absurd

Post by Sculptor1 »

Atla wrote: June 9th, 2019, 5:11 pm
Consul wrote: June 9th, 2019, 4:53 pm

This sort of metaphysics happily violates the law of non-contradiction, doesn't it?
But when logic leaves the room irrationality and obscurity enter it.
No, it doesn't. I guess you could say from a Western perspective that Eastern nondualism is basically "monistic" or looks "monistic", however it also has no actual separations, no divisions.
If you want something that is absurd, you call everything the same thing. So black is white, white is black. Beware next time you cross the road.
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6038
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Materialism is absurd

Post by Consul »

Sculptor1 wrote: June 10th, 2019, 6:02 amIf you want something that is absurd, you call everything the same thing.
Nondualists can hardly call nondualism and non-nondualism one and the same thing.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6038
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Materialism is absurd

Post by Consul »

Felix wrote: June 10th, 2019, 1:23 amI once read a series of discussions by prominent exobiologists in which they debated whether humans would be able to recognize intelligent extraterrestrial life that did not resemble us at all, for example, crystalline entities, mobile aquatic organisms, or compact gaseous clouds. Their opinion on the subject was just about evenly divided, but they all agreed that communication was the key. If the ET's communicated nonverbally, via telepathy, chemical signals, or whatever, we probably would not recognize them as sentient.
I think there's a non-accidental connection between life and consciousness, and crystals and gas clouds aren't living organisms.

By the way, if you want to see alien creatures, you'll find plenty of exotic organisms on Earth that are highly dissimilar from us.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6038
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Materialism is absurd

Post by Consul »

Consul wrote: June 9th, 2019, 4:53 pm
Atla wrote: June 9th, 2019, 4:37 pmEastern non-dualism is: not-many, not-two, not-one, not-zero.
This sort of metaphysics happily violates the law of non-contradiction, doesn't it?
But when logic leaves the room irrationality and obscurity enter it.
"In the meditational process of discovery then, Zen moves from an ordinary, commonsensical standpoint to an extraordinary standpoint and with this transformation returns to the everyday “life-world,” wherein no Aristotelian either-or logic is accepted as the standard for knowing and understanding reality. Due to this reason, paradoxes, contradictions, and even what appears to be utter nonsense abound in Zen literature. The kōan method mentioned above exemplifies this point. To cite just one such example: “the river does not flow but the bridge does.” If one attempts to understand it by relying on Aristotelian either-or logic as one’s standard for understanding, one will be under the impression that this expression is nonsensical or meaningless."

Japanese Zen Buddhist Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/japanese-zen/

However, there are cases where apparent contradictions can be interpreted in such a way that they turn out to be merely apparent. For instance, if "a is F & a is not F" is contextually relativized and read as "a is F relative to x & a is not F relative to y", then it can be non-contradictory. So by interpreting contradictions of the form p & ~p (Fa & ~Fa) relativistically as "p is relatively true & ~p is relatively true" rather than as "p is absolutely true & ~p is absolutely true" we can avoid real contradictions.
Note that this is not to say that it's possible to give a consistent interpretation of all apparent contradictions in Buddhist philosophy!

"If so, neither LEM nor LNC is directly at stake in the tetralemma: you can have your Aristotle and Buddha too.
We tend to recalibrate apparent violations of LNC as conforming to a version of the law that incorporates the Aristotelian qualifications: a sincere defense of “p and not-p” plausibly involves a change in the context of evaluation or a shift in viewpoint, or alternatively a suppression of modal or epistemic operators. This practice can be seen as an instance of a general methodological principle associated with Davidson and Quine that has come to be called the principle of charity (or, alternately, the principle of rational accommodation): when it is unclear how to interpret another's argument, interpret it in a way that makes the most sense. At the same time, this procedure evokes the standard Gricean mode of explanation (Grice 1989; see the entry on implicature): granted the operation of the Cooperative Principle and, more broadly, the shared premise of rationality, we reinterpret apparent violations of valid principles or maxims so as to conserve the assumption that one's interlocutor is a rational and cooperative agent. And as Aristotle would remind us, no principle is more worthy of conservation than the Law of Non-Contradiction."


Contradiction > LNC and the Buddhist Tetralemma
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6038
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Materialism is absurd

Post by Consul »

Consul wrote: June 10th, 2019, 9:32 amNondualists can hardly call nondualism and non-nondualism one and the same thing.
Japanese Zen Buddhist Philosophy > Overcoming Dualism
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Felix
Posts: 3117
Joined: February 9th, 2009, 5:45 am

Re: Materialism is absurd

Post by Felix »

Consul: "I think there's a non-accidental connection between life and consciousness, and crystals and gas clouds aren't living organisms."

But whose to say what the limits of biology are? Exobiologists speculate that advanced forms of nonauditory and nonvisual sense apprehension may be possible: tactile, olfactory, and gustatory sensory apparatus, that utilize vibrational, chemical or electromagnetic means of communication.
"We do not see things as they are; we see things as we are." - Anaïs Nin
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7091
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Materialism is absurd

Post by Sculptor1 »

Consul wrote: June 10th, 2019, 9:32 am
Sculptor1 wrote: June 10th, 2019, 6:02 amIf you want something that is absurd, you call everything the same thing.
Nondualists can hardly call nondualism and non-nondualism one and the same thing.
ROLF
What about non-non-non-dualism?
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7091
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Materialism is absurd

Post by Sculptor1 »

Felix wrote: June 10th, 2019, 10:21 am Consul: "I think there's a non-accidental connection between life and consciousness, and crystals and gas clouds aren't living organisms."

But whose to say what the limits of biology are?
Biologists actually.
There really is no exobiology until there is exo-life.
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6038
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Materialism is absurd

Post by Consul »

Felix wrote: June 10th, 2019, 10:21 am Consul: "I think there's a non-accidental connection between life and consciousness, and crystals and gas clouds aren't living organisms."
But whose to say what the limits of biology are? Exobiologists speculate that advanced forms of nonauditory and nonvisual sense apprehension may be possible: tactile, olfactory, and gustatory sensory apparatus, that utilize vibrational, chemical or electromagnetic means of communication.
The limits of biology are the limits of life. All forms of life we know are carbon-based, and whether non-carbon-based forms are possible is an open question. However, if a physical system is to be a type of living organism at all, it must have a some biochemical constitution or other (which clouds and stones certainly haven't).

If there are extraterrestrial organisms, they may have developed sense organs and sensory capacities that no animal on Earth has. But even on Earth there are ones humans lack such as the lateral line organ.

As for communication as the exchange of signs or messages, it always requires some kind of stimulus-receiving sense organ and some information-encoding and -transmitting physical medium such as sound waves; so extraterrestrial organisms couldn't communicate telepathically, no matter how highly developed they are.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6038
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Materialism is absurd

Post by Consul »

Sculptor1 wrote: June 10th, 2019, 11:48 am
Consul wrote: June 10th, 2019, 9:32 am Nondualists can hardly call nondualism and non-nondualism one and the same thing.
ROLF
What about non-non-non-dualism?
That's the same as non-dualism.

Two theorems of propositional logic:

1. double negation: ~~p <–> p
2. triple negation: ~~~p <–> ~p
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Consul
Posts: 6038
Joined: February 21st, 2014, 6:32 am
Location: Germany

Re: Materialism is absurd

Post by Consul »

Consul wrote: June 10th, 2019, 10:08 am "In the meditational process of discovery then, Zen moves from an ordinary, commonsensical standpoint to an extraordinary standpoint and with this transformation returns to the everyday “life-world,” wherein no Aristotelian either-or logic is accepted as the standard for knowing and understanding reality. Due to this reason, paradoxes, contradictions, and even what appears to be utter nonsense abound in Zen literature.…"

Japanese Zen Buddhist Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/japanese-zen/
No wonder, since an anti-Aristotelian logical nondualism eliminating the difference or distinction between is and isn't, present and absent, yes and no must result in absurdities and contradictions.
"We may philosophize well or ill, but we must philosophize." – Wilfrid Sellars
User avatar
Sculptor1
Posts: 7091
Joined: May 16th, 2019, 5:35 am

Re: Materialism is absurd

Post by Sculptor1 »

Consul wrote: June 10th, 2019, 1:07 pm
Sculptor1 wrote: June 10th, 2019, 11:48 am
ROLF
What about non-non-non-dualism?
That's the same as non-dualism.

Two theorems of propositional logic:

1. double negation: ~~p <–> p
2. triple negation: ~~~p <–> ~p
Since dualism is absurd, the you can add as many nons to the front of it you like - it is still nonce.
Post Reply

Return to “Epistemology and Metaphysics”

2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise

Entanglement - Quantum and Otherwise
by John K Danenbarger
January 2023

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul

Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness

Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023

The Unfakeable Code®

The Unfakeable Code®
by Tony Jeton Selimi
April 2023

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are
by Alan Watts
May 2023

Killing Abel

Killing Abel
by Michael Tieman
June 2023

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead

Reconfigurement: Reconfiguring Your Life at Any Stage and Planning Ahead
by E. Alan Fleischauer
July 2023

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough

First Survivor: The Impossible Childhood Cancer Breakthrough
by Mark Unger
August 2023

Predictably Irrational

Predictably Irrational
by Dan Ariely
September 2023

Artwords

Artwords
by Beatriz M. Robles
November 2023

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope

Fireproof Happiness: Extinguishing Anxiety & Igniting Hope
by Dr. Randy Ross
December 2023

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes

Beyond the Golden Door: Seeing the American Dream Through an Immigrant's Eyes
by Ali Master
February 2024

2022 Philosophy Books of the Month

Emotional Intelligence At Work

Emotional Intelligence At Work
by Richard M Contino & Penelope J Holt
January 2022

Free Will, Do You Have It?

Free Will, Do You Have It?
by Albertus Kral
February 2022

My Enemy in Vietnam

My Enemy in Vietnam
by Billy Springer
March 2022

2X2 on the Ark

2X2 on the Ark
by Mary J Giuffra, PhD
April 2022

The Maestro Monologue

The Maestro Monologue
by Rob White
May 2022

What Makes America Great

What Makes America Great
by Bob Dowell
June 2022

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!

The Truth Is Beyond Belief!
by Jerry Durr
July 2022

Living in Color

Living in Color
by Mike Murphy
August 2022 (tentative)

The Not So Great American Novel

The Not So Great American Novel
by James E Doucette
September 2022

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches

Mary Jane Whiteley Coggeshall, Hicksite Quaker, Iowa/National Suffragette And Her Speeches
by John N. (Jake) Ferris
October 2022

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All

In It Together: The Beautiful Struggle Uniting Us All
by Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
November 2022

The Smartest Person in the Room: The Root Cause and New Solution for Cybersecurity

The Smartest Person in the Room
by Christian Espinosa
December 2022

2021 Philosophy Books of the Month

The Biblical Clock: The Untold Secrets Linking the Universe and Humanity with God's Plan

The Biblical Clock
by Daniel Friedmann
March 2021

Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe

Wilderness Cry
by Dr. Hilary L Hunt M.D.
April 2021

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute: Tools To Spark Your Dream And Ignite Your Follow-Through

Fear Not, Dream Big, & Execute
by Jeff Meyer
May 2021

Surviving the Business of Healthcare: Knowledge is Power

Surviving the Business of Healthcare
by Barbara Galutia Regis M.S. PA-C
June 2021

Winning the War on Cancer: The Epic Journey Towards a Natural Cure

Winning the War on Cancer
by Sylvie Beljanski
July 2021

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream

Defining Moments of a Free Man from a Black Stream
by Dr Frank L Douglas
August 2021

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts

If Life Stinks, Get Your Head Outta Your Buts
by Mark L. Wdowiak
September 2021

The Preppers Medical Handbook

The Preppers Medical Handbook
by Dr. William W Forgey M.D.
October 2021

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress: A Practical Guide

Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress
by Dr. Gustavo Kinrys, MD
November 2021

Dream For Peace: An Ambassador Memoir

Dream For Peace
by Dr. Ghoulem Berrah
December 2021